• No results found

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

References

Related documents

Pursuant to Rule 218(a), Pa.R.D.E., an attorney who is suspended for a period exceeding one year may not resume the practice of law until reinstated by the Supreme Court

AND NOW, this 5‘11 day of June, 2012, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated February 10, 2012, the Joint Petition

Administered by a designated panel of three Members of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on June 11,

By letter dated July 17, 1992, Office of Disciplinary Counsel advised Petitioner of a complaint made against her by a former client, Edward Johnson.. No response was filed

By written order dated April 3, 1998, the court ordered that Respondent file an accounting of all the funds received by him and/or Laura Hutterer (his fiancé) and placed in

Charge I, the Gulick matter, involves allegations that Respondent, who was then the Susquehanna County District Attorney, violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7(a) and (b),

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommends that the Respondent, [ ], be suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a

Respondent knew that the $500 Messmer check represented funds of the Goodall Firm and that the check should be timely given to the bookkeeper.. Respondent did not notify the firm