• No results found

ClearDebt Group Limited

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ClearDebt Group Limited"

Copied!
54
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ClearDebt Group Limited

REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the year ended 30 June 2015

(2)

CONTENTS

Page

Financial highlights 1

Directors and advisers 2

Chairman’s statement 3

Chief Executive’s statement 4-6

Directors’ report 7-10

Strategic review 11-12

Corporate governance 13-14

Directors’ remuneration report 15-16

Accounts

Independent Auditor’s report to the members of ClearDebt Group Limited 17-18 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 19 Consolidated statement of financial position 20 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 21

Consolidated statement of cash flows 22

Notes to the consolidated financial statements 23-44

Company balance sheet 45

Notes to the company financial statements 46-51

(3)

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

1

2015 2014

£ £

Revenue 7,837,962 8,674,436

Gross profit 2,807,803 3,029,715

Loss before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (360,570) (255,067)

Loss from operations (820,100) (901,322)

Loss before taxation (841,559) (1,195,763)

Loss after taxation (852,591) (1,661,399)

Cash generated by operations 1,307,219 78,626

Since 1 July 2014 (2014: 1 July 2013), the following numbers of new Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVA’s) have been arranged through ClearDebt: -

Year ended Year ended

30 June 2015 30 June 2014 First quarter 477 669 Second quarter 393 608 Third quarter 231 620 Fourth quarter 296 733 _____ _____ 1,397 2,630 _____ _____ As at 30 June 2015 the total number of active IVA’s and Protected Trust Deeds (“PTD’s”) was 9,516 (2014: 10,028). No new IVA or PTD cases were acquired during the year.

As at 30 June 2015 the total number of Debt Management Plans (“DMP’s”) under management was 627 (2014: 205).

(4)

DIRECTORS AND ADVISERS

2 DIRECTORS

G Carey FCIB

D E M Mond FCA FCCA D M Shalom ACA A F Smith A J Leon FCA S Lee

SECRETARY

D E M Mond FCA FCCA

REGISTERED OFFICE Nelson House Park Road Timperley Altrincham Cheshire WA14 5BZ AUDITORS

UHY Hacker Young Manchester LLP Chartered Accountants St James Buildings 79 Oxford Street Manchester M1 6HT REGISTRARS Britdaq Limited Richmond House Eastbourne Road Blindley Heath Lingfield Surrey RH7 6JX BANKERS

The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC P O Box 5429

Macclesfield & Stockport CRT 3rd Floor 38 Mosley Street

Manchester

M61 OHW SOLICITORS DAC Beachcroft LLP 3 Hardman Street Manchester M3 3HF DWF LLP 1 Scott Place 2 Hardman Street Manchester M3 3AA

(5)

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

3

I present the Group’s financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2015.

Group revenue was £7,837,962 (2014: £8,674,436) and gross profit was £2,807,803 (2014: £3,029,715). Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation resulted in a loss of £360,570 (2014: £255,067) after taking into account a further exceptional profit of £76,321 (2014: £2,280,455) relating to further monies due on disposal of the majority of the Group’s debt management book in 2014 and a further goodwill impairment of £938,927 (2014: £3,463,353). After accounting for the above the Group made a loss after taxation of £852,591 (2014: £1,661,399) after reduced net finance charges of £21,459 (2014: £294,441) and depreciation and amortisation charges of

£459,530 (2014: £646,255).

At the year end the Group’s net assets decreased to £3,233,861 (2014: £4,079,286). Cash flow remained positive and cash balances increased to £969,791 (2014: £338,970) after the repayment of some £100,000 of loans leaving the Group with a remaining debt of only £103,165 (2014: £203,750)

During the year our advice and debt management subsidiary Abacus (Financial Consultants) Limited (“Abacus”) applied for authorisation by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and is currently going through the approval process but continues to operate under its interim permission with the FCA. Prices for DMP back books have fallen substantially with the uncertainty of the FCA process and many industry buyers have now paused acquisition of these books at any price until the FCA landscape becomes clearer.

Our Individual Voluntary Arrangement (“IVA”) subsidiary ClearDebt Limited has given up its FCA Interim Permission as at 31 December 2014 and has not applied for a full FCA licence as it only deals with insolvency cases. It has therefore taken advantage of the exclusion from the requirement for an FCA licence where the Insolvency Practitioner is acting in reasonable contemplation of an Insolvency appointment.

In terms of numbers of new IVAs passed, the Group passed 1,397 new IVAs compared to 2,630 in 2014. The numbers of IVAs in the marketplace peaked at the end of the June 2014 quarter and have been falling quarter on quarter since. We believe this has occurred both as a result of the economic recovery, as well as the introduction of the FCA regime in April 2014 which has led to large reductions in the number of referral organisations – who have been unwilling or unable to comply with the new FCA requirements on debt advice.

We have had another successful year in recovering compensation for IVA clients who have often been mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance (PPI). This continues to generate good additional supervisory income as mis-sold PPI claims monies are paid into the IVA estate of our customers for the benefit of creditors. The majority of these claims have however now been realised and we expect this income stream to drop off in the coming financial year.

We continue to reduce our overheads wherever possible to enable us to continue to trade profitably going forward without the benefit of the related supervisory income from PPI mis-sales. We anticipate a tough year ahead with the increased costs of FCA regulation and the reduced IVA numbers in the marketplace although any anticipated rises in UK interest rates may provide a boost to demand for our services.

We also intend to further tidy up our balance sheet by the cancellation of the deferred share capital and to facilitate this we sought and received on 27 October 2015 shareholders’ approval to change our plc status back to that of a private limited company. Hence, we are proposing at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting in December to cancel the deferred share capital. The private limited company status will not affect the ability for shareholders to trade our shares on the matched bargain facility provided by Britdaq.

Gerald Carey FCIB Chairman

(6)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STATEMENT

4

The Group has recorded a loss of £841,559 before taxation in the year.

Our debt management and advice subsidiary Abacus (Financial Consultants) Limited (“Abacus”) applied for its full FCA authorisation on 19 December 2014 and is going through the approval process presently. We expect to be granted full authorisation by the end of this calendar year and in the meantime Abacus continues to operate under its interim permission.

The decision to sell the bulk of the debt management book and our timing in the latter part of the last financial year appears to have been astute with prices falling substantially since then as the implications of the FCA regime have been now fully understood by the market. Indeed, many buyers have paused or withdrawn from the industry whilst they re-assess the value of such books given the substantial extra work the FCA require any purchasers to do in reviewing the quality of the advice given to customers by the vendor. Invariably the books that are available have become available due to vendor compliance issues with the FCA meaning substantial work needs to be undertaken in both due diligence and in ensuring post acquisition in a short timescale that all plans acquired are still appropriate for the customer’s current needs.

Abacus did however complete a purchase of a small back book of approximately 100 DMP’s in May 2015 for some £39,000.

Substantial management time continues to be taken up with the FCA approval process for Abacus as the continual requests for further information by the FCA is dealt with.

We have made substantial improvements to our systems and processes over the year and whilst time consuming, it has enabled us to generate substantial management information to understand our business and customer needs more clearly.

Following a review of the IVA business it was determined that it did not require FCA authorisation as it could rely on the statutory Insolvency exclusion granted to licensed insolvency practitioners as ClearDebt Limited (“ClearDebt”) only deals with insolvency cases. We therefore surrendered our interim permission on 31 December 2014 in respect of the ClearDebt business and did not seek FCA authorisation. IVAs remain the focus of the Group although we continue to run a small debt management book to service customers who are not suitable for an IVA and to whom a debt management plan is the most appropriate solution for them.

OPERATIONAL REVIEW ClearDebt – IVA Division

The numbers of new IVA’s passed dropped markedly in the year reducing by 47% to 1,397 (2014: 2,630). The insolvency statistics show that IVA numbers have been falling throughout the period and we continue to be disciplined in our costs of acquisition in the face of many of our competitors who still appear to us to be paying unsustainable rates for the provision of information required to put forward new cases.

No new IVA books were acquired during the year and as at 30 June 2015 we had a total of 9,516 (2014: 10,028) IVA’s and PTD’s generating income. In April 2015 we completed the approval of a mass variation to our IVA book with the agreement of creditors which enabled us to close large numbers of cases where the payments by the customer were complete but the case had remained open solely pending the completion of PPI mis-selling investigations.

The division made a loss before taxation of £632,208 (2014: £1,610,317) after Group recharges during the year and after a goodwill write down of £938,927 (2014: £1,942,059). This represents a small decrease in profitability when compared to last year where, excluding the goodwill write down, the division made a profit of £306,719 (2014: £331,742). Supervisory fees relating to PPI mis-selling redress once again made a good contribution to profitability although we expect this to now tail off as the majority of the mis-sold PPI claims have now been processed.

(7)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STATEMENT

5

The Board monitors (on a monthly basis) several key performance indicators (“KPIs”) for the business and continues to monitor the number of cases passed, the cost per case acquired and the staff heads to caseload numbers. We continue to only adopt referral and marketing relationships where the cost of acquisition is in our view economic to make a profit over the life of a case as well as focusing on the compliance of lead introducers. Where we find evidence of non–compliant selling with any of our partners we continue to insist on immediate changes to ensure compliance or have terminate relationships. This has resulted in lower numbers of cases being passed although encouraging new lead sources are starting to reverse that trend in recent months.

Abacus– Debt Management Division

The division made a loss before tax of £209,351 (2014: profit £414,554) after Group recharges. The profit last year however included a net gain of £759,161 from the sale of the back book less goodwill write downs. The main role of the division continues to be to provide debt advice although we have started to rebuild our debt management book to service customers whose most appropriate solution is a debt management plan. As at 30 June 2015, the total number of active DMP’s was 627 (2014: 205). We also received a further £76,321 of deferred consideration in respect of the prior year sale of the back book.

The Board has KPIs to monitor the number of active income generating plans as well as the value of monthly contributions made by debtors. The costs of acquisition of cases and plans are also monitored closely. IVA plans remain our focus and we will only grow the book where customers unsuitable for an IVA require a DMP.

ClearCash – prepaid MasterCard

The division was sold just prior to the year end as we decided to focus on our core activities. We achieved a small profit on the sale of the shares of the subsidiary ClearCash Limited although this was after the write down of the start-up costs of the division of some £253,000 from the previous financial years.

The division made a small profit before taxation in the year, to the date of disposal, of £16,443 (2014: loss £27,837) but the level of profitability and potential of the business was felt to be insufficient to justify the management time going forward.

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Group turnover reduced to £7,837,962 (2014: £8,674,436) reflecting the reduced numbers of new IVAs passed. Gross profit however declined by 7%to £2,807,803 (2014: £3,029,715) reflecting the continuing pressure on fees and the costs of new customer acquisition. Losses before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation amounted to

£360,570 (2014: £255,067) which included some £76,321 of deferred consideration in respect of the DMP back book sales in 2014 and a further impairment of £938,927 against the carrying value of goodwill related to the insolvency business (2014: £3,463,353). Finance costs decreased as expected to £21,962 (2014: £295,877) following the repayment of the majority of the debt of the Group in 2014.

Cash resources increased during the year and at the year-end amounted to £969,791 (2014: £338,970). This is pleasing especially after the payment of some £500,000 in taxation liabilities due in respect of the year ended 30 June 2014.

Operational cash flow remains satisfactory from the IVA casebook backed by our royalty income and PPI mis-selling claims related supervisory income.

(8)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S STATEMENT

6 GOING CONCERN

As part of the Groups going concern review the Board has followed the guidelines published by the Financial Reporting Council entitled “Going Concern and Liquidity Risk: Guidance for UK Companies 2009”. The Board has prepared detailed financial forecasts and cash flows for the two years to 30 June 2017 and in drawing up these forecasts the Board has assumed that its application for Full Permission will be granted by the FCA to enable it to continue to trade. The forecast assumptions are based upon its view of the current and future economic conditions in the UK that will prevail over the forecasted period - given that the business is likely to be solely focused on the UK market for the foreseeable future. We have produced sensitivities to these forecasts to test our ability to trade as a going concern for at least the following 12 months. In addition, D E M Mond has provided the Board with an undertaking of financial support in the event that the Group should require additional finance. The Board believes that the use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate based upon a review of these forecasts and the finance available to the Group.

FUTURE OUTLOOK

The IVA market is holding steady at similar levels to the past few years and whilst we have been increasing market share the declining disposable incomes of indebted consumers continue to impact on IVA fees and our margins. Profitability remains favourable although this is mainly due to the contribution from mis-sold PPI related supervisory receipts which are expected to reduce over the next 12 months.

We continue to reduce our cost base wherever possible and we are carefully monitoring the cost of referrals and marketing spend to ensure that new cases are acquired at an affordable level to achieve sustainable profitability once mis-sold PPI claims related contributions reduce.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all our employees for their dedication and hard work during the year in providing our customers with the fair and sustainable solutions they require appropriate to their circumstances. I would also especially like to thank all the staff for their efforts in documenting our systems and processes to further enforce the high level principles of the FCA throughout our business and ensure that the customer’s best interests remain at the heart of all we do.

Finally, the Board continues to look for ways in which value can be realised for shareholders although this is proving difficult to achieve at present whilst the new FCA regime is currently being rolled out. We anticipate that many participants and referrers in the industry may lose their licences to trade or take on new business in the next few months making it hard to plan for until we know who the winners and losers under the new FCA regime will be.

David Emanuel Merton Mond FCA FCCA Chief Executive Officer

(9)

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

7

The Directors present their report and the financial statements of the Group for the year ended 30 June 2015. ClearDebt Group Limited is a parent company, incorporated and domiciled in England.

Principal Activities and Review of the Business

The principal activity of the Group is the provision of financial advice and appropriate solutions to individuals experiencing personal debt problems.

The principal activity of the Company is that of a holding company.

A review of the Group’s activities and its future prospects is detailed in the Chairman’s Statement on page 3 and the Chief Executive’s Statement on pages 4 to 6.

Results and Dividends

The trading results for the year and the Group’s financial position at the end of the year are set out in the attached financial statements.

The Directors do not recommend payment of a dividend (2014: nil).

Share Capital

The Company is aware of the following substantial interests in the ordinary share capital as at 25 November 2015:

Number of shares held % of Total

D E M Mond 119,054,616 38.61 O Mond 17,459,800 5.66 A Mond 15,373,733 4.99 S Mond 15,232,602 4.94 D Murray 11,921,125 3.87 Mrs M Rose 11,328,466 3.67

The Directors are not aware of any other person who is beneficially interested in 3% or more of the issued share capital.

Directors who held office during the year

The Directors of the Company who held office during the year are as follows: G Carey FCIB (Non-Executive Chairman)

D E M Mond FCA FCCA A F Smith

D M Shalom ACA S Lee

A J Leon FCA (Non-Executive)

Payment of Creditors

It is the Group’s policy to consider the terms of payment with suppliers when agreeing the terms of the transaction, to ensure that suppliers are aware of these terms and abide by them. Trade creditor days for the Group at 30 June 2015, were 10 days (2014: 13 days). This represents the ratio, expressed in days, between the amounts invoiced to the Group in the period by its suppliers and the amounts due, at the year end, to trade creditors falling due for payment within one year.

Employee Involvement

The Group recognises and seeks to encourage the involvement of its employees, with the aim being the recruitment, motivation and retention of quality employees throughout the Group.

The Group’s employment policies, including the commitment to equal opportunity, are designed to attract, retain and motivate employees regardless of sex, race, religion or disability. The Group is committed to ensuring and communicating the requirements for a safe and healthy working environment for all employees, consistent with health and safety legislation and, wherever practicable, gives full consideration to applications for employment from disabled persons.

(10)

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

8

All businesses face a range of risks and uncertainties, being subject to risk factors from internal and external sources. The Board considers the likelihood and significance of risk factors when putting in place risk management procedures to ensure risk mitigation.

The following are considered to be the key risks facing the Group: -

1. Compliance – the industry is adapting to a strict new compliance regime regulated by the FCA. Businesses and their referral partners have to apply for the first time for Full Permission from the FCA to continue to trade. The licence application made by Abacus (Financial Consultants) Limited was submitted by the 31 December 2014 deadline and we expect to receive Full Permission before the end of 2015. There are therefore risks that Full Permission may not be received or restrictions are placed upon our activities. In addition, there are risks that some of our key referral partners may not achieve licence approval. We continue to invest heavily in our compliance regime and we are also providing advice and assistance to those referral partners we have carefully selected to help them meet the standards required by the FCA.

2. Competition - the market for debt resolution solutions remains highly competitive. The Group seeks to manage the risk of losing referrers through providing innovative solutions supported by high quality delivery. The Group’s main marketing channel is through referrals and the internet and the Group monitors closely the strategies of competitors and the prices paid in the market place and reacts appropriately where necessary. 3. Credit risk – the Group’s credit risk is attributable to its trade receivables and is managed by daily monitoring

of customer’s payments into their programmes versus agreed contracted terms.

4. Funding arrangements – the Group monitors cash flow as part of its normal activities. Cash flow positions are discussed with the Board on a monthly basis to ensure that all possible treasury benefits are being taken and facilities are available if necessary. Advertising and marketing spend is monitored closely as it is a key component of funding requirements.

5. Royalty income - substantial revenue has been earned from royalty income from a third party which provides outsourced services to ClearDebt Limited and other companies which manage IVA’s and Protected Trust Deeds (PTD’s). These services are provided to and paid for by, the estates of the respective IVA’s and PTD’s. Calculation of the amount of revenue due to ClearDebt Limited is based on the revenue invoiced by the third party. Should these services cease to be chargeable to the estates then the reduction in royalty income would significantly affect the reported revenues and profits of ClearDebt Limited and the Group.

6. Economic environment – the current economic climate remains favourable as the market for indebted consumers is likely to continue to grow in the next few years although the amount of disposable income that consumers have available for solutions remains depressed - leading to pressure on margins.

7. Creditor Pressure – Creditors can restrict the market for personal debt resolutions by refusing to agree to proposals which they do not deem acceptable. This can have the effect of restricting approvals and therefore the timing of fees or the receipt of any fees at all. The Group is actively involved in talking to creditors both independently and through its Trade Association, Debt Resolution Forum constantly to ensure that all Group products are in line with creditor approval criteria as much as possible.

(11)

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

9 Directors’ Responsibilities

The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare such financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have chosen to prepare group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union and have chosen to prepare the parent company financial statements under in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors must not approve the accounts unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period.

In preparing the parent company financial statement, the directors are required to: - select suitable accounting policies and apply them consistently;

- make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

- state whether UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

- prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

In preparing the group financial statements, International Accounting Standard 1 requires that the directors:

- properly select and apply accounting policies;

- present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;

- provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity's financial position and financial performance; and

- make an assessment of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The directors are also responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

1. the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole; and

2. the strategic review, includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.

Statement as to Disclosure of Information to Auditors

The directors who were in office on the date of approval of these financial statements have confirmed, as far as they are aware, that there is no relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware. Each of the directors has confirmed that they have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as directors in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that it has been communicated to the auditor.

(12)

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

10 Auditors

UHY Hacker Young Manchester LLP, Chartered Accountants has indicated its willingness to continue in office and a resolution that they should be re-appointed as auditors will be put to the members at the annual general meeting.

By order of the Board

D E M Mond Company Secretary 25 November 2015

(13)

STRATEGIC REVIEW

11

The Companies Act 2006 requires the Board of Directors to regularly review its operations against its strategic objectives and to report on an annual strategic review. The following section summaries the Board’s review for the financial year of this report.

Activities and status

The principal activity of the Group is the provision of financial advice and appropriate solutions to individuals experiencing personal debt problems. In addition to this review statement the Chairman’s and Chief Executives’ Statements on pages 3 - 6 and the financial report give a review of developments during the year and of future prospects.

The directors consider that the Company was not at any time up to the date of this report a close company within the meaning of Section 414 of the Act.

Our Strategic Approach

Our strategy remains to provide the highest standard of debt advice to indebted consumers in the UK ensuring that they receive the solution most appropriate for their circumstances. We listen to our customers and take a collaborative working approach to map out a bespoke solution for their specific requirements. By treating our customers fairly and providing successful outcomes we aim to build a trusted partner relationship which may be used to provide additional services once their debt solution has been completed.

As we build our brand so the costs of customer acquisition and the costs of failed solutions will reduce and ensure we can produce sustainable long term profits to our shareholders.

Our Strategy is driven by our Values

At the core of our vision – satisfactory returns for our shareholders through sustainable long term profits - three values guide how we conduct our business. We work to be:

a. Ethical and responsible

i. For people - our shareholders and the public ii. For standards in business practice

iii. For the environment b. Open

iv. Having honest relationships with our customers and shareholders c. Transparent

v. In our approach to all so that we can take responsibility for all we do and be held to account for our advice and solutions at all times.

Business Objectives - A Partner of Choice

Our vision is to create long term sustainable returns for our shareholders by being the partner of choice for both our customers and referrers.

Principal risks and uncertainties

The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group are set out in page 8 of the director’s report.

Environmental matters and our business in Society

a. Our Commitment to the Community

We believe that as a responsible business working in the community we should support those organisations we can to help improve the world in which we live. In 2015 we have supported several local charities and have made donations to a locally based charity to enable free debt advice to indebted individuals to be provided both locally and across the country.

(14)

STRATEGIC REVIEW

12

b. Our Environment

We are committed to improving the environment and minimising any negative impact our activities may have upon it. We encourage our partners to make similar commitments.

We are committed to energy efficiency and to reducing our carbon footprint. We will select, configure and use any vehicles we acquire to ensure the maximum efficiency. We encourage the use of public transport whenever possible. We will encourage energy efficient lighting, heating and air-conditioning systems and practice building energy management.

c. People

We believe we can only become better at what we do and more successful as a business by encouraging and supporting our people to discover their talents and make the most of their capabilities.

We are committed to invest time and resources to ensuring that all of our people at every level in our own company and in those of our partners are equipped with the necessary skills to meet current and future business needs and to aid their own professional and personal development. We believe in structured continuing professional development is the key to personal fulfilment and to delivering better services competitively.

Health and safety is of paramount importance to us all and we encourage both our partners and our own management to pursue the highest possible standards meeting all regulatory requirements.

d. Business Ethics

Trust is important today more than ever and building and maintaining our reputation is absolutely the key to us.

The long term trusted relationships we build with our partners are rooted in our open, trusting and positive values.

We recognise the vital importance that clarity, open communication and delivery to expectation have in building confidence and trust.

Key performance indicators

The financial key performance indicators are set out in the operational review of the Chief Executive on pages 4 and 5.

Financial Instruments

Information in respect of the Group’s policies on financial risk management objectives including policies to manage credit risk, liquidity risk and foreign currency risk are given in note 20 to the financial statements.

By order of the Board

D E M Mond Director

(15)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

13 Principles of Corporate Governance

The Group’s Board appreciates the value of good corporate governance not only in the areas of accountability and risk management but also as a positive contribution to business prosperity. It believes that corporate governance involves more than a simple “box ticking” approach to establish whether a company has met the principles (including those set out in the corporate governance guidelines for AIM companies published by the Quoted Companies Alliance in September 2010) of a number of specific rules and regulations. Rather the issue is one of applying corporate governance in a sensible and pragmatic fashion having regard to the individual circumstances of a particular company’s business. The key objective is to enhance and protect shareholder value.

Board Structure

The Board is responsible to shareholders for the proper management of the Group. A statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the accounts is set out in the directors’ report.

The Non-Executive Directors have a particular responsibility to ensure that the strategies proposed by the Executive Directors are fully considered.

To enable the Board to discharge its duties, all Directors have full and timely access to all relevant information and there is a procedure for all Directors, in furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice, if necessary, at the expense of the Group. The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved to it and meets monthly. It is responsible for overall group strategy, approval of major capital expenditure projects and consideration of significant financing matters.

The following Committees have been set up, which have written terms of reference and deal with specific aspects of the Group’s affairs.

1. The Remuneration Committee, which includes D E M Mond and the two Non-Executive Directors, is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on the Company’s framework of executive remuneration and its cost. The Committee determines the contract terms, remuneration and other benefits for each of the Executive Directors, including pension rights and compensation payments. The Board itself determines the remuneration of D E M Mond and the Non-Executive Directors. The Committee meets as required.

2. The Audit Committee includes the two Non-Executive Directors. Its prime tasks are to review the scope of the external audit, to review reports from the auditors and to review the half-yearly and annual accounts before they are presented to the Board, focusing in particular on accounting policies and areas of management judgment and estimation. The Committee is responsible for monitoring the controls, which are in force to ensure the integrity of the information reported to the shareholders. The Committee acts as a forum for discussion of internal control issues and contribute to the Board’s review of the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control and risk management systems and processes. It advises the Board on the appointment of external auditors and on their remuneration for both audit and non-audit work and discusses the nature and scope of the audit with the external auditors. It reviews and monitors the independence of the auditors especially with regard to non-audit work. It meets at least twice a year including immediately before the submission of the annual and interim financial statements to the Board.

Any new Non-Executive Directors will be asked to join both Committees.

No formal nomination Committee exists in view of the stage of development of the Group. Instead appointments to the Board by the Chief Executive and other Executive Directors are discussed with the Non-Executive Chairman. Appointments are made after an evaluation of the skills, knowledge, and expertise required ensuring that the Board as a whole has the ability to ensure that the Group can continue to compete effectively in its market place.

Internal Control

The Directors are responsible for the Group’s system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. The Board has designed the Group’s system of internal control in order to provide the Directors with reasonable assurance that its assets are safeguarded, that transactions are authorised and properly recorded and that material errors and irregularities are either prevented or would be detected within a timely period. However, no system of internal control can eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives or provide absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. The key elements of the control system in operation are:

(16)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

14

a. The Board meets regularly with a formal schedule of matters reserved to it for decision and has put in place an organisational structure with clear lines of responsibility defined and with appropriate delegation of authority;

b. There are procedures for planning, approval and monitoring of capital expenditure and information systems for monitoring the Group’s financial performance against approved budgets and projections;

The process adopted by the Group accords with the guidance contained in the document “Internal Control Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code” issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

The Audit Committee receives reports from the external auditors on a regular basis and from Executive Directors of the Group. The Board has considered whether the Group’s internal controls processes would be significantly enhanced by an internal audit function and has taken the view that at the Group’s current stage of development, this is not required. The Board will continue to review this matter each year.The Board receives periodic reports from all Committees.

There are no significant issues disclosed in the financial statements for the period ended 30 June 2015 and up to the date of approval of the report and financial statements that have required the Board to deal with any related material internal control issues.

Relations with Shareholders

The Group values its dialogue with both institutional and private investors. Effective two-way communication with fund managers, institutional investors and analysts is pursued and this encompasses issues such as performance, policy and strategy. During the year the Directors have not had any meetings with analysts and institutions, though have had discussions with a number of shareholders when requested.

There is also an opportunity, at the Company’s Annual General Meeting for individual shareholders to raise general business matters with the full Board and notice of the Company’s Annual General Meeting is circulated to all shareholders at least 20 working days before such meeting. The Chairman of the Audit and Remuneration Committee will be available at the Annual General Meeting to answer questions.

(17)

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT

15

The Board’s Remuneration Committee, which currently comprises Gerald Carey (Non-Executive Chairman), Anthony Leon (Non-executive director) and David Mond (Chief Executive Officer), makes recommendations to the Board within agreed terms of reference in determining specific remuneration packages for each of the Directors, including pension rights.

Members of the Committee who have a personal financial interest in the matters to be decided are not involved in decisions. In arriving at its recommendations, the Committee has access to professional advice from both within and outside the Company.

Remuneration Policy

Each remuneration package is reviewed against a background of published comparative information on the remuneration of Executive Directors in similar positions, taking into account the industry, the region of employment, the type of work and the size of the Company. The extent to which the recommended remuneration is above or below average takes account of the Director’s qualifications and length of service with the Company, the Director’s actual performance and the performance of the Company. This will remain the policy for forthcoming years.

Directors’ Emoluments

The emoluments of the Directors from the date of their appointment during the financial year ended 30 June 2015 were as follows:

2015 2014

2015 Total Total

Salary & 2015 Salary & Salary &

Benefits Pensions Benefits Benefits

£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000

Executive Directors

David Mond (Chief Executive Officer) 273 - 273 195 David Shalom (Finance Director) 223 - 223 146 Andrew Smith (Marketing & External Affairs Director) 52 - 52 51 Simon Lee (Chief Operating Officer) 200 - 200 120

Non-Executive Directors

Gerald Carey (Chairman) 23 - 23 23

Anthony Leon 15 - 15 15

___ ___ ___ ___

Aggregate remuneration 786 - 786 550

___ ___ ___ ___

On 1 August 2014, in line with UK legislation on pensions, the executive directors and employees of the Group were auto enrolled into a defined contribution pension scheme set up to satisfy the legislation. David Shalom opted out of the scheme. The 3 remaining executive directors received less than £500 each in payments made on their behalf by the Group in accordance with the scheme rules.

Under the terms of the scheme those members of staff that did not opt out had 1% of their gross salary deducted and paid into the scheme on their behalf whilst the employing company paid in a further 1% into the scheme on their behalf. The level of contributions and company funding will increase in line with the present statutory requirements under the legislation.

Directors’ Options

Options have been granted to directors under an EMI scheme. The granting of options ensures that the holders are incentivised to concentrate on growing shareholder value. No share options were granted during the year leaving options outstanding over 5,500,000 ordinary shares at a weighted average exercise price of 1.82p per ordinary share.

Directors’ Service Agreements

Anthony Leon, Gerald Carey and David Mond all have agreements subject to 6 months’ notice. David Shalom, Andrew Smith and Simon Lee all have service agreements subject to 12 months’ notice.

(18)

DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT

16 Directors’ Interests

The interests of the Directors in the ordinary shares of the Company were as follows:

Ordinary Shares At 0.5p each At 0.5p each At 30 June At 30 June 2015 2014 David Mond 119,054,616 119,054,616 Andrew Smith 6,750,000 6,750,000 David Shalom 2,150,000 2,150,000 Gerald Carey 1,020,000 1,020,000 Anthony Leon 500,000 500,000

The directors held the following interests in share options as at 30 June 2015 and 25 November 2015.

At 30 June At 30 June Option Date Expiry

Scheme 2015 2014 Price Exercisable Date

David Mond EMI 375,000 375,000 2.00p 07.10.12 07.10.19 David Mond EMI 500,000 500,000 1.75p 21.09.13 21.09.20 David Mond EMI 750,000 750,000 1.75p 31.10.14 31.10.21 Andrew Smith EMI 375,000 375,000 2.00p 07.10.12 07.10.19 Andrew Smith EMI 750,000 750,000 1.75p 31.10.14 31.10.21 David Shalom EMI 375,000 375,000 2.00p 07.10.12 07.10.19 David Shalom EMI 500,000 500,000 1.75p 21.09.13 21.09.20 David Shalom EMI 750,000 750,000 1.75p 31.10.14 31.10.21 Simon Lee EMI 375,000 375,000 2.00p 07.10.12 07.10.19 Simon Lee EMI 750,000 750,000 1.75p 31.10.14 31.10.21

(19)

TO THE MEMBERS OF CLEARDEBT GROUP LIMITED

17

We have audited the Group and Parent Company financial statements which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the Company Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors

As more fully explained in the Directors’ Responsibilities Statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s (APB’s) Ethical Standards for Auditors.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements

An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.

Opinion on the financial statements

In our opinion the financial statements:

- the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 30 June 2015 and of the Group’s loss for the year then ended;

- the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union;

- the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

- the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion the information given in the Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.

(20)

TO THE MEMBERS OF CLEARDEBT GROUP LIMITED

18 Matters on which we are required to report by exception

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

- adequate accounting records had been kept; or

- returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

- the Parent Company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

- certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made.

- we have not received all the information and explanations that we considered necessary for the purpose of our audit.

Michael D Wasinski (Senior Statutory Auditor) For and on behalf of

UHY HACKER YOUNG MANCHESTER LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor

25 November 2015

St James Building 79 Oxford Street Manchester M1 6HT

(21)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended 30 June 2015

19 2015 2014 Notes £ £ Revenue 3 7,837,962 8,674,436 Cost of sales (5,030,159) (5,644,721) _________ _________ Gross profit 2,807,803 3,029,715 Administrative expenses (2,303,090) (2,071,919) Profit on disposal of debt management books 76,321 2,280,455

Profit on disposal of subsidiary 6 4,489 -

Goodwill impairment 10 (938,927) (3,463,353)

Share based payment 17 (7,166) (29,965)

_________ _________

Loss before interest, tax,

depreciation and amortisation (360,570) (255,067)

Depreciation 11 (182,431) (193,118)

Amortisation 10 (277,099) (453,137)

Gain on bargain purchase -

-_________ _________

Loss from operations 4 (820,100) (901,322)

Finance costs 5 (21,962) (295,877)

Finance income 503 1,436

_________ _________

Loss before taxation (841,559) (1,195,763)

Taxation 8 (11,032) (465,636)

_________ _________

Loss after taxation and total comprehensive

loss for year (852,591) (1,661,399)

_________ _________

Amount attributable to:

Owners of the parent (852,591) (1,661,399)

_________ _________

Loss per ordinary share - basic (pence) 9 (0.28p) (0.54p) Loss per ordinary share - diluted (pence) 9 n/a n/a

(22)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

As At 30 June 2015

Company Number 02441375

20 2015 2014 Notes £ £ Assets Non-current assets Intangible assets 10 91,209 1,264,758

Property, plant and equipment 11 241,676 337,899

Deferred taxation 15 20,349 19,918

__________ _________

353,234 1,622,575

Current asset

Trade and other receivables 12 2,870,754 4,123,800

Cash and cash equivalents 969,791 338,970

__________ _________

3,840,545 4,462,770 __________ _________

Total assets 4,193,779 6,085,345

__________ _________

Equity and liabilities Equity

Issued capital 16 6,166,812 6,166,812

Share premium 279,948 279,948

Share based compensation 376,484 369,318

Retained losses (3,589,383) (2,736,792)

__________ _________

Total equity attributable to the owners of the parent 3,233,861 4,079,286 __________ _________

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables 13 847,141 1,301,457

Corporation tax payable 13 9,612 500,852

Current financial liabilities 13 103,165 150,000 __________ _________ 959,918 1,952,309 Non-current liabilities Financial liabilities 14 - 53,750 __________ _________ Total liabilities 959,918 2,006,059 __________ _________

Total equity and liabilities 4,193,779 6,085,345

__________ _________ The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 25 November 2015 and are signed on its behalf by:

D E M Mond Director

(23)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

For the year ended 30 June 2015

21

Issued Share Share Share Based Other Retained Total Capital Premium Compensation Reserves Losses Equity

£ £ £ £ £ £

Balance as at 30 June 2013 6,166,812 279,948 339,353 - (1,075,393) 5,710,720

Share based compensation - - 29,965 - - 29,965

Total comprehensive loss - - - - (1,661,399) (1,661,399) for the year

________ ________ ________ _______ _________ ________

Balance as at 30 June 2014 6,166,812 279,948 369,318 - (2,736,792) 4,079,286

Share based compensation - - 7,166 - - 7,166

Total comprehensive loss - - - - (852,591) (852,591) for the year

________ ________ ________ _______ ________ ________

Balance as at 30 June 2015 6,166,812 279,948 376,484 - (3,589,383) 3,233,861 ________ ________ ________ _______ _________ ________ Share capital

Share capital has arisen on the issue of shares and represents the nominal value of shares issued.

Share premium

The share premium account arose from the issue of equity shares above the nominal value less share issue costs.

Share based compensation

This reserve is the result of the Company’s grant of equity settled share options and warrants and measured in accordance with IFRS2 share-based payment.

Retained losses

(24)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

22

2015 2014

£ £

Cash flow from continuing operating activities

Loss before taxation (841,559) (1,195,763)

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 182,431 193,118 Amortisation of intangible assets 277,099 453,137

Profit on sale of subsidiary (4,489) -

Profit on disposal of debt management books (76,321) (2,280,455)

Goodwill impairment 938,927 3,463,353

Loss on disposal of fixed assets 2,339 101,246

Share based payment 7,166 29,965

Decrease/ (increase) in trade and other receivables 1,254,483 (1,166,260)

Finance costs 21,962 295,877

Finance income (503) (1,436)

(Decrease)/ increase in trade and other payables (454,316) 185,844 _________ _________ Cash generated by operations 1,307,219 78,626 Corporation tax (paid)/ refund (500,151) 52,832

Interest on loans (21,962) (295,877)

_________ _________ Net cash generated by/ (used in) operating activities 785,106 (164,419)

Investing activities

Acquisition of intangibles (42,542) (288,690)

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (88,482) (66,467) Disposal of intangible assets 76,321 2,819,035

Sale of subsidiary 500 -

Finance income 503 1,436

_________ _________ Net cash (used in) /generated by investing activities (53,700) 2,465,314

Financing activities

Repayment of existing loans (200,585) (2,250,000) Proceeds from new loans advanced 100,000 200,000

_________ _________ Cash used by financing activities (100,585) (2,050,000)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents 630,821 250,895 Opening cash and cash equivalents 338,970 88,075 _________ _________

Closing cash and cash equivalents 969,791 338,970

(25)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

23 1. General information

ClearDebt Group Limited is a company incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom under the Companies Act 2006. The Group’s functional and presentational currency is £ sterling.

Interpretations of standards

The following accounting standards, interpretations and amendments have been adopted by the Company since 1 July 2014 with no significant impact on its results or financial position:

IAS 27 “Separate Financial Statements (2011) IAS 28 “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures” IAS 32 “Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” IFRS10 “Consolidated Financial Statements”

IFRS 11 “Joint Arrangements”

IFRS 12 “Disclosures of Interest in Other Entities”

The following standards, interpretations and amendments to existing standards have been published and are mandatory for the Company’s accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2015 or later periods, but which have not been adopted by the Company:

Annual improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 cycle and 2011-2013 Cycle.

IAS 16 and IAS 38 - Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation effective from 1 January 2016

IFRS 7 Amendment related to transition to IFRS is effective from 1 January 2016 IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” is effective from 1 January 2018.

The Directors anticipate that the adoption of these standards and interpretations in future periods will have no material impact on the financial statements of the Group.

2. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Preparation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and IFRIC interpretations as endorsed by the European Union (IFRS) and the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.

The financial statements have been prepared on the historic cost basis. The principal accounting policies adopted are set out below.

Going concern

As part of the Groups going concern review the Board has followed the guidelines published by the Financial Reporting Council entitled “Going Concern and Liquidity Risk: Guidance for UK Companies 2009”. The Board has prepared detailed financial forecasts and cash flows for the two years to 30 June 2016 and in drawing up these forecasts the Board has assumed that its application for Full Permission will be granted by the FCA to enable it to continue to trade. The forecast assumptions are based upon its view of the current and future economic conditions in the UK that will prevail over the forecasted period - given that the business is likely to be solely focused on the UK market for the foreseeable future. We have produced sensitivities to these forecasts to test our ability to trade as a going concern for at least the following 12 months. In addition, D E M Mond has provided the Board with an undertaking of financial support in the event that the Group should require additional finance.

The Board believes that the use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate based upon a review of these forecasts and the finance available to the Group.

(26)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

24 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements

The preparation of the financial information in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.

The principal balances that have been estimated relate to: -

- estimates as to the recoverability of goodwill. The Group is required to review, on an annual basis, whether goodwill has suffered any impairment. The recoverable amount is determined based on value in use calculations. The use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows and the choice of a discount rate in order to calculate present value - actual outcomes may vary. The carrying amount of goodwill at the balance sheet date was £nil after impairment losses of £938,927 identified during the year.

- estimates relating to provisions required for uncollectable debtor balances (see note 12).

Basis of Consolidation

Where the company has the power, either directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of another entity or business so as to obtain benefits from its activities, it is classified as a subsidiary. The consolidated financial statements present the results of the company and its subsidiaries (“the Group”) as if they formed a single entity. Inter-company transactions are therefore eliminated in full.

Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used in line with those used by the Group.

Business Combinations

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the results of business combinations using the purchase method. In the consolidated statement of financial position, the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are initially recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date. The results of acquired operations are included in the consolidated income statement from the date on which control is obtained.

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of a business combination over the interest in the fair value of identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired. Cost comprises the fair values of assets given, liabilities assumed and equity instruments issued.

Goodwill

Goodwill arising on acquisition of subsidiaries or business is recognised as a separate asset on the statement of financial position after the recognition at fair value of any other intangible assets identified at the time of acquisition.

Goodwill is capitalised as an intangible asset. Where the fair value of identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceeds the fair value of consideration paid, the excess is credited in full to the Group income statement on the acquisition date. The Group carries out annual impairment tests for goodwill. Impairment losses in respect of goodwill are recognised immediately in the income statement and are not reversed.

(27)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

25 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Impairment

At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its intangibles and property, plant and equipment to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent of other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have been adjusted.

If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as expenses in the consolidated income statement.

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately.

Other Intangible Assets

Internal and externally acquired intangible assets are initially recognised at cost and subsequently amortised over their useful economic lives. The amortisation expense is shown separately on the face of the Consolidated Income Statement. The significant intangibles recognised by the Group, their useful economic lives and the methods used to determine the cost of intangibles acquired in a business combination are as follows: -

Software and other development costs - 4 years’ straight line Intangible assets - Debt management back books - 12 months’ straight line Intangible assets - Insolvency back books - 3-4 years’ straight line

Expenditure arising from the Group’s development costs and software development is recognised only if all of the following conditions are met:

- an asset is created that can be identified;

- it is probable that the asset created will generate future economic benefits; - the development cost of the asset can be measured reliably;

- the Group has the intention to complete the asset and the ability and intention to use or sell it; - sufficient resources are available to complete the development and to either sell or use the asset. Where the criteria have not been achieved, software development expenditure is recognised as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.

Segmental Reporting

Management determines its operating segments by identifying components:

a) that engage in business activities that earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the Group),

b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker, the board of directors of ClearDebt Group Limited, to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment, and c) for which discrete financial information is available.

(28)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

26 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Revenue

Revenue is recognised at the fair value of amounts receivable or received in relation to a range of services provided to customers as follows:

Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVA’s)

Fees are earned for arranging and administering IVA’s on behalf of individuals experiencing debt problems. Generally, revenue is accrued based upon the stage of completion of specific customer contracts where the outcome can be assessed with reasonable certainty and the value for that service has been agreed between the Group and the customer.

Nominee fees

Nominee fees are recognised upon the approval of an IVA proposal at a creditors meeting.

Supervisory fees

Supervisory fees are accrued on a monthly basis over the duration of the arrangement as the service is provided. Protected Trust Deeds (PTD’s)

Fees earned in respect of PTD’s are recognised when received. Debt Management Services

Fees are receivable for the management of debts on behalf of customers experiencing financial difficulties. Fees are recognised upon receipt of customer payments on the basis that these arrangements are informal and there is no certainty that economic benefits will accrue until a payment is received.

Commissions and Payment Protection Mis-selling Claims Income

The Group also receives commission income from the referral of loans and other products as well as fees in respect of non IVA claims for mis-sold payment protection products. Commissions are recorded as they are received. Royalty Income

Revenue from royalty income is accrued in accordance with contractual agreements in place. Revenue is calculated as a proportion of the revenue invoiced by that third party.

Prepayment Card Services

The Group receives a revenue share from the issue and usage charges in respect of the ClearCash prepaid MasterCard. Income and charges are recognised in the period in which they were incurred by the card user.

Property, Plant and Equipment

All property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided at rates calculated to write off the cost less residual value of each asset over its expected useful life, as follows:

Leasehold improvements - 25% straight line Fixtures and fittings - 25% straight line

Residual value and estimated remaining lives are reviewed annually.

Provisions

Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event where it is probable that it will result in an outflow of economic benefits that can be reliably estimated. If the effect of time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money.

References

Related documents

When a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale financial asset has been recognised through the statement of total recognised gains and losses, and

Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group’ s interest in the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of

The deferred tax asset arising from the initial recognition of goodwill shall be recognised as part of the accounting for a business combination to the extent that it is probable

After initial recognition available-for sale financial assets are measured at fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until

Excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the assets and liabilities identifiable for each associate company at acquisition is recognised as “goodwill” (Note 2.2.d)). If there

Financial instruments classified as at fair value through profit or loss are carried at fair value after initial recognition, with changes in fair value recognised in the

• Primary reasons for the business combination • Factors that contributed to goodwill recognition • Fair value of acquisition and consideration, by. class

We have reviewed the consolidated statement of financial position of Country Group Development Public Company Limited and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) and the separate