• No results found

2012 ENERGY BENCHMARKING REPORT San Francisco Municipal Buildings. September 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "2012 ENERGY BENCHMARKING REPORT San Francisco Municipal Buildings. September 2013"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2012

ENERGY BENCHMARKING REPORT

San Francisco Municipal Buildings

(2)

Cover Photo: City Hall. Opened in 1915. (Credit: davidyuweb / flickr)

Among San Francisco’s 32 office buildings, City Hall had the seventh lowest Energy Use Intensity in 2012 and earned a preliminary ENERGY STAR rating of 90, indicating that it performed better than 90 percent of similar office buildings nationwide. (Owner: Real Estate Division)

(3)

Acknowledgements

Gathering the information necessary to complete this report involved contributions of time and expertise by numerous people at 26 different departments. This report marks only the second time that the City and County of San Francisco has publicly disclosed the relative energy consumption of its buildings, and includes many facilities that were not part of the 2011 report. Continued care went into ensuring that the data was as complete and accurate as possible.

Special thanks to Dan Heffernan of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Power Enterprise for help with this project.

SFPUC Power Enterprise staff: Hina Dave John Doyle Darryl Dunn Anna Fedman Dan Heffernan Angie Lee David Robinett SF Environment staff: Barry Hooper Calla Ostrander Mark Palmer Sachiko Tanikawa Nick Young

SFPUC Project Manager: Jonathan Cherry

Please email any questions about this report to: energydata@sfwater.org

Climate Liaisons and other City department staff: Airport: Houshang Esmaili

Animal Care and Control: Liam Curry

Arts Commission: Rebekah Krell, Judy Nemzoff Asian Art Museum: Erik Cline

California Academy of Sciences: Ari Harding

Convention Facilities / Moscone: Steve Basic, Corrine Mehigan District Attorney: Martha Knutzen

Emergency Management: Vivina Santos Fine Arts Museums: Mike Badger

Fire Department: Rhab Boughn, Tania Fokin Fleet Management / Central Shops: Dan Coleman Human Services Agency: John Murray

Juvenile Probation: Catherine McGuire, Sheila Layton Police Department: Ivan Sequeira

Public Health: Richard Bitanga, Max Bunuan, Diana Kenyon, John Lee, Anson Moon, Tyrone Navarro, Marc Slavin

Public Library: Roberto Lombardi

Public Works: Cynthia Chono, Patrick Rivera

Real Estate: Marta Bayol, Lesley Giovannelli, Rob Reiter, John Updike Recreation & Park: Ana Alvarez, Erin Anderson

SFMTA: Terry Fahey, Rob Malone, Marty Mellera, Rosa Rankin, Ken Yee SFUSD: Jennifer Helfrich, Nik Kaestner

Sheriff: Kevin Lyons

Technology (DT): Brian Roberts War Memorial: Kevin Kelly

(4)

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Introduction

San Francisco’s Approach to Benchmarking

Energy Use in San Francisco’s Municipal Buildings

2012 Energy Benchmarking Results

Putting the Results in Context

Appendix A: Key to Benchmarking Notes

Appendix B: List of Departments and Acronyms

Appendix C: EUI Normalized by Hours of Operation

5

7

8

10

14

32

33

34

34

(5)

 

Executive Summary

Background

This second annual report details the energy performance of almost 450 of San Francisco’s municipal facilities during calendar year 2012, including more than 46 million square feet of building area. In February 2011, the San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance was approved by the Board of Supervisors and signed by Mayor Edwin M. Lee. The ordinance requires owners of non-residential buildings over 10,000 square feet to annually benchmark and disclose the energy performance of their buildings, using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager tool to obtain ENERGY STAR ratings when possible.

As the owner and occupant of hundreds of buildings, the City and County of San Francisco has chosen to lead by example and provide

transparency about its own operations. The report also includes data on over 130 San Francisco Unified School District facilities.

By distributing this report on behalf of 26 different agencies, the SFPUC hopes to provide a fresh perspective on these public facilities,

highlighting energy performance successes and focusing attention and resources on buildings that may benefit from energy improvements.

Key Findings

Comparison by Building Type:The detailed charts in this report give a rich

amount of information about each location. For each facility type, the reader can see the individual facilities ranked in descending order of Energy Use Intensity (EUI), plus an indication of each facility’s annual carbon footprint and a profile of what times of year are most (and least) energy intensive. Summary charts provide insights into the energy use of each municipal facility type.

ENERGY STAR Ratings:The ENERGY STAR rating system is designed for

commercial buildings, so only some municipal facility types are eligible for a 1-100 rating. Of the municipal facilities eligible for a rating, almost 80% outperformed the national median for similar buildings. Only 5 out of 139 rating-eligible facilities ranked in the bottom 25% compared to their national peers. For the second year, eleven City facilities

performed in the top 25% nationwide (the threshold for the ENERGY STAR label) and 42 K-12 schools also met that threshold in 2012.

Comparison to Prior Year:The improving energy use trend noted in the

2011 report continued this year. The overall EUI of benchmarked facilities improved 3.6% from 2011 and 4.4% compared to 2009. The average 2012 carbon footprint of benchmarked facilities improved 5.1% from 2011 and 7.0% compared to 2009. However, numerous factors may influence this trend and further detailed analysis is needed beyond the data presented here to identify all of the specific causes.

Calendar Year 2012 Highlights:

Benchmarking results are provided for 446 municipal facilities

across 29 facility types, including the addition of SFUSD buildings.

For each facility type, buildings are ranked in order of Energy Use

Intensity (EUI, or energy use per square foot).

Overall in 2012, the EUI for municipal buildings improved 3.6%

from the prior year, and the overall carbon footprint decreased 5.1% from the prior year.

Nearly 80% of San Francisco facilities in ENERGY STAR building

types performed equal to or better than the national average.

Only five locations ranked in the bottom 25% compared to similar

buildings nationwide.

San Francisco City Hall is among the locations that scored high

enough for the ENERGY STAR label in 2012.

Making Use of the Results

The findings suggest that San Francisco’s municipal buildings performed well in 2012. However, the results here are just a first step. The wide

(6)

variation in energy performance within most facility types suggests there are many opportunities for improvement.

This report is one part of efforts by the SFPUC and other departments to track and improve the energy efficiency of municipal buildings. The SFPUC offers a range of energy efficiency services such as energy audits and green building commissioning that can identify technical deficiencies and recommend operations and maintenance improvements. The role of building occupants in using energy wisely is also crucial.

Developing this annual report continues to be a major undertaking supported by numerous departments. Each department should look in more detail at facilities that appear as outliers in the data and provide data improvements where necessary to improve the benchmarking process in future years. The SFPUC is hopeful that the format of this report provides value to municipal building owners, managers, occupants, and the general public, and welcomes suggestions about how to improve this report in future years.

(7)

Introduction

The City and County of San Francisco is strongly committed to reducing its impact on the environment and its contributions to climate change. Through key policy documents including the Climate Action Plan and the 2011 Updated Electricity Resource Plan, the City has laid out strategies to achieve its ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals.

One of the actions the City is taking in support of those commitments is to reduce the energy consumption of public buildings. San Francisco’s public buildings are fortunate to obtain their electricity from GHG-free sources, primarily the City’s Hetch Hetchy Power system. However, responsible use of this public resource demands that the City make the most efficient use of this energy. Also, these buildings consume natural gas and steam, which contribute to climate change.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) has offered energy efficiency services to its power customers for the past three

decades. Combined with the efforts of individual departments, these energy improvements in existing buildings save the City millions of dollars per year in energy costs while also improving the indoor environment for building occupants. Additionally, as public facilities are built or undergo major renovations, they must meet the energy performance and LEED Gold standards of the City’s Green Building Ordinance and Environment Code Chapter 7.

However, to most effectively take action, building owners and occupants need to be informed of cost-effective opportunities for energy savings. With this in mind, the Board of Supervisors approved the San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Energy Performance Ordinancein February 2011, amending the Environment Code. The ordinance requires owners of non-residential buildings larger than 10,000 square feet (both privately and municipally owned) to annually disclose their buildings’ energy performance by benchmarking against similar facilities.

With support from 25 other departments that own or lease full buildings, the SFPUC has issued this report to provide San Francisco’s agencies and the general public a better understanding of how the City’s municipal facilities perform. This report identifies high performing buildings as well as opportunities for improvement, and is an attempt by the City to lead by example and provide transparency related to government operations. The information in this report is just a first step. Together with the more detailed information gained from energy audits and the in-depth knowledge of building owners and occupants, this report will help City departments target resources to locations that could benefit the most from energy-related improvements.

Photo: Multi-Service Center North. Built in 1913.

The Polk Street homeless shelter used 19% less energy in calendar year 2012 than the previous year. The SFPUC completed upgrades to the homeless shelter’s heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems in early 2012, after completing a lighting retrofit project in 2010. (Owner: Human Services Agency)

(8)

San Francisco’s Approach to Benchmarking

In 2011, San Francisco joined a growing number of cities that have recently adopted ordinances requiring building owners to benchmark and publicly disclose the energy performance of their facilities each year. Energy benchmarking is simply a way to track the performance of a building over time and compare that building to other similar structures, in order to help identify opportunities for improvement.

While the concept of energy benchmarking is simple, the undertaking of accurately performing this process for San Francisco’s hundreds of municipal buildings continues to be relatively complex. As the City’s public electricity provider, the SFPUC has opted to coordinate the required data gathering effort and publish a consolidated annual report for all City departments. This second annual report builds upon last year’s effort, while also expanding the number of benchmarked municipal buildings by almost 50%. Over the past two years, SFPUC staff has continued to work with representatives of 25 different departments to gather, verify, and update the facility data necessary for this report. This report includes more facilities than required by the ordinance. Although the ordinance only requires benchmarking buildings larger than 10,000 square feet, this municipal report includes buildings of smaller size where a meaningful benchmark could be established. The smallest buildings—park restrooms and kiosks, for example—are excluded. Also, this report includes numerous buildings owned by the City outside of the geographic boundaries of San Francisco, as well as some privately owned buildings that are occupied in full by City departments.

San Francisco’s ordinance, like those in other cities, identifies the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager tool as the preferred method of benchmarking for private-sector buildings. As a well-recognized national rating tool that draws on the best available energy use data, Portfolio Manager (and the associated ENERGY STAR rating system) is an excellent way for owners and occupants of eligible facilities to see how their buildings stack up against local and national peers.

Eligible buildings can receive a 1-100 score (with 50 being the median and 100 the best) that compares a structure to similar buildings nationwide.

The inclusion of K-12 schools in this year’s report has greatly increased the number of rating-eligible facilities compared to the 2011 annual report. However, the bulk of the City’s municipal building types—the libraries, fire stations, museums, recreation centers, etc.—are still benchmarked based on on-site Energy Use Intensity (EUI), which is a measure of annual energy use per square foot of building area. The resulting EUI for each facility is then compared to the EUI of other San Francisco municipal buildings of a similar type. While national average EUI figures are published for a variety of building types, these figures are not normalized for climate and thus are not an ideal method of

understanding how well a building in San Francisco performs. A building in San Francisco’s mild climate would tend to perform relatively well compared to its national peers on the basis of EUI, without revealing much about the building’s actual efficiency.

Another decision was the use of “on-site” rather than “source” EUI as the primary metric in this report, due to the City’s source of electricity. To derive source EUI, the EPA’s Portfolio Manager tool uses national averages to convert electricity used in a facility to the total energy required to supply this electricity. In most cases, electricity delivery involves substantial conversion losses through the burning of fossil fuel, plus some losses due to transmission and distribution of the resulting power. Portfolio Manager recommends an average site-source ratio of 3.34 to account for these losses. However, the SFPUC’s Hetch Hetchy Power system and some local distributed generation provide nearly all of the electricity needed by San Francisco’s municipal buildings. Since these power sources do not involve converting fossil fuels to electricity, use of a national average site-source ratio would be misleading. Therefore, all comparisons in this report (with the exception of ENERGY STAR ratings) are based on site energy use.

While this benchmarking report is a new step toward identifying energy efficiency opportunities, there are several existing efforts to track and

(9)

report the energy efficiency of the City’s buildings. Some City departments (e.g. the Real Estate Division and the California Academy of Sciences) were already using Portfolio Manager to benchmark specific facilities prior to the requirements of the new ordinance. Also, the SFPUC has distributed quarterly Energy Usage Reports to every department for several years, giving departments regular information about fluctuations in energy use for each of their sites. The SFPUC and other departments have also annually contributed energy data for every City facility as part of the Climate Action Plan process coordinated by the Department of the Environment.

It is the hope of the SFPUC that the format of this report will be helpful to City departments and other readers as a way to supplement and improve upon other information sources about San Francisco’s municipal

sustainability performance. As changes are made to the EPA’s ENERGY STAR system, and as San Francisco’s private sector buildings begin to release their own energy performance data, the SFPUC will look for ways to further refine its benchmarking methodology in order to improve the accuracy and relevancy of its reporting and to help lead the way in improving access to energy data in San Francisco and the nation.

San Francisco municipal facility types eligible for ENERGY STAR rating: K-12 School (NEW for 2012 report)

Mental Health Center (Medical Office) Hospital

General Office

Courthouse (NEW for 2012 report) Warehouse

Wastewater Treatment Plant

San Francisco municipal facility types not eligible for rating: Convention Center

Performance Hall Art/Cultural Center Museum

Childcare / Teen Center College / Adult Education Library Homeless Service Medical Clinic Veterinarian Parking Garage Fire Station Police Station Emergency Center Jail / Correctional Clubhouse Recreation Center Swimming Pool Camp

Other Recreational Building Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair Other Shop

Transit Station Airport

(10)

Energy Use in San Francisco’s Municipal Buildings

Information Sources and Assumptions

Creating an accurate energy performance benchmark of San Francisco’s municipal buildings requires information from numerous sources.

Energy data:Electricity, natural gas, and steam data is stored in the

SFPUC’s energy accounting database, which contains metered monthly usage for all utility meters where billing is managed by the SFPUC. Some additional natural gas data was obtained from PG&E, in cases where the site pays PG&E directly for natural gas and the meter information was provided by the individual department to the SFPUC. Natural gas data for SFUSD facilities was provided by SFUSD. There are 17 facilities where a portion of energy use records are missing. These are listed separately at the end of the report.1

Facility data:Accurate facility data is just as important as accurate energy

use data, in order to reliably benchmark a building. As part of the initial report (calendar year 2011), the SFPUC and other departments

engaged in a thorough verification process to review available building and operations data and supply additional detail for the benchmarking effort. This verification process continued for the additional facilities added to the current report, and departments were also asked to provide any updates for buildings that were previously included. For a description of this process, see the inset on page 13.

This report generally refers to “facilities” rather than “buildings”, because in many cases there are energy meters shared by multiple buildings at one location. These locations are benchmarked as

campuses. For instance, the Airport is listed as one facility, but contains 70 individual buildings. San Francisco General Hospital is

      

1 Excluded are any amounts of fuel oil that may be burned in several dual-fuel boilers, to ensure readiness in case of a natural gas curtailment event.

benchmarked as a single facility but is actually a campus of more than 15 individual buildings. Similarly, Moscone Center North and South are considered as a campus due to their shared mechanical systems, as are the War Memorial Veterans Building and Opera House.

In some cases, facilities contain more than one space type. For

instance, the Hall of Justice is a mixed-use facility that contains offices, a courthouse, and jail areas. Where this would affect the ENERGY STAR rating, multiple space types were entered into EPA’s Portfolio Manager. Departments also supplied the SFPUC with the size of parking garages and parking lots connected to buildings. Where attached parking would affect the ENERGY STAR rating, this data was entered into Portfolio Manager as an additional space type. However, it is important to note that the EUI calculations in this report include parking garage area as part of a facility’s square footage, which in most cases decreases the EUI of a building due to the lower energy intensity of a typical parking garage. Parking lots are not included in the EUI calculations.

Civic Center steam loop:Two historic Civic Center buildings obtain steam

from the NRG Energy Center steam loop but do not have individual steam meters: Bill Graham Civic Auditorium and the DPH Central Office at 101 Grove. To generate an estimated EUI for these buildings, the unmetered portion of Civic Center steam use was apportioned to these two buildings based on their square footage. These buildings are not eligible for an ENERGY STAR rating due to the absence of accurate steam meter data. (A steam sub-meter was installed at City Hall at the end of 2011, providing accurate steam use data for City Hall.)

Snapshot of Energy Use

In calendar year 2012, the overall Energy Use Intensity (EUI) of the 445 benchmarked facilities (excluding the Airport) was 74.74 kBtu of on-site

(11)

Energy Use in Municipal Facilities: Calendar Year 2012

The buildings benchmarked in this report represent over 72% of the electricity, natural gas, and district steam used in San Francisco’s municipal facilities in calendar year 2012. Shown in dark green, these 446 facilities (including San Francisco International Airport) used a total of 3,791,754 MMBtu of on-site energy. This report also provides partial benchmark results for an additional 5% of municipal facility energy use, though these facilities cannot be accurately benchmarked on a per-square-foot basis. 22% of the on-site energy used in municipal facilities is excluded from this report, as indicated. [Note that the figures for the Housing Authority (SFHA) and Port are partial totals that exclude non-SFPUC energy such as natural gas.]

Benchmarked with ENERGY STAR

(139 Facilities) 949,490 MMBtu 18.2% of energy use Benchmarked EUI Only (306 Facilities) 1,345,002 MMBtu 25.7% of energy use Airport EUI Only (1 Facility) 1,497,263 MMBtu 28.6% of energy use Water and Wastewater

Treatment Buildings 4.1%

Buildings with Incomplete Meter Data

1.0%

Buildings of Unknown Size 0.05%

Reporting Independently

Port of San Francisco 3.0% of energy use

(Electricity Only) Other

0.5% SFHA (Electricity Only)

1.5% City College 2.7% SFMTA Non-Building 5.0% SFPUC Non-Building 4.0% Streetlights 1.8% Treasure Island 1.8% Other Non-Building 1.0%

Inactive Buildings or Not Covered by Ordinance

0.9%

Departments Not Covered by Ordinance

4.8% of energy use

Excluded City Facilities

14.6% of energy use Partial Benchmark 5.2% of energy use Benchmarked Facilities (Including Airport) 72.5% of energy use

(12)

energy per square foot of building area.2 This was an improvement of 3.6% from the 2011 EUI of 77.53.3

      

2 The overall EUI comparisons provided in the report exclude the Airport, due to

its large size and lack of building-level meter detail. Additionally, some Airport natural gas data prior to 2011 is not available to the SFPUC. Including the Airport, the total EUI decreased 2.3% from 2011 to 2012.

3 The 2011 EUI figure differs somewhat from the number cited in the 2011 report, primarily due to the inclusion of SFUSD facilities in this report. Note that the overall year-to-year comparison includes some buildings that were under renovation or that may have experienced other changes in use affecting their energy use. The site EUI figures shown in this report are not weather normalized

Comparing the two charts above, some building types consume energy out of proportion to their size. For instance, the two hospitals comprise only 4.5% of the benchmarked square footage, but consumed 17% of benchmarked energy in 2012 (EUI of 316.1). This is largely due to the hospitals’ operating hours and intensity of use. On the other hand, parking garages (which are unheated) make up 11.5% of benchmarked square footage but used only 1.1% of the year’s benchmarked energy use (EUI of only 7.9). Museums have a higher than average EUI (likely due to

       

to account for year-to-year fluctuations in the number of heating and cooling degree days. The ENERGY STAR ratings, where available, are weather normalized. Airport 15,579,508 sq.ft. 33.7% Education 8,615,321 sq.ft. 18.6% Parking Garages 5,331,484 sq.ft. 11.5% Offices 3,496,611 sq.ft. 7.6% Service, Repair, and

Storage 2,526,002 sq.ft. 5.5% Hospitals 2,088,030 sq.ft. 4.5% Convention Centers 2,071,000 sq.ft. 4.5% Public Safety 1,640,517 sq.ft. 3.5% Recreation Facilities 1,325,653 sq.ft. 2.9%

Museums and Art 1,223,551 sq.ft. 2.6% Performance Halls 1,061,450 sq.ft. 2.3% Libraries 585,181 sq.ft. 1.3%

Health & Human Services 371,019 sq.ft. 0.8% Transit Stations 363,000 sq.ft. 0.8%

Benchmarked Square Footage, by Building Category

(Total Benchmarked Building Area = 46,278,327 sq ft)

Airport 1,497,263 MMBtu 39.5% Education 378,045 MMBtu 10.0% Parking Garages 42,281 MMBtu 1.1% Offices 255,076 MMBtu 6.7% Service, Repair, and

Storage 166,614 MMBtu 4.4% Hospitals 660,084 MMBtu 17.4% Convention Centers 122,703 MMBtu 3.2% Public Safety 157,755 MMBtu 4.2% Recreation Facilities 122,998 MMBtu 3.2%

Museums and Art 202,100 MMBtu 5.3% Performance Halls 78,960 MMBtu 2.1% Libraries 40,641 MMBtu 1.1%

Health & Human Services 46,010 MMBtu 1.2% Transit Stations 21,225 0.6%

Benchmarked Energy Use, by Building Category

(13)

Electricity 607,135 MWh 2,071,631 MMBtu 55% of energy use Natural Gas 16,402,393 therms 1,640,239 MMBtu 43% of energy use District Steam 66,904,500 lbs 79,884 MMBtu 2% of energy use

Energy Use and GHG Emissions, by Fuel Type (Calendar Year 2012 Benchmarked Energy Use = 3,791,754 MMBtu)

Electricity 0 tons CO2 0% of emissions Natural Gas 95,954 tons CO2 94% of emissions District Steam 6,657 tons CO2 6% of emissions

unique climate control needs), while schools on average are less energy intensive (partly because they are closed in the summer). The average EUI figure for each building type is found in the next section of the report. Municipal facilities use GHG-free SFPUC electricity, natural gas supplied by PG&E or an aggregator (either the California Department of General Services or SPURR), and steam supplied by NRG. To compare these forms of on-site energy use, units have been converted throughout this report to British thermal units (Btu) of energy.4 The charts belowshow the different energy sources used at the 445 benchmarked facilities plus the Airport, as well as the total associated greenhouse gas emissions.5

      

4 Conversion factors are those referenced by EPA’s ENERGY STAR Portfolio

Manager: (3.412 kBtu per kWh of electricity; 100 kBtu per therm of natural gas; 1.194 kBtu per lb of district steam). 1 MMBtu = 1,000 kBtu = 1,000,000 Btu. 5 GHG emissions from SFPUC electricity are zero for 2012. Natural gas emissions use national averages cited by ENERGY STAR (11.7 lbs CO2 per therm of natural

gas). Steam emissions provided by NRG (0.199 lbs CO2 per pound of steam).

Sources and Verification of Facility Data

To develop a list of facilities, SFPUC staff began with a list of over 1,000 individually metered municipal facilities in the Power Enterprise energy accounting database, and cross-referenced this data with databases of owned and leased facilities maintained by the City’s Real Estate Division and Capital Planning Committee.

Next, the SFPUC screened out facilities owned by agencies not covered by the ordinance, such as the Housing Authority and City College. The Port of San Francisco, which maintains its own facility records and natural gas use data, will independently report its energy performance data.

Of the 90 facility categories in the database, those that did not meet the definition of “building” were also screened out. These included bridges, bus stops, fire pumps, sirens, street lights, traffic signals, water pumps, etc. While extremely small buildings such as park restrooms and kiosks were excluded from the report, numerous other buildings smaller than the ordinance’s 10,000 square foot threshold were included where they provided a meaningful comparison to other buildings.

To maximize the accuracy of the facility list used in the initial 2011 report, the SFPUC displayed all known facility data in a web-based survey tool and asked each department to verify its list of facilities and the associated data. The SFPUC supplied a list of meters associated with each facility, for each department to correct meter matchups if necessary. Representatives from all 26 affected departments (including SFUSD for the 2012 report) verified the data and provided corrections and missing information. Data verified through this process included building square footage, number of building occupants, operating hours, year built (and renovated), and other ENERGY STAR facility characteristics depending on building type.

The SFPUC and other Departments were able to verify most facility data. Square footage information and partial meter data from a small fraction of relevant facilities is still unknown. A “partial benchmark” of those facilities is included in this report, and an effort will be made to obtain the missing data in future years.

(14)

General

Office Courthouse

Medical

Office Hospital Warehouse K-12 School

# of Rated Facilities % of Rated Facilities Top 25% (75-100 rating) 10 1 42 53 38.1% 2nd Quarter (50-74 rating) 6 1 3 2 46 58 41.7% 3rd Quarter (25-49 rating) 4 1 18 23 16.5% Bottom 25% (0-24 rating) 1 1 3 5 3.6% TOTAL 21 1 4 1 3 109 139 100%

San Francisco Facilities in ENERGY STAR Categories:

Comparison to National Median Rating

2012 Energy Benchmarking Results

Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for all Facilities

As described previously, the primary method of benchmarking the facilities in this report is to compare the on-site annual Energy Use

Intensity (EUI) of each facility to other San Francisco municipal facilities of the same type. By listing the facilities of each type in descending order of EUI, the reader can quickly see which facilities consumed the most energy per square foot, and which consumed the least. While the charts on the far right-hand side of pages 17-31 show the total energy use for each facility, the primary comparison is on a per-square-foot basis. This EUI comparison is helpful, but not perfect. The wide variation in energy performance within many facility types indicates the potential for energy efficiency retrofit projects to improve the poorer performers. However, each department should look in more detail at the list of its buildings to help interpret the results. Some facility types are susceptible to having complex energy meter arrangements that do not always correspond to discrete buildings (e.g. locations in Golden Gate Park and other Recreation & Park clubhouses and playgrounds), which means the EUI for some facilities includes energy use from adjacent areas as well. To help track changes in energy use over time, a comparison to calendar year 2011 EUI is included for each site. This comparison is also not

perfect, as it is not normalized to account for annual fluctuations in weather, but does provide informative results. Note that in cases where a facility was vacant or under construction for an extended period of time during 2011 or 2012, a note (4) is included after the facility name.

ENERGY STAR Ratings

Since the ENERGY STAR rating system was developed primarily for commercial buildings, the majority of municipal buildings in San Francisco are building types that are not eligible for a 1-100 rating. However, of the 446 municipal facilities benchmarked in this report, 139 of them do have building characteristics and available data that make them eligible for an ENERGY STAR 1-100 rating. The SFPUC entered data for those 139 facilities into the EPA’s Portfolio Manager system, which generated ratings that allow a comparison to national averages. Unlike the EUI data, these ratings take into account local climate and weather conditions, as well as building characteristics such as weekly operating hours and number of occupants.

In general, seven types of San Francisco municipal facilities fall into a category eligible for an ENERGY STAR rating: Office buildings,

Courthouses, Mental Health Centers (Medical Office), Hospitals, Warehouses, K-12 Schools, and Wastewater Treatment Plants. Of the facilities in appropriate categories, some did not qualify for a rating because they did not meet ENERGY STAR’s minimum operating

thresholds (for instance, the buildings were too small or did not have any full-time occupants). The ratings for these non-qualifying facilities are

(15)

listed as “N.Q.” along with explanations. Several other locations are qualifying building types but the SFPUC did not have adequate facility data to generate an accurate rating. Finally, the City’s wastewater treatment plants are not rated in this report, as ENERGY STAR’s methodology for rating these facilities requires more detailed monthly operations data than was available at the publication time of this report. As can be seen in the chart above, 53 of the 139 rating-eligible facilities achieved a preliminary score in the top 25% of similar buildings

nationwide, and therefore appear tentatively qualified to receive the ENERGY STAR label for calendar year 2012.6 Almost 80% of rating-eligible San Francisco facilities performed equal to or better than the national median for similar buildings. Only five facilities were rated in the bottom 25% compared to similar buildings nationwide. Individual ratings for all of these facilities can be seen in the charts on the following pages, grouped by facility type. The top 11 (non-school7) facilities are listed individually to the right side of this page.

Carbon Footprint

The GHG emissions of each facility (on a per square foot basis) is provided to help integrate this benchmarking report with departments’ annual Climate Action Plan reporting. The average 2012 carbon footprint of the benchmarked facilities (5.26 pounds of CO2 emissions per square foot) improved 5.1% from 2011 and 7.0% compared to 2009.

One key difference between San Francisco’s municipal buildings and their national counterparts is that electricity in municipal buildings is GHG-free electricity from the SFPUC’s Hetch Hetchy Power system. This difference is not taken into account by the ENERGY STAR ratings, thus

      

6 Preliminary ratings for calendar year 2012 obtained in June 2013. To obtain

the ENERGY STAR label, the building owner must have the results validated by a licensed engineer or architect, and submit a formal application to the EPA. 7 Although preliminary ENERGY STAR ratings are provided for K-12 schools on the following pages, further site investigations are needed before the scores can be validated. Some operating characteristics (number of personal computers and number of walk-in freezer/refrigeration units) were estimated at each school based on national per-square-foot averages. 

becomes an additional lens with which to view the relative performance of the facilities in this report. Emissions factors used in this report are explained on the next page.

Data Uncertainties and Exceptions

As described in the previous section of this report, a small number of facilities received a “partial benchmark” due to missing square footage or meter information. These facilities are listed separately on the last page of the benchmarking results.

In addition to these partially benchmarked buildings, there are notes (#)

beside the names of some facilities. These notes clarify situations where energy or facility data is treated as a special case, or where facilities need further investigation in future years. Among these are facilities that are in eligible ENERGY STAR categories, but do not meet the EPA’s thresholds for ratings. For a key to these notes, see Appendix A.

The 11 office and medical office facilities that appear qualified for the ENERGY STAR label for calendar year 2012 (subject to validation) are: Department of Public Health: Mission Mental Health Services

Department of Public Works: 1680 Mission St

Human Services Agency: Human Services Agency Headquarters MediCal -- 1440 Harrison

Social Services -- 1235 Mission Real Estate Division: 25 Van Ness Ave

City Hall

One South Van Ness Public Defender's Office

San Francisco Public Library: Library Support Services Building SFPUC: Moccasin Administration Building

(16)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu

Health & Human Services

Medical Clinic- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -15.0% 55.3 8.47

Potrero Hill Health Center DPH 1976 2012 8,000 -37.4% 95.5 N/A 7.44

Curry Senior Service Center DPH 1930 2006 11,195 -11.8% 94.0 N/A 8.27

Mental Health Center- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 1.9% 31.9 1.08

Chinatown Child Development Center DPH 1950 1985 9,250 14.6% 34.4 70 0.85

Mission Mental Health Services DPH 1943 2002 32,000 1.3% 25.4 90 0.67

Dpt.

Facility Year Built Renov.Year

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012 ENERGY STAR Building Area (sq. ft.) 0 100 200 300 400 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000

How to Interpret Data on the Following Pages

The 2012 Energy Benchmarking results are grouped by facility type, and provide key data points about each facility, as well as the facility’s energy performance in calendar year 2012.

Each facility’s preliminary 2012 ENERGY STAR rating is shown here. Facilities in the top 25% of similar buildings nationwide are indicated with a green dot. Facilities in the bottom 25% are indicated with a red dot. “N/A” indicates a facility type not eligible for a rating, or that inadequate information is available. “N.Q.” indicates the facility is an eligible category but does not qualify for a rating based on EPA’s operating thresholds. General category of building, corresponding

to energy use snapshot in previous chapter Specific facility type, allowing a comparison of similar facilities to each other

The change in annual EUI from 2011 to 2012 is shown in this column for each facility. An improvement of more than 10% is shown in green. An EUI increase of more than 10% is shown in red. Facilities that were unoccupied for prolonged periods during either 2011 or 2012 are indicated with a note (4) next to the facility name. This section includes facility characteristics for each location—facility owner, year built, year renovated,

and total building area in square feet. Electricity use shown in yellow

Natural gas use shown in light blue District steam shown in dark blue

2012 Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for each facility, in kBtu of total on-site energy, per square foot of building area See Appendix B for a list of department

acronyms.

The fluctuation in monthly EUI is shown throughout the calendar year, to provide a sense of the times of year with highest and lowest energy use.

Bars shown in this area indicate total 2012 energy use for each facility, in MMBtu of on-site energy. Note: Chart scales vary for different facility types.

San Francisco’s average 2012 EUI for each facility type is provided on the top row here, and also shown as a gray bar for comparison to individual facilities.

Each facility’s estimated 2012 carbon footprint is shown here as pounds of CO2 emissions per square foot of building area.

For electricity in 2012, GHG emissions associated with SFPUC electricity were zero. Natural gas emissions are derived from national averages cited by ENERGY STAR (11.7 lbs CO2 per

therm of natural gas). GHG emissions from steam provided by NRG Energy Center (0.199 lbs CO2 per pound of steam).

(17)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu

Convention Centers

Convention Center- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 4.6% 59.2 3.29

Moscone Center West CFD 2002 775,000 7.5% 73.9 N/A 4.40

Moscone Center North & South (1) CFD 1981 1992 1,296,000 2.1% 50.5 N/A 2.63

Performance Halls

Performance Hall - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D N/A 74.4 6.41

Bill Graham Civic Auditorium (steam unmetered) (2) RED 1915 1989 302,250 N/A 84.0 N/A 10.18 War Memorial Veterans Building & Opera House WMPAC 1932 529,700 -2.2% 76.8 N/A 5.75 Davies Symphony Hall / Zellerbach Rehearsal Hall (1) WMPAC 1980 229,500 -3.2% 56.2 N/A 2.96

Museums and Art

Art/Cultural Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 2.8% 41.4 3.14

GGP -- Sharon Arts Studio (3) RPD 1888 1992 11,376 4.4% 92.7 N/A 10.84

Randall Museum RPD 1951 32,030 -4.2% 75.1 N/A 6.44

Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts SFAC 1948 32,230 41.7% 34.9 N/A 2.29 SOMArts Cultural Center SFAC 1906 17,844 15.7% 32.3 N/A 0.90 Harvey Milk Center for the Arts RPD 1950 2009 23,125 -15.4% 30.0 N/A 1.73 African American Art & Culture Complex SFAC 1935 34,031 -4.0% 28.3 N/A 2.04

Bayview Opera House SFAC 1888 14,000 -1.6% 9.8 N/A 0.00

Arts Commission Window Site / Gallery SFAC 1914 4,163 30.0% 8.2 N/A 0.23 Museum- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -7.3% 185.0 9.63

California Palace of the Legion of Honor FAMSF 1924 1995 117,665 -5.0% 302.7 N/A 21.52 GGP -- Conservatory of Flowers (3) RPD 1879 2003 27,900 4.4% 218.5 N/A 25.56 Asian Art Museum AAM 1917 2003 185,000 -11.6% 187.3 N/A 8.57

De Young Museum FAMSF 2005 292,500 -4.5% 183.9 N/A 9.90

California Academy of Sciences CAS 2008 426,000 -9.4% 151.8 N/A 5.70

Coit Tower RPD 1933 2012 5,687 1.0% 52.8 N/A 0.00

Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012 ENERGY STAR Building Area (sq. ft.) 0 25 50 75 100 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 0 100 200 300 400 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 0 25 50 75 100 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000

(18)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012 ENERGY STAR Building Area (sq. ft.) Education

Childcare / Teen Center- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 0.5% 39.5 3.48

San Miguel CDC (4) SFUSD 1929 1953 21,700 46.3% 216.0 N/A 21.59

Argonne CDC SFUSD 2001 2,500 1.0% 115.0 N/A 9.34

Zaida T Rodriguez Early Education SFUSD 1976 1,800 -14.9% 99.3 N/A 8.29

Noriega CDC SFUSD 1951 14,700 -12.5% 60.8 N/A 5.27

Earl P Mills Community Center HSA 1971 15,000 -23.0% 59.3 N/A 4.52 Commodore Stockton CDC SFUSD 1924 25,000 7.6% 51.2 N/A 3.25 Junipero Serra Annex CDC SFUSD 1970 5,800 -33.7% 46.3 N/A 1.31 Jefferson Early Education SFUSD 1960 2,400 -23.6% 45.4 N/A 3.33 Sojourner Truth Child Center HSA 1971 5,184 -5.8% 38.6 N/A 3.41 Tule Elk Park CDC SFUSD 1923 32,000 -15.9% 35.7 N/A 3.49

Theresa Mahler CDC SFUSD 1943 4,000 24.1% 28.6 N/A 1.23

MLK Child Care Center HSA 1971 7,409 -11.8% 28.0 N/A 2.74

Playmates Nursery SFUSD 1954 3,000 -20.2% 27.6 N/A 1.50

Mission CDC SFUSD 1976 4,100 -25.3% 27.0 N/A 1.59

Leola M Havard Early Education SFUSD 1969 74,100 -30.0% 26.5 N/A 2.41 SFUSD -- SPEd Medical Therapy Unit (Laguna) SFUSD 1972 12,400 -8.2% 15.2 N/A 0.76

John McLaren CDC SFUSD 1954 130,091 14.7% 14.9 N/A 1.39

Shorey Childrens Center HSA 1971 9,700 -6.1% 10.0 N/A 0.64 College / Adult Education- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 0.6% 102.6 10.04

SFPD Academy SFPD 1966 19,332 28.1% 179.1 N/A 15.68

GGP -- Senior Center RPD 1930 5,940 -10.7% 142.4 N/A 12.79 Southeast Community Facility and Greenhouses (5) SFPUC 1986 193,400 -2.2% 96.1 N/A 9.79 Sheriff Community Programs / Five Keys Adult School SHF 1959 2004 10,842 -14.2% 61.2 N/A 3.08 K-12 School- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -6.5% 42.4 3.53

Mission Education Center Elementary SFUSD 1911 27,000 148.6% 105.3 13 10.95 Principals Center Collaborative (Old Laguna Honda) SFUSD 1908 27,900 15.0% 90.1 41 9.11

Ida B Wells High SFUSD 1910 34,300 -9.2% 89.9 35 8.79

Independence High SFUSD 1954 21,300 12.5% 82.6 53 8.23

Robert Louis Stevenson Elementary SFUSD 1953 47,500 -6.0% 76.2 43 7.87 Visitacion Valley Middle SFUSD 1971 113,600 -30.3% 73.6 1 6.50 El Dorado Elementary SFUSD 1953 30,300 8.3% 73.3 29 6.90 Jose Ortega Elementary SFUSD 1953 35,180 -11.3% 73.1 33 7.22 Raoul Wallenberg High SFUSD 1952 51,600 29.5% 70.5 49 5.94 International Studies Academy at Enola Maxwell SFUSD 1971 108,400 -0.6% 67.9 51 6.02 George Peabody Elementary SFUSD 1976 16,229 -9.7% 65.9 18 4.07 Paul Revere Elementary SFUSD 1928 1968 56,400 13.2% 65.6 27 5.34 Hilltop County Community High / Sunshine Building SFUSD 1937 48,943 22.0% 62.7 66 5.68 Sanchez Elementary SFUSD 1927 34,000 -17.4% 62.4 40 5.69

Ulloa Elementary SFUSD 1952 53,000 2.1% 61.3 50 5.80

(19)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Sunset Elementary SFUSD 1951 40,150 -10.3% 60.4 44 5.67

Downtown High SFUSD 1936 33,100 -22.9% 59.9 66 5.28

School of the Arts / Academy of Arts and Sciences SFUSD 1970 209,500 -8.5% 59.7 45 3.95 Buena Vista / Horace Mann SFUSD 1924 68,000 -25.5% 59.1 45 5.56 Philip and Sala Burton High SFUSD 1963 230,000 3.9% 57.2 77 5.06 Sunnyside Elementary SFUSD 1927 30,900 9.8% 57.1 65 5.71 Claire Lilienthal (K-2 Madison Campus) SFUSD 1910 27,500 4.4% 56.1 63 5.34 E R Taylor Elementary SFUSD 1923 55,553 14.2% 55.7 65 5.49 Cleveland Elementary SFUSD 1911 27,500 -6.2% 55.4 50 4.52

Alamo Elementary SFUSD 1924 50,420 -7.7% 52.6 32 3.40

Lawton Elementary SFUSD 1934 64,940 3.2% 52.5 61 5.02

George Moscone Elementary SFUSD 1997 45,108 -3.5% 52.2 26 3.55 George Washington High SFUSD 1936 228,800 -1.4% 52.0 84 4.55 Hillcrest Elementary SFUSD 1951 60,280 -4.6% 51.8 69 5.08 Alice Fong Yu Elementary SFUSD 1914 59,650 0.3% 50.6 50 4.64 Leonard R Flynn Elementary SFUSD 1926 52,700 9.4% 50.4 67 4.53

Presidio Middle SFUSD 1930 140,000 -22.0% 50.1 45 4.77

Chinese Immersion Elementary at DeAvila SFUSD 1926 54,100 29.3% 49.4 72 4.72 Clarendon Elementary SFUSD 1962 39,500 -7.6% 49.1 52 4.06 Francis Scott Key Elementary SFUSD 1936 48,300 -26.9% 48.2 64 3.99 Lakeshore Elementary SFUSD 1954 46,800 1.8% 47.6 71 4.17 Bessie Carmichael / Filipino Education Ctr (6-8) SFUSD 1975 8,800 7.9% 47.2 57 2.62 SF International High SFUSD 1980 33,100 -16.8% 47.0 66 3.06 Sheridan Elementary SFUSD 1975 46,335 10.7% 46.9 53 3.24 Bessie Carmichael Elementary SFUSD 2000 56,358 -20.1% 46.7 37 2.82

Redding Elementary SFUSD 1917 26,100 -6.1% 46.5 66 3.80

Lafayette Elementary SFUSD 1927 66,000 -15.1% 46.4 72 4.39 John O'Connell High SFUSD 1999 130,091 -0.4% 45.9 64 2.90

Roosevelt Middle SFUSD 1930 121,000 -5.1% 45.8 53 4.34

Dr William Cobb Elementary SFUSD 1923 37,900 -18.7% 45.5 61 3.73 Metropolitan Arts & Tech High SFUSD 1976 60,700 -12.8% 45.4 50 3.35 Longfellow Elementary SFUSD 1960 40,500 -23.3% 44.6 68 3.71

Galileo High SFUSD 1924 242,400 -3.5% 44.0 92 3.79

Marina Middle SFUSD 1936 152,900 -18.7% 43.5 61 4.24

James Denman Middle / Leadership High SFUSD 1940 150,900 25.8% 43.3 41 3.61 John Muir Elementary SFUSD 1928 53,500 28.9% 43.1 75 3.71 Bryant Elementary and CDC SFUSD 1969 32,500 56.2% 42.8 54 2.77 Starr King Elementary SFUSD 1955 49,900 0.3% 42.7 85 4.05 Glen Park Elementary SFUSD 1936 45,200 4.5% 42.3 75 3.88 Bret Harte Elementary SFUSD 1954 79,000 0.9% 41.6 73 3.84 New Traditions Elementary SFUSD 1924 26,300 -21.5% 41.4 72 3.19 Argonne Elementary SFUSD 1997 52,000 -15.0% 41.3 67 3.00

(20)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Dr Martin Luther King Middle SFUSD 1940 75,900 18.7% 40.9 57 3.07 A P Giannini Middle SFUSD 1954 142,800 -24.7% 40.6 66 3.84 Malcolm X Elementary SFUSD 1957 50,800 -20.4% 40.4 80 3.47 Rooftop Alternative (5-8 Mayeda Campus) SFUSD 1997 21,000 -12.2% 39.6 32 0.85 West Portal Elementary SFUSD 1927 44,700 -11.3% 39.2 70 3.13

Francisco Middle SFUSD 1926 80,000 -29.2% 39.1 64 3.14

Rosa Parks Elementary / Raphael Weill CDC SFUSD 1927 1964 66,900 -7.6% 38.8 70 3.06 Thurgood Marshall High SFUSD 1957 134,600 -21.5% 38.7 86 2.85

Sutro Elementary SFUSD 1976 32,860 -13.8% 38.3 68 2.66

Monroe Elementary SFUSD 1977 53,540 6.8% 38.3 71 2.75

Former Irving M Scott School SFUSD 1895 12,300 15.2% 38.0 90 3.10 Herbert Hoover Middle SFUSD 1956 132,400 61.7% 38.0 54 3.12 Rooftop Alternative (K-4 Burnett Campus) SFUSD 1952 23,300 149.2% 37.8 89 3.35 Jefferson Elementary SFUSD 1923 42,700 -24.9% 37.3 76 3.00 Cesar Chavez Elementary SFUSD 1926 49,100 -1.1% 36.4 87 3.12 Commodore Sloat Elementary SFUSD 1977 59,200 0.1% 36.3 76 2.72 Dr Charles R Drew Elementary SFUSD 1971 55,234 -18.7% 36.3 73 2.52

Mission High SFUSD 1922 225,000 -16.5% 36.3 93 2.77

Tenderloin Elementary SFUSD 1998 61,569 -7.5% 35.5 62 2.09 June Jordan High / City Arts and Tech High SFUSD 1957 151,600 -6.6% 34.9 96 3.03 James Lick Middle SFUSD 1932 116,000 -29.8% 34.9 84 3.46 Visitacion Valley Elementary SFUSD 1936 51,400 -20.3% 34.7 93 3.15 Spring Valley Elementary SFUSD 1912 50,400 1.4% 34.3 85 2.66 Claire Lilienthal (3-8 Winfield Scott Campus) SFUSD 1930 34,000 -1.6% 34.3 86 2.79 Abraham Lincoln High SFUSD 1940 330,200 1.4% 34.3 98 2.79

Lowell High SFUSD 1962 245,000 -4.5% 34.2 96 2.68

Chinese Education Center SFUSD 1976 11,700 -10.3% 34.1 74 1.46 Sherman Elementary SFUSD 1928 56,200 -19.6% 33.5 93 3.13 Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy SFUSD 1952 30,560 -29.8% 32.8 87 2.55

Aptos Middle SFUSD 1931 168,000 1.7% 32.7 73 2.90

Jean Parker Elementary SFUSD 1996 46,000 -11.5% 32.7 87 2.39

Balboa High SFUSD 1928 261,700 -17.7% 32.4 99 2.87

Alvarado Elementary SFUSD 1926 58,650 -36.3% 32.2 93 2.80 SF Community School SFUSD 1911 66,900 15.9% 31.6 95 3.05 Edison Elementary Charter SFUSD 1927 59,200 -13.7% 31.1 87 2.38 Miraloma Elementary SFUSD 1952 51,900 -11.8% 30.5 95 2.56

Yick Wo Elementary SFUSD 1983 26,000 -9.0% 29.9 91 2.18

Grattan Elementary SFUSD 1971 55,420 -14.5% 28.5 93 2.26 Dianne Feinstein Elementary SFUSD 2003 50,479 -9.4% 28.3 78 1.26 Garfield Elementary SFUSD 1979 33,800 -10.9% 28.2 72 1.13 Frank McCoppin Elementary SFUSD 1976 32,700 2.4% 27.8 72 1.07 John Yehall Chin Elementary SFUSD 1914 23,100 -9.9% 27.4 84 1.29

(21)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Daniel Webster Elementary SFUSD 1924 42,800 14.2% 26.7 45 0.27 Junipero Serra Elementary SFUSD 1977 34,200 -26.9% 24.1 87 0.83 Fairmount Elementary SFUSD 1976 60,960 -3.1% 22.7 90 1.21 Civic Center Secondary at John Swett Campus SFUSD 1912 29,060 -43.0% 22.6 91 1.23 Creative Arts Charter Elementary SFUSD 1908 1962 61,400 11.2% 22.0 96 1.55 Gordon J Lau Elementary SFUSD 1914 1956 63,800 0.3% 21.8 99 1.82 Marshall Elementary SFUSD 1977 34,300 -1.9% 20.9 93 0.97

Everett Middle SFUSD 1926 330,200 -5.0% 18.2 95 1.65

McKinley Elementary SFUSD 1977 45,160 -11.6% 18.0 95 0.78 Dr George Washington Carver Elementary SFUSD 1974 108,294 -12.2% 17.9 93 0.94

Libraries

Library- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -2.3% 69.4 1.64

Ocean View Branch Library SFPL 2000 4,794 -1.1% 171.4 N/A 3.89 Western Addition Branch Library SFPL 1966 2008 8,000 2.5% 90.2 N/A 6.83 Chinatown Him Mark Lai Branch Library SFPL 1921 1996 17,858 -5.0% 82.6 N/A 3.74 Richmond/Milton Marks Branch Library SFPL 1914 2009 13,900 10.8% 77.5 N/A 3.10 Marina Branch Library SFPL 1954 2007 7,633 -13.4% 75.5 N/A 4.06 Park Branch Library SFPL 1909 2011 8,060 -0.9% 73.3 N/A 5.07

Main Library SFPL 1996 376,000 -3.0% 73.0 N/A 3.38

Presidio Branch Library SFPL 1921 2011 10,205 1.2% 70.3 N/A 5.65 Ingleside Branch Library SFPL 2009 6,100 -7.3% 66.4 N/A 4.04 Potrero Branch Library SFPL 1951 2010 5,428 -26.9% 65.3 N/A 2.91 West Portal Branch Library SFPL 1939 2007 8,010 -37.7% 64.0 N/A 3.36 Noe Valley/Sally Brunn Branch Library SFPL 1916 2008 6,096 -35.1% 63.1 N/A 3.67 Anza Branch Library (4) SFPL 1932 2011 8,222 24.1% 62.7 N/A 3.69 Portola Branch Library SFPL 2009 6,427 -1.6% 58.8 N/A 2.93 Bernal Heights Branch Library SFPL 1940 2010 8,777 -14.9% 56.3 N/A 2.79 Sunset Branch Library SFPL 1918 2007 9,434 -3.9% 54.2 N/A 1.38 Visitacion Valley Branch Library (4) SFPL 2011 9,945 149.3% 54.0 N/A 3.07 Ortega Branch Library (4) SFPL 2011 9,300 132.5% 49.4 N/A 2.24 Mission Branch Library SFPL 1916 10,479 -1.9% 49.3 N/A 0.99 Merced Branch Library (4) SFPL 1958 2011 5,832 -20.6% 48.5 N/A 1.96 North Beach Branch Library SFPL 1959 8,455 10.7% 47.3 N/A 3.48 Excelsior Branch Library SFPL 1967 2005 8,322 -2.7% 45.8 N/A 2.50 Parkside Branch Library SFPL 1951 2010 6,822 2.2% 40.1 N/A 1.81 Eureka Valley/Harvey Milk Branch Library SFPL 1961 2009 6,465 1.6% 38.8 N/A 1.11 Glen Park Branch Library SFPL 2007 7,185 -8.0% 37.9 N/A 0.59 Golden Gate Valley Branch Library (4) SFPL 1917 2011 7,432 105.1% 35.7 N/A 1.19

0 50 100 150 200 0 7,500 15,000 22,500 30,000 0 75 150 225 300 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000

(22)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Health & Human Services

Homeless Service- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -7.6% 160.5 14.64

Multi-Service Center South HSA 1924 25,600 4.1% 286.8 N/A 27.24 Multi-Service Center North HSA 1913 37,125 -19.0% 177.9 N/A 16.20 Mission Neighborhood Resource Center HSA 1922 6,500 -2.2% 131.3 N/A 8.55 Hamilton Family Shelter HSA 1966 50,000 -6.2% 86.7 N/A 7.82 Medical Clinic- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -15.0% 110.6 8.47

San Francisco City Clinic DPH 1930 8,000 50.8% 158.1 N/A 13.53 Southeast Health Center DPH 1979 2012 14,604 -8.0% 139.6 N/A 9.10 Castro Mission Health Center (Health Center #1) DPH 1965 2008 15,258 -8.1% 121.9 N/A 9.25 Ocean Park Health Center (Health Center #5) DPH 1967 2009 16,247 -17.4% 118.4 N/A 9.90 Silver Avenue Health Center (Health Center #3) DPH 1967 2005 22,950 -22.3% 100.2 N/A 7.49 Chinatown Public Health Center (Health Center #4) DPH 1967 2010 22,500 -8.7% 98.7 N/A 6.78 Maxine Hall Health Center (Health Center #2) DPH 1966 2006 20,590 -31.9% 96.9 N/A 7.80 Potrero Hill Health Center DPH 1976 2012 8,000 -37.4% 95.5 N/A 7.44 Curry Senior Service Center DPH 1930 2006 11,195 -11.8% 94.0 N/A 8.27 Mental Health Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 1.9% 31.9 1.08

S Van Ness Mental Health / Mission Family Center DPH 1958 14,700 1.8% 49.0 63 2.59 South of Market Mental Health Services DPH 1956 1998 13,000 7.2% 43.1 60 1.28 Chinatown Child Development Center DPH 1950 1985 9,250 14.6% 34.4 70 0.85 SE Child/Family Therapy Center (6) DPH 1939 1998 3,000 10.1% 29.4 N.Q. 1.83 Mission Mental Health Services DPH 1943 2002 32,000 1.3% 25.4 90 0.67 Redwood Center (7) DPH 1939 11,000 -29.2% 13.1 N.Q. 0.00 Veterinarian- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -2.2% 298.7 27.56

Animal Shelter ACC 1931 1989 29,500 -2.2% 298.7 N/A 27.56

Hospitals

Hospital- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -3.5% 316.1 27.73

San Francisco General Hospital DPH 1915 1976 1,370,904 -2.4% 369.1 9 32.94 Laguna Honda Hospital (8) DPH 1926 2010 717,126 -6.9% 214.9 N.Q. 17.76

0 100 200 300 400 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000

(23)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012 ENERGY STAR Building Area (sq. ft.) Offices

General Office- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -8.5% 73.0 2.07

Temp Sewer Operations Office (6) SFPUC 2000 2,500 -1.4% 147.8 N.Q. 0.00 Hall of Justice (9) RED 1959 700,000 -7.5% 144.3 N.Q. 10.88 Sheriff Training Facility SHF 1963 2002 19,057 23.7% 118.4 10 7.84 SFUSD -- Administration - Franklin (10) SFUSD 1976 78,028 -10.4% 111.3 N/A 3.61 GGP -- McLaren Lodge and Annex RPD 1896 1950 17,252 -1.5% 111.2 48 7.28 GGP -- Park Aid Station / Natural Areas Program (4) (6) RPD 1902 2012 2,733 95.9% 99.9 N.Q. 5.87 Moccasin Administration Building (11) SFPUC 12,241 50.1% 95.3 75* 0.00

Enforcement Division SFMTA 1920 8,000 6.0% 94.5 43 3.77

CHN Headquarters DPH 1923 1993 60,000 6.7% 93.5 54 6.44

DPH Central Office (steam unmetered) (2) DPH 1932 119,000 N/A 93.0 N.Q. 11.16 SFUSD -- Academics and Professional Development (10) SFUSD 1973 23,400 14.2% 89.6 N/A 4.62

1660 Mission St RED 1990 90,619 -0.7% 79.4 54 3.84

SFUSD -- Children's Center Administration Building (10) SFUSD 1930 20,000 6.1% 72.3 N/A 7.06

1680 Mission St DPW 1923 41,200 15.9% 70.5 78 4.28

Investigations -- 160 South Van Ness HSA 1936 2002 14,219 4.1% 68.0 60 2.13 Women's Resource Center SHF 1959 5,920 -21.8% 67.3 31 4.41 Human Services Agency Headquarters HSA 1979 171,385 -17.1% 67.1 75 3.02 Social Services -- 1235 Mission HSA 1935 124,219 -0.5% 63.7 83 2.64 SFFD - Headquarters SFFD 1912 1999 50,000 6.5% 59.7 73 1.87 SFUSD -- School Health Programs (10) SFUSD 1950 13,900 -0.5% 59.7 N/A 3.51

30 Van Ness Ave RED 1965 180,939 -30.8% 57.7 70 1.30

Library Support Services Building SFPL 1925 2001 43,182 -7.0% 54.0 83 3.18 25 Van Ness Ave RED 1913 1985 130,000 -4.7% 51.5 81 0.40 35/45 Onondaga Building (4) (12) DPH 1928 1932 8,747 -72.9% 48.7 N.Q. 4.94 MediCal -- 1440 Harrison HSA 1921 52,200 -19.0% 47.4 91 1.62

City Hall (2) RED 1915 2000 516,484 N/A 45.9 90 1.98

Seneca First Stop Visit Cntr/Workforce Development HSA 1947 8,100 13.0% 45.8 72 2.44 One South Van Ness (OSVN) RED 1959 1989 655,000 -4.3% 43.5 86 0.82 SFUSD -- Student Nutrition Services (10) SFUSD 1932 9,900 -56.3% 38.4 N/A 2.02

Airport Reprographics SFO 1967 6,000 -1.9% 37.3 48 1.03

Public Defender's Office RED 1985 52,000 -12.4% 32.1 92 0.30 SFUSD -- Administration - Van Ness (10) SFUSD 1927 241,956 -12.5% 22.6 N/A 1.99 Courthouse- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -1.3% 58.2 3.96

Community Justice Center 1913 18,430 -1.3% 58.2 66 3.96

(24)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012 ENERGY STAR Building Area (sq. ft.) Public Safety

Fire Station- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -0.1% 65.7 5.24

Fire Station 35 (Fire Boat House) SFFD 1908 1994 4,712 17.3% 205.1 N/A 10.15 Fire Station 34 SFFD 1929 1998 4,400 -0.8% 142.7 N/A 11.93

Fire Station 22 SFFD 1962 5,900 4.7% 136.6 N/A 12.98

Fire Station 20 SFFD 1963 1997 10,300 4.0% 114.3 N/A 11.20 Fire Fighting Training Center - Treasure Island SFFD 5,040 -35.9% 108.3 N/A 0.00

Fire Station 31 SFFD 1913 8,500 7.0% 106.3 N/A 8.96

Fire Station 29 SFFD 1956 1996 8,300 -15.4% 100.2 N/A 9.28 Fire Station 06 SFFD 1948 1998 13,500 20.1% 98.6 N/A 9.15 Fire Station 05 SFFD 1954 1984 12,600 -5.1% 97.2 N/A 9.04 Fire Station 15 SFFD 1957 1997 12,138 1.3% 96.7 N/A 6.01 Fire Station 17 SFFD 1955 1996 12,100 -3.3% 96.3 N/A 8.40 Old Fire Station 01 SFFD 1953 1992 14,100 -2.8% 94.8 N/A 8.19

Fire Station 21 SFFD 1958 1988 8,000 4.5% 88.5 N/A 8.79

Fire Station 18 SFFD 1951 1997 15,900 7.6% 85.7 N/A 8.05

Fire Station 10 SFFD 1956 14,300 1.7% 85.3 N/A 8.24

Fire Station 16 SFFD 1938 1998 14,000 -9.8% 83.0 N/A 8.24 Fire Station 43 SFFD 1970 1995 10,800 1.5% 82.3 N/A 4.60

Fire Station 38 SFFD 1960 13,400 -3.4% 81.1 N/A 7.61

Fire Station 13 SFFD 1974 1999 18,790 1.7% 78.8 N/A 5.06

Fire Station 37 SFFD 1915 1990 6,950 3.3% 75.9 N/A 6.24

Fire Station 11 SFFD 1956 1996 14,000 3.2% 75.0 N/A 6.56

Fire Station 39 SFFD 1923 1998 8,450 6.3% 74.9 N/A 6.45

Fire Station 12 SFFD 1955 11,300 -9.8% 72.7 N/A 6.28

Fire Station 40 SFFD 1931 1995 7,350 3.9% 72.3 N/A 4.72

Fire Station 19 SFFD 1951 1998 11,500 -2.5% 71.4 N/A 6.50 Fire Station 07 / Division of Training SFFD 1953 2003 33,600 6.1% 71.0 N/A 5.91

Fire Station 08 SFFD 1940 1994 8,000 6.0% 66.6 N/A 4.27

Fire Station 41 SFFD 1956 9,600 9.0% 63.3 N/A 5.92

Fire Station 32 SFFD 1941 1991 10,900 4.3% 61.3 N/A 5.84 Fire Station 26 SFFD 1968 1997 15,000 -9.6% 60.6 N/A 5.40 Fire Station 24 SFFD 1914 1997 7,600 -21.7% 58.6 N/A 4.52 Fire Station 23 SFFD 1959 1996 12,000 -2.7% 55.6 N/A 5.25 Fire Station 44 SFFD 1915 1998 8,450 29.1% 54.1 N/A 4.30

Fire Station 33 SFFD 1973 1998 5,900 7.9% 52.9 N/A 3.52

Fire Station 03 SFFD 1973 8,000 -7.5% 50.8 N/A 2.68

Fire Station 25 SFFD 1916 11,420 -3.4% 50.0 N/A 3.67

Fire Station 36 SFFD 1961 1996 16,100 -14.1% 49.8 N/A 4.25 Fire Station 09 SFFD 1972 1995 21,400 11.4% 49.0 N/A 3.67

Fire Station 02 SFFD 1994 16,920 5.6% 42.0 N/A 2.35

Fire Station 42 SFFD 1979 1998 9,300 -0.7% 39.4 N/A 2.41

0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 0 100 200 300 400

(25)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Fire Station 14 SFFD 1973 15,900 3.5% 35.1 N/A 1.80

Fire Station 48 - Treasure Island SFFD 15,000 -6.0% 28.8 N/A 1.54 Fire Station 49 SFFD 1958 2002 75,000 -6.0% 12.8 N/A 0.49 Police Station- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -2.6% 78.1 3.94

Central Police Station SFPD 1970 8,000 7.1% 134.9 N/A 2.58 Bayview Police Station SFPD 1996 16,000 17.2% 115.8 N/A 5.13 Ingleside Police Station SFPD 1910 1990 18,500 -18.3% 110.2 N/A 8.15 Park Police Station SFPD 1910 1993 13,700 -7.5% 90.9 N/A 6.08 Northern Police Station SFPD 1988 1987 18,000 -6.8% 78.0 N/A 3.48 Taraval Police Station SFPD 1929 1994 18,070 23.8% 74.6 N/A 4.85 SFPD Tactical Company SFPD 1941 2009 52,125 -6.8% 73.3 N/A 3.81 Mission Police Station SFPD 1994 25,000 -10.9% 66.5 N/A 2.77 Richmond Police Station SFPD 1910 1993 13,000 12.2% 58.9 N/A 2.62 Tenderloin Police Station SFPD 2000 27,500 1.2% 42.4 N/A 1.42 Emergency Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 3.3% 193.3 8.98

Emergency Operations Center DEM 1998 2010 56,000 3.3% 193.3 N/A 8.98 Jail / Correctional- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -4.1% 115.5 4.18

San Francisco County Jail, San Bruno Facility SHF 1934 2006 348,202 -3.8% 152.1 N/A 11.43 Youth Guidance Center JUV 1950 2006 210,000 -4.8% 143.1 N/A 12.47 County Jail #1 & #2 SHF 1994 250,000 -4.1% 41.2 N/A 0.62

0 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 0 100 200 300 400

0 100 200 300 400 0 3,750 7,500 11,250 15,000 0 100 200 300 400 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000

(26)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012 ENERGY STAR Building Area (sq. ft.) Recreation Facilities

Clubhouse - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -5.0% 62.4 2.75

South Sunset Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1949 1,500 6.7% 250.6 N/A 6.97 Sandy Tatum Clubhouse RPD 2005 20,000 -14.4% 207.7 N/A 14.38 Youngblood Coleman Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1960 2,135 16.9% 164.6 N/A 2.96 James Rolph Jr Clubhouse RPD 1921 2,730 44.9% 153.4 N/A 5.36 Laurel Hill Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1953 1,134 -21.1% 125.7 N/A 12.89 Merced Heights Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1950 1,136 1.1% 119.6 N/A 3.78 GGP -- Golf Course Clubhouse RPD 1951 2,470 -11.7% 104.4 N/A 0.00 Jose Coronado Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1995 933 15.7% 103.2 N/A 1.14 Lincoln Park Golf Course RPD 1936 6,329 11.4% 83.3 N/A 2.65 Helen Wills Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2005 3,082 20.0% 77.0 N/A 6.32 Argonne Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2006 1,000 110.0% 76.9 N/A 4.19 Hayes Valley Clubhouse (4) RPD 2011 2,500 75.8% 60.7 N/A 2.79 Midtown Terrace Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1961 2,176 1.1% 64.5 N/A 6.39 Crocker Amazon Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 1982 24,040 -2.5% 63.9 N/A 0.41 Silver Terrace Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1953 7,842 -6.4% 60.9 N/A 1.04 Gilman Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1969 1,578 -29.1% 59.6 N/A 0.00 Boeddeker Park and Clubhouse RPD 1989 3,740 30.2% 57.8 N/A 1.86 Jackson Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1912 8,060 26.3% 54.9 N/A 3.72 Mccoppin Square Clubhouse RPD 1955 2,000 -2.6% 52.9 N/A 2.08 Visitacion Valley Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2003 2,600 -17.6% 52.0 N/A 3.21 Christopher Clubhouse RPD 1971 2,337 -41.6% 51.5 N/A 0.00 Parque Ninos Unidos Clubhouse RPD 2004 2,414 -5.4% 48.9 N/A 3.91 Margaret S Hayward Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1922 6,717 -1.7% 45.7 N/A 1.01 Woh Hei Yuen Clubhouse RPD 1997 5,000 -13.4% 38.5 N/A 2.35 J. P. Murphy Clubhouse RPD 1950 1,820 -4.7% 35.9 N/A 2.78 Wawona Clubhouse (Project Insight) RPD 1950 1,830 -18.9% 33.1 N/A 2.59 Peixotto Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 2,000 3.4% 30.3 N/A 2.62 Cow Hollow Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1950 675 15.7% 29.2 N/A 2.01 West Portal Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2004 2,728 9.2% 27.5 N/A 0.58 Douglas Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1926 1,072 -15.8% 26.1 N/A 1.29 Miraloma Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1949 1,352 11.8% 23.7 N/A 1.71 Richmond Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1916 1,200 32.1% 23.6 N/A 1.56 Rochambeau Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2004 1,482 -8.2% 23.4 N/A 1.23 Sigmund Stern Grove / Trocadero Clubhouse RPD 1930 2005 12,832 -4.0% 23.4 N/A 0.00 GGP -- Stow Lake Boathouse RPD 1945 4,647 -35.8% 23.2 N/A 0.63 Sunnyside Conservatory RPD 1900 2009 1,536 6.8% 22.2 N/A 0.00 Julius Kahn Clubhouse RPD 1922 1,105 -19.4% 20.8 N/A 1.39 Excelsior Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1928 2,255 -28.5% 19.4 N/A 1.32 Grattan Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1949 1,854 15.8% 19.4 N/A 1.46 Sunnyside Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1969 4,412 23.3% 16.4 N/A 0.60

(27)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Junipero Serra Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 1,578 16.6% 13.1 N/A 0.27 Willie Woo Woo Wong Clubhouse RPD 1927 6,000 -3.6% 12.3 N/A 0.20 Alice Chalmers Clubhouse RPD 1951 2,505 35.9% 11.7 N/A 0.00 West Sunset Clubhouse RPD 1953 13,530 -42.7% 8.7 N/A 0.00 Pine Lake Park Clubhouse RPD 1950 1,242 -16.3% 7.2 N/A 0.00 Lake Merced Boathouse (4) RPD 1950 9,100 34.2% 6.6 N/A 0.00 Presidio Heights Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1910 958 -16.0% 5.6 N/A 0.61 Cabrillo Clubhouse (4) RPD 1931 1,420 -10.2% 5.3 N/A 0.00 Fulton Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 1,420 -64.9% 5.0 N/A 0.17 Cayuga Clubhouse (4) RPD 2011 2,500 -100.0% 0.0 N/A 0.00 Recreation Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -8.3% 52.7 2.02

Moscone Rec Center RPD 1924 2008 9,650 -3.5% 131.1 N/A 8.75 Joseph Lee Rec Center RPD 1950 2007 16,383 20.3% 115.9 N/A 10.51 Eureka Valley Rec Center RPD 1951 2004 17,880 -8.7% 99.1 N/A 9.79 Potrero Hill Rec Center RPD 1950 18,805 169.4% 76.0 N/A 7.15 Minnie & Lovie Ward Rec Center RPD 2007 2008 19,461 -2.0% 73.1 N/A 6.11 St. Mary's Rec Center and Playground RPD 1949 23,307 10.5% 68.0 N/A 5.76 GGP -- County Fair Building/Hall Of Flowers RPD 1961 1969 23,477 11.3% 66.7 N/A 5.79 Bernal Heights Rec Center RPD 1932 5,008 -2.6% 53.7 N/A 4.10 Upper Noe Rec Center RPD 1950 2006 16,447 12.8% 51.4 N/A 3.30 Richmond Rec Center RPD 2000 18,470 -25.9% 48.5 N/A 1.78 Mission Rec Center / Mission Arts Center RPD 1984 2012 30,850 -0.8% 45.2 N/A 2.30 Tenderloin Rec Center RPD 1995 10,133 -29.8% 43.6 N/A 2.85 Palega Rec Center (4) RPD 1928 2012 18,397 -61.4% 42.4 N/A 4.58 GGP -- Model Yacht Clubhouse (3) RPD 1938 3,168 -7.7% 37.2 N/A 4.36 Betty Ann Ong Chinese Rec Center (4) RPD 1951 2012 24,234 N/A 32.3 N/A 2.25 Gene Friend Rec Center @ SOMA RPD 1989 16,354 -53.2% 21.2 N/A 0.59 Glen Park Rec Center / Glenridge Nursery School RPD 1934 22,301 -49.0% 17.5 N/A 0.44 GGP -- Kezar Pavilion RPD 1925 24,254 7.3% 14.1 N/A 0.00 Sunset Rec Center (4) RPD 1940 2012 16,424 -91.2% 7.4 N/A 0.85 Swimming Pool- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -13.5% 266.8 23.15

Coffman Pool / Herz Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1957 2008 12,289 -13.4% 457.6 N/A 41.47 Rossi Swimming Pool and Playground RPD 1958 15,162 2.2% 433.1 N/A 45.07 Hamilton Rec Center and Pool RPD 1953 2010 16,988 -12.8% 413.2 N/A 33.90 Charlie Sava Swimming Pool / Larsen Park RPD 1957 2008 12,900 -24.1% 411.4 N/A 35.72 North Beach Swimming Pool/Joe DiMaggio Playground RPD 2004 2006 16,384 3.7% 239.8 N/A 19.43 Garfield Pool and Garfield Square Clubhouse RPD 1958 21,160 -13.5% 232.2 N/A 22.97 Martin Luther King Jr Swimming Pool RPD 2001 23,851 -7.7% 205.8 N/A 14.54 Balboa Swimming Pool (13) RPD 1962 19,000 -6.0% 32.2 N/A 0.00 Mission Community Pool / Clubhouse (4) RPD 1916 2012 8,500 -92.3% 15.4 N/A 0.48

0 75 150 225 300 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000

(28)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Other Recreational Buildings - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 9.0% 83.3 4.52

GGP -- Murphy Millwright's Cottage (4) RPD 1904 2011 2,960 94.8% 522.2 N/A 1.61

SF Zoo RPD 1930 65,799 4.0% 388.2 N/A 25.12

GGP -- Beach Chalet and Visitor Center RPD 1925 1996 18,045 -1.5% 231.1 N/A 24.87 GGP -- Kezar Stadium RPD 1924 5,000 31.8% 226.8 N/A 16.87 GGP -- Music Concourse RPD 1900 5,095 -9.2% 127.2 N/A 0.00

SFPD Stables SFPD 1935 11,800 39.4% 82.9 N/A 8.44

SFPD Pistol Range SFPD 1942 1989 10,000 -11.4% 53.1 N/A 1.36 Candlestick Park Stadium RPD 1960 500,000 14.4% 38.4 N/A 1.27 GGP -- Pioneer Log Cabin RPD 1911 1931 2,256 -4.2% 36.9 N/A 0.00

Camp Ida Smith SFPUC 1,200 -9.6% 33.7 N/A 0.00

GGP -- Bercut Equitation Field RPD 1930 20,632 -11.6% 11.6 N/A 0.00 GGP -- Dutch Windmill RPD 1902 2,500 43.7% 11.1 N/A 0.00

Fay House RPD 1912 4,536 -29.9% 1.2 N/A 0.00

(29)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI) EUI Change Since 2011 Carbon Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site MMBtu Dpt.

Facility Year

Built Year

Renov. Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Calendar Year 2012

ENERGY STAR Building

Area (sq. ft.)

Service, Repair, and Storage

Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair- San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -1.3% 84.3 4.03

GGP -- Maintenance Yard and Nursery RPD 1957 43,947 -10.3% 237.3 N/A 23.19 H. Hetchy-Warnerville Substation/Switchyard SFPUC 1,835 5.2% 197.7 N/A 0.00 Cable Car Barn and Power House SFMTA 1906 1984 83,741 7.5% 160.4 N/A 0.64 Kirkland Division - Motor Coach SFMTA 1949 9,352 -19.0% 157.5 N/A 5.03 Metro East Facility - LRV SFMTA 2008 180,000 3.7% 149.2 N/A 5.09

Millbrae Yard SFPUC 60,045 2.7% 126.9 N/A 5.94

City Distribution Division SFPUC 67,500 0.4% 126.8 N/A 8.16 Cameron Beach (Geneva) Yard - LRV and Streetcar SFMTA 1984 31,514 -6.4% 121.5 N/A 4.88 Woods Division - Motor Coach SFMTA 1976 161,719 -4.9% 109.8 N/A 6.62

DT Corporation Yard DT 1950 45,000 9.9% 73.3 N/A 4.07

References

Related documents

Following a background section in which the analytic signal, ultrasonic model, and previous modeling predictions are described with reference to published literature, the novel

quantitative capstone project was to examine and compare the differences between the use of an intraoperative forced air-warming device and a forced air warming device plus

Framework to Implement Customer Driven Product Development Approach for Sri Lankan Furniture Design Industry There are two major management approaches in the global product

The title compound showed poor antimicrobial activity, good antioxidant and antitubercular activities but potent anticancer activity against HeLa cancer cell lines,

The presented Network Security Simulator NeSSi (see Figure 1) allows NSPs to experiment with different network-centric security framework setups and algorithms in order to evaluate

revolution of an uneducated people, since it could have little chance of success and only lead to "useless spilling of blood." Rizal's comment that a noble, patriotic

PLCS Reporter provides summary reports of active and historical data including:.. Client

Top Ten Essential Resume Elements Using Keywords and Action Words Managing Your Online Presence Interviewing 1012. Building Your