Aerodynamic Simulation
using
STAR-CCM+
Viscous CFD Code Validation
19 March 2013
CD-adapco STAR-CCM+
Code Validation Efforts
Kenneth E. Xiques
CRM Solutions
4092 Memorial Pkwy SW, Suite 200 Huntsville, AL 35803
Objectives
•Validate/Verify and Apply Cart3D, Loci/CHEM and STAR-CCM+ CFD codes
– Loci/CHEM is a research code developed by Mississippi State
– STAR-CCM+ is a Commercial code developed by CD-adapco
– Cart3D is a Cartesian Euler code developed by Nasa Ames
•Test geometry repair and grid generation capabilities
•Test range and power of Physics models
– Viscous modeling, Turbulence Models, Non-Newtonian Fluids
– Moving bodies (6 dof)
– Propulsion, Chemically Reacting Flows, Real Gas
•Determine level of required expertise for productivity
– Ease of use and practicality
•Test efficiency and accuracy in prediction of aerodynamics for complex geometries
Primary Questions
•Is prediction of aerodynamics over complex missile geometries using RANS CFD codes possible and practical in a production environment?
•What are the computational resource and manpower requirements to perform such analyses?
•Can Viscous CFD be performed efficiently and accurately within current resource constraints without relying on CFD specialists?
•Can STAR-CCM+ attack a broader range of problems than available with current in-house software?
•Would such analyses enhance the range and accuracy of CFD data produced at CRM for current customers?
Analysis Criteria
•Perform analysis in most general form without refinement based on CFD experience
– How much expertise does it require
•Determine the relative robustness and accuracy that can be achieved with relatively simple, ‘canned’ approaches
– Establish standard practices and procedures for problem types
•Limit time, computer resources and expertise required to go from CAD to database delivery of analysis within the required accuracy constraints.
CRM Linux Cluster
600 Intel Cores, 7TB Disk Space, Redhat RHEL O/S
• 130 Dell 1955 Blades
• 2 Intel dual core Xeon processors
• 4 cores per blade
• 16 GB memory per blade
• 10 Dell M600 blades
• 2 Intel quad core Xeon processors
• 8 cores per blade
• 16 GB memory per blade
• 7 TB disk space in Raid 5-0
• 2 x Dell PowerVault MD1000
• Diskless configuration
• 3 x Dell 1950 file servers
Metis Computational Grid
METIS Grid Mid-Body
METIS(d0) Mach Contours
Gear Mach Contours with Mesh
Gear Mach Contours
Gear Mach Contours with Mesh (body)
SCUD B Mach Contours M=3
SCUD B Mach Contours M=3
SCUD B Gauge Press (clipped)
Finner CFD Drag Data
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dr ag C oe ffici en t Mach Star_Total Star_BSE Star_Shear LC_TotalFM3 Surface Grid
FM3 Surface Grid
FM3 Surface Grid
FM3 Surface Grid
FM3 Surface Grid
FM3(d0) Mach Contours with Mesh
FM3(d0) Temp Contours
FM3(d15) Mach 1.6 Contours
FM3(d0) CFD Drag Data
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Dr ag Coe ffic ien t Mach POLYS TETS LC SHEAR P SHEAR TFM3(d15) CFD Drag Data
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Dr ag Coe ffic ien t Mach POLYS TETS LC SHEAR P SHEAR TConclusions
•STAR-CCM+ code is superior for CAD geometry repair, surface remeshing and initiating analysis (all codes tested were robust and accurate)
– The more difficult the geometry the greater the time advantage
– Can be mastered quickly by non-expert
– Grids can be used to feed other codes
•Requires sizable computational resources for most problems of interest
•Seamless switch to different Physics models and BC’s
•Roe’s scheme is unstable for Mach > 3 flows but very accurate for Mach < 3
•AUSM+ scheme is very stable, robust and accurate
•Needs automated solution adaptation capability
•Superior solution monitoring and data reduction capabilities
Future STAR-CCM+ Work
•Continue drag study
– Complete Missile run matrices using STAR-CCM+
– Use Solution Adaptation
– Compare with available data
•Perform Moving body analyses for V/V work (Finner and Manpad)
– Compare with Available data
•Perform Heat Transfer Analyses (Blunt Body and Base Heating)
– Compare to Holden Data
• Perform Jet Interaction Problem (Binary Gas)
• Perform Jet Interaction Problem (Reacting Gas)
• Perform Store Separation Analysis (6-DOF)
•Acoustics
– Bombay Cavity (Acoustics, Store Separation, Fluid Structure)
– Landing Gear (fixed and Moving Body)