• No results found

Consumer Attitude and Behaviour towards Organic Food: Cross cultural study of Turkey and Germany

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Consumer Attitude and Behaviour towards Organic Food: Cross cultural study of Turkey and Germany"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Consumer Attitude and Behaviour

towards Organic Food

Cross-cultural study of

Turkey and Germany

Nihan MUTLU

Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Tilman Becker

(2)

2

CONTENTS

Introduction

Organic Agriculture in Turkey

Organic Agriculture in Germany

Research Objectives

Methodology

Results

(3)

3

Introduction

Why organic food?

Food safety, quality, ethical movements…etc.

Different market structures between western and

eastern Europe (emerging, growing, established)

Necessity of consumer studies in organics;

Lack of information in Turkey

(4)

4

Organic Agriculture in Turkey

Start-up: mid 80’s with export

orientated production

First Regulation: 1994, based on

(EEC) No 2092/91 and IFOAM Basic

Standards. Last revision has done in

2005.

Certification: 11 Agents ( 5 national)

Export: 37 countries:

Germany (61%);

USA (15%);

UK (5%) …etc.

Domestic market:

Urban area (Big

supermarkets, a few

organic shops and bazaar)

(5)

5

Organic Agriculture in Germany

Organically managed land and farms , ZMP, 2006

Start-up: Early 20th century

Regulation: First EU Regulation

2092/91 based IFOAM Basic

Standards, private organic agriculture

associations (Demeter, Naturland..etc)

Certification: 22 inspection bodies

Import: Biggest importer of

Europe with 38%

Domestic market:

Organic food market share

3%, 4.5 billion €

Marketing channel:

Supermarkets, organic

shops, direct marketing,

bazaar, discounts, health

stores

(6)

6

Research Objectives

Socio-demographic distribution (age, gender,

household structure, education, income…)

Buying behaviour (frequency, shopping place and

product preference)

Organic food and label knowledge

Motivations and barriers

(7)

7

Methodology

Literature Research

Questionnaire design

Sampling (Only organic consumers)

Consumer Survey (Interviews in Germany, online survey in Turkey)

(8)

8

Results - Demographic Distribution

Turkey

Germany

Age

25-50 (74%)

0-24 (13%)

50-64 (13%)

25-34 (32%)

50-64 (24%)

35-50 (22%)

0-24 (12%)

Over 64 (10%)

Gender

female(52%)

female(70%)

Household number

3 or over 4

with kids

1 or 2

Children age

over 6 years

over 14 years

Education

university(88%)

university(52%)

Socio-economic

status

Full-time working

middle / low-middle

income

Full-time working

middle / low-middle

income

(9)

9

Results – Buying Behaviour

Frequency & first purchase time of organic food products

Turkey Germany

less then monthly monthly 2-3 per month 1-2 per week 5-7 per week frequency 20 15 10 5 0 R es p o n d en ts last 6 months last year 1-3 years 3-5 years more then 5 years time 20 15 10 5 0 R es p o n d en ts less then monthly monthly 2-3 per month 1-2 per week 5-7 per week Frequency 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 R es p o n d en ts last 6 months 1-3 years 3-5 years more then 5 years Time 40 30 20 10 0

R

e

sp

o

n

d

en

ts

(10)

10

Results – Shopping Place Preferences

Turkey

Germany

Today

Future

Today

Future

Supermarket

1

1

2

2

Organic shops

3

2

1

1

Bazaar

4

3

3

3

Farm

2

3

4

5

Discount

6

5

5

4

Specialized shops

5

4

6

5

Comparison of ranking in shopping place preferences

(11)

11

Results – Product Preferences

Demand differences between products of today and future in Turkey

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Product groups R e s p o n d e n ts

Today's product choice Future product choice

Maximum Changes

Meat products: +58%

Textile: +50%

Bakery, sugar and baby

products: +40%

Beverages: +36%

Pulses: +31%

Milk products: +27%

Herbs & spices: +24%

Oil products: +18%

Cereals: +14%

Minimum Changes

Fresh fruits and

vegetables, dried fruits

and nuts: +2-3%

(12)

12

Results – Product Preferences

Demand differences between products of today and future in Germany

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Product groups R e s p o n d en ts

Today's product choice Future product choice

Maximum Changes

Cereals: +16%

Pulses and meat

products: +14%

Textile: +12%

Herbs & spices: +8%

Minimum Changes

Milk products, dried fruits

& vegetables oil and

sugar products: +6%

Vegetables, baby

products: +4%

Beverages and bakery

products: +2%

No Changes

Fresh fruits: 0%

(13)

13

Results – Product Preferences

Most preferred products in Turkey

& in Germany:

Fresh fruits and vegetables

Milk and milk products, cereals

Less preferred products in

Turkey

& in Germany:

Baby products and textile

Strategies for future organic market

•Turkey’s organic market is satisfied with fresh fruits and vegetables &

dried fruits and nuts or conventional products are also charming.

•Meat products can easily find consumers in Turkey. Herbs and spices,

pulses, beverages, bakery, cereals and sugar products expected to

expand demand in Turkey.

•Germany is a saturated market with all categories and will be difficult

to introduce new product to the market. Cereals, pulses and meat

(14)

14

Results – Organic Food Description

Comparison of overall ratings in organic food description

Turkey

Germany

Healthy

4.6

4.4

High Nutritional Value

4.3

4.2

Products are grown in

harmony with nature

4.3

4.4

Free from chemical

pesticides and fertilizers

4.4

4.3

Produced with environmentally / animal

friendly techniques

4.4

4.4

Free from GMO

4.4

4.4

Products must be certified

4.7

3.6

(15)

15

Results – Label Knowledge

Government Logos;

“Bio-Siegel” great success

“Turkish logo” needs further

actions

Private Logos;

Should be carefully

introduced to both markets

Danger of confusion

Source: Own Calculations

DE DE

DE

(16)

16

Results – Consumer Motivations

Turkey

Motivations

Germany

List order Average rating Average rating List order

1 4.64 Health 4.52 1

2 4.61 Saving resources 3.86 9

3 4.50 Support organic movement /

sustainability 4.48 2

4 4.36 Food safety 4.08 8

5 4.27 High quality 4.20 7

6 4.23 Taste 4.42 4

7 4.16 Environment 4.44 3

8 4.13 Support local / small farmers 4.26 5

9 4.00 Animal welfare 4.22 6

10 3.92 Freshness 3.60 10

11 3.91 Positive image 3.53 11

12 3.67 Against big companies 3.44 12

13 2.63 Fashion 2.56 13

(17)

17

Results – Consumer Barriers

Turkey

Barriers

Germany

List order Average rating Average rating List order

1 4.56 Price 3.96 1

2 4.45 Availability 3.78 2

3 4.39 Assortment 3.42 6

4 4.06 Lack of media information < 3

-5 4.06 Seasonality 3.49 5

6 4.05 Income 3.67 4

7 3.93 Durability < 3

-8 3.69 Trust < 3

-9 3.63 Regional origin 3.69 3

10 3.43 Packaging < 3

-11 3.31 Time to look for < 3

-12 3.30 Recognition < 3

-13 3.27 Appearance and taste < 3

-14 3.06 Cooking conditions < 3

(18)

18

Conclusion

Turkey;

Need more research and

development

Production should be enlarged

(to reduce high price, to raise

availability and accessibility)

Production aims should turn to

domestic market

Subsidies will be useful

More organic shops should be

established

Germany;

Harmonisation of private labels

Raising awareness of

consumers to regional products

should be taken into account!

Discounts are overtaking the

place of direct marketing from

farms

Both countries;

•Should invest to inform consumers about certification and true

labels

(19)

19

References

Aksoy, U. 2002. Turkey. Report on Organic Agriculture in the Mediterranean Area – Mediterranean Organic

Agriculture Network, Options Méditerranéennes, Series B: N°40, CIHEAM- IAMB, Bari. Al-Bitar (Ed.). p. 147 - 159.

Babadogan, G. and Koc, D. 2005. Organik Tarım Ürünleri Dış Pazar Araştırması. IGEME, Turkey

Bichler, B., Häring, A. M., Dabbert, S. and Lippert, C. 2005. ‘Determinants of Spatial Distribution of Organic

Farming in Germany’. Paper presented at Researching Sustainable Systems, Adelaide/Australian, 21. - 23. 09. 2005, p. 304-307. ISOFAR / FIBL. 1 June 2007, available at: http://orgprints.org/6322/

BMELV, 2007. Verzeichnis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zugelassenen Kontrollstellen, 1 June

2007.available at: http://www.bmelv.de/cln_044/nn_750590/DE/04-Landwirtschaft/OekologischerLandbau/ VerzeichnisKontrollstellen.html

BLE, 2006. At a glance information about the Bio-Siegel. Federal Agency for Agriculture and Food (BLE), Bonn,

Germany. 1 June 2007, available at: http://www.oekolandbau.de/fileadmin/redaktion/bestellformular/pdf/ BMVEL_Verbrau._engl_flyer.pdf

Bolten, J., Kennerknecht R. and Spiller, A. 2006. Perspectives of small retailers in the organic market:

Customer satisfaction and customer enthusiasm. Paper presented at 98. Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists EAAE, Crete, 29 June - 2 July 2006. 1 June 2007, available at: http://orgprints.org/10198/

Dempsey, T. 2007. Turkey. 1 June 2007, available at: http://www.photoseek.com/Turkey.html

ETO, 2007. Ecological Agriculture in Turkey (in Turkish). Ecological Agriculture Organisation. 1 June 2007,

available at: http://www.eto.org.tr/tureko.asp

Güler, S., 2006. Organic Agriculture in Turkey. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture. OMU, Vol. 21, No.2. p. 238-242  Haccius, M. and Immo L., 2000. Organic Agriculture in Germany, Stiftung Ökologie & Landbau (SÖL), Bad

Dürkheim, Germany. 15 June 2007, available at: http://www.organic-europe.net

Hamm, U., and Gronefeld, F., 2004. The European Market for Organic Food: Revised and Updated Analysis.

(20)

20

References – cont.

Kenanoğlu, Z. and Karahan, Ö. 2002. Policy implementations for organic agriculture in Turkey. British Food Journal, Vol. 104, No. 3/4/5, p. 300-318

Latacz-Lohmann, U. and Foster, C. 1997. From niche to mainstream strategies for marketing organic food in Germany and the UK. British Food Journal. Vol. 99, No. 8, p. 275-282

MARA, 2005. Organik Tarimin Esaslari Ve Uygulanmasina İlişkin Yönetmelik, Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. 15 June 2007, available at: http://www.tarim.gov.tr/uretim/organiktarim/organik.doc  Padel, S. 2004. ‘Main Findings of the Delphi Survey on the market for organic food’ In: O. Schmid, J.

Sanders, P. Midmore (Ed.), Organic Marketing Initiatives and Rural Development. Vol.7, University of Wales Aberystwyth, UK, p.24-25

Rehber, E. and Turhan, S., 2002. Prospects and Challenges for developing Countries in trade and production of organic food and fibres - The case of Turkey, British Food Journal, Vol. 104 No: 3/4/5, p.371-390

Richter, T. 2005. ‘The Organic Market in Germany – Overview and information on market access, BLE. 15 June 2007, available at: http://www.oekolandbau.de/fileadmin/redaktion/bestellformular/pdf/031105.pdf  Richter, T. and Hempfling, G. 2003. Supermarket Study 2002: Organic Products in European

Supermarkets, FIBL. 10 June 2007, available at: http://orgprints.org/8356

Willer, H. 2007. Organic Agricultural Land and Farms in Europe, FIBL Survey 2007, 1 May 2007, available at: http://www.organic-europe.net/country_reports/germany/default.asp

Zanoli, R. (ed), Baehr, M., Botschen, M., Laberenz, H., Naspetti, S., Thelen, E., 2004. The European Consumer and Organic Food. Organic Marketing Initiatives and Rural Development: Vol. 4, Aberystwyth, UK  ZMP, 2006. Marktüberblick. Oekomarkt Jahrbuch 2006. 1 May 2007, available at:

(21)

THANK YOU

Nihan MUTLU

References

Related documents

In his monograph Klaus described reliable methods of extracting all six metals in the pure form; together with methods of determining platinoids in the very noble metals

Using a patient and provider perspective, this study investigates the cost-effectiveness of a brief motivational interviewing (MI) intervention versus a combined intervention of MI

relationship of BRAF V600E, TERT and NRAS mutations for papillary thyroid carcinoma patients in Northwest China.. Meiling Huang † , Changjiao Yan † , Jingjing Xiao, Ting Wang * and

Our involvement in the area of solid supported regents in organic transformations [11] , herein we wish to report the ‘claycop’ catalyzed efficient and chemoselective addition

According to the National AFP cases surveillance guidelines, a VDPV case was defined as an AFP case from whom Sabin-related poliovirus ( ≥ 10 nucleotides (nt) VP1 substitutions for

Although there have been sev- eral studies on Australian travellers in general, there is still limited information on the uptake of vaccination and preventative health advice

When the Random, Normal, and Independent conditions are met, our usual inference procedures based on the sampling distribution of the difference between sample means will

The null hypothesis in a chi-square goodness-of-fit test should state a claim about the distribution of a single categorical variable in the population of interest.. In our