Incentives for risk reporting –
a discretionary disclosure and cheap talk approach
Presentation at the
30th Annual Conference of the EAA
Lisbon, April 26, 2007
Dr. Michael Dobler, MBR
Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
University of Ottawa
Introduction
Risk reporting
information on the effects risks (and opportunities) may have on an entity's future economic position (risk factors, risk
management, risk forecasts)
risk-related disclosure that shall help users to assess the
distribution of future cash-flows or parameters of it (verifiable, non verifiable)
Tradeoff
incentives
literature: claimed benefits for preparers and users
evidence: variation/restrictions in voluntary risk reporting
regulation
literature: call for (more) regulation
Introduction
Research question
risk reporting incentives in their relation to regulation
Research approach
adoption, review and discussion of discretionary disclosure and cheap talk models
Main results
incentives limited by on three levels
regulation may partly mitigate, but not overcome incentives
Main contribution
qualifying prior assessments on risk reporting
analytically based considerations on risk reporting rules
Background
Risk
uncertainty-based vs. target-based views
distributions of future outcomes
Risk reporting
verifiable vs. non-verifiable risk information
risk-related disclosure that shall help users to assess the distribution of future cash-flows or parameters of it
Risk management
information source for risk reporting
Background
Regulation
piecemeal approach vs. comprehensive approach
table 1 (p. 30)
managers have room to exercise discretion
Empirical evidence
large variation/restrictions in voluntary and mandatory risk reporting
table 2 (p. 31)
managers do exercise discretion
Review
Basics
unraveling principle
verifiable vs. non-verifiable disclosure
expected values vs. variances
Structure
verified risk reporting
disclosure models on disclosure cost
disclosure models on uncertainty of information availability
unverified risk reporting
single-period cheap talk models
Review
Disclosure cost
(verified risk reporting)
amendment:
disclosure associated with cost C > 0
general results
withholding of (unfavorable) information: low cash flows, large variances of cash flows
disclosure less likely with increasing cost C
Jorgensen & Kirschenheiter (2003)
disclosure of variances less likely with increasing risk aversion of outsiders
mandating disclosure of variances will (weakly) increase a firm's cost of capital
Review
Uncertainty of information availability
(verified risk reporting)
amendment:
manager only informed with 0 < p < 1
general results
withholding of (unfavorable) information: low cash flows, large variances of cash flows
disclosure less likely with decreasing probability p
special results
information and disclosure precision (e.g. Penno
1996, 1997; Richardson 2001)
Review
Single-period cheap talk
(unverified risk reporting)
amendment:
disclosure not verified
general results
credible communication possible, but needs noise
favorable forecasts may be disclosed with more precision than unfavorable ones
Fischer & Stocken (2001)
information and disclosure precision
Review
Multi-period cheap talk
(unverified risk reporting)
amendments:
disclosure not verified, reputation
general results
diverse (e.g. Sobel 1985; Benabou & Laroque 1992;
Kim 1996; Stocken 2000; Morris 2001)
Stocken (2000)
perfect public equilibrium in review phases, where a manager nearly always reports truthfully if
sufficient weight of long term-term incentives
sufficiently long review phases / interaction
Discussion
Incentives/restrictions of risk reporting
manager may have no/pretend not to have information
manager may withhold private information because he cannot disclose credibly/can misreport
manager may withhold private information because he fears disadvantages
Regulation on risk reporting
managerial risk information endowment
enforcement of (credible) risk reporting
mandatory risk reporting
Discussion – Information endowment
Incentives
verified risk reporting
depends on common knowledge probability of managerial information endowment
information vs. disclosure precision
unverified risk reporting
non-credible or boilerplate disclosure
information vs. disclosure precision
Regulation
minimum probability of managerial information endowment
still margins to withhold available risk information
Discussion – Enforcement
Incentives
verified risk reporting
cost vs. disclosure
unverified risk reporting
cost vs. credibility
cost vs. disclosure
Regulation
nominal/actual value comparison ex post inadequate
audit (ex ante) reduces to test of plausibility
Discussion – Mandatory risk reporting
Incentives
verified risk reporting
various, most likely related to cost
unverified risk reporting
various, probably related to cost (self-fulfilling prophecy)
Regulation
certain costs probably demotivate regulation (verified risk reporting)
uncertain costs questionable (unverified risk reporting)
Discussion – Specific risk reporting rules
Incentives
verified risk reporting
uncertainty of information availability
unverified risk reporting
credibility
Regulation
negative reports
risk management reports
Conclusions
Incentives
limited at (at least) three levels
Regulation
may mitigate, but cannot overcome these incentives
General assessment of risk reporting
adverse incentives do matter even in presence of regulation
caution not to overestimate risk reporting in both, an unregulated and a regulated environment
Caveats
Contact
Michael Dobler
Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
University of Ottawa