• No results found

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/233624766

Post-operative pain therapy with controlled

release oxycodone or controlled release

tramadol following orthopedic surgery: A

prospective, randomized, double-blind

investigation

ARTICLE in THE PAIN CLINIC · SEPTEMBER 2005

DOI: 10.1163/156856905774482733 CITATIONS

10

READS

418

4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Stefan Wirz

CURA Katholische Einrichtungen im Sieben… 63PUBLICATIONS 461CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Maria Wittmann University of Bonn 32PUBLICATIONS 165CITATIONS SEE PROFILE

Available from: Stefan Wirz Retrieved on: 08 December 2015

(2)

The Pain Clinic, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 367-376 (2005) © 2005 VSP

Also available online - www.vsppub.com

Research paper

Post-operative pain therapy with controlled

release oxycodone or controlled release

tramadol following orthopedic surgery:

A prospective, randomized, double-blind

investigation

STEFAN WIRZ *, HANS-CHRISTIAN WARTENBERG, MARIA WITTMANN and JOACHIM NADSTAWEK

Klinik und Poliklinik fur Anasthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat, Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany

S u m m a r y Background and objective: The purpose of this trial was to compare the efficacy, safety

and side effects of post-operative pain therapy using oral controlled release formulations of tramadol and oxycodone.

Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation, we observed the post-operative course of 57 patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery. We assessed pain at rest and during exercise, vital signs and side effects using direct measuring and Numerical Rating Scales over a period of three post-operative days. We used chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U-tsst for numerical variables (p < 0.05).

Results: Demographic medical data and pain levels did not differ between the two treatments. Parameters for vital signs remained stable. Nausea and emesis occurred significantly more frequently with tramadol (p = 0.011, p = 0.013). Despite insignificance, central effects such as sedation, insomnia, myoclonus or nightmares were more frequent with tramadol. During the post-operative period, dizziness and sedation were attenuated significantly in the tramadol group (p = 0.031, p = 0.015) as was dry mouth in the oxycodone group (p = 0.041).

Conclusion: Our findings underline the efficacy of oral controlled release formulations of tramadol and oxycodone for post-operative pain therapy. Controlled release oxycodone was shown to cause less nausea and emesis than controlled release tramadol. Further investigation is needed in order to confirm these results.

Key words: Emesis; nausea; oxycodone; post-operative pain therapy; side effects; tramadol.

introduction In recent years the use of tramadol and oxycodone has been established for

post-operative pain therapy. The centrally acting weak synthetic /x agonist tramadol possesses two complementary mechanisms: binding to /x-opioid receptors and a weak inhibition of the reuptake of norepinephrine and serotonin. Because of its safety it has found widespread oral or intravenous use in Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA)1>2, but several studies reveal an

incidence of side effects that restrict the use of the drug.3"6

Oxycodone is a strong semisynthetic opioid. Its oral and intravenous formulations have proved to be efficient and safe in post-operative pain therapy, comparable to tramadol.7""13 In some countries oxycodone has

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.wirz@web.de

(3)

368 S. Wirz et al.

become one of the most frequently used opioids for post-operative pain therapy.14

Few data are available on the comparative efficacy, safety and side effects of tramadol and oxycodone for post-operative pain therapy.15'16 In

post-operative pain therapy, oral controlled release (CR) formulations of both drugs caused fewer side effects than the immediate release formulations.8-12'20

Prior references on the safety of tramadol reported less frequent adverse events, whereas literature on oxycodone remains contradictory.2"4'16

Comparative studies on the oral CR administration of both substances are lacking. For that reason we investigated the efficacy and safety of orally administered CR formulations of oxycodone and tramadol with special regard to side effects.

patients and Patients

methods After approval of the study design by the local Ethics Committee and written

informed consent was obtained from the subjects, 62 patients older than 18 and younger than 65 years of age (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I—II) scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities were enrolled in the study. Criteria for exclusion were known or suspected cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, neurological, psychiatric or allergic diseases, lactation or pregnancy, drug dependency, alcoholism, opioid tolerance, history of abuse or history of treatment with any opioids, and current treatment with analgesics other than the study medications.

During surgery the patients underwent a standardized general anesthesia including the use of propofol as an induction agent, rocuronium as a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug, remifentanil as an opioid, and isoflurane/air/oxygen mix as anesthetic. The administration of long-acting benzodiazepines, local, regional or epidural and spinal blocks, was not allowed in the peri-operative period. The administration of piritramide was permitted immediately before or after surgery but, after the patient was transferred to the ward, no substance other than the oral study medications was given.

Drug administration

Since there are no recommendations concerning the direct conversion factor of oral tramadol and oxycodone dosage, we referred to other references on the conversion factors to morphine2-4'6'9'14'15'18119 and, thereby, calculated

a conversion factor of 10/1. Post-operative pain treatment using the study medication started in the evening of the day of the surgical procedure. Times of administration were fixed at 6.00 and 18.00 h. Using a computerized randomization program, patients received a CR formulation of either a tablet of 100 mg tramadol or of 10 mg oxycodone. In order to preserve the blindness of the investigator and the patient, a study nurse packaged the study drugs identically and another nurse administered them to the patients, both unaware of their contents. A single use of an additional rescue medication for treating acute exacerbation of pain with either 100 mg tramadol or 10 mg oxycodone p.o. was allowed. If pain therapy was still insufficient (numeric rating scales > 50), then the use of additional non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was allowed.

Pain and symptom assessment, safety evaluation

To collect data, an investigator observed the patients enrolled in this study, beginning on the day of surgery. The variables — drug dosage, pain, symptoms, and vital signs — were recorded over 3 days following surgery.

(4)

Comparison of controlled release oxycodone and tramadol 369

Data were collected daily at each of 4 time points (7.00, 14.00, 19.00, 22.00 h).

Dosage of the study medication, especially the use of the rescue medica-tion, was registered daily. Numeric rating scales (NRS: 0 denotes no pain, 100 worst pain imaginable) were used to assess pain during rest and exercise. Additionally, patients could communicate freely about their satisfaction with the post-operative pain management.

Symptoms such as nausea, sedation, dizziness, dry mouth or pruritus were assessed by the NRS. The incidence of vomiting was additionally recorded. Non-numerical symptoms, such as the occurrence of sleep disturbances (sleep onset and sleep maintenance-insomnia), nightmares and myoclonus, were assessed on a two-step scale (no-yes).

The safety of the post-operative study medication was assessed using vital parameters such as blood pressure (100/60 to 140/90 mmHg), heart rate (60-90 beats per minute), respiratory rate (respiratory depression < 10 breaths per minute), and peripheral oxygen saturation (>95% saturation).

Statistics

Descriptive statistics. Distinct statistical parameters — mean value (mv),

median, standard deviation (sd), minimum and maximum — were used for descriptive purposes. The data obtained at different times of the day were analyzed by means of detailed statistics (e.g. on day 1 at 7.00 h) and by means of summarized statistics (e.g. on day 1, on days 1-3).

Confirmatory statistics. Appropriate non-parametric test procedures were

applied, depending on the data characteristics. Either the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables to detect group differ-ences on the need for an additional rescue medication, the use of non-opioids and the occurrence of side effects measured by categorical assessments (such as vomiting, sleep disorders, etc.). The Mann—Whitney [/-test was used to compare quantitative numerical variables of both groups from day 1 to 3, such as pain intensity (measured by NRS at rest at different given times and during exercise), or the intensity of several symptoms assessed by NRS (such as nausea, dizziness, etc.). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically sig-nificant for all applied test procedures.

results All patients suffered from acute nociceptive post-operative pain. 57 patients

completed the study. Five patients receiving oxycodone did not complete the investigation because of an early discharge after minor surgery, 31 patients received tramadol and 26 oxycodone. Demographic and surgical-medical data were comparable in both treatment groups (Table I).

No severe adverse effects were seen in either group. Vital signs remained stable and within the normal ranges mentioned above. Especially, no respiratory rate lower than 10 breaths per minute or oxygen saturation lower than 95% was observed.

Given the opportunity to communicate complaints about the post-operative pain therapy, two patients in both groups each expressed their dissatisfaction, mainly due to insufficient pain therapy. The mv for NRS of pain at rest (day one to three) were 25, 35, 40, and 59 for these patients.

Group analysis

Differences for pain both at rest and with exercise were not significant between the two groups. The number of patients who used the rescue medication (i.e. additional study medication: tramadol: n = 8, oxycodone:

(5)

370 S. Wirz et al.

Table I.

Demographic and medical data, pain, n = 57

Tramadol (n) Oxycodone (n) Total Age (years) mv ± sd med-min-max Sex (male/female) Surgical procedure Fractures

Surgery of ligaments of the ankle or knee Mesh graft

Removal of material Other type of surgery

31 46.85 ±18.2 43-18-64 24/4 9 4 4 7 7 26 48.35 ± 16.67 46-20-64 21/5 8 5 4 6 3 0.694 0.757 NRS H Tramadol B Oxycodone 40 30 20 10 0 -P:= 0.011 15 6 p = (D.421 P =•0.188 I 10 0 15 p = 0.717 4

T

rf

nausea p = 0.2 19 14

dizziness sedation pruritus dry mouth

Figure 1. Symptom assessment: NRS of nausea, dizziness, sedation, pruritus, and dry mouth for tramadol and oxycodone, during the post-operative period (day 1 to day 3), n = 57 (NRS 0-100, mv, sd of several symptoms for each group) NRS = numeric rating scales.

n = 11, p = 0.707, chi-squared test) or additional NSAIDs (tramadol: n = 4, oxycodone: 2, p = 0.523, Fisher's exact test) did not differ

significantly. Additional NSAIDs were administered in cases where the rescue medication was considered insufficient (tramadol: 2, oxycodone: 1) and where there was no need for further rescue medication (tramadol: 2, oxycodone: 1). It involved dipyrone, rofecoxib, or celecoxib. Cumulative doses of dipyrone were 3500 mg (130 drops), 1200 mg celecoxib (6 capsules) and 75 mg rofecoxib (3 tablets).

During the postoperative period significant differences between the two groups emerged for nausea and emesis. Additionally, differences were signif-icant for sleep maintenance-insomnia at day 3 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Table II). Night-mares occurred in the tramadol group only. Although these results lacked significance, myoclonus, sleep onset insomnia and sedation were more se-vere or frequent with tramadol, while dryness of the mouth was more sese-vere with oxycodone. No group differences were seen for pruritus.

An additional detailed analysis of the NRS for pain at different given times over of the 3 days yielded no significant differences, except for the first morning of the observation with a significant higher NRS for oxycodone than for tramadol (oxycodone: mv, sd 27.88 ± 16.74; tramadol: mv, sd

(6)

Comparison of controlled release oxycodone and tramadol 371

70 -|

60

50

40

30

20

-10

0 A

p = 0.013 15

0

0 Tramadol • Oxycodone

p = 0.244

0

emesis myoclonus sleep onset

insomnia

sleep nightmares maintenance

insomnia

Figure 2. Symptom assessment: cumulative frequency of the symptoms emesis, sleep onset insomnia, sleep maintenance

insomnia, nightmares, and myoclonus, for tramadol and oxycodone, during post-operative day 1 to day 3, n = 57 (n = cumulative number of patients with symptoms during the post-operative period).

Table II.

Pain scores, n = 57

Pain (rest) day 1 (mv ± sd-med) Pain (rest) day 2 (mv ± sd-med) Pain (rest) day 3 (mv ± sd-med) Pain (rest) day 1-3 (mv ± sd-med) Pain (exercise) day 1-3 (mv ± sd-med) Pain (rest) day 1 vs. 3 p -value

Pain (exercise) day 1 vs. 3 p -value

Need for rescue medication Mean dosage rescue medication (mg/d/patient)

Mean daily dosage (mg/d/patient) Additional use of NS AID

Tramadol 22.83 ±17.03-20 17.10 ±14.51-10 10.65 ±13.88-5 16.67 ± 14.29-13 16.96 ± 17.76-8.33 0.000 0.102 11 11.83 211.83 4 Oxycodone 27.93 ± 18.01-26 20.96 ±16.38-20 16.30± 15.37-15 21.73 ±15.40-20 9.58 ±7.98-10 0.000 0.256 8 1.03 21.03 2 P 0.290 0.316 0.161 0.209 0.649

0

0 0.707 0 0 0.523

Differences between day one and day three

During the three-day observational period, NRS for pain at rest decreased significantly in both groups. Changes of pain levels (pain at rest) were all significant for each given time (p-values 7.00/14.00/19.00/22.00 h: oxy-codone day 1 vs. day 3: 0.001/0.001/0.000/0.001; tramadol day 1 vs. day 3: 0.021/0.001/0.001/0.001). By contrast, pain during exercise on day 1 did not differ significantly from day 3 in either group (Table II).

Between day 1 and day 3, the severity of sedation and dizziness decreased significantly with tramadol, while with oxycodone, dryness of the mouth, and dizziness did, though not significantly. In both groups, changes of the NRS for sleep onset and maintenance-insomnia, nightmares, and myoclonus were either not significant or parameters remained constant.

(7)

372 S. Win et al.

Emesis and the use of anti-emetics

In the tramadol group, the number of patients who vomited remained constant but with an increasing frequency of vomiting. On day 1, all five patients vomited just once; on day two, three of five once and two twice; and on day three, three of five patients once, two twice and one three times. In both groups, the frequency of the use of antiemetics was not significantly different (oxycodone: n = 2, tramadol: n = 4; p = 0.523). Even though dosages of metoclopramide did not differ significantly, consumption in the tramadol group distinctly exceeded that in the oxycodone group (cumulative doses were in tramadol group: 131.2 mg in metoclopramide group 410 drops, in oxycodone group: 100 drops; p = 0.48). Additionally, one patient in the tramadol group received 210 mg of dimenhydrinate (3 suppositories). Side effects are shown in Table III.

discussion Study design, patients, substances and formulation

In this prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial, both treatment groups had a comparable background in terms of demographic and medical data or surgical procedure. We assume no major significant influences by the peri-operative agents because of a 'wash out' period of at least one night and their short half-time of metabolism and elimination. Post-operative pain therapy was acceptable with both CR tramadol and oxycodone, since no drop-outs due to side effects, excessive doses of rescue medication or changes of methods were registered. We could not discriminate possible influences on the premature discharge of five patients, as a better efficacy of oxycodone or the kind of the surgical procedure.

Most prior studies have analyzed CR oxycodone for cancer pain therapy,17"21

but few for post-operative analgesia.8-1 li21 Previous comparisons of oral CR

oxycodone and tramadol have not been reported for post-operative pain ther-apy after orthopedic surgical procedures, whereas in most studies oral oxy-codone is compared with other substances and not with tramadol3'5'6'14'23 or

else intravenous administration is studied.15-16

In contrast to other studies, the combination with NSAIDs was restricted in this trial in order to assess distinctly the side effects of tramadol or oxycodone.8'9'22 Indirectly, our results might demonstrate the potential for

a mono therapy with oral CR /^-agonists as an alternative to NSAIDs, in case of contraindications.

We used comparable CR formulations of tramadol and oxycodone. There is controversy as to whether CR formulations might have lower side effects than immediate release formulations.8-12'20 The attenuation of some symptoms

agreed with results of another trial.17

Dosage, efficacy, conversion ratio

The dosage of the study medication was effective for post-operative pain therapy after the chosen surgical procedures. The significantly higher pain level for oxycodone at the first recorded time in the investigation remains unclear. As we did not investigate plasma levels, we could not relate this neither to different pharmacokinetic parameters of both CR formulations, nor did we find a correlation to influences of different surgical procedures. Nevertheless, it was a short-term phenomenon, as no further differences of pain levels and the use of the rescue medication were observed at any other point in time.

Despite significantly decreasing pain levels at rest, improvement of pain during exercise from day one to three was poor in both groups, pointing to the need to improve post-operative pain therapy. Other authors used

(8)

Comparison of controlled release oxycodone and tramadol 373

Table III.

Daily assessment of symptoms, differences between the both opioids and between day one and three: n = 57 (NRS, n = patients) * = tramadol vs. oxycodone

Symptom Day 1 p day 1 Day 2

Substance (NRS resp. n) * (NRS resp. n) *

p day 2 Day 3 p day 3 /; day 1 (NRS resp. n) * vs. day 3 Nausea Tramadol 15.97 ±24.58 0.082 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 5.77 ± 15.54 (mg mv sd) Emesis Tramadol 5 0.041 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 0 (mg mv sd)

Sleep onset insomnia

Tramadol 8 0.153 (mg mv sd)

Oxycodone 3 (mg mv sd)

Sleep maintenance insomnia

Tramadol 19 0.278 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 13 (mg mv sd) Nightmares Tramadol 2 0.291 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 0 (mg mv sd) Sedation Tramadol 22.90 ± 22.685 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 13.85 ± 16.27 (mg mv sd) Dizziness Tramadol 10.00 ±17.51 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 11.73 ±16.79 (mg mv sd) Myoclonus Tramadol 9 0.098 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 3 (mg mv sd) Pruritus Tramadol 4.19 ±11.19 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 3.46 ±10.93 (mg mv sd) Dry mouth Tramadol 15.16 ±18.23 (mg mv sd) Oxycodone 21.92 ±17.89 (mg mv sd) 0.132 0.446 0.642 0.140 15.81 ±20.25 7.69 ± 17.28 5 0 12 6 22 14 2 0 21.94± 18.52 15.00 ±17.94 9.03 ± 15.78 10.38 ±18.65 7 2 3.87 ±10.86 3.85 ±12.35 13.55 ± 17.23 18.08 ±17.89 0.033 0.041 0.164 0.145 0.544 0.146 0.446 0.120 0.662 0.323 12.26 ±15.86 4.62 ±14.21 5 0 12 4 22 15 1 0 15.16 ±15.89 15.38 ±16.79 6.45 ± 13.55 8.46 ±16.90 5 2 3.55 ± 10.82 4.23 ±12.39 13.55 ± 17.43 18.08 ±17.89 0.012 0.041 0.047 0.221 0.544 0.877 0.844 0.291 0.801 0.291 0.305 0.180 constant constant 0.277 0.685 0.421 0.578 0.554 constant 0.031 0.285 0.015 0.173 0.224 0.638 0.157 0.157 0.493 0.041

(9)

374 S. Wirz et al.

higher doses or the intravenous administration and demonstrated improve-ments of pain at exercise, function or mobilization for both oxycodone and tramadol.1'2'9'15'22'23 Due to the heterogeneity of the surgical procedures we

did not evaluate functional improvement.

Comparable pain levels and the use of further medication in both groups support the calculated conversion factor of tramadol/oxycodone =

10/12-4,6,9,i4,i5,i8,i9,24-26 b u t fu r the r pharmacokinetic studies are needed to

confirm the result by titration.

Safety

According to prior studies, neither substance generated any serious adverse effects on vital signs.2"4'7-14 Possibly, this might be related to the exclusion

criteria. However, studies enrolling patients with organ malfunctions are difficult to execute owing to ethical restrictions. None of the CR formulations of either drug produced respiratory depression, contradictory to a publication on the intravenous administration reporting a significant higher incidence with oxycodone than with tramadol.16

Side effects

Nausea, emesis. Sunshine and Reuben found a lower frequency of

nau-sea and vomiting with CR oxycodone than with oral immediate release oxycodone.8'12 Comparisons of analogous formulations of tramadol have not

yet been published.

Comparisons of oxycodone with morphine reported no differences in the rates of nausea and emesis during the post-operative period,9-14'23 but reports

on the use in cancer pain are ambiguous.18'19'21'23"25 Prior trials on tramadol

showed varying incidences of nausea and emesis in comparison with other opioids.2"6-26

The significant results of our trial on the oral CR formulation agree with Silvasti et al's findings, which report a lower incidence of nausea and emesis for intravenous oxycodone than for intravenous tramadol. The higher consumption of anti-emetics with post-operative oral tramadol had also been demonstrated for intravenous administration.15

Central symptoms. While Silvasti found comparable central effects for

tramadol and oxycodone,15 in this comparative trial we found that central

effects such as sedation, sleep onset and maintenance-insomnia, and night-mares tended to be more frequent with tramadol. Prior studies comparing either oxycodone or tramadol with morphine showed diverging incidences of sedation, dizziness, impairment of mental state, sleep disturbances and nightmares.2'3-6'9'14'18'19'21'25'26 However, the attenuation of sedation and

dizzi-ness and the increase in sleep disorders in the tramadol group might correlate to central nervous effects of this substance and, from that, underline the im-pact of the noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibition of this drug.4'26

In the patients of our investigation, myoclonus emerged more frequently with tramadol than with oxycodone. Overall, the higher frequency of myoclonus contrasts with the findings of other authors.25'26 Nor did our

patients suffer from organ impairment with the risk of the accumulation of ^-agonists or their metabolites, nor were high dosages applied. Possibly, this symptom has been underestimated so far.

Pruritus, dry mouth. The fact that no significant differences in the

incidence of pruritus emerged agrees with other references.9'12-24 In general,

(10)

Comparison of controlled release oxycodone and tramadol 375

Prior investigations comparing oxycodone or tramadol with morphine yield contradicting results on the incidence of dry mouth.3'24"26 Although

autonomic nervous system effects such as dry mouth are principal symptoms of tramadol,4 the results of our trial indicate a higher rate with oxycodone,

especially at the beginning of a therapy, although it decreased significantly over a three-day period.

conclusions This trial demonstrates that the oral controlled release administration of

oxycodone and tramadol for therapy of post-operative pain is effective, safe, and convenient, even as a mono treatment. Although oxycodone is a highly potent opioid, its side-effect profile seems to be more favorable than that of the less potent yU-agonist tramadol. Because of a reduced frequency and severity of the symptoms of nausea and vomiting, the use of oxycodone should replace the recent practice of using tramadol for the management of post-operative pain therapy.

references 1. Stubhaug A, Grimstad J, Breivik H, Lack of analgesic effect of 50 and 100 nig oral

tramadol after orthopaedic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo and standard active drug comparison, Pain 62, 111-8 (1995).

2. Vickers MD, O'Flaherty D, Szekely SM, et al., Tramadol: pain relief by an opioid without depression of respiration, Anaesthesia 47, 291-6 (1992).

3. Houmes RJ, Voets MA, Verkaaik A, et al,, Efficacy and safety of tramadol versus morphine for moderate and severe postoperative pain with special regard to respiratory depression, Anesth Analg 74, 510-4 (1992).

4. Lee CR, McTavish D, Sorkin EM, Tramadol. A preliminary review of its pharmacody-namic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute and chronic pain states, Drugs 46, 313-40 (1993).

5. van den Berg AA, Halliday E, Lule EK, et al. The effects of tramadol on postoperative nausea, vomiting and headache after ENT surgery. A placebo-controlled comparison with equipotent doses of nalbuphine and pethidine, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43, 28-33 (1999).

6. Ng KF, Tsui SL, Yang JC, et al., Increased nausea and dizziness when using tramadol for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) compared with morphine after intra-operative loading with morphine, Eur J Anaesthesiol 15, 565—70 (1998).

7. Olkkola KT, Hamunen K, Seppala T, et al, Pharmacokinetics and ventilatory effects of intravenous oxycodone in post-operative children, Br J Clin Pharmacol 38, 71-6 (1994). 8. Sunshine A, Olson NZ, Colon A, et al., Analgesic efficacy of controlled-release

oxycodone in post-operative pain, J Clin Pharmacol 36, 595-603 (1996).

9. Curtis GB, Johnson GH, Clark P, et al, Relative potency of controlled-release oxy-codone and controlled-release morphine in a post-operative pain model, Eur J Clin Phar-macol 55,425-9 (1999).

10. Poyhia R, Vainio A, Kalso E, A review of oxycodone's clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, J Pain Symptom Manage 8, 63-7 (1993).

11. Tanskanen P, Kytta J, Randell T, Patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone in the treatment of post-craniotomy pain, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43, 42-5 (1999).

12. Reuben SS, Connelly NR, Maciolek H, Post-operative analgesia with controlled-release oxycodone for outpatient anterior cruciate ligament surgery, Anesth Analg 88, 1286-91 (1999).

13. Reuben SS, Steinberg RB, Maciolek R,etal, Pre-operative administration of controlled-release oxycodone for the management of pain after ambulatory laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery, J Clin Anesth 14, 223-7 (2002).

14. Kalso E, Poyhia R, Onnela P, etal., Intravenous morphine and oxycodone for pain after abdominal surgery, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 35, 642-6 (1991).

15. Silvasti M, Tarkkila P, Tuominen M, et al, Efficacy and side effects of tramadol versus oxycodone for patient-controlled analgesia after maxillofacial surgery, Eur J Anaesthesiol 16, 834-9 (1999).

16. Tarkkila P, Tuominen M, Lindgren L, Comparison of respiratory effects of tramadol and oxycodone, J Clin Anesth 9, 582-5 (1997).

17. Citron ML, Kaplan R, Parris WC, et al., Long-term administration of controlled-release oxycodone tablets for the treatment of cancer pain, Cancer Invest 16, 562-71 (1998).

(11)

376 S. Win et al.

18. Kalso E, Vainio A, Morphine and oxycodone hydrochloride in the management of cancer pain, Clin Pharmacol Ther 47, 639-46 (1990).

19. Bruera E, Belzile M, Pituskin E, et al.. Randomized, double-blind cross-over trial comparing safety and efficacy of oral release oxycodone with controlled-release morphine in patients with cancer pain, J Clinical Oncology 16, 3222-9 (1998). 20. Hummel T, Roscher S, Paali E, et al, Assessment of analgesia in man: tramadol

controlled release formula vs tramadol standard formulation, Eur J Clin Pharmacol 51, 31-8 (1996).

21. Maddocks I, Somogyi A, Abbott F, etal, Attenuation of morphine-induced delirium in palliative care by substitution with infusion of oxycodone, J Pain Symptom Manage 12, 182-9 (1996).

22. Cheville A, Chen A, Oster G, et al,, A randomized trial of controlled-release oxycodone during inpatient rehabilitation following unilateral total knee arthroplasty, / Bone Joint Surg Am 83, 572-6(2001).

23. Silvasti M, Rosenberg P, Seppala T, et al., Comparison of analgesic efficacy of oxycodone and morphine in post-operative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 42, 576-80 (1998).

24. Mucci-LoRusso P, Berma B, Silberstein P, et al., Controlled released oxycodone com-pared with controlled released morphine in the treatment of cancer pain: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study, Europ J Pain 2, 239-49 (1998).

25. Heiskanen T, Kalso E, Controlled-release oxycodone and morphine in cancer related pain, Pain 73, 37-45 (1997).

26. Wilder-Smith CH, Hill L, Osier W, O'Keefe, Effect of tramadol and morphine on pain and gastrointestinal motor function in patients with chronic pancreatitis, Digest Dis Sci 44,1107-16(1999).

Figure

Figure 2. Symptom assessment: cumulative frequency of the symptoms emesis, sleep onset insomnia, sleep maintenance insomnia, nightmares, and myoclonus, for tramadol and oxycodone, during post-operative day 1 to day 3, n = 57 (n = cumulative number of patie
Table III.

References

Related documents

The fact that social relations are permeated by power means that certain groups manage to impose their tastes, deciding what is good for the others or, inversely, restricting

AD: Alzheimer ’ s disease; ADME: Adsorption, distribution, metabolization, and elimination; A β : Amyloid-beta; BCM7: Beta-casomorphin-7; BNP: B-type- natriuretic peptide;

to secondary prevention of fragility fractures, including bone mineral density (BMD) testing, evaluation at a fall and fracture clinic, drug prescription, and

Important questions include how much state support should go to families raising children; whether that support should be used to encourage particular practices, such as

This paper describes the behaviour change communication strategies used to implement PNS; and analyses HIV testing patterns arising from the implementation of PNS.Drawing

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of tillage time (fall and spring) and tillage time/N supply interactions within each tillage system on selected

Parallele Ergebnisse fanden sich für die regionale und globale Myokardfunktion: Sowohl unter Ruhebedingungen, als auch unter Pacing ergab sich für das Infarktareal unter der

Notes: Mice were administered optimized rhodamine 6g/silica particles orally every 24 hours for 4 days, and organs were harvested 3 hours after the final