• No results found

Stretching has long been touted as an important

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Stretching has long been touted as an important"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

799 䉷 2006 National Strength & Conditioning Association

B

ALLISTIC

S

TRETCHING

I

NCREASES

F

LEXIBILITY AND

A

CUTE

V

ERTICAL

J

UMP

H

EIGHT

W

HEN

C

OMBINED

W

ITH

B

ASKETBALL

A

CTIVITY

MANDY

T. WOOLSTENHULME,

1

CHRISTINE

M. GRIFFITHS,

2

EMILY

M. WOOLSTENHULME,

1

AND

ALLEN

C. PARCELL

1

1Human Performance Research Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602;2Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314.

ABSTRACT. Woolstenhulme, M.T., C.M. Griffiths, E.M. Wool-stenhulme, and A.C. Parcell. Ballistic stretching increases flex-ibility and acute vertical jump height when combined with bas-ketball activity. J. Strength Cond. Res. 20(4):799–803. 2006.— Stretching is often included as part of a warm-up procedure for basketball activity. However, the efficacy of stretching with re-spect to sport performance has come into question. We deter-mined the effects of 4 different warm-up protocols followed by 20 minutes of basketball activity on flexibility and vertical jump height. Subjects participated in 6 weeks (2 times per week) of warm-up and basketball activity. The warm-up groups partici-pated in ballistic stretching, static stretching, sprinting, or bas-ketball shooting (control group). We asked 3 questions. First, what effect does 6 weeks of warm-up exercise and basketball play have on both flexibility and vertical jump height? We mea-sured sit and reach and vertical jump height before (week⫺1) and after (week 7) the 6 weeks. Flexibility increased for the bal-listic, static, and sprint groups compared to the control group (p ⬍ 0.0001), while vertical jump height did not change for any of the groups. Our second question was what is the acute effect of each warm-up on vertical jump height? We measured vertical jump immediately after the warm-up on 4 separate occasions during the 6 weeks (at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6). Vertical jump height was not different for any group. Finally, our third question was what is the acute effect of each warm-up on vertical jump height following 20 minutes of basketball play? We measured vertical jump height immediately following 20 minutes of basketball play at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6. Only the ballistic stretching group demonstrated an acute increase in vertical jump 20 minutes af-ter basketball play (p ⬍ 0.05). Coaches should consider using ballistic stretching as a warm-up for basketball play, as it is beneficial to vertical jump performance.

KEYWORDS. warm-up, static stretching

INTRODUCTION

S

tretching has long been touted as an impor-tant part of fitness and exercise warm-ups be-cause of its putative effects on injury and per-formance. However, few controlled studies ex-ist to support the assertion that stretching de-creases injury (29). Furthermore, a growing body of evi-dence indicates that the acute effects of stretching may impair performance, while the chronic effects of stretch-ing on performance are less clear. Because stretchstretch-ing is routinely included as a warm-up for sport participation, the effects of a stretching warm-up in the context of sport performance are an important consideration for coaches and athletes. If stretching does not reduce injury and may impair performance, its inclusion as a warm-up may be unwarranted.

Following a single bout of stretching, decreases have been seen in 1 repetition maximum (1RM) knee flexion and knee extension (18, 23), maximal voluntary contrac-tion (11), maximal isometric torque (21), maximal isoki-netic torque (5, 8, 22), and balance, reaction time, and movement time (1). Decreases in the strength and power of acutely stretched muscle may contribute to a decrease in vertical jump performance; however, conflicting data exist. Some studies have shown decreases in vertical jump height following static stretching (3, 9, 31, 34) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretch-ing (2), whereas other studies have shown no decrease in vertical jump height following static stretching (2, 17, 25, 30) and ballistic stretching (30).

Few studies have looked at the chronic effect of stretching on performance. Two studies indicate that flex-ibility training does not improve performance. Running economy did not change following 3 weeks of hip or trunk flexibility training (13) or following 10 weeks of thigh and calf flexibility training (24). Additional evidence from cor-relation studies provides conflicting data regarding the relationship between flexibility and performance. In elite men volleyball players, greater hip flexibility was posi-tively correlated with vertical jump height; however, in elite women volleyball players, greater hip flexibility was negatively correlated with vertical jump height (19). In contrast, less flexibility was associated with higher run-ning economy in subelite and recreational runners (4, 12). Because the inclusion of stretching as part of a preex-ercise warm-up is common practice, it is necessary to un-derstand its effects on performance. Both the chronic and acute effects of a stretching warm-up on vertical jump performance are unclear. Furthermore, no studies have investigated the effect of stretching combined with sport participation on vertical jump performance. The purpose of our study was twofold: to investigate both the chronic and acute effects of a stretching warm-up combined with sport participation on vertical jump height and flexibility. Specifically from a coaching standpoint, we wanted to test whether stretching prior to basketball play is beneficial or detrimental to vertical jump performance. Because basketball is a highly anaerobic activity consisting of re-peated sprints, we also wanted to evaluate the effects of a more specific warm-up of full-court sprints on vertical jump performance.

To this end, we measured flexibility and vertical jump height before and after 6 weeks of a static stretching, bal-listic stretching, sprinting, or basketball shooting

(2)

warm-FIGURE1. Experimental design. Pre- (week⫺1) and posttest (week 7) vertical jump and sit-and-reach test measurements were not preceded by a warm-up.

TABLE1. Subject characteristics.* Group Height (cm) Weight (kg) Age

(y) n Women Men Control Ballistic Sprint Static 174⫾ 8 169⫾ 20 176⫾ 9 173⫾ 10 64⫾ 8 65⫾ 12 75⫾ 15 73⫾ 18 21⫾ 2 20⫾ 2 19⫾ 1 20⫾ 2 10 12 11 10 7 8 7 5 3 4 4 5 * Values are means⫾ SD.

up that was followed by 20 minutes of basketball play. We also measured vertical jump height every 2 weeks im-mediately after the warm-up and imim-mediately after bas-ketball play. We asked 3 questions: (a) What is the chron-ic effect of flexibility training used as part of a warm-up for sport participation on vertical jump height?; (b) What is the acute effect of stretching on vertical jump height?; and (c) What is the acute effect of stretching on vertical jump height when it is combined with basketball play? Based on the studies that have shown decreases in power and strength with stretching, we hypothesized that ver-tical jump height would decrease with 6 weeks of stretch-ing trainstretch-ing that resulted in increased flexibility. We also expected an acute decrease in vertical jump height im-mediately following the stretching warm-ups that would persist throughout the basketball play.

METHODS

Experimental Approach to the Problem

Subjects participated in 6 weeks (2 times per week) of basketball activity preceded by a warm-up. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 up groups. The warm-up consisted of 5 minutes of light jogging followed by 8 minutes of either ballistic stretching, static stretching, sprinting, or basketball shooting (control). The warm-up was followed by 20 minutes of basketball play.

Vertical jump height and flexibility (sit and reach) were measured before and after the 6 weeks of exercise. Vertical jump height and flexibility measurements were taken on separate days, 48 hours apart during week⫺1 (pretest) and during week 7 (posttest). No warm-ups were performed on the pre- and posttest days. Vertical jump was also measured every 2 weeks (weeks 0–6) immedi-ately following the warm-up (post–warm-up) and imme-diately following the basketball play (postbasketball) (see Figure 1).

Subjects

Forty-three subjects (27 women, 16 men) volunteered for this study. All subjects were enrolled in beginning or in-termediate basketball physical education classes at the university. All were recreationally active with no formal jump training background. Subject characteristics are re-ported in Table 1. Subjects were healthy and did not have a history of injury to the lower extremities. The study was

approved by the University Institutional Review Board, and all subjects gave their informed consent.

Flexibility

Flexibility was measured with a sit-and-reach test (2, 18, 23). Subjects removed their shoes and sat in the straight leg position with their feet flat against the sit-and-reach testing box. Subjects placed one hand on the other, with the middle fingers aligned and elbows extended. Subjects reached forward with their hands on top of the sit-and-reach box, as far as possible, without bending their knees. The feet were considered as zero, and each subject’s score was recorded as the distance from the tip of the middle finger to the feet. Both positive and negative scores were thus measurable. Because we were interested only in the change in flexibility, the data are reported as the differ-ence in flexibility pre- to posttest. The best of 3 trials was used.

Vertical Jump

Vertical jump height was measured with a jump force plate (Probotics, Inc., Huntsville, AL) that calculated height based on time in the air. Jump heights were mea-sured for a 2-leg, standing take-off, in which subjects first bent their knees and then jumped upward as high as pos-sible. Two trials were performed, with a 5-second rest in-terval between each trial. Vertical jump height was de-termined as the best of the 2 trials.

Static Stretching Group

The static stretching program consisted of 4 stretching exercises. Each stretch was held for 30 seconds. All stretches were performed twice with a 15-second rest be-tween stretches. The following is a description of each exercise.

Sit and Reach. Subjects were seated with their legs

straight and their feet upright, no more than 6 in. apart. Subjects bent from the waist until they felt tightness but not pain.

Lunge—Knee Bent. Subjects were standing and were

instructed to take a long step forward. The front knee was directly above the ankle, and the other knee was resting on the floor. Without changing the position of the knee on the floor or the forward foot, subjects lowered the front of the hip downward.

Standing Heel Cord—Knee Extended. Subjects stood

on a stair with one ankle off the end of the step and the other on the step. Subjects kept the back leg straight and allowed their weight to push the back ankle down as far as possible without eliciting pain.

Standing Heel Cord—Knee Flexed. Subjects stood on a

stair with one ankle off the end of the step and the other on the step. Subjects bent the back knee and allowed their weight to push the back ankle down as far as possible without eliciting pain.

(3)

FIGURE2. Change in flexibility after 6 weeks. Values are means⫾ SEM. * p ⬍ 0.0001, compared to control.

TABLE2. Vertical jump height (cm).*

Group Pretest Posttest

Control Ballistic Sprint Static 49.5⫾ 3.8 45.1⫾ 3.3 49.4⫾ 3.4 48.7⫾ 3.0 49.0⫾ 3.6 45.7⫾ 2.8 50.1⫾ 3.2 48.5⫾ 2.7 * Values are means⫾ SEM.

FIGURE3. Vertical jump height without up (no warm-up), after warm-up (post–warm-warm-up), and after warm-up and basketball play (postbasketball). Values are means⫾ SEM. * p⬍ 0.05, significantly greater than no warm-up for the bal-listic group; † p⬍ 0.05, significantly greater than post–warm-up for the ballistic gropost–warm-up.

Ballistic Stretching Group

The ballistic stretching group performed exactly the same exercises as the static stretching group, except that each exercise was performed with end range-of-motion, bounc-ing movements. A metronome was set to 60 b·min⫺1and

subjects bounced to the beat.

Sprint Group

The sprint group completed five ⬃35-second sprints the length of the basketball court, with a 30-second rest pe-riod in between each sprint. For one 35-second sprint, subjects began on the baseline, sprinted to the near foul line and back, sprinted to the half-court line and back, sprinted to the far foul line and back, and sprinted to the opposite baseline and back.

Control Group

The control group consisted of a basketball shooting warm-up with a partner. One person shot the basketball from anywhere on the court and then rebounded the ball and passed it to his/her partner. The partner then shot, rebounded his/her own shot, and passed back to the first person, who repeated the cycle until the warm-up period was over (8 minutes).

Statistical Analyses

The pre- and posttest flexibility and vertical jump data were analyzed with separate 1-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs). To test the acute effects of stretching on ver-tical jump, the pre- and posttest verver-tical jump data (no warm-up) were compared to the post–warm-up vertical jump and the postbasketball vertical jump with a repeat-ed-measures ANOVA. All individual pairwise compari-sons were made with the Tukey post hoc test, and signif-icance was set at pⱕ 0.05.

RESULTS

Flexibility

Flexibility increased significantly for all groups, com-pared to the control group, after the 6 weeks (Figure 2). The ballistic group increased by 3.3⫾ 0.9 cm, the sprint group increased by 3.0 ⫾ 0.8 cm, and the static group increased by 2.2⫾ 1.0 cm, (p ⬍ 0.0001, values are means ⫾ SEM).

Vertical Jump Height

Vertical jump height did not change after 6 weeks for any group, indicating that chronic stretching does not affect vertical jump height (Table 2). Vertical jump height was

not different for any group immediately following the warm-up compared to the no–warm-up vertical jump group (pre- and posttest data), indicating that stretching does not affect acute vertical jump height. However, for the ballistic stretching group, following 20 minutes of bas-ketball play (postbasbas-ketball), vertical jump heights were 2.9 and 3.2 cm greater, compared to post–warm-up and no–warm-up vertical jump groups, respectively (p⬍ 0.05) (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION

We investigated the effects of a sport-specific warm-up, a sprinting warm-up, and 2 different stretching warm-ups, on flexibility and vertical jump height. We hypothesized that 6 weeks of stretching would decrease vertical jump height. In contrast to our hypothesis, flexibility training had no effect on vertical jump height. This finding is sim-ilar to that observed in other studies (13, 24), which in-dicated that flexibility training does not improve running economy, indicating that increased flexibility associated with chronic stretching has little effect on performance.

We also hypothesized that stretching would have an immediate negative effect on vertical jump height. How-ever, vertical jump height was not different in the post– warm-up group compared to the no–warm-up group. Pre-vious research has reported mixed results with regard to the acute effect of stretching on vertical jump height. Fol-lowing static stretching, some studies have shown a de-crease (3, 9, 31, 34), while other studies have shown no decrease in vertical jump height (2, 17, 25, 30, 35). The authors of one study (30) investigated the effects of bal-listic stretching on vertical jump height, and they report-ed no decrease in vertical jump height. Our results would agree with the growing body of evidence that both static and ballistic stretching may not decrease acute vertical jump height.

(4)

in isometric maximal voluntary force (MVC) of the quad-riceps that was not associated with a decrease in vertical jump height following static stretching. Other studies have shown decreases in MVC (11), 1RM knee flexion and extension (18, 23), maximal isometric and isokinetic torque (5, 8, 21, 22), and balance, reaction time, and movement time (1) following various protocols of static stretching. This evidence for decreased muscular perfor-mance following stretching may not directly translate into decreased whole-body vertical jump height perfor-mance, as seen in our study and other studies.

Our third question was to determine the effects of both stretching and basketball play on vertical jump height. We hypothesized that a decrease in vertical jump height immediately following the warm-up would persist after 20 minutes of basketball play. We did not see a de-crease after the warm-up, as previously discussed, and we report a ⬃3-cm increase in vertical jump height for the ballistic stretching group following basketball play, com-pared to both the no–warm-up and post–warm-up condi-tions. This is a finding with potentially significant prac-tical application. Using ballistic stretching as part of a warm-up before playing basketball may actually be ben-eficial to vertical jump performance.

The mechanism behind this increase in vertical jump height is not readily apparent. In a study by Young and Behm (35), the effect of various warm-ups on vertical jump was tested. They reported that vertical jump height was greater after a warm-up consisting of only a 4-minute run, compared to a static stretching-only warm-up. When both the running and static stretching were combined into 1 warm-up, vertical jump height was not different from the control. The authors suggest that stretching may have a negative effect on vertical jump performance, while running has a positive effect. When the 2 were com-bined into 1 warm-up, they may have cancelled each oth-er out, and no change in voth-ertical jump was seen. These findings agree with our findings, in that no change in vertical jump was seen following a warm-up of running and stretching. Furthermore, in the Young and Behm (35) study, when practice jumps were included in the running and stretching warm-up, vertical jump was higher than the run- and stretch-only warm-up. These data indicate that the inclusion of sport-specific activity into a warm-up may increase vertical jump. Our data are similar, in that 20 minutes of basketball play combined with ballistic stretching increased vertical jump.

It is interesting that ballistic stretching caused an in-crease in vertical jump following basketball play, while static stretching did not. The dynamic nature of muscle contractions used in most sports, including basketball, seems at odds with the traditionally used static stretch warm-up. Perhaps ballistic stretching provides a more specific warm-up to the muscle, in that most muscular movements associated with basketball are not static stretches of the muscle but rather dynamic contractions preceded by a ballistic-type stretch. Specificity of stretch-ing to subsequent sport movement is supported by Fletch-er and Jones (10), who report that a warm-up including static stretching decreased acute sprint performance, while a warm-up including active dynamic stretching in-creased acute sprint performance. They suggest that the rehearsal of specific movement patterns through dynamic active stretching may increase coordination, which allows the muscle to transition more quickly, and therefore with

increased power, from the eccentric to the concentric phase of contraction.

Our flexibility results showed a significant increase following the 6 weeks of training for the static, ballistic, and sprint groups. Our results indicate that ballistic stretching is as effective as static stretching for increas-ing flexibility, and our results agree with those of nu-merous other studies (6, 7, 14–16, 20, 33). One study (32) has even reported that ballistic stretching was more ef-fective than static stretching at increasing flexibility. In-terestingly, the practice of ballistic stretching has been contraindicated in the literature, under the premise that it carries a greater risk of injury (6, 7, 26, 27) and that it results in greater delayed-onset muscle soreness (6). Un-fortunately, the statements from these references that have established the idea that ballistic stretching is dan-gerous are not supported with any scientific evidence. No scientific evidence exists that ballistic stretching actually causes injury, and some evidence indicates that ballistic stretching may result in less soreness than static stretch-ing (28).

Our data also indicate that sprinting was as effective as both static and ballistic stretching at increasing flexi-bility. The sprint group increased in flexibility to the same degree as did both stretching groups. A study by Wiemann (33) reported a significant increase in hip flex-ion range of motflex-ion following 15 minutes of ballistic stretching, static stretching, and stationary cycling. These combined results demonstrate that sport-related activity may increase flexibility to the same extent as stretching.

In conclusion, ballistic stretching, static stretching, and sprinting were equally effective at increasing flexi-bility. Furthermore, when ballistic stretching was includ-ed as a warm-up, performance of vertical jump was in-creased with basketball play. However, an inin-creased flex-ibility resulting from 6 weeks of stretching had no effect on vertical jump height. These findings indicate that the stimulus imposed upon the muscle with an acute stretch may be very different than the long-term effects of chron-ic stretching with respect to motor performance. It may not be a long-term increase in range of motion that is the primary benefit of stretching, but rather the acute stim-ulus placed upon the muscle in a stretching warm-up.

PRACTICAL

APPLICATIONS

Stretching has long been recommended as part of a warm-up for sports participation. The type of recom-mended stretching has traditionally been a slow stretch that is held at the point of discomfort but not pain, with the oft-repeated ‘‘Don’t bounce’’ warning. Bouncing dur-ing stretchdur-ing is thought to increase the risk of injury while stretching. Yet no evidence exists to support this claim, and our study indicates that ballistic stretching (defined herein as controlled, bouncing movements per-formed at the end of the range of motion of a stretch) can be safely and effectively used as a warm-up for basketball play. Ballistic stretching is as effective as traditional stat-ic or no-bounce stretching at increasing flexibility. Fur-thermore, ballistic stretching used as part of a warm-up for basketball play increases vertical jump performance. All of the subjects who engaged in a ballistic stretching warm-up and then played basketball increased their tical jump heights by about 3 cm. We only measured ver-tical jump height after 20 minutes of basketball play, so

(5)

it is unclear when the increase may first appear or if it persists until the end of a basketball game, but clearly a 3-cm increase in jump height would be beneficial for as long as it lasts. Therefore, we suggest that ballistic stretching is a safe and beneficial warm-up for basketball activity. Coaches should consider having their players use ballistic (or bouncing) stretching, as it may more closely mimic the muscular movements of basketball activity and thus provide a more specific, and therefore beneficial, warm-up.

REFERENCES

1. BEHM, D.G., A. BAMBURY, F. CAHILL,ANDK. POWER. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36:1397–1402. 2004. 2. CHURCH, J.B., M.S. WIGGINS, F.M. MOODE,ANDR. CRIST.

Ef-fect of warm-up and flexibility treatments on vertical jump per-formance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 15:332–336. 2001.

3. CORNWELL, A., A.G. NELSON, G.D. HEISE, AND B. SIDAWAY. Acute effects of passive muscle stretching on vertical jump per-formance. J. Hum. Movement Stud. 40:307–324. 2001. 4. CRAIB, M.W., V.A. MITCHELL, K.B. FIELDS, T.R. COOPER, R.

HOPEWELL,ANDD.W. MORGAN. The association between flex-ibility and running economy in sub-elite male distance run-ners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 28:737–743. 1996.

5. CRAMER, J.T., T.J. HOUSH, G.O. JOHNSON, J.M. MILLER, J.W. COBURN,ANDT.W. BECK. Acute effects of static stretching on peak torque in women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18:236–241. 2004.

6. DEVRIES, H.A. Evaluation of static stretching procedures for improvement of flexibility. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 33:222–229. 1962.

7. ETNYRE, B.R.,ANDE.J. LEE. Comments on proprioceptive neu-romuscular facilitation stretching techniques. Res. Q. Exerc.

Sport 58:184–188. 1987.

8. EVETOVICH, T.K., N.J. NAUMAN, D.S. CONLEY,ANDJ.B. TODD. Effect of static stretching of the biceps brachii on torque, elec-tromyography, and mechanomyography during concentric iso-kinetic muscle actions. J. Strength Cond. Res. 17:484–488. 2003.

9. FAIGENBAUM, A.D., M. BELLUCCI, A. BERNIERI, B. BAKKER,AND

K. HOORENS. Acute effects of different warm-up protocols on fitness performance in children. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19:376– 381. 2005.

10. FLETCHER, I.M.,ANDB. JONES. The effect of different warm-up stretch protocols on 20 meter sprint performance in trained rugby union players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18:885–888. 2004. 11. FOWLES, J.R., D.G. SALE, AND J.D. MACDOUGALL. Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantar flexors. J.

Appl. Physiol. 89:1179–1188. 2000.

12. GLEIM, G.W., N.S. STACHENFELD,ANDJ.A. NICHOLAS. The in-fluence of flexibility on the economy of walking and jogging. J.

Orthop. Res. 8:814–823. 1990.

13. GODGES, J.J., P.G. MACRAE,ANDK.A. ENGELKE. Effects of ex-ercise on hip range of motion, trunk muscle performance, and gait economy. Phys. Ther. 73:468–477. 1993.

14. HARDY, L.,ANDD. JONES. Dynamic flexibility and

propriocep-tive neuromuscular facilitation. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 57:150– 153. 1986.

15. HARTLEY-O’BRIEN, S.J. Six mobilization exercises for active

range of hip flexion. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 51:625–635. 1980. 16. HOLT, L.E., T.M. TRAVIS,ANDT. OKITA. Comparative study of

three stretching techniques. Percept. Motor Skills 31:611–616. 1970.

17. KNUDSON, D., K. BENNETT, R. CORN, D. LEICK,ANDC. SMITH. Acute effects of stretching are not evident in the kinematics of the vertical jump. J. Strength Cond. Res. 15:98–101. 2001. 18. KOKKONEN, J., A.G. NELSON,ANDA. CORNWELL. Acute muscle

stretching inhibits maximal strength performance. Res. Q.

Ex-erc. Sport 69:411–415. 1998.

19. LEE, E.J., B.R. ETNYRE, H.B. POINDEXTER, D.L. SOKOL, AND

T.J. TOON. Flexibility characteristics of elite female and male

volleyball players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 29:49–51. 1989. 20. LUCAS, R.C.,ANDR. KOSLOW. Comparative study of static,

dy-namic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch-ing techniques on flexibility. Percept. Motor Skills 58:615–618. 1984.

21. NELSON, A.G., J.D. ALLEN, A. CORNWELL,ANDJ. KOKKONEN. Inhibition of maximal voluntary isometric torque production by acute stretching is joint-angle specific. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 72: 68–70. 2001.

22. NELSON, A.G., I.K. GUILLORY, C. CORNWELL,AND J. KOKKO

-NEN. Inhibition of maximal voluntary isokinetic torque produc-tion following stretching is velocity-specific. J. Strength Cond.

Res. 15:241–246. 2001.

23. NELSON, A.G., AND J. KOKKONEN. Acute ballistic muscle stretching inhibits maximal strength performance. Res. Q.

Ex-erc. Sport 72:415–419. 2001.

24. NELSON, A.G., J. KOKKONEN, C. ELDREDGE, A. CORNWELL,AND

E. GLICKMAN-WEISS. Chronic stretching and running economy.

Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 11:260–265. 2001.

25. POWER, K., D. BEHM, F. CAHILL, M. CARROLL,ANDW. YOUNG. An acute bout of static stretching: Effects on force and jumping performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36:1389–1396. 2004. 26. SHELLOCK, F.G.,ANDW.E. PRENTICE. Warming-up and

stretch-ing for improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related injuries. Sports Med. 2:267–278. 1985.

27. SMITH, C.A. The warm-up procedure: To stretch or not to

stretch. A brief review. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 19:12–17. 1994.

28. SMITH, L.L., M.H. BRUNETZ, T.C. CHENIER, M.R. MCCAMMON, J.A. HOUMARD, M.E. FRANKLIN,ANDR.G. ISRAEL. The effects of static and ballistic stretching on delayed onset muscle sore-ness and creatine kinase. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 64:103–107. 1993.

29. THACKER, S.B., J. GILCHRIST, D.F. STROUP,ANDC.D. KIMSEY

JR. The impact of stretching on sports injury risk: A systematic

review of the literature. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36:371–378. 2004.

30. UNICK, J., H.S. KIEFFER, W. CHEESMAN,ANDA. FEENEY. The acute effects of static and ballistic stretching on vertical jump performance in trained women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19:206– 212. 2005.

31. WALLMANN, H.W., J.A. MERCER,ANDJ.W. MCWHORTER.

Sur-face electromyographic assessment of the effect of static stretching of the gastrocnemius on vertical jump performance.

J. Strength Cond. Res. 19:684–688. 2005.

32. WEBER, S., AND H. KRAUS. Passive and active stretching of muscles. Phys. Ther. Rev. 29:407–410. 1949.

33. WIEMANN, K.,ANDK. HAHN. Influences of strength, stretching

and circulatory exercises on flexibility parameters of the hu-man hamstrings. Int. J. Sports Med. 18:340–346. 1997. 34. YOUNG, W.,ANDS. ELLIOTT. Acute effects of static stretching,

proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching, and max-imum voluntary contractions on explosive force production and jumping performance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 72:273–279. 2001. 35. YOUNG, W.B., AND D.G. BEHM. Effects of running, static

stretching and practice jumps on explosive force production and jumping performance. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 43:21– 27. 2003.

Address correspondence to Dr. Allen C. Parcell, allen㛮 parcell@byu.edu.

References

Related documents

Tough Impact resistant High elongation at break Excellent surface quality. Tough enclosures

Firstly, the results from table 5.1, which are for the characteristics of the multivariable process outputs after optimising PID control using individually PID controller tuning,

Organizations that document actual performance data are generally better at forecasting cost, schedule, and resource completion, thereby avoiding scope creep and successfully

The Black community is internally diverse, and Black students are navigating multiple intersecting identities, including [dis]abilities (Steward, 2008, 2009). The reality is that

Kati Takaluoma Culminatum Innovation Oy Ltd Project manager Atte Lötjönen Dublin City University Research Officer Tapani Salmi Helsinki University Hospital MD.. Tapani Koivukangas

The RIDM process is used to inform decision making by emphasizing proper use of risk analysis to make decisions that impact all mission execution domains (e.g., safety, technical,

1.3.4 The series compensation provides a means of regulating power flowing through two parallel lines by introducing series capacitance in one of the lines,

Quality: We measure quality (Q in our formal model) by observing the average number of citations received by a scientist for all the papers he or she published in a given