• No results found

Recent developments in Post Keynesian methodology and their relevance for understanding environmental issues

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Recent developments in Post Keynesian methodology and their relevance for understanding environmental issues"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1"35**

(2)
(3)

2. Recent developments in Post

Keynesian methodology and

their relevance for understanding

environmental issues

Andrew Mearman

*/530%6$5*0/

6OUJMRVJUFSFDFOUMZ1PTU,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJDTIBTIBESFMBUJWFMZMJUUMFUP TBZBCPVUUIFFDPOPNJDTPGUIFFOWJSPONFOU .FBSNBOBC .VDIPGUIJTOFXXPSLTUFNTGSPNBNFUIPEPMPHJDBMDSJUJRVFPGOFPDMBT TJDBMFDPOPNJDTCPSSPXJOHIFBWJMZGSPNUIFQIJMPTPQIZPGTDJFODFBTXFMM

as economic methodology, and from increased awareness of and concern for the environment.

The methodological developments are located in three main literatures, all of which have a potential impact on how Post Keynesians understand

FOWJSPONFOUBMJTTVFT'JSTUUIFSFDFOUSFEJTDPWFSZPG,FZOFTšTXSJUJOHTPO

philosophy and ethics have led to a fresh interpretation of his economics. Especially important is the Treatise on Probability ,FZOFTXIJDI DPOUBJOT B DSJUJRVF PG FYJTUJOH UIFPSJFT PG QSPCBCJMJUZ BOE EFWFMPQT BO BMUFSOBUJWFUIFPSZ5IJTXPSLIBTMFEUPBCFUUFSVOEFSTUBOEJOHPGNFUI

odology, of uncertainty, and of assorted theoretical issues, such as the role and existence of money in the economy.

5XPMJUFSBUVSFTCPUIJOTQJSFECZ,FZOFTBSFNPSFDPOUSPWFSTJBM5IFTF BSFOPUVOJWFSTBMMZBDDFQUFECZ1PTU,FZOFTJBOTNBOZPGXIPNSFHBSE UIFN BT JODPSSFDU PS BU CFTU EJTUSBDUJOH GSPN UIFPSFUJDBM BOE FNQJSJDBM XPSL

#BCZMPOJBOJTN1 EFWFMPQFE QSJODJQBMMZ CZ 4IFJMB %PX IPMET UIBU

TDJFODFEPFTOPUTFBSDIPVUHSFBUUSVUIDMBJNTSBUIFSUIFBJNPGUIFPSZJT

(4)

BQ)PXFWFSJUTIPVMECFOPUFEUIBUNBOZ1PTU,FZOFTJBOT WJFX#BCZMPOJBOJTNXJUITVTQJDJPODMBJNJOHJUJTJOTVɴDJFOUMZSJHPSPVT FDMFDUJDBOEJODPIFSFOU %BWJETPOŝ%PX)PMU

&WFONPSFDPOUSPWFSTJBMIBTCFFO$SJUJDBM3FBMJTNBQIJMPTPQIZEFWFM PQFECZ3PZ#IBTLBS #IBTLBSQSPWJEFEBOBSHVNFOUGPS

a reality existing independent of our present conception of it, which has

EFQUIBOEJTPQFO0CTFSWBCMFFWFOUTBOEFYQFSJFODFTUIFJOJUJBMGPDVTPG TDJFODFBSFUIVTUIFQSPEVDUTPGDBVTBMNFDIBOJTNTPQFSBUJOHŠCFOFBUIš UIFPCTFSWBCMFTVSGBDFSFBMJUZ#PUIUIFTPDJBMBOEOBUVSBMTDJFODFTTFFLUP JEFOUJGZUIFTFNFDIBOJTNT$SJUJDBM3FBMJTNIBTCFFOCSPVHIUUPFDPOPN JDTCZ5POZ-BXTPO *UTIBSFTNBOZDPODFSOTPG,FZOFTBOE #BCZMPOJBOJTN*UTNBJODPOUSJCVUJPOUPFDPOPNJDTIBTCFFOUPVSHFUIBU BHSFBUFSQSPNJOFODFCFHJWFOUPPOUPMPHZ-BXTPO VTFT$SJUJDBM 3FBMJTNUPBSHVFBHBJOTUNBUIFNBUJDBMBOETUBUJTUJDBMUFDIOJRVFT FYDFQU JOIJHIMZVOMJLFMZDJSDVNTUBODFT5IFSFBSFPGDPVSTFDSJUJRVFTPG$SJUJDBM 3FBMJTNPOFQSPNJOFOUDSJUJDJTNJTUIBUJUJTVOBCMFUPJOGPSNFNQJSJDBM XPSL %PXOXBSE

This chapter examines these methodological developments and draws out their implications for a Post Keynesian economics of the environment.

*UJTCFZPOEUIFTDPQFPGUIJTDIBQUFSUPBSHVFGPSBTJOHMF1PTU,FZOFTJBO

methodology for environmental economics or to contrast this with exist JOHBMUFSOBUJWFTTVDIBT OFPDMBTTJDBMFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPNJDTPS OPO OFPDMBTTJDBMFDPMPHJDBMFDPOPNJDT2 Rather, we consider several common

UIFNFT UIBU TUSBEEMF UIF 1PTU ,FZOFTJBO NFUIPEPMPHJDBM MJUFSBUVSFT B GPDVT PO SFBMJTN BOE POUPMPHZ B WJFX UIBU SFBMJUZ JT PSHBOJD BOE DPNQSJTFTDPNQMFYŠPQFOTZTUFNTš IPXSFDFOUNFUIPEPMPHJDBMEFWFM PQNFOUTSFJOGPSDFUIF1PTU,FZOFTJBODPODFQUPGVODFSUBJOUZBOE UIF JNQMJDBUJPOT GPS DIPJDF PG NFUIPE TQFDJɲDBMMZ BSHVNFOUT GPS QMVSBMJTN BOEUIFNJYJOHPGNFUIPET&BDIPGUIFTFXJMMCFDPOTJEFSFEJOUVSOBOE

related to a Post Keynesian economics of the environment.

3&"-*4."/%0/50-0(:

5IFSFJTDPOTJEFSBCMFEFCBUFBCPVUUIFFYUFOUPGSFBMJTN BTPQQPTFEUP TVCKFDUJWJTNJO,FZOFTšTUIFPSZPGQSPCBCJMJUZ ,FZOFTC#BUFNBO CVUCPUI#BCZMPOJBOJTNBOE$SJUJDBM3FBMJTNBEPQUUIFQSFDFQUPG CPUIDPNNPOTFOTFBOETDJFOUJɲDSFBMJTNUIBUUIFSFJTBSFBMJUZFYJTUJOH

independent of our particular investigation of it. They agree that while it

JTSFBTPOBCMFUPBSHVFUIBUPVSQFSDFQUJPOTPGSFBMJUZPVSBDUJPOTVQPOJU BOEPVSVOEFSTUBOEJOHPGJUBSFDPNQMFYUIFSFJTBSFBMJUZUPCFTUVEJFE

(5)

TPDJBMDPOTUSVDUJPOT:FTPVSVOEFSTUBOEJOHPGUIFNJTNFEJBUFECZTPDJBM BDUJWJUZGPSFYBNQMFPVSDPODFSOGPSBOEBDUJPOTUPXBSETUJHFSTSFɳFDU UIFWBMVFQVUPOUIFNCZTPDJFUZ#VUUIBUJTOPUUIFTBNFBTDMBJNJOHUIBU

PVS UIFPSJFT BCPVU UIFN BDUVBMMZ DSFBUF UIFN /FWFSUIFMFTT JU JT XPSUI SFTUBUJOHUIJTCBTJDSFBMJTUQSJODJQMFCFDBVTFPGUIFJOɳVFODFPGDPOTUSVDUJW

ist thought in economics, which sometimes argues that reality is purely

BTPDJBMDPOTUSVDUXJUIOPNBUFSJBMFMFNFOU"1PTU,FZOFTJBOFOWJSPO NFOUBMBOBMZTJTNVTUUBLFUIJTSFBMJTNTFSJPVTMZXIJDINFBOTFOHBHJOHJO

ontological analysis.

3FDPHOJ[JOHUIFJNQPSUBODFPGPOUPMPHZSFJOGPSDFTUIF1PTU,FZOFTJBO CFMJFGUIBUUIFPSJFTTIPVMECFSFBMJTUJDŝUIFZNVTUSFGFSUPSFBMUIJOHTBOE IBWFTPNFCBTJTJOSFBMJUZ*OUIBUTFOTF1PTU,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJDTTIBSFT

one of the main strengths of ecological economics, which is that an under TUBOEJOHPGUIFPCKFDUPGLOPXMFEHFBOEPGFDPMPHJDBMDPODFQUTJOGPSNT FDPOPNJD DPODFQUT &YJTUJOH FDPOPNJD DPODFQUT BSF SFKFDUFE JG UIFZ BSF VOBCMF UP JMMVNJOBUF FDPMPHJDBM GBDUPST 1PTU ,FZOFTJBOT DMBJN UIBU JUT SFBMJTNJTBOBEWBOUBHFJOFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPNJDT0SUIPEPYUSFBUNFOUT BDDFQUUIBUUIFSFJTBSFBMJUZCVUBSFMFTTDPODFSOFEUIBUUIFJSUIFPSJFTBSF SFBMJTUJDUIFZBSFIBQQZUPVTFDPOWFOJFOUɲDUJPOTTVDIBTUIFOPUJPOPGB SBUJPOBMFDPOPNJDQFSTPONBYJNJ[JOHUIFJSVUJMJUZ"TJNJMBSDPODFSOGPS SFBMJTNFYJTUTJOFDPMPHJDBMFDPOPNJDT'PSFYBNQMF(PXEZ BSHVFT

that models of the consumer in environmental analysis should capture

CFIBWJPVSBMSFHVMBSJUJFTTVQQPSUFECZFYQFSJNFOUBMSFTVMUT

)PXNJHIUUIJTBɱFDUB1PTU,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJDTPGUIFFOWJSPONFOU 5IF DBQJUBM DPOUSPWFSTZ PG UIF T BOE T TFF )BSDPVSU QSPWJEFTBTVHHFTUJPO5IFDPOUSPWFSTZGPDVTFEPOUIFQPTTJCJMJUZPGBO BHHSFHBUF QSPEVDUJPO GVODUJPO BOE PO UIF QPTTJCJMJUZ PG WBMVJOH BHHSF HBUFDBQJUBMBOEUIFQSPɲUSBUFJOEFQFOEFOUMZ5IJTEFCBUFTIPXFEUIBU DBMDVMBUJOHDBQJUBMTUPDLEFQFOETPOUIFQSPɲUSBUFXIJDIJUTFMGEFQFOET POUIFWBMVBUJPOPGUIFDBQJUBMTUPDL"TBSFTVMUBHHSFHBUFDBQJUBMTUPDL XBT DPOTJEFSFE JOGFBTJCMF BMPOH XJUI BHHSFHBUF QSPEVDUJPO GVODUJPOT

While the capital controversy centred on several theoretical curiosa, an

FTTFOUJBMFMFNFOUPGUIFEFCBUFXBTBOPOUPMPHJDBMDPODFSOBCPVUXIFUIFS DBQJUBMXBTIPNPHFOFPVTBOEQFSGFDUMZNBMMFBCMFJOIJTUPSJDBMMZSFWFSTJCMF XBZT/FPDMBTTJDBMFDPOPNJTUTBEWPDBUFETVDIBDPODFQUJPOXIFSFBT1PTU ,FZOFTJBOTBSHVFEUIBUDBQJUBMJTNPSFJOɳFYJCMFBOEIFUFSPHFOFPVT

The capital controversy may have implications for the concept of natural

DBQJUBMŠ/BUVSBMDBQJUBMšJTBUFSNEFWFMPQFENBJOMZCZFDPMPHJDBMFDPOP NJTUT*UNFBOTŠUIFXIPMFFOEPXNFOUPGMBOEBOESFTPVSDFTBWBJMBCMFUP VTJODMVEJOHUIFFDPMPHJDBMMJGFTVQQPSUTZTUFNTUIBUNBLFFDPOPNJD BDUJWJUZQPTTJCMFš )BSSJTQ/BUVSBMDBQJUBMNBZCFVTFGVM

(6)

BOEUIFSFGPSFXIFUIFSEFWFMPQNFOUJTTVTUBJOBCMF&DPMPHJDBMFDPOPNJTUT BMTPEJTUJOHVJTICFUXFFODSJUJDBMBOEOPODSJUJDBMOBUVSBMDBQJUBMUPTUSFTT IPXDSVDJBMTPNFSFTPVSDFTBSF 4QBTIBOE$MBZUPOQ

From the perspective of the capital controversies, however, we must

RVFTUJPO UIF OPUJPO PG OBUVSBM DBQJUBM TJODF JU BUUFNQUT UP NFBTVSF UIF BHHSFHBUFTUPDLPGBWBTUOVNCFSPGIFUFSPHFOFPVTPCKFDUT8IJMFNBO NBEFDBQJUBMJTSFQSPEVDJCMFJOBOJEFOUJDBMGPSNOBUVSBMDBQJUBMJTOPU

Further, when some natural capital is critical, and other natural capital is

OPUIPXDPVMEUIFZCFDPNQBSFEBOENFBTVSFE 5IFOBUVSFTPGOBUVSBM DBQJUBM BOE NBONBEF DBQJUBM NJHIU CF TP EJɱFSFOU BT UP SFOEFS UIFN JODPNNFOTVSBUF-JLFXJTFGPSEJɱFSFOUUZQFTPGOBUVSBMDBQJUBM5 Further

QSPCMFNT BSJTF JO USZJOH UP WBMVF TVDI B TUPDL "MM UIJT DSFBUFT EJɴDVM UJFT GPS FOWJSPONFOUBM BOBMZTJT 4VDI DSJUJDJTNT TJHOJɲDBOUMZ VOEFSNJOF GVSUIFSDPODFQUTTVDIBTXFBLTVTUBJOBCJMJUZXIJDIIPMETUIBUNBONBEF QIZTJDBMBOEOBUVSBMDBQJUBMDBOCFFBTJMZTVCTUJUVUFE8FBLTVTUBJOBCJMJUZ JTVOEFSNJOFEBTBDPODFQUCFDBVTFJUIPMETUIBUBEFDSFBTFJOOBUVSBM DBQJUBM TIPVME CF DPNQFOTBUFE GPS CZ BO JODSFBTF JO QIZTJDBM DBQJUBM )PXFWFSJGUIFUXPUZQFTPGDBQJUBMBSFFTTFOUJBMMZEJɱFSFOUJUJTEJɴDVMUUP TFFIPXUIFZDPVMECFDPNQBSFEBOEFWFOGVSUIFSIPXXFDPVMETVCTUJUVUF

one for another.

03("/*$*4."/%01&/4:45&.4

3FBMJTNBMTPIBTJNQMJDBUJPOTGPSTUVEZJOHUIFFOWJSPONFOUQBSUJDVMBSMZ JOSFMBUJPOUPPSHBOJDJTNBOEPQFOTZTUFNT"TIJTXPSLPOQSPCBCJMJUZ

evolved, Keynes adopted an organic ontology. Drawing on Winslow

XF DBO JNBHJOF ,FZOFTšT POUPMPHZ BT JOWPMWJOH JOUFSOBM OFDFT TBSZSFMBUJPOT"OJOUFSOBMSFMBUJPOJTPOFJOXIJDIBOFOUJUZ"JTEFɲOFE QBSUMZJOUFSNTPGBOPUIFSFOUJUZ#5IVTXFDBOUBMLPGJOUFSOBMSFMB UJPOTCFUXFFOQPMMVUFSQPMMVUBOUBOEQPMMVUFEQSFEBUPSBOEQSFZJOQVU

and output, invader and invaded, and so on. Social examples of internal relations include landlord–tenant, master–slave and employer–employee.

#BCZMPOJBOJTNBMTPFYQMJDJUMZBEPQUTPSHBOJDJTN5IFSFNBZCFQBSBMMFMT CFUXFFOUIJTMJUFSBUVSFBOEFDPMPHJDBMFDPOPNJDTGPSFYBNQMF/PSHBBSE QOPUFTUIBUOFPDMBTTJDBMBQQSPBDIFTBTTVNFUIFTFQBSBCJMJUZ

of factors of production.

(7)

DPOTJTUFOUXJUIPSHBOJDJTNXJUI,FZOFTšTQPTJUJPOXJUI#BCZMPOJBOJTN

with Critical Realism, and with other Post Keynesian perspectives such

BT %BWJETPOšT XPSL PO OPOFSHPEJDJUZ DPNQMFYJUZ UIFPSZ BOE HFOFSBM

systems theory.

'JHVSF EJTQMBZT B QPTTJCMF XBZ UP DPODFQUVBMJ[F PQFO TZTUFNT 5IJT FYBNQMF JT POMZ JMMVTUSBUJWF JU JT QFSIBQT NPTU VTFGVM BT B WFIJDMF

for discussing some of the main characteristics of open systems and their implications.

5IFTZTUFNIBTBCPVOEBSZXIJDIJTQFSNFBCMFBOETIPXTIPXTZTUFN UISPVHIQVUJTOPSNBMBOEOFDFTTBSZGPSUIFTZTUFNšTTVSWJWBM5IFQFSNF BCMFCPVOEBSZBMMPXTUIFJNQBDUPGFYUFSOBMDBVTBMGBDUPSTUPCFGFMUJOTJEF UIFTZTUFN5IFSFJTOPBTTVNQUJPOUIBUFYUFSOBMGBDUPSTDBOCFFYDMVEFE BOETPUIFPCKFDUTJOTJEFUIFTZTUFNBSFOPUJTPMBUFE*ODPOUSBTUFDPOPNJDT

Events

M1 M2

(Mechanisms)

M operative/ M’ not operative

[image:7.484.82.391.88.413.2]

Time (M3)

(8)

tends to treat outside factors as an inconvenience for their models. This is

KVTUJɲFEBTBOFDFTTBSZBCTUSBDUJPOCVUJOGBDUUIFZNBLFBTTVNQUJPOTUIBU EFOZUIFOBUVSFPGUIFTZTUFNJORVFTUJPO

4ZTUFNTBSFTFUTPGFOUJUJFTBOEUIFSFMBUJPOTCFUXFFOUIFN'SPNPSH BOJDJTNXFLOPXUIBUTPNFSFMBUJPOTNBZCFJOUFSOBMBOEGSPNDPNQMFY BEBQUJWF TZTUFNT XF LOPX UIBU TPNF SFMBUJPOT NBZ CF JOUFSOBM XIJMF PUIFSTBSFFYUFSOBM#FDBVTFUIFTZTUFNNPWFTUISPVHIUJNFFOUJUJFTXJUIJO UIFTZTUFNFWPMWFPWFSUJNFBTEPSFMBUJPOTCFUXFFOUIFN'VSUIFSNPSF PWFSUJNFUIFFOUJUJFTNBZBDUJOEJɱFSFOUXBZTDPNCJOFJOEJɱFSFOUXBZT

and create new emergent phenomena. The history of the system therefore matters in understanding its current state. For this reason, the system is

TIPXOXJUIBUJNFBSSPX0GDPVSTFUIFJNQPSUBODFPGIJTUPSZUPFDPOPNJD BOBMZTJTIBTCFFOFNQIBTJ[FECZ1PTU,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJTUT GPSFYBNQMF 3PCJOTPO4JNJMBSMZFDPMPHJDBMFDPOPNJDTIBTTUSFTTFEIJTUPSZŝGPS JOTUBODFUISPVHIUIFDPFWPMVUJPOPGTZTUFNT /PSHBBSE

"TTUBUFEBCPWFPOFBTQFDUPGSFDFOUXPSLJO1PTU,FZOFTJBONFUIPEPM PHZIBTCFFOUPTIJGUUIFGPDVTPGBOBMZTJTPOUPPOUPMPHJDBMDPODFQUTTVDI BT TUSVDUVSF BOE NFDIBOJTN *O UIF TZTUFN CFJOH EJTDVTTFE UIF FOUJUJFT GPVOE NBZ CF TUSVDUVSFE 5IFTF TUSVDUVSFE FOUJUJFT NBZ CF WFSZ EJɱFS FOUGSPNFBDIPUIFSJOOBUVSF'PSFYBNQMFBIVNBOBOEBɲTIBSFCPUI TUSVDUVSFEFOUJUJFTCVUBSFWFSZEJɱFSFOU$BVTBMNFDIBOJTNTPSQSPDFTTFT TVDIBT.1BOE.2JO'JHVSFNBZCFDPOUBJOFEXJUIJOUIFTFTUSVD

UVSFT5IFZNBZBDUJOEFQFOEFOUMZPS BOEQFSIBQTEJɱFSFOUMZBUEJɱFS FOUUJNFTJODPNCJOBUJPODSFBUJOHFWFOUT0UIFSFWFOUTBMTPNBZUSJHHFS NFDIBOJTNTUPPQFSBUFUIJTJTXIZUIFWFSUJDBMBSSPXTTIPXOJO'JHVSF BSFUXPXBZBSSPXT'VSUIFSNPSFUIFPCKFDUTNBZCFJOUFSOBMMZSFMBUFE PSPSHBOJDBOEUIJTSFMBUJPOTIJQJUTFMGNBZIBWFBDBVTBMGVODUJPO .

'PSFYBNQMFJOUSZJOHUPFYQMBJOɲTITUPDLTPOFNFDIBOJTNNBZCFUIF BDUJPOTPGUIFɲTIFSNBOBOEBOPUIFSNFDIBOJTNUIFBDUJPOTPGPUIFSɲTI UIFTFSFMBUJPOTIJQTBɱFDUUIFɲOBMPVUDPNF

)PXFWFS UIFTF NFDIBOJTNT NBZ OPU BMXBZT PQFSBUF .FDIBOJTNT JOTJEFUIFTZTUFNNBZPQFSBUFJOUFSNJUUFOUMZUIFSFCZDSFBUJOHVODFSUBJOUZ BCPVUBOEXJUIJOUIFTZTUFN4JNJMBSMZNFDIBOJTNTPVUTJEFUIFTZTUFN NBZOPUBMXBZTPQFSBUFUPBɱFDUUIFTZTUFN*OUIFEJBHSBN..šSFQSF TFOUTUIFPO .BOEPɱ .šOBUVSFPGNFDIBOJTNT5IVTUIFSFJTBGPDVT POQPUFOUJBMJUJFTBOEOPUKVTUBDUVBMJUJFT*OBEEJUJPOUIFXBZTJOXIJDI DBVTBMNFDIBOJTNTDPNCJOFBMTPDIBOHFPWFSUJNF

"OPUIFS JNQPSUBOU DPODFQU JT POUPMPHJDBM EFQUI $BVTBM NFDIB OJTNT MZJOH CFOFBUI UIF MFWFM PG FWFOUT PQFSBUF UP DIBOHF UIF TZTUFN $PODFQUVBMJ[JOHUIFOBUVSFPGSFBMJUZJOUIJTXBZIBTTQFDJɲDJNQMJDBUJPOT 'JSTUUIFFDPMPHJDBMEJNFOTJPOPGUIFFDPOPNZJTDMFBSMZBDLOPXMFEHFE

(9)

the ecological. It is therefore incorrect to envisage the economic and the

FDPMPHJDBMBTTFQBSBUFTQIFSFT TFF'JHVSFBBTJTDPNNPOJOFOWJSPO

mental economics. The concept of depth also enriches all the approaches

TFFLJOHUPFNCFEUIFFDPOPNJDXJUIJOUIFFDPMPHJDBM TFF'JHVSFC*O GPSNVMBUJPOTTVDIBT'JHVSFCSFBMJUZDPVMECFɳBUUIFFDPOPNZESBXT GSPNUIFFDPMPHZXIJDITVSSPVOETJU%FQUISFRVJSFTVTUPUIJOLPGUIF FDPOPNJDBTFNCFEEFEJOBOE BUBIJHIFSMFWFMFNFSHFOUGSPNUIFFDP MPHJDBM5IBUTUJMMBMMPXTPOFUPFOWJTBHFUIFFDPOPNJDSFBDUJOHCBDLPOUIF FDPMPHJDBM'PSUIJTSFBTPOXFESBXUIFUXPXBZBSSPXTJO'JHVSFD

.PSFPWFS CFOFBUI UIF NFDIBOJTNT TIPXO JO UIF EJBHSBN UIFSF BSF GVSUIFS MFWFMT &DPOPNJD FWFOUT BSF EFUFSNJOFE CZ DPNCJOBUJPOT PG FDPOPNJD NFDIBOJTNT CVU BMTP QPMJUJDBM TPDJBM BOE QTZDIPMPHJDBM NFDIBOJTNT XIJDI BSF JO UVSO BMM BɱFDUFE CZ UIF CJPMPHJDBM DIFNJDBM

and physical mechanisms. Therefore, any ecological feature or event is

DPNQMFYMZEFUFSNJOFECZBSBOHFPGDBVTBMNFDIBOJTNTMPDBUFEBUWBSJPVT MBZFSTPGSFBMJUZ5BLFUIFQPMMVUJPOPGBSJWFS0OFDBODPOTUSVDUBDBVTBM TFRVFODFBTBTUPSZPGIPXUIFQPMMVUJPOPDDVSSFEBOEXIBUJUTFɱFDUTXFSF "QIZTJDBMQSPDFTTPGQSPEVDUJPOIBTDSFBUFEBUPYJDFɵVFOU5IJTJTQBSUMZ

a product of the physical and chemical mechanisms (and hence engineer JOH5IFFDPOPNJDNFDIBOJTNTBSFUIPTFDBVTJOH JOUIFTFOTFPGBUFN QPSBMDBVTBMTFRVFODFBQBSUJDVMBSQSPEVDUJWFUFDIOPMPHZUPCFDIPTFO $MBTTSFMBUJPOTNBZBMTPBɱFDUUIFDIPJDFPGUFDIOPMPHZ5IFQIZTJDBMBOE DIFNJDBMPVUQVUBMTPBɱFDUTUIFCJPMPHJDBMOBUVSFPGUIFSJWFSBOEIVNBOT 5IFDIFNJDBMJOUIFSJWFSIBSNTPSHBOJDFMFNFOUTJOUIFSJWFSTVDIBTɲTI BOEBOZUIJOHFMTFUIBUDPOTVNFTUIFXBUFSPSUIFɲTI5IFQPMMVUJPONBZ DBVTF JMM IFBMUI BOE UIF MPTT PG FOKPZNFOU GSPN BDUJWJUJFT SFMBUFE UP UIF SJWFSTVDIBTTXJNNJOHPSɲTIJOH5IFGBDUUIBUUIFQPMMVUJPOJTOPUJDFE

is the result of social mechanisms that value rivers and create institutional structures for monitoring them. The impulse to act against pollution is, in turn, partly psychological and partly cultural (it may emanate from reli HJPVTPSPUIFSDVMUVSBMOPSNT

This story is familiar to economists. What does the concept of ontologi

cal depth add? Principally, it impels comprehending the pollution as not

NFSFMZBDBVTBMTFRVFODFPGFWFOUTJOXIJDIBOFWFOUPDDVSTBOEMFBET EJSFDUMZUPBOPUIFSFWFOU MJLFPOFCJMMJBSECBMMTUSJLJOHBOPUIFSCVUJO UFSNTPGMBZFSTPGSFBMJUZXJUIEJɱFSFOUDBVTBMNFDIBOJTNT'VSUIFSUIF

higher layers in the overall structure, such as the economic, are dependent

POMPXFSMFWFMTTVDIBTQIZTJDBMTUSVDUVSFCVUUIFZBMTPIBWFUIFJSPXO

properties which are emergent from the lower.

5IJTDPODFQUVBMGSBNFXPSLQSPWJEFTBCSPBEFSBOEEFFQFSBQQBSBUVT

(10)

(a) Economy and ecology as separate, interacting spheres

(b) Economy as lying within the ecological

(c) Economic emergent from ecological

Ecological Economic

Resources

Wastes

Economic

Ecological Sun

Waste heat

Economic

Ecological

Sources: B4FFGPSFYBNQMF$PNNPO Q'JH CBEBQUFEGSPN)BSSJT

[image:10.484.123.372.62.544.2]

Q'JH

(11)

FYQMBJOJOHBOBQQBSFOUMZFDPOPNJDFɱFDU4VDIBXJEFSWJFXJTDSVDJBMJO

dealing with highly complex ecological issues. That does not mean that an economist must understand every detail of every aspect at every layer of

SFBMJUZCVUOFJUIFSDBOBMMUIFTFMBZFSTCFJHOPSFE"OFDPOPNJTUJOGPSNFE CZ UIJT WJFX NVTU QBZ NPSF BUUFOUJPO UP UIF JOUFSBDUJPO CFUXFFO UIF

economy and ecology.

.FUIPEPMPHJDBMMZ UIJT IBT JNQPSUBOU JNQMJDBUJPOT .PTU PG UIF UJNF

economists ignore the underlying physical to focus on the economic, and

DMBJN UIBU UIJT JT B OFDFTTBSZ BCTUSBDUJPO )PXFWFS UBLJOH FDPMPHJDBM DPOTJEFSBUJPOTJOUPBDDPVOUUIJTBCTUSBDUJPOJTDMFBSMZOPUKVTUJɲFE&WFSZ QSPEVDUJPO EFDJTJPO IBT JSSFEVDJCMF FDPMPHJDBM EJNFOTJPOT BOE JNQMJDB UJPOT *U DPVME FWFO CF BSHVFE UIBU DMBTTJDBM FDPOPNJTUT SFDPHOJ[FE UIJT $ISJTUFOTFO"TBOBTJEFNFUIPEPMPHJDBMMZUIJTDPVMENFBOUIBU BOFDPOPNJDBOBMZTJTPGUIFFOWJSPONFOUJTOFDFTTBSJMZJOUFSEJTDJQMJOBSZ JUNVTUUBLFJOGPSNBUJPOGSPNPUIFSEJTDJQMJOFTUPJOGPSNJUTPXOKVEHF

ments. Further, the lessons from methodological developments such as

UIPTFGPVOEJO,VIO BOE#BCZMPOJBOJTNBTXFMMBTBSHVNFOUTGPS QMVSBMJTNTVHHFTUUIBUTUSBUFHJFTPGFDPOPNJDJNQFSJBMJTNBSFVOMJLFMZUP CFTVDDFTTGVM

However, analysis in terms of depth and causal mechanisms means that it is important to focus on mechanisms, and their potential activity

BOEFɱFDUT BOEUIFJSJOUFSBDUJPOXJUIPUIFSNFDIBOJTNT5IJTDIBOHFT UIF QPMJDZ GPDVT 5IF LFZ POUPMPHJDBM RVFTUJPOT BSF 8IJDI NFDIB OJTNTFYJTU )PXBSFNFDIBOJTNTUSJHHFSFE BOE $BOTUSVDUVSFTCF DSFBUFEXJUINFDIBOJTNTUIBUQSPEVDFCFUUFSPVUDPNFT

5IBUJTOPUUPTBZUIBUUIFGSBNFXPSLEFTDSJCFEIFSFJTXJUIPVUɳBXT

The concept of depth does not let us determine the mechanisms that are most important. Clearly, when applied to the environment, this is crucial.

4PNF NFDIBOJTNT NBZ CF DSVDJBM UP MJGF PS EFBUI BOE UIVT UIFSF JT B

hierarchy of mechanisms to consider. There is an analogy here with lexi DPHSBQIJDQSFGFSFODFTXIJDIJNQMZUIBUTVCTUJUVUBCJMJUZCFUXFFOHPPETJT OPU DPNQMFUF WBO EFO #FSHI FU BM (FMTP BOE 1FUFSTPO

Lexicographic preferences are a staple of Post Keynesian consumer theory (see Lavoie, 1992, passim

The ontology outlined may have other implications for economics gen FSBMMZBOEGPSBOFDPOPNJDTPGUIFFOWJSPONFOUTQFDJɲDBMMZ'PSFYBNQMF UIF DPODFQU PG FRVJMJCSJVN BQQFBST QSPCMFNBUJD &RVJMJCSJVN IBT CFFO BDPODFSOPG1PTU,FZOFTJBOTTJODFBUMFBTU,SFHFM BOE3PCJOTPO &RVJMJCSJVNFODPNQBTTFTNVMUJQMFWFSZEJɱFSFOUTFOTFTJODMVEJOH FYQFDUBUJPOTCFJOHNFUBCBMBODFPGGPSDFTBOFRVBMJUZPGUXPRVBOUJUJFT

and no tendency to change. While some meanings of the term (for example,

(12)

BDUUPDSFBUFTUBCJMJUZPUIFSTBSFXFBL*UNJHIUCFQPTTJCMFGPSJOEJWJEVBM FYQFDUBUJPOTUPCFNFUCVUPOMZCZMVDLCFDBVTFUIFDVSSFOUBDUJPOTPG BHFOUTNBLFUIFDPOTUSVDUJPOPGQSPCBCJMJUZEJTUSJCVUJPOTWFSZEJɴDVMU TFF CFMPX4JNJMBSMZHJWFOFNFSHFODFJUJTEJɴDVMUUPDPODFJWFPGFRVJMJCSJVN BTUIFFOEPGBOFDPOPNJDQSPDFTT2VFTUJPOJOHUIFDPODFQUPGFRVJMJCSJVN BMTPSBJTFTRVFTUJPOTBCPVUFDPOPNJDT*OUIFDPOUFYUPGUIFFOWJSPONFOU NBOZDPODFQUTBSFUISPXOJOUPEPVCU'PSFYBNQMFBMMOPUJPOTPGPQUJNJ [BUJPONVTUCFRVFTUJPOFE5IJTIBTBDPOTJEFSBCMFJNQBDUPOFOWJSPONFO

tal economics, and even on ecological economics (where optimum is a less

QPQVMBSDPODFQUCVUTUJMMVTFE

6/$&35"*/5:

5IFTFDPOEJNQMJDBUJPOPGSFDFOUNFUIPEPMPHJDBMXPSLGPSUIFTUVEZPGUIF

environment concerns uncertainty. It is clear that environmental analysis

BOE EFDJTJPONBLJOH BSF EPHHFE CZ VODFSUBJOUZ "MM FDPOPNJTUT XPVME BDDFQUUIBU)PXFWFS1PTU,FZOFTJBOTIBWFMPOHUBLFOBQBSUJDVMBSWJFX POVODFSUBJOUZŝUIBUJUJTOPOQSPCBCJMJTUJD5IJTQPJOUJTXFMMFTUBCMJTIFE JO1BVM%BWJETPOšTXPSL XIJDITUSFTTFTUIFOPOFSHPEJDOBUVSFPG

the world. Davidson claims that through crucial decisions (those that are

JSSFWFSTJCMFPSEJɴDVMUUPSFWFSTFGVUVSFQPTTJCJMJUJFTBSFDIBOHFEBOEUIVT QSPCBCJMJUZ EJTUSJCVUJPOT GPS GVUVSF FWFOUT BSF JNQPTTJCMF UP GPSNVMBUF

That has implications for economic modelling and for the economy. It

FYQMBJOTUIFFYJTUFODFPGNPOFZBTTPNFUIJOHQFPQMFTFFLUPIPMEBTBTUPSF PGXFBMUIEVSJOHVODFSUBJOUJNFT ,FZOFT$IBQUFSBOEJUNFBOT UIBUJOEJWJEVBMBHFOUTNBLFEFDJTJPOTCBTFEOPUPOSBUJPOBMDBMDVMBUJPO CVUPGUFOPOBXIJN%BWJETPOšTWJFXJTJUTFMGSPPUFEJO,FZOFTšTXPSLPO QSPCBCJMJUZ3FDFOUEFWFMPQNFOUTJO1PTU,FZOFTJBONFUIPEPMPHZIBWF

refocused attention on Keynes and provide ontological support for his views.

(13)

SBUJPOBMUPCFMJFWFHJWFOUIFFWJEFODFš -BXTPOQSBUIFSUIBO XJUIXIBUJTŠPVUUIFSFš"HFOUTBSFIFMEUPGPSNPOUIFCBTJTPGJOEVD UJPOBEFHSFFPGSBUJPOBMCFMJFGJOBIZQPUIFTJTXIJDIJUTFMGJTGPSNFECZ BOBMPHZ"MUIPVHI,FZOFT EJEOPUEFɲOFVODFSUBJOUZGPSIJNBOE

contraNBJOTUSFBNFDPOPNJDTVODFSUBJOUZJTOPUBQSPCBCJMJTUJDDPODFQU 1SPCBCJMJUZ IFMQT EFɲOF VODFSUBJOUZ TJODF UIFSF JT B DPSSFTQPOEFODF CFUXFFODFSUBJOUZBOELOPXMFEHFPGBQSPCBCJMJUZSFMBUJPOBOEUIFSFGPSF VODFSUBJOUZDBOCFEFɲOFEBTUIFBCTFODFPGTVDILOPXMFEHF

"HFOUTGPSNQSPCBCJMJUZFTUJNBUFTBCPVUPVUDPNFTCVUBMTPBXFJHIU TJNJMBSUPBEFHSFFPGDPOɲEFODF OPUUPCFDPOGVTFEXJUIUIFTUBUJTUJDBM DPODFQU PG DPOɲEFODF JOUFSWBM ŝ TFF 'SBOLMJO UIBU UIFZ IBWF JO UIPTFFTUJNBUFT*GBQSPCBCJMJUZDBSSJFTBMPXXFJHIUUIBUQSPCBCJMJUZJT MJLFMZUPCFVOTUBCMF,FZOFT QOPUFTUIBU

5IFTUBUFPGMPOHUFSNFYQFDUBUJPOVQPOXIJDIPVSEFDJTJPOTBSFCBTFEEPFT OPUTPMFMZEFQFOEUIFSFGPSFPOUIFNPTUQSPCBCMFGPSFDBTUXFDBONBLF*UBMTP

depends on the confidenceXJUIXIJDIXFNBLFUIJTGPSFDBTUŝPOIPXIJHIMZXF SBUFUIFMJLFMJIPPEPGPVSCFTUGPSFDBTUUVSOJOHPVURVJUFXSPOH

,FZOFTšTUIFPSZPGQSPCBCJMJUZBOEJUTTVCTFRVFOUJOUFSQSFUBUJPOBOE FYQBOTJPOQSPWJEFBUIFPSZPGBDUJPOŝBHFOUTDPOTJEFSMJLFMJIPPEQMVT DPOɲEFODF PS QSPCBCJMJUZ QMVT XFJHIU 8IFO XFJHIU JT MPX ,FZOFT BSHVFT JOWFTUPST XJMM CF ESJWFO CZ GBDUPST TVDI BT DPOWFOUJPO XIJNT ŠBOJNBMTQJSJUTšJNBHJOBUJPO $BSWBMIPQBOEFUIJDT 3VOEF "T%PX BSHVFT,FZOFTQMBDFTBOFNQIBTJTPOKVEHFNFOU JOEFDJTJPONBLJOHJOVODFSUBJOFOWJSPONFOUT4IFPɱFSTNPOFUBSZQPMJDZ UISPVHIDPNNJUUFFTPGEFDJTJPONBLFSTTVDIBTUIPTFJODFOUSBMCBOLTBT

an example.

5IFEJTUJODUJPOCFUXFFOQSPCBCJMJTUJDSJTLBOEOPOQSPCBCJMJTUJDVODFS UBJOUZ IBT JOɳVFODFE FDPMPHJDBM FDPOPNJTUT 4QBTI BOE $MBZUPO 4QBTI*UTVQQPSUTUIFWJFXUIBUFOWJSPONFOUBMGVUVSFTDBOOPUIBWF QSPCBCJMJUJFTBUUBDIFEUPUIFNCBTFEPOQBTUSFMBUJWFGSFRVFODJFTHJWFO UIBUJOPQFOTZTUFNTFDPMPHJDBMFOUJUJFTBSFFWPMWJOHJOOPOSBOEPNXBZT 'PSFYBNQMFUIFOPUJPOPGBGFFECBDLMPPQTVHHFTUTUIBUSJTJOHMFWFMTPG DBSCPOEJPYJEFMFBEUPJSSFWFSTJCMFDIBOHFTJOUIFFDPTZTUFN TVDIBTUIF PDFBOTQSPEVDJOHUIFJSPXOOFUDBSCPOEJPYJEF5IJTDIBOHFTUIFCBTJTPG

life. Under such circumstances, simply extrapolating from past instances

FWFOXJUITPNFTUPDIBTUJDBEKVTUNFOUJTɳBXFE4VDIBSHVNFOUTIBWF

parallels in complexity theory. In complex adaptive systems, agents adapt to new circumstances, often creating new rules and routines and mecha OJTNTUIBUHPWFSOGVUVSFCFIBWJPVSUIFSFCZDSFBUJOHFNFSHFOUQIFOPN

(14)

JOUIFQBTUJOUIFQBTUJUXPVMEIBWFCFFOEJɴDVMUUPQSFEJDUUIFGVUVSF*O UIFMBOHVBHFPGOPOFSHPEJDJUZQBTUGSFRVFODZEJTUSJCVUJPOTXPVMEIBWF EJɱFSFOUBWFSBHFTUIBODVSSFOUPSGVUVSFPOFT

'VSUIFSNPSFJUDPVMECFBSHVFEUIBUFWFOXJUIBMPHJDBMUIFPSZPGQSPC BCJMJUZUIFSFJTOPCBTJTGPSDPOTUSVDUJOHBQSPCBCJMJUZGPSTPNFFDPMPHJDBM PVUDPNF0SUPCFNPSFQSFDJTFPOFDPVMEOPUDPOTUSVDUBQSPCBCJMJUZEJT USJCVUJPOJOXIJDIPOFIBTNVDIDPOɲEFODFCFDBVTFUIFBWBJMBCMFFWJEFODF JTMJLFMZUPCFTNBMMSFMBUJWFUPPVSJHOPSBODFBCPVUUIFQSPCMFN&WFOUT GBSJOUIFGVUVSFBSFEJɴDVMUUPQSFEJDUBUUFNQUJOHUPNBLFGPSFDBTUTBCPVU UIFFDPOPNZZFBSTGSPNOPXJTGSVJUMFTT ,FZOFT'PSFYBNQMFJU XPVMETFFNJNQPTTJCMFUPDPOTUSVDUBQSPCBCJMJUZEJTUSJCVUJPOPGUIFFɱFDUT PGQFBLXPSMEPJMQSPEVDUJPO $BNQCFMMXIJDIJODMVEFFDPOPNJD SFPSHBOJ[BUJPOBOETPDJBMEJTMPDBUJPO#VUXIBUJTUIFQSPCBCJMJUZPGBOZ

one of these outcomes, or even of counteracting events or mechanisms,

TVDIBTUIFBCJMJUZPGJOEJWJEVBMTUPTVTUBJOUIFNTFMWFTXJUIPVUBDDFTTUP PJM 4VDIWBSJBCMFTBQQFBSCFZPOEFTUJNBUJPODFSUBJOMZQBTUEBUBQSPWJEF

little support for any estimate, however precise.

*OFDPOPNJDTVODFSUBJOUZBɱFDUTUIFPSZ5IF"SSPXBOE%FCSFV NPEFMPGHFOFSBMFRVJMJCSJVNSFRVJSFTUIFFYJTUFODFPGBDPNQMFUFTFUPG GVUVSFTNBSLFUT5IFTFXPVMETJNQMZOPUFYJTUJOUIFXPSMEQJDUVSFEIFSF 5IF QSPCMFNT BSF TQFDJɲDBMMZ BDVUF GPS FOWJSPONFOUBM QSPCMFNT 5IF DPOWFOUJPOBMBOBMZTJTPGQPMMVUJPOTVHHFTUTUIBUUIFSFNBZCFBOPQUJNBM BNPVOUPGQPMMVUJPO"UZQJDBMBOBMZTJTPGQPMMVUJPODBMDVMBUFTNBSHJOBM QSJWBUF BOE TPDJBM DPTUT BOE CFOFɲUT PG VOJUT PG QPMMVUJPO BOE QSPEVD UJPO5IFDPOUSBTUCFUXFFOTPDJBMBOEQSJWBUFJOWPMWFTUIFSFDPHOJUJPOPG FYUFSOBMJUJFT.PSFPWFSUIFDBMDVMBUJPOPGDPTUTBOECFOFɲUTSFRVJSFTGPS BDDVSBDZUIBUGVUVSFDPTUTBOECFOFɲUTBSFUBLFOJOUPBDDPVOU)PXFWFS UIPTFGVUVSFFɱFDUTBSFVOLOPXO5IFZXPVMEOFFEUPCFFTUJNBUFEQSPCB CJMJTUJDBMMZCVUUIFBSHVNFOUTBCPWFTVHHFTUUIBUUIFSFMFWBOUQSPCBCJMJUZ EJTUSJCVUJPOTNBZOPUFWFOFYJTU

5IFTFQSPCMFNTQMBHVFBMMDPTUŝCFOFɲUBOBMZTFTUIFNPTUQPQVMBSUPPM FNQMPZFECZFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPNJTUT5IFQFSWBTJWFOFTTPGVODFSUBJOUZ MFBETUPNFUIPEPMPHJDBMPCKFDUJPOTUPDPTUŝCFOFɲUBOBMZTJT )BSSJT QQ ŝ ,FBU (PXEZ )BOTTPO 4QBTI ŝ BHFOUTBSFOPUFRVJQQFEXJUIUIFJOGPSNBUJPOUPDBMDVMBUFGVUVSFCFOFɲUT

and weigh them against future costs. Such an approach assumes methods

(15)

EJTDPVOUXPVMECFTBGFBOESFBTPOBCMFGPSVTUPBTTVNFUIVTPVSBCJMJUZ UPQSFEJDUCFDPNFTSFMFWBOU'PSQPMJDZBOBMZTJTGSPNBSFBMJTUQFSTQFDUJWF POFXPVMEQSFGFSUIBUEJTDPVOUGBDUPSTIBETPNFPCKFDUJWFBODIPS*UNBZ CF QPTTJCMF UP FNQMPZ SBOEPN EJTDPVOU GBDUPST TJNVMBUJPOT TFOTJUJWJUZ BOBMZTJTBOEUIFMJLFUPUIFQSPCMFNCVUXJUIPVUNVDIDPOɲEFODFUIBUUIJT XJMMJNQSPWFUIFQSFEJDUJPOBOEWBMVBUJPOPGGVUVSFPVUDPNFT0GDPVSTF UIFTBNFBOBMZTJTBQQMJFTUPDPTUFɱFDUJWFOFTTBOBMZTJTXIJDIBWPJETUIF QSPCMFNTPGDPNQBSJOHDPTUTBOECFOFɲUTCVUTUJMMNVTUFOHBHFJODBMDVMB

tion of the future and its translation into present values.

6/$&35"*/5:"#065.&5)0%4

'PS%PXOPPOFNFUIPEDBOCFSFMJFEVQPOBQSJPSJ#BCZMPOJBOJTNJT PSHBOJDJOJUTQSBDUJDF*OWFTUJHBUJPOTFWPMWFPGUFOJOVOQSFEJDUBCMFXBZT BOE QFSIBQT IBMU UP TUBSU BHBJO GSPN B EJɱFSFOU QPJOU 4DJFODF JT USJBM

and error, not in the sense of moving incrementally to a perfect theory,

CVUJOUSZJOHPVUUIFPSJFTBOEUBLJOHFMFNFOUTGSPNPOFBOEQBSUTGSPN BOPUIFSUPUFMMBTUPSZ5IVT#BCZMPOJBOJTNIPMETUIBUUIFSFJTVOMJLFMZ UPCFBTJOHMFTFUPGBYJPNTPSBTJOHMFUIFPSZXIJDIDBOFYQMBJOBTFUPG QIFOPNFOB5IFPSJFTCFHJOOJOHGSPNEJɱFSFOUBTTVNQUJPOTBOEEJɱFSFOU QBSBEJHNTUIFSFGPSFNVTUCFSFTQFDUFEBOEFYQMPSFE 'FZONBO

#BCZMPOJBOJTN BMTP BEWPDBUFT UIFPSJFT XIPTF BTTVNQUJPOT GPSN BOE DPOUFOU CFBS TPNF SFMBUJPO UP SFBMJUZ *U IPMET UIBU BUPNJTUJD UIFPSJFT BSFMFTTMJLFMZUPCFTVDDFTTGVMUIBOPSHBOJDUIFPSJFT)PXFWFSBUPNJTUJD UIFPSJFTTIPVMEOPUCFUISPXOPVUCFDBVTFUIFZNJHIUUISPXTPNFMJHIU

on reality, particularly if there are parts of it which are more atomistic.

)PXFWFSTJNQMFUIFPSJFTUIBUBSFEFEVDFEGSPNTJNQMFBYJPNTBSFQSPC

lematic. 3FɳFDUJOH UIF DPODFSOT PG .BSTIBMM BOE ,FZOFT BCPVU MPOH

DIBJOT PG EFEVDUJPOT GSPN BYJPNT #BCZMPOJBOJTN SFHBSET TVDI MPHJDBM MFBQTUPCFTPNFXIBUGBODJGVM %PXQ5IJTJTQBSUMZCFDBVTF EVFUPVODFSUBJOUZBCPVUUIFXPSMEUIFSFJTOPTFUPGBYJPNTUIBUXFDBO CF SFBTPOBCMZDFSUBJOBCPVUBOEBMTPCFDBVTFEFEVDUJPOTBTTVNFUIBUOP

other interfering factors will change the conclusion.

5IFBOBMZTJTPGBOFDPTZTUFNJTBDBTFJOXIJDIUIFJEFOUJɲDBUJPOPGB TJOHMFTFUPGESJWJOHBYJPNTJTQSPCMFNBUJD"TJMMVTUSBUFEBCPWFQPMMVUJPO JTDPNQMFYBOETPXFOFFETFWFSBMEJɱFSFOUTUSBOETPGSFBTPOJOHBOEFWJ EFODFUPVOEFSTUBOEJUTDBVTFT0OUIFJTTVFPGDMJNBUFDIBOHFBMUIPVHI

models generally predict a dire future, there are a range of models and

(16)

ŠUIFšNPEFMPGDMJNBUFDIBOHF4VQQPSUGPSUIJTWJFXJTHJWFOJNQMJDJUMZCZ TUVEZJOHUIFCFIBWJPVSPGNBKPSEFDJTJPONBLFSTTVDIBTDFOUSBMCBOLT XIPNBZVTFPOFNBJOTUSVDUVSBMNPEFMBOETVQQPSUUIJTCZVTJOHBTFUPG BVYJMJBSZNPEFMT5IFQSPCMFNTBTTPDJBUFEXJUINPEFMMJOHBOEGPSFDBTU JOHUIPTFFDPOPNJDTZTUFNTJOUIFGBJSMZTIPSUUFSNBSFMJLFMZUPCFNVDI HSFBUFSJONPEFMTBUUFNQUJOHUPDBQUVSFDMJNBUFDIBOHFBOEJUTFɱFDUT GPS BOJMMVTUSBUJPOTFF4QBTI

5IFSF BSF HSPVOET GPS GVSUIFS QFTTJNJTN ,FZOFTšT NFUIPEPMPHJDBM PCKFDUJPOTUP5JOCFSHFOTVHHFTUUIBUNPEFSOFDPOPNFUSJDUFDIOJRVFTIBWF TFWFSFMJNJUBUJPOT CVUTFF#SBEZ'PS,FZOFTUIFBTTVNQUJPOTPG UIFVOJGPSNJUZPGOBUVSFBOEɲYFEDPFɴDJFOUTVOEFSNJOFUIFVTFGVMOFTT

of econometrics in an organic reality. Econometrics assumes an inde QFOEFODFPGPCTFSWBUJPOTBOEUIJTJOUVSOBTTVNFTBOBUPNJDSBUIFSUIBO PSHBOJDSFBMJUZ5IJTDSJUJRVFIBTCFFOFNCSBDFECZ%BWJETPOCZ$SJUJDBM 3FBMJTNBOECZ%PX"MMBSHVFBHBJOTUUSBEJUJPOBMNFUIPETPGFDPOPNJD BOBMZTJTESJWFOCZFDPOPNFUSJDTCFDBVTFUIFZSFMZPODMPTFETZTUFNT

Such arguments can appear rather sceptical and even nihilistic. What

DBOXFBTBHFOUTEP 'BDJOHVODFSUBJOUZBCPVUUIFXPSMEBOEBCPVUXIJDI NFUIPETUPVTFSFTFBSDIFSTBOEQPMJDZNBLFSTSFRVJSFBCBTJTGPSBDUJPO 0OFQPTTJCMFSPVUFJTUPBEPQUUIFŠQSFDBVUJPOBSZQSJODJQMFšBWJFXDPN

monly held in ecological economics. The precautionary principle holds

UIBUIVNBOJUZTIPVMEŠTUSJWFGPSNJOJNVNJOUFSGFSFODFXJUIUIFPQFSBUJPO PGOBUVSBMTZTUFNTFTQFDJBMMZXIFSFXFDBOOPUQSFEJDUMPOHUFSNFɱFDUTš )BSSJT Q "EWPDBUJOH UIF QSFDBVUJPOBSZ QSJODJQMF DBO CF

understood in the context of uncertainty, open systems and the limited

QSPTQFDUTPGEFWFMPQJOHLOPXMFEHFJOTVDIFOWJSPONFOUT)PXFWFSDSJUJDT

of the precautionary principle might argue that it is merely a way of avoid JOHPSTVTQFOEJOHKVEHFNFOUBOEBOBMZTJT5IJTJTOPUTUSJDUMZGBJSCFDBVTF QSFDBVUJPO KVEHFNFOU BOE BOBMZTJT BSF DPOOFDUFE JOEFFE QSFDBVUJPO

often follows the others.

"1PTU,FZOFTJBOBQQSPBDIXPVMECFUPBQQMZKVEHFNFOUEJSFDUMZBOE CBTFBDUJPOPOUIBU0OFXBZUIBUDPOɲEFODFJOBDPVSTFPGBDUJPONBZCF JODSFBTFE BOEUIFXFJHIUPGBSHVNFOUJODSFBTFEJTUPHBUIFSNPSFFWJ EFODF)PXFWFSUIJTDBOOPUCFBTJNQMFJOEVDUJWFFYFSDJTFPGHFOFSBMJ[JOH GSPNBOVNCFSPGDBTFTPSDPVOUJOHTJNJMBSJOTUBODFT3BUIFS,FZOFTTBX CFOFɲUJOOFHBUJWFBOBMPHZUIBUJTHBUIFSJOHFWJEFODFJOVOMJLFTJUVBUJPOT *GBɲOEJOHPDDVSSFEJOBSBOHFPGDPOUFYUTJUXBTNPSFMJLFMZUPCFUSVF "DDPSEJOHUP%PX Q,FZOFTFNQMPZFEBOPSEJOBSZPSIVNBO MPHJDJOXIJDIXFVTFŠKVEHFNFOUUPDPNCJOFEJSFDULOPXMFEHFJOEJSFDU UIFPSFUJDBM LOPXMFEHF DPOWFOUJPOBM LOPXMFEHF BOE BOJNBM TQJSJUT PS JOUVJUJPOš UP NBLF EFDJTJPOT /POF PG UIJT HVBSBOUFFT HSFBUFS BDDVSBDZ

(17)

1-63"-*4.

#BCZMPOJBOJTN BOE $SJUJDBM 3FBMJTN BSHVF UIBU NFUIPET TIPVME CF UBJ MPSFEUPUIFSFBMJUZUIFZBSFTUVEZJOHIPXFWFSHJWFOUIFDPNQMFYJUZPG UIFFOWJSPONFOUJUJTEJɴDVMUUPCFDPOɲEFOUUIBUUIFDPSSFDUNFUIPEIBT CFFO DIPTFO 'PS UIJT BOE PUIFS SFBTPOT UIFSF IBWF CFFO NBOZ SFDFOU DBMMT GPS QMVSBMJTN *OFWJUBCMZ UIFSF BSF NBOZ EFɲOJUJPOT PG QMVSBMJTN 4BMBOUJBOE4DSFQBOUJ1MVSBMJTNDBOCFEFɲOFEBTUIFBEWPDBDZPG QMVSBMJUZ5IJTDBOPQFSBUFPOWBSJPVTMFWFMT0OFDBOFOWJTBHFBQMVSBMJUZ

of realities, or a fragmented, complex reality in which there is a plurality of heterogeneous types of entity. Given that, and given the difficulties in

FTUBCMJTIJOHLOPXMFEHFJOUIPTFFOWJSPONFOUTPOFDBOBEWPDBUFBQMVSBM JUZPGNFUIPEPMPHJDBMBQQSPBDIFT JODMVEJOHTPNFUIBUNBLFQSFEJDUJPO UIFJSTUBOEBSEGPSUIFPSFUJDBMTVDDFTTBOEPUIFSTUIBUFTDIFXUIJTTUBOEBSE BOEPGNFUIPET4JHOJɲDBOUMZFDPMPHJDBMFDPOPNJTUTIBWFBMTPBSHVFEGPS QMVSBMJTN .BSUJOF["MMJFSFUBM

Given the difficulty of choosing the correct method, some authors have

BSHVFE UIBU TFWFSBM NFUIPET CF DPNCJOFE %PXOXBSE BOE .FBSNBO BSHVFGPSNJYFENFUIPETSFTFBSDI.JYFENFUIPETDPNCJOFJOB

single investigation, multiple data types, theoretical accounts, methods

BOENFUIPEPMPHJFT%PXOXBSEBOE.FBSNBO DPOUFOEUIBUFDP OPNJD BHFOUT TVDI BT UIF #BOL PG &OHMBOE VTF NJYFE NFUIPET BT B

response to the uncertainty they face. Using mixed methods has implica UJPOTGPSFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPNJDT"TXJUIBMMFDPOPNJDTFOWJSPONFOUBM FDPOPNJDTIBTBRVBOUJUBUJWFBOEGPSNBMCJBT.JYFENFUIPETTFFUIJTCJBT BTNJTQMBDFE3BUIFSDPOTJTUFOUXJUI,FZOFTšTDPODFQUPGXFJHIUEJɱFS FOUNFUIPETBOEEBUBJMMVNJOBUFEJɱFSFOUQBSUTPGSFBMJUZBOEBEEUPUIF

weight of the argument.

5IFSFJTBQBSBMMFMIFSFXJUINVMUJDSJUFSJBBOBMZTJTXIJDIJTTPNFUJNFT SFGFSSFEUPBTŠNVMUJDSJUFSJBFWBMVBUJPOšPSŠNVMUJBUUSJCVUFVUJMJUZBOBMZTJTš 4UJSMJOH.VMUJDSJUFSJBBOBMZTJTBUUFNQUTUPHBUIFSUPHFUIFSQJFDFT PGFWJEFODFGSPNEJɱFSFOUQFSTQFDUJWFTUPBJEEFDJTJPONBLJOHJODPNQMFY FOWJSPONFOUT "T JUT OBNF TVHHFTUT JU USJFT UP BWPJE UIF QSPCMFNT XJUI BUUFNQUJOH UP NBLF PQUJNJ[BUJPO EFDJTJPOT CBTFE PO B TJOHMF DSJUFSJPO )PXFWFSNVMUJDSJUFSJBBOBMZTJTIBTBRVBOUJUBUJWFCJBTTJODFJUBUUFNQUTUP HFOFSBUFBOBMHPSJUINUIBURVBOUJɲFTBMMUIFFWJEFODF .BSUJOF["MMJFSFUBM 4UJSMJOH4UJSMJOHBOE.BZFS"NJYFENFUIPETBQQSPBDI XPVMETFFUIJTɲOBMTUFQBTVOOFDFTTBSZ3BUIFSGPMMPXJOH,FZOFTFWJEFODF XPVMECFQSFTFOUFEJOJUTSBXRVBOUJUBUJWFBOERVBMJUBUJWFGPSNBOEEFDJ TJPONBLFSTXPVMEUIFOVTFUIFJSKVEHFNFOUJOESBXJOHDPODMVTJPOT9 How

(18)

FBDIJOWFTUJHBUJPOSFRVJSFTJUTPXODPOUFYUTQFDJɲDSFTQPOTF5IJTJTOPU FDMFDUJDJTNTPNFNFUIPETXJMMCFCFUUFSUIBOPUIFSTJOEJɱFSFOUDPOUFYUT BOE TPNF NFUIPET XJMM CF CFUUFS QFS TF NPEFMMJOH WFSTVT SFBEJOH UFB MFBWFT#VUUIJTBQQSPBDISFDPHOJ[FTUIBUDPNQMFYFOWJSPONFOUTSFRVJSF DPNQMFYJOWFTUJHBUJPO5IJTUBLFTVTCBDLUP,FZOFTšTIVNBOMPHJD

$0/$-64*0/

This chapter has discussed some recent developments in Post Keynesian methodology and their implications for an economic analysis of the

FOWJSPONFOU 4DFQUJDT BOE PUIFS DSJUJDT NJHIU BTL Š4P XIBU š .BOZ PG UIF BSHVNFOUT NBEF IFSF IBWF CFFO GPSFTIBEPXFE PGUFO XJUIJO 1PTU ,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJDT5IBUJTUSVFIPXFWFSUIFSFDFOUXPSLIBTDPEJ ɲFEUIFFBSMJFSXPSL'VSUIFSBDSJUJDNBZTBZUIBUUIFSFDPNNFOEBUJPOT BCPWFBSFMJHIUBOEXFBL"HBJOUIBUJTUSVFNFUIPEPMPHJDBMBSHVNFOUT BSFOFDFTTBSJMZWBHVF:FUWBHVFOFTTNBZCFBWJSUVFJOVODFSUBJOFOWJSPO NFOUT5PQBSBQISBTF,FZOFTJUJTCFUUFSUPCFWBHVFMZSJHIUUIBOQSFDJTFMZ XSPOH 'VSUIFSNPSF SFDFOU NFUIPEPMPHJDBM XPSL IBT IJHIMJHIUFE UIF QSPCMFNPGQSFTDSJQUJWFNFUIPEPMPHZ5IVTUIFEFWFMPQNFOUTJOB1PTU

Keynesian methodology should act only as suggestions for practice, not

SVMFT "OZ VTFGVM EFWFMPQNFOUT JO B 1PTU ,FZOFTJBO FDPOPNJDT PG UIF FOWJSPONFOUXJMMFNFSHFGSPNUIFPSFUJDBMBOEFNQJSJDBMXPSLBMCFJUXJUI UIFBTTJTUBODFPGNFUIPEPMPHZ.VDIPGUIFUIFPSFUJDBMBQQBSBUVTBMSFBEZ FYJTUTUIFOFXNFUIPEPMPHZXJMMBTTJTUGVUVSFXPSL

5IJTDIBQUFSBMTPIBTJEFOUJɲFETPNFLFZGFBUVSFTPGB1PTU,FZOFTJBO

economics of the environment, which is rooted in the methodology of the

BQQSPBDI " 1PTU ,FZOFTJBO FOWJSPONFOUBM FDPOPNJDT XPVME FNCSBDF SFBMJTNPOUPMPHJDBMSFɳFDUJPOBOPOUPMPHZPGEFQUIMBZFSTBOEFNFSHFODF BOPOUPMPHZPGVODFSUBJOPQFOOFTTIJTUPSZBOEDIBOHFBTDFQUJDJTNBCPVU

current methods, including long chains of deduction, mathematical model MJOHFDPOPNFUSJDTBOEDPODFQUTTVDIBTFRVJMJCSJVNBOEPQUJNJ[BUJPOBOE BSFDPHOJUJPOUIBUPSEJOBSZMPHJDBMUIPVHIUNJHIUSFRVJSFXFJHIJOHEJɱFS

ent types of evidence drawn from a variety of locations and methods.

'JOBMMZUIFSFBSFNBOZPWFSMBQTCFUXFFOUIF1PTU,FZOFTJBOBQQSPBDI

to economics, especially its methodological positions and recommenda

tions, and ecological economics. This commonality is much more than

(19)

have already drawn on Post Keynesian influences, for instance on natural

DBQJUBMBOEPOVODFSUBJOUZDPOWFSTFMZ1PTU,FZOFTJBOTDBOMFBSONVDI

from the practical and theoretical developments in ecological economics,

GPSJOTUBODFPONVMUJDSJUFSJBBOBMZTJT

/05&4

%PX QSFGFSTUIFUFSNŠTUSVDUVSFEQMVSBMJTNšUP#BCZMPOJBOJTN5IFGPSNFSDPOWFZT UIFQMVSBMJTNTIFBEWPDBUFTCVUFTDIFXTFDMFDUJDJTN%PXGFFMTUIBU#BCZMPOJBOJTNIBT CFDPNFBTTPDJBUFEXJUIFDMFDUJDJTN EFTQJUFIFSNBOZTUBUFNFOUTUPUIFDPOUSBSZ4JODF #BCZMPOJBOJTNJTCFUUFSLOPXOJUTIBMMCFSFUBJOFEIFSF

5IJTEJTUJODUJPOJTSBUIFSCMVOUCVUDPNNPO )BSSJT*UJTCFZPOEUIFTDPQFPGUIF

chapter to explore either environmental or ecological economics in detail, or the distinc UJPOCFUXFFOUIFN(FOFSBMMZFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPNJDTUFOETUPCFOFPDMBTTJDBMXIJMF

ecological economics does not.

.BOZSFBMJTUTBSHVFGPSBNPSBMSFBMJTNUIBUJTBNPSBMJUZFYJTUJOHJOEFQFOEFOUPGVTJO UIFTBNFXBZUIBUPCKFDUTNJHIU .FBSNBO

4QBTIBOE$MBZUPO OPUFUIBUUIFSFBSFNBOZEFɲOJUJPOTPGOBUVSBMDBQJUBMBOEUIBU OPOFPGUIFBWBJMBCMFEFɲOJUJPOTJTQBSUJDVMBSMZFɱFDUJWF

.BSUJOF["MMJFSFUBM. BSHVFUIBUUIFSFJTPOMZXFBLDPNQBSBCJMJUZCFUXFFOPCKFDUT DPOTJEFSFE JO FDPMPHJDBM BOBMZTJT 5IJT DBTF BQQMJFT BMTP UP OBUVSBM BOE OPOOBUVSBM DBQJUBM)PMMBOE BSHVFTUIBUUIFEJTUJODUJPOCFUXFFOOBUVSBMBOENBONBEFDBQJ UBMTJTDPNQMJDBUFEFWFOVOTVTUBJOBCMF'PSFYBNQMFDVMUJWBUFEOBUVSFJTQBSUMZOBUVSBM QBSUMZNBONBEF)PMMBOEBSHVFTGVSUIFSUIBUUIFEJTUJODUJPOCFUXFFOXFBLBOETUSPOH TVTUBJOBCJMJUZJTɳBXFE

*UDPVMECFTBJEUIBUTVDITDFOBSJPTBSFDIBSBDUFSJ[FECZJHOPSBODFUIBUJTOPULOPXJOH UIFQPTTJCMFPVUDPNFTPGQSPDFTTFT6OEFSVODFSUBJOUZUIFQPTTJCMFPVUDPNFTDPVMECF LOPXOFWFOJGOPQSPCBCJMJUZDPVMECFBUUBDIFEUPUIFN4FF4UJSMJOH BOE'BCFS FUBM $IBQUFSGPSGVSUIFSEJTDVTTJPO

5IFSFBSFMJNJUTUPUIJTBSHVNFOU4PNFFɱFDUTNBZCFFBTZUPJEFOUJGZBOEQSFEJDU TVDI BTQPVSJOHFYDFTTDIFNJDBMTJOUPBSJWFSIPXFWFS#BCZMPOJBOJTNVSHFTDBVUJPOBCPVU NBLJOHTUSPOHDBVTBMDMBJNT

*UTIPVMECFOPUFEUIBUUIFEFDJTJPOUPSFKFDUBYJPNBUJDUIPVHIUIBTCFFODPOUSPWFSTJBM BNPOH1PTU,FZOFTJBOT%BWJETPO ŝIBTBSHVFEUIBU1PTU,FZOFTJBOTNVTUBEPQU BOBYJPNBUJDGSBNFXPSLUPDPNQFUFXJUINBJOTUSFBNBQQSPBDIFT)PXFWFS%PX BSHVFTBHBJOTUUIJTBOETVHHFTUTUIBU%BWJETPOšTVTFPGUIFXPSEŠBYJPNšTIPVMEOPUCF UBLFOJOUIFTBNFXBZBTJTJUVTFEJONBJOTUSFBNBQQSPBDIFT4QFDJɲDBMMZ1PTU,FZOFTJBO BYJPNTTIPVMECFFNQJSJDBMMZHSPVOEFEBOEOPUMFBEUPMPOHDIBJOTPGMPHJDSFBTPOJOH " TJNJMBS QSPDFEVSF PDDVST VOEFS NVMUJDSJUFSJB NBQQJOH 4UJSMJOH 4UJSMJOH BOE

.BZFS.VMUJDSJUFSJBNBQQJOHJTTFFOBTFTDIFXJOHBOZBOBMZUJDBMɲYTVDIBT UIPTFBMMFHFEMZBUUFNQUFECZDPTUŝCFOFɲUBOBMZTJT5IJTDMBJNEFTFSWFTGVSUIFSJOWFTUJHB UJPOTJODFNVMUJDSJUFSJBNBQQJOHSFUBJOTDPODFQUTTVDIBTVUJMJUZNBYJNJ[BUJPO BDSPTT DSJUFSJB 4UJSMJOHQBOEŠMJOFBSBEEJUJWFXFJHIUJOHš 4UJSMJOHBOE.BZFS QXIJDISFUBJOBRVBOUJUBUJWFCJBT

3&'&3&/$&4

(20)

#BUFNBO# Š,FZOFTšTDIBOHJOHDPODFQUJPOPGQSPCBCJMJUZšEconomics and Philosophy, 3ŝ

#IBTLBS3 A Realist Theory of Science#SJHIUPO)BSWFTUFS

#IBTLBS3 The Possibility of Naturalism)FNFM)FNQTUFBE)BSWFTUFS #SBEZ . Š+. ,FZOFTš QPTJUJPO PO UIF HFOFSBM BQQMJDBCJMJUZ PG NBUI

FNBUJDBM MPHJDBM BOE TUBUJTUJDBM NFUIPET JO FDPOPNJDT BOE TPDJBM TDJFODFš

Synthese, 76 ŝ

$BNQCFMM$ Š8IFOXJMMUIFXPSMEšTPJMBOEHBTQSPEVDUJPOQFBL šJO3 %PVUIXBJUF FEBefore the Wells Run Dry: Ireland’s Transition to Renewable Energy%VCMJO'FBTUB#PPLTQQŝ

$BSWBMIP' Š,FZOFTPOQSPCBCJMJUZVODFSUBJOUZBOEEFDJTJPONBLJOHš

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 11 ŝ

$ISJTUFOTFO1 Š3FDPWFSJOHBOEFYUFOEJOHDMBTTJDBMBOE.BSTIBMMJBOGPVO EBUJPOTGPSB1PTU,FZOFTJBOFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPNJDTšInternational Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 1 ŝ

$PNNPO . Environmental and Natural Resource Economic: An Introduction-POEPO-POHNBO

%BWJETPO1 Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory"MEFSTIPU6,BOE #SPPLɲFME6564"&EXBSE&MHBS

%BWJETPO1 ŝŠ4FUUJOHUIFSFDPSETUSBJHIUPOBIJTUPSZPG1PTU,FZOFTJBO FDPOPNJDTšJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26 ŝ

%PX4$ Š6ODFSUBJOUZBOENPOFUBSZQPMJDZšOxford Economic Papers,

56 ŝ

%PX 4$ Š"YJPNT BOE #BCZMPOJBO UIPVHIU B SFQMZšJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27 ŝ

%PXOXBSE1 FE Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique,

-POEPO3PVUMFEHF

%PXOXBSE 1 BOE " .FBSNBO Š3FUSPEVDUJPO BT NJYFENFUIPET USJ BOHVMBUJPO SFPSJFOUJOH FDPOPNJDT JOUP TPDJBM TDJFODFšCambridge Journal of Economics, 31 ŝ

%PXOXBSE1BOE".FBSNBO Š%FDJTJPONBLJOHBUUIF#BOLPG&OHMBOE BDSJUJDBMBQQSBJTBMšOxford Economic Papers, 60 ŝ

'BCFS.3.BOTUFUUFOBOE+1SPPQT Ecological Economics: Concepts and Methods$IFMUFOIBN6,BOE#SPPLɲFME7564"&EXBSE&MHBS 'FZONBO3 The Character of Physical Law$BNCSJEHF.".*51SFTT 'SBOLMJO+ Š3FTVSSFDUJOHMPHJDBMQSPCBCJMJUZšErkenntnis, 55 ŝ (FMTP # BOE + 1FUFSTPO Š5IF JOɳVFODF PG FUIJDBM BUUJUVEFT PO UIF

EFNBOEGPSFOWJSPONFOUBMSFDSFBUJPOJODPSQPSBUJOHMFYJDPHSBQIJDQSFGFSFODFTš

Ecological Economics, 53 ŝ

(PXEZ+ Š5PXBSEBOFYQFSJNFOUBMGPVOEBUJPOGPSCFOFɲUŝDPTUBOBMZTJTš

Ecological Economics, 63ŝ

)BOTTPO4 Š1IJMPTPQIJDBMQSPCMFNTJODPTUŝCFOFɲUBOBMZTJTšEconomics and Philosophy, 23ŝ

)BSDPVSU ( Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital,

$BNCSJEHF$BNCSJEHF6OJWFSTJUZ1SFTT

)BSSJT+ Environmental and Natural Resource Economics; A Contemporary Approach/FX:PSL)PVHIUPO.JɵJO

)PMMBOE " Š4VCTUJUVUBCJMJUZ PS XIZ TUSPOH TVTUBJOBCJMJUZ JT XFBL BOE BCTVSEMZTUSPOHTVTUBJOBCJMJUZJTOPUBCTVSEšJO+'PTUFS FEValuing Nature,

(21)

)PMU31' Š1PTU,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJDTBOETVTUBJOBCMFEFWFMPQNFOUš

International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment,1 ŝ )PMU 31' Š8IBU JT 1PTU ,FZOFTJBO &DPOPNJDT š JO . 'PSTUBUFS (

.POHJPWJ BOE 4 1SFTTNBO FETPost Keynesian Macroeconomics: Essays in Honour of Ingrid Rima-POEPO3PVUMFEHFQQŝ

,FBU3 Š7BMVFTBOEQSFGFSFODFTJOOFPDMBTTJDBMFOWJSPONFOUBMFDPOPN JDTšJO+'PTUFS FEValuing Nature-POEPO3PVUMFEHFQQŝ

,FZOFT+. A Treatise on Probability-POEPO.BDNJMMBO

,FZOFT +. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,

-POEPO.BDNJMMBO

,FZOFT +. ŠThe General Theory GVOEBNFOUBM DPODFQUT BOE JEFBTš

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51ŝ

,FZOFT+. BŠ/FXUPOUIFNBOšThe Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes7PM-POEPO.BDNJMMBO

,FZOFT +. C Š'1 3BNTFZšTheCollected Writings of John Maynard Keynes7PM-POEPO.BDNJMMBO

,SFHFM+ Š&DPOPNJDNFUIPEPMPHZJOUIFGBDFPGVODFSUBJOUZUIFNPEFMMJOH NFUIPETPG,FZOFTBOEUIF1PTU,FZOFTJBOTšEconomic Journal, 86, 209–25.

,VIO5 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions$IJDBHP*-6OJWFSTJUZ

of Chicago Press.

-BWPJF . Foundations of Post Keynesian Economic Analysis: New Directions in Modern Economics "MEFSTIPU 6, BOE #SPPLɲFME 75 64"

Edward Elgar.

-BXTPO5 Š,FZOFTQSFEJDUJPOBOEFDPOPNFUSJDTšJO5-BXTPOBOE.) 1FTBSBO FETKeynes’ Economics: Methodological Issues4ZEOFZ$SPPN)FMN QQŝ

-BXTPO5 Economics and Reality-POEPO3PVUMFEHF -BXTPO5 Reorienting Economics-POEPO3PVUMFEHF

.BSUJOF["MMJFS + ( .VOEB BOE + 0š/FJMM Š8FBL DPNQBSBCJMJUZ PG WBMVFT BT B GPVOEBUJPO GPS FDPMPHJDBM FDPOPNJDTšEcological Economics, 26,

ŝ

.FBSNBO" BŠ1PTU,FZOFTJBOFDPOPNJDTBOEUIFFOWJSPONFOUJOUSPEVD UJPOUPUIFNJOJTZNQPTJVNšInternational Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 1 ŝ

.FBSNBO " C Š8IZ IBWF 1PTU ,FZOFTJBOT IBE SFMBUJWFMZ MJUUMF UP TBZ PO FDPOPNJDT PG UIF FOWJSPONFOU šInternational Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 1 ŝ

.FBSNBO" Š3FBMJTNšJO+1FJMBOE*WBO4UBWFSFO FETThe Handbook of Economics and Ethics $IFMUFOIBN 6, BOE /PSUIBNQUPO ." 64"

Edward Elgar.

/PSHBBSE3 Š$PFWPMVUJPOBSZEFWFMPQNFOUQPUFOUJBMšLand Economics,

60 ŝ

/PSHBBSE3 Š4VTUBJOBCMFEFWFMPQNFOUBDPFWPMVUJPOBSZWJFXšFutures,

20 ŝ

3PCJOTPO+ Š)JTUPSZWFSTVTFRVJMJCSJVNšIndian Economic Journal, 21

ŝ

3VOEF+ Š,FZOFTJBOVODFSUBJOUZBOEUIFXFJHIUPGBSHVNFOUTšEconomics and Philosophy, 6ŝ

4BMBOUJ"BOE&4DSFQBOUJ FET Pluralism in Economics, Cheltenham, UK

(22)

4QBTI$ Š5IFFDPOPNJDTPGDMJNBUFDIBOHFJNQBDUTBMB4UFSOOPWFMBOE OVBODFEPSSIFUPSJDBMMZSFTUSJDUFE šEcological Economics, 63ŝ

4QBTI$BOE"$MBZUPO Š5IFNBJOUFOBODFPGOBUVSBMDBQJUBMNPUJWBUJPOT BOENFUIPETšJO"-JHIUBOE+4NJUI FETSpace, Place and Environmental Ethics-POEPO3PXNBO-JUUMFɲFMEQQŝ

4UJSMJOH" Š.VMUJDSJUFSJBNBQQJOHNJUJHBUJOHUIFQSPCMFNTPGFOWJSPO NFOUBMWBMVBUJPO šJO+'PTUFS FEValuing Nature-POEPO3PVUMFEHFQQ ŝ

4UJSMJOH " BOE 4 .BZFS Š" OPWFM BQQSPBDI UP UIF BQQSBJTBM PG UFDI OPMPHJDBM SJTL B NVMUJDSJUFSJB NBQQJOH TUVEZ PG B HFOFUJDBMMZ NPEJɲFE DSPQš

Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 529–55.

WBO EFO #FSHI + " 'FSSFSJ$BSCPOFMM BOE ( .VOEB Š"MUFSOBUJWF NPEFMT PG JOEJWJEVBM CFIBWJPVS BOE JNQMJDBUJPOT GPS FOWJSPONFOUBM QPMJDZš

Ecological Economics, 32 ŝ

Figure

Figure 2.1  An open-system ontology
Figure 2.2  The economic and the ecological: contrasting conceptions

References

Related documents