• No results found

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 19, 2003

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 19, 2003"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

References

Related documents

Plaintiff appeals, claiming the time limit for Plaintiff to seek recovery from Capitol Homes for breach of an express warranty was not limited by the language which states “With

On the other hand, the appellees – the injured party and the Lees – argue that the insurance policy is ambiguous and should be construed against the insurance company. Additionally,

1.. supported, in part, by Dr. Chavin’s affidavit in which he stated that he is familiar with the standard of care for anesthesiologists practicing the speciality of pain

As a condition of his probation, the Defendant was assigned to the intensive outpatient program for drug addiction treatment at the Council for Alcohol & Drug

Melton has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his probation and reinstating his original sentence of incarceration. At the outset,

The evidence at trial also served as the evidence for the motion to suppress. At the close of proof, but before finding the appellant guilty of the offenses, the trial court noted that

[counsel] was admittedly ineffective when he informed Petitioner that he could apply to be removed from the registry after ten years. This was testified to during the hearing

In conducting a de novo review of a sentence, this court must consider (a) any evidence received at the trial and/or sentencing hearing, (b) the presentence report, (c) the