• No results found

Understanding the compliance of Refactoring with Maintenance

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Understanding the compliance of Refactoring with Maintenance"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Table 2: case of refactoring (ΔAverage daily changes of reusability metrics in R) and development (ΔM)

References

Related documents

For the first case, double Pareto metrics, we have found that weighted methods per class (WMC, with weights equal to 1), coupling between object classes, and requests for a class

By measuring and comparing cohesion and coupling quality metrics for before and after versions of the code base in reviews that performed significant architectural changes, we were

Among the various cognitive complexity metrics discussed below, some metrics are code level and other are class and coupling metrics..

They proposed certain metrics-Number of Ancestor Classes (NAC), Number of Descendant Classes (NDC), Number of Local Methods (NLM), Class Method Complexity (CMC)

RFC measures the complexity of the software by counting the number of methods in the class and also captures the information about the coupling of the class to

This paper presents the new object oriented metrics namely for coupling of class by counting the number of associated classes within a class & total associated class and

i) Weighted Methods per Class (WMC): It counts the total number of methods of a class. The measure of WMC should be kept down. ii) Coupling Between Object classes (CBO): CBO is