• No results found

New York State Title V Program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "New York State Title V Program"

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

New York State

New York State

Title V Program

Title V Program

What’s Working

What’s Working

What’s Not

What’s Not

Michael Styk, P.E.

Environmental Engineer II

(2)

Background

Background

NYS permitting program

– Emission point permits – first issued 1973

• Two-phased program – permit to construct/certificate to operate

– Title V program status

• Interim approval granted 12/9/96

(3)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Facility Permit System

– Requirements consolidated under single permit – Permit administration simplified

• Processing streamlined, more efficient

• # of permits required reduced

(4)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Quality of monitoring conditions improved

– Level of detail increased to meet enforceability criteria

– All conditions reference a federal or state requirement

– Limits and requirements more clearly defined • Agency inspection and review process enhanced

(5)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Permits more uniform

– Details in operating conditions allow regulated sources to keep their methods consistent

• Reporting/recordkeeping time frames

• Averaging periods

– Common TV requirements allow for an exchange of ideas with other states

(6)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Compliance and enforcement enhanced

– Facilities know what to expect regarding compliance and reporting requirements

– Self-reporting aspect compels facilities to consider requirements more seriously

• Sources are under closer scrutiny

(7)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Compliance and enforcement (continued)

– Networking improved

• Increasing cooperation between environmental and operations managers to assure compliance

– Multiple uses of compliance reports: • Inspection aid/checklist

• Discovery tool

• Starting point for more in-depth questions

(8)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Permit Review Report (PRR)

– Favorably received by public

– Discussions regarding basis for monitoring and applicability force reviewers to examine rationale for selecting appropriate compliance strategies

– Provides details into permit writer’s thought process for future reference

(9)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Public Participation Enhanced

– Permitting process more open

– Permit reviews incorporate environmental justice concerns

– TV permits and PRR’s posted on department website for easier public access

(10)

Title V Successes

Title V Successes

Development of AFS

– Initially designed for Title V program – Ties all permitting activities together:

– Application processing/Permit development – Compliance and enforcement

– Inventory tracking

– Maintaining historical data – Fee billing

(11)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

Initial permit applications rarely complete

– Applicants overlook requirements

– Permit writers routinely seek additional data

Permits tend to be long and complex

– Applicants and public find some permits cumbersome and difficult to follow

(12)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

Volume of reports can be overwhelming

– Entry of semi-annual/annual certification data time consuming

– Field staff have difficulty completing thorough reviews in a timely manner

– EPA deadlines for uploading case entries to AIRS often hard to meet

(13)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

Guidance for reporting ‘deviations’ vs

‘violations’ limited

– Distinction between the two often confusing to both facility and reviewer

– Need more consistent application of ‘enforcement discretion’ and ‘affirmative defense’

(14)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

Overlapping reporting requirements for MACT

– Synchronizing MACT and TV reporting requirements difficult

Coordination of undelegated program

components problematic

(15)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

Monitoring guidance lacking

– How is periodic monitoring to be applied to non-standard air pollution sources (i.e. those without controls or appropriate operating parameters,

RACT sources, opacity)?

– What’s considered sufficient to ‘assure compliance’?

(16)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

SIP issues

– SIP submittals not acted on in a timely manner • Repealed and revised regulations still need to be listed

• Repetitive requirements included in permits

• Confusing to both facilities and staff

Supersession issues

(17)

Title V Problems

Title V Problems

Other issues:

– Non-concurrent public and EPA reviews lengthen processing of significant permit modifications

– Repetitive permit objections filed by interest groups have diverted staff resources from

permitting duties

• Lengthy and repetitive responses often required to both petitioners and EPA

(18)

Making It Work

Making It Work

Development of permit QA audit program

Development of permit manual

Developing commonly used monitoring

conditions

Continuing discussions with EPA Region 2 to

resolve SIP and supersession problems

(19)

Contact Information

Contact Information

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Bureau of Stationary Sources Division of Air Resources 625 Broadway, 2nd Floor Albany, NY 12233-3254 518 – 402 – 8403 518 – 402 – 9035 (fax) http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dar/index.html E-mail: [email protected]

References

Related documents

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights is the competent court, within the framework of the Inter- -American System for the Protection of Human Ri- ghts, to recognize

An international review published by researchers from Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry and dental institutions in Australia and US in the Journal for

Figure 1: The validation process VALIDATION Commissioning Installation checks Installation tests Commissioning tests Thermometric tests Microbiological tests Residual gas

loading, longevity, fecundity and adult energy reserves) of parasitoid wasps, and ultimately

Ulbrich, Nonmonotone trust region methods for nonlinear equality constrained optimization without a penalty function, Math. Yabe, A globally convergent trust-region SQP method without

Při použití starších verzí bylo možné, při testování na virtuální síti, tento systém úspěšně použít, ale stejně jako v případě Windows XP, byla záměrně

As fresh mortar properties test, slump and setting time tests were done whereas compressive, and flexural strength tests were done to study hardened concrete properties. Slump

By lending the STRIPS to Refco, however, Samueli was able to take the position that: (i) he was not required to accrue discount on the STRIPS (because during the term of