• No results found

If You Think Investing is Gambling, You re Doing it Wrong!

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "If You Think Investing is Gambling, You re Doing it Wrong!"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

“If You Think Investing is

Gambling, You’re Doing it Wrong!”

Warren Buffet

Jennifer Arthur, M.Sc.

PhD Candidate, University of Adelaide Supervisor: Dr. Paul Delfabbro

10th European Conference on Gambling Studies and Policy Issues

(2)

Investing versus Gambling

• Investing has economic utility; gambling does not.

• Investing has positive expected returns; gambling has negative.

• Gambling can be addictive and destructive, investing is healthy.

• Investors are risk-averse; gamblers are risk-seekers.

• Investing is long-term process; gambling focuses on immediate outcomes.

• Investing is based on skill and knowledge; whereas gambling is based on luck and emotions.

(3)

“On Wall Street, Gambling is Called

Innovation and Clients are Called

Idiots” Jon Stewart

Media

(4)

'We lost everything gambling on shares'

As do-it-yourself investing goes mainstream, one couple lost their life savings by using a tool meant for professionals

Gianpaolo Prinzi and Fernanda Freitas “invested” in shares for their retirement, but lost

£180,000 in doing so

(5)

Public Perception

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Buying Instant Win Tickets Playing EGMs (slots, video lottery terminals) Bingo for Money Buying Lottery Tickets Casino Table Games for Money Horse/Dog Race Betting Paying to Enter Tournament with Cash Prizes Buying High-risk Stocks Betting on Sports Spending $ on Games at Fairs for Prizes Playing Games vs. Other People for $ Buying "Blue Chip" Stocks Games vs Other People for no $ Taking Emotional or Physical Risks Buying Raffle or Fundraising Tickets Starting a Business Purchasing Insurance

% of North American Adults Indicating whether they consider the Activity to be 'Gambling' (n = 12,843)

Reproduced with permission from Williams, Stevens, &Nixon (2011)

(6)

Formal Definitions

Investing – putting money into an asset with the

expectation of capital appreciation, dividends, and/or interest earning. This may or may not involve research.

Most or all forms of investment involve some risk.

Gambling – staking money or material goods on an event with an uncertain outcome where the outcome of the event determines whether the stake is lost or

additional money or material goods is won.

• Three elements: Stake, Prize, and Chance

(7)

Investing or Gambling?

• Day-Trading ?

• Penny Stocks ?

• Derivatives (Options, Futures, Swaps)?

• Betting on Financial Indices?

• Professional Sports Handicapping or Poker Playing?

• Card counting?

(8)

Research Questions

• Do gamblers play the stock market and vice versa? If so, to what extent?

Does their pattern of gambling differ from gamblers who do not play the stock market?

• Is there a stronger relationship between gambling and more ‘speculative’ stock market products? (e.g., 'penny stocks’, day trading)?

Is there a relationship between problem gambling and high-risk stock play?

Day-Trading? If so, do existing problem gambling instruments capture problematic high-risk stock play?

• Who are the high-risk stock players? What differentiates them from others?

• Are there investor subgroups and if so what differentiates investor subgroups?

(9)

Sample

• Secondary data analysis of 8498 Canadian adults surveyed via RDD in 2007/2008

• Response Rate 46.6%

• Last major prevalence study of gambling in Canada

• Included questions about stock market investing

(10)

Stock Market Questions

Do you yourself buy and sell on the stock market?

In the past 12 months, have you purchased any high-risk stocks, options, or futures?

Roughly how much money do you put into high-risk stocks, options, or futures in a typical year?

About how often do you check the value of these investments in a typical MONTH?

What do you estimate is your net loss or gain in the past 12 months from high-risk stocks, options, or futures?

In your lifetime, what do you estimate is your net loss or gain from investing in high-risk stocks, options or futures?

In the past 12 months, have you done any ‘day trading’ on the stock market, where you buy and sell stocks several times on the same day?

How often do you day trade in atypical MONTH?

What do you estimate is your net loss (or gain) in the past 12 months from day trading?

In your lifetime, what do you estimate is your net loss (or gain) from day trading?

(11)

Total Sample

N = 8498

Gamblers

n= 6010 (70.7%)

Have NOT Independently Traded Stocks, Options,

or Futures on the Stock Market

n = 5443 (90.5%)

Traded Stocks, Options, or Futures on the Stock

Market

n = 534 (8.9%)

Have NOT Traded High- Risk Stocks, Options, or

Futures

n = 393 (71.3%)

Traded High-Risk Stocks, Options, or Futures/Day Traded

n = 154 (29.3%)

Results

(12)

Multivariate Analyses

Binary logistic regressions differentiating:

• Gamblers who independently buy/sell on the stock market compared to gamblers who do not.

• Gamblers who independently buy/sell high-risk stocks, options, or futures/day trade compared to gamblers who do not

Stepwise entry

• IVs: age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education, employment status, household income, household debt, physical disability, mental health (past year), past month tobacco use, past month alcohol use, past month drug use, number of gambling formats gambled on, frequency of play on each format, CPGI scores

(13)

Differences between Gamblers who Independently Buy/Sell on the Stock Market compared to Gamblers who do not

Variable Regression

Coefficients (B) Wald Statistics Odds Ratios

Household Income .176 306.520** 1.193

Employment 98.325**

Part-Time (-.508) 14.372** .602

Self-Employed .502 33.744** 1.652

Retired (-.219) 4.662 .803

Unemployed (-1.124) 14.474** .325

Homemaker (-.565) 8.800* .568

Student (-.211) 1.327 .810

Disability (-1.471) 9.938* .230

Past Month Alcohol Use .518 52.294** 1.679

Gender .494 65.488** 1.638

Ethnicity 61.240**

Ethnicity (Asian) .973 49.464** 2.646

Ethnicity (Other) (-.191) 6.124* .826

Age .017 38.636** 1.017

Household Debt (-2.349) 35.216** 10.478

Horse/Dog Racing Frequency .382 27.647** 1.465

Bingo Frequency (-.176) 12.847** .839

Skill-Based Games Frequency .105 11.578* 1.110

Table Games Frequency .226 9.900* 1.254

Instant Win Frequency (-.068) 9.500* .934

Lottery Frequency .057 7.801* 1.059

Past Month Tobacco Use (-.195) 8.125* .822

Constant -2.926 282.072** .054

*p < .01 NAGELKERKE R SQUARED = 24.6%.

**p < .001 OVERALL PREDICTION SUCCESS = 68.1%

(14)

Differences between Gamblers who Buy/Sell High-Risk Stocks or Day Trade compared to Gamblers who do not

Variable Regression

Coefficients (B) Wald Statistics Odds Ratios

Household Income .209 350.373** 1.232

Gender 1.033 226.496** 2.809

Ethnicity 172.903**

Asian 1.645 118.799** 5.183

other (-.531) 35.947** .588

Employment Status 152.533**

Retired (-.522) 18.665** .593

Self-employed .716 65.563** 2.047

Other (-.718) 38.722** .488

Marital Status 84.755**

Married (-.572) 29.532** .564

Widowed (-.471) 6.093 .624

Divorced (-.656) 22.193** .519

Never Married .158 1.720 1.171

Past Month Alcohol Use .758 77.660** 2.133

Number of Gambling Formats .245 43.178** 1.278

Casino Table Game Frequency .521 41.173** 1.684

Instant Win Frequency (-.161) 34.156** .852

EGM Frequency (-.276) 32.603** .759

Horse/Dog Racing Frequency .399 28.567** 1.491

Sports Betting Frequency (-.088) 4.136 .916

Problem Gambling Status .609 7.225* 1.838

Past Month Tobacco Use (-.435) 33.122** .647

Age .017 29.528** 1.017

Physical Disability (-.338) 8.093* .713

Household Debt (-2.419) 28.046** 11.235

Constant (-4.203) 179.058** .015

*p < .01 NAGELKERKE R SQUARED = 40.9%

**p < .001 OVERALL PREDICTION SUCCESS = 75.0%

(15)

Conclusions

Only 8.9% of gamblers also independently buy/sell on the stock market (so, not that common an activity among

gamblers)

However, these people still fairly similar to ‘regular’ gamblers in many ways in that they engage in same number of gambling formats and are no different in terms of problem gambling

status.

Also no different in terms of marital status, education, drug use, mental health status, and presence of physical disability.

(16)

Conclusions

Some differences identified (partly due to a very large sample size) but only 24.6% of the variance explained and only 68.1%

classification accuracy.

• Demographically - more likely to be: employed (especially self- employed or full-time); male; Asian; older; and to have lower household debt, higher incomes.

• More likely to use alcohol and less likely to use tobacco.

• Game Play – higher frequency of participation in horse race betting, skill-based social betting, casino table games, and lotteries; and less likely to play bingo and instant win tickets.

(17)

Conclusions

• So, are ‘high risk stock’ players more similar to ‘regular gamblers’?

• Yes and No.

No, in sense that differences between the groups is greater (variance explained increases to 40.9% and classification accuracy increases to 75%)

• These people have higher incomes, more likely to be male, Asian, retired, self- employed, living common-law, use alcohol, not use tobacco, not have physical disability, lower debt.

Yes, in the sense that these people have greater involvement in traditional

gambling (play more formats) leading to significantly higher rates of problem gambling. Also have higher frequency involvement in casino table games, horse race betting

.

(18)

Limitations

• Constrained by the parameters of secondary data analysis

Could not compare non-gamblers

Buying or selling ‘high-risk stocks, options, or futures’ is

not the wording I would have used (as some people use

these products to actually hedge risk)

(19)

Thank you for your attention!

Acknowledgements: University of Adelaide, Dr. Paul Delfabbro, and Dr. Robert Williams

(20)

Differences between Gamblers who Independently Buy/Sell High-Risk Stocks, Options, or Futures/Day Trade compared to Gamblers who only Buy/Sell Low- Risk Stocks/D

Variable

Regression

Coefficients (B) Wald Statistics Odds Ratios

Marital Status 15.067**

Married (-.694) 5.270* .499

Widowed (-.675) 1.640 .509

Divorced (-.896) 4.719* .408

Never Married .146 .159 1.157

Income .104 11.293** 1.110

Casino Table Games Frequency .636 9.505** 1.889

CPGI (Total Score) 1.166 6.763** .312

Gender .525 6.291* 1.690

Physical Disability (-.726) 4.783* .484

Constant .304 .303 1.355

*p < .05 NAGELKERKE R SQUARED = 17.7%

**p < .01 OVERALL PREDICTION SUCCESS = 64.8%

References

Related documents

The methodology follows as (1) Selection of climate model; (2) Hydrological modeling of Krishna river basin with multi gauge calibration and validation; 3) Assessment of water

Therefore I tell other boxers here: originally combat was just a minor skill, but the ordinary people mostly judge one’s boxing skills by the relative superiority or inferiority

Missing measurements can be recovered by computational techniques for data imputation, thus completing the interaction profiles and enabling down- stream analysis algorithms that

Estimation of EDPVR suggests lower LV compliance in patients with elevated PCWP with exercise, an association that was not seen for patients with increased resting PCWP,

While some fiber bundles such as Optic Radiations and Anterior Commissure are not related to language, the other ones (Anterior Segment Right, Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus Left

Pay 5% of the cost of books and 5% of the tuition for 9-15 semester hours at a local university for the scholarship employee At the end of the contract term, upon completion of

In the present study maximum number of cases with chronic rhinosinusitis, xray findings shown haziness, this is similar to the study conducted by