Growing Better Melons
George Clough
Oregon State University
Hermiston Agricultural Research &
Extension Cente
r
Growing Better Melons
w/polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation
!"#$%&'
(
! ! !"#$%&'($%)&!
! ! !*$#+,-,&!
! ! !./+(!01,%21,%)&!
! ! !341+5$-/%!
! ! !6/((+%$-/%!
Growing Better Melons:
)*+,-.,/0&'(
(
(
1,23$-0&&(
( ( (
7!8!9,,:&!
(4.,-*((1&.,53$&670-.(
( ( (
7!4%+;/#1!
! ! !7!%/!)<+%%+%5!/#!#,'($%-%5!
! ! ! !7!,&'=!9>&,,2(,&&!1,(/%&!
((
8$&,*+,-.,/0&'(
(
(9"&.&(
( (
7!6($%)&!
! !7!.',?+$(+@,2!AB4+'1,%)!
! ! ! !C"#$%&'($%),#D!
! !7!E%?#,$&,2!!F$G/#!!
! !7!H%?,#)$+%)I!
! ! ! !2,(+J,#I!
! ! ! !B4$(+)I!
9"-&$*02,:"-&'(
(
(
4$;0(
( ( (
F$#5,#!K!L!M/&)!
(
)/0(
( ( (
N(2,#!!K!!L!!M/&)!
Watermelon Transplant Size:
Cell Size Leaf Area Weight
51 (1f”) 7.97 0.66
73 (1
!
”) 6.36 0.45
96 (1d”) 4.56 0.31
135 (1c”) 3.12 0.20
Watermelon Transplant Size:
Watermelon Transplant Size:
Yield (t/acre)
Cell Size Early Total
51
18.5
42.3
73 18.9 39.8
96 21.9 40.1
Watermelon Transplant Depth:
-
"soil line“ vs cotyledon
- 3 years
deep-setting tended to increase early yield
deep-set plants appeared more vigorous
depth did not influence total yield
Watermelon Transplant Age:
Watermelon Transplant Age:
- 2 locations
age of transplant did not affect early or
total yield or fruit size
Vavrina
, et al., U of Fla.
- 3 cell sizes (50, 73, 135 cell)
- 3 years
neither age of transplant nor cell-size
affected early or total yield or fruit size
Growing Better Melons:
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Y ield tons/a
!""#$%&'()*(+,-$./(+0$
Clough, OSU1998 Seedless Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs) Carousel 37.4 10.4 15.0 Crimson Jewel 32.4 11.2 14.1 Honey Heart 28.7 10.5 12.8 King of Hearts 27.4 11.1 13.2 Nova 35.0 10.3 12.4 Palomar 29.0 10.5 13.0 Summer Sweet 2532 41.5 10.0 15.3 Summer Sweet 3521Y 30.0 10.6 10.61998 Seedless Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs) Summer Sweet 5032 26.9 10.4 15.4 Summer Sweet 5544 29.7 11.2 14.6 SWX0037 37.2 10.7 18.4 SWX3022 25.8 11.3 16.6 SWX3053 28.3 10.7 13.1 SWX4016 38.6 10.5 17.6 Tri-X 626 33.7 10.8 13.5 Clough, OSU0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Y ield tons/a
2008 Watermelon Yield
7/23/2008 *Primed2008 Seedless Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs) 7167 8.6 8.5 12.6 7187 8.7 8.4 12.7 9601 HQ 9.7 9.3 12.2 9651 HQ 5.8 8.8 11.5 Crunchy Red F1 9.8 8.2 13.2 Melody 6.1 8.6 11.4 Super Crisp 32 7.9 8.7 13.2 Sweet Delight 6.0 8.8 12.8 Tri-X 212 10.4 8.5 13.7 Tri-X 313 8.8 8.3 13.70 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Y ield tons/a
2009 Watermelon Yield
<=>?=>@@A( <=BC=>@@A( D=CB=>@@A(
*Primed
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Y ield tons/a
2009 Total Yield
2009 Seedless Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs) 7167 32.2 9.9 15.8 7187 22.7 10.2 14.3 9601 HQ 33.1 10.2 14.1 9651 HQ 25.6 10.1 13.5 Crunchy Red F1 27.0 9.4 14.2 Melody 25.8 9.8 13.6 Super Crisp 32 25.1 10.4 14.2 Sweet Delight 26.0 10.5 15.3 Tri-X 212 23.1 9.7 13.4 Tri-X 313 25.8 9.8 14.3Growing Better Melons:
Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs)Fruit/
Acre
5104 43.7 11.3 10.4 4180 5109 30.3 10.8 7.6 3930 5116 35.6 11.3 8.3 4260 Extazy 33.4 10.9 8.5 3960 Liliput 37.6 11.3 10.3 3640 MiniTriploid 2132 40.1 10.9 11.5 3490 MiniTriploid 2308 30.4 11.0 10.4 2930 MiniTriploid 2168 34.8 11.8 12.8 2690 Petit Perfection* 30.0 11.9 6.3 4710 RWT 8149 32.0 11.5 6.9 4620Organic Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs)Fruit/
Acre
Bibo 14.6 11.9 3.0 9750 Little Deuce Coupe 20.5 11.7 4.1 9960 Mini Yellow 25.3 10.5 6.2 8330 Petit Perfection 24.0 10.9 4.2 11220 Poquito 31.8 10.1 7.2 8710 Precious Petit 20.1 10.9 3.3 11980 RWT 8189 16.1 12.0 3.4 9365 Valdoria 24.7 9.9 5.1 9860 Vanessa 24.2 9.9 5.3 9040Drip irrigation, black polyethylene mulch, California
Seedless Personal Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit Wt
(lbs)Fruit/
Acre
Bibo 38.5 14.0 6.6 11700 Petit Perfection 43.4 13.0 8.0 10890 Precious Petit 40.9 10.0 7.4 11980 RWT 8149 49.3 14.0 7.3 13470Drip irrigation, black polyethylene mulch, conventional, Indiana
Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Fruit
Shape
Xite 33.4 11.6 1.13 Mohican 26.3 11.6 1.10 Petite Perfection 30.3 12.0 1.05Average 4 locations, 5 in-row spacings
Seedless Mini-Watermelon
Production
In-row
Spacing
Plants
1000/acreFruit Yield
Ton/acre 1000/acre 9 6.5 31.6 11.0 12 4.8 32.8 11.0 15 3.9 29.7 10.3 18 3.2 28.6 9.7 21 2.8 27.4 9.0Average of 4 locations, 3 cultivars
Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production
Cultivar
Yield
(ton/acre)Soluble
Solids
(%)Hollow
Heart
Colored
Seed
Betsy 28.9 11.8 0.2 1.4 Petit Treat 24.6 12.6 4.1 0.7 Valdoria 30.0 11.8 0.3 2.4 Vanessa 32.0 11.6 0.7 0.6Average 6 in-row spacings
Seedless Mini-Watermelon
Production
In-row
Spacing
Plants
1000/acreFruit Yield
Ton/acre 1000/acre 6 12.4 36.8 14.0 9 8.3 30.0 11.0 12 6.2 29.0 10.1 18 4.1 29.2 9.0 24 3.1 28.7 8.7 30 2.5 26.0 7.2 Average of 4 cultivars Walters, 2009Seedless Mini-Watermelon
Production
In-row
Spacing
Costs
($/acre)Net Revenue
Local Wholesale 6 10,892 $28,310 $4,790 9 9,008 $20,260 $2,700 12 8,240 $18,490 $2,450 18 7,568 $15,060 $1,480 24 7,182 $14,490 $1,480 30 6,778 $ 7,121 -$1,219 Average of 4 cultivars Walters, 2009Growing Better Melons:
Nutrient Availability & Effectiveness:
Fixation - phosphorus
Leaching - NO
3-N, K, B
Volatilization - urea"NH
3#
Competition - soluble salts
pH - optimum 6 - 6.5:
Ca, P, Mg deficient < 6
Fe, P deficient > 7
Requirements:
Preplant soil test
-
quick, inexpensive
- very general, field variability
- "calibrated" to soil type
Application Rate:
Readily available
- production guides
- usually for maximum yields
- adjust for expected yield
Fruit removal:
w / 40 ton / acre yield
(80000 lb) (7.5% DM) (3% N) = 180
lb N
/ acre
(80000 lb) (7.5% DM) (0.5% P) = 30
lb P
/ acre
=
68
lb P
2O
5/ acre
(80000 lb) (7.5% DM) (2.5% K) =
150 lb K
/ acre
Requirements:
Tissue analysis
- more expensive
- slow turn-around time
- indicates plant nutrient status
- sampling more difficult
Plant sap quick-tests
- very quick
- accurate
Plant tissue analysis at early bloom stage for
watermelon.
(
4.,.E&( F( G( H( 9,( I/( 4( Fe Mn Zn B Cu Mo G02(%0-.(JKL( G,2.&(#02(7$33$"-(J##7L( Deficient <2.5 0.25 2.7 1.0 0.25 0.2 30 20 20 20 5 0.3 Adequate 2.5-3.5 0.25-0.50 2.7-3.5 1.0-2.0 0.25-0.50 0.2-0.4 30-100 20-100 20-40 20-40 5-10 0.3-0.5 High >3.5 0.5 3.5 2.0 0.5 0.4 100 100 40 40 10 0.5 Maynard, U FlaSufficiency ranges for petiole sap testing
for watermelon.
Crop development
stage
Fresh petiole sap
concentration (ppm)
NO3-N K Vines 6” long 1200-1500 4000-500 0 Fruits 2” long 1000-1200 4000-500 0 Fruits one-half mature 800-1000 3500-4000 At first harvest 600-800 3000-350
0
Nutrition X Irrigation
Movement, redistribution and
accumulation of soluble nutrients are
influenced by irrigation application.
Nutrients move w/ wetting front as
water moves through soil.
Application w/Drip:
Broadcast (in bed) and Incorporate:
- 25-40% of N & K and 100% of P
and micronutrients.
Fertigate:
Application w/Drip:
Fertigation:
- apply nutrients in 1
stpart of irrigation
cycle
- chemigate near end of cycle to prevent
algae growth, precipitation etc.
Application w/Drip:
Foliar
- application of nutrients directly to the
leaves.
- large amounts of nutrients cannot be
applied w/o injury to plant.
- may be very effective with micronutrients,
especially if soil pH is alkaline.
Nutrient Sources:
Nitrogen
- at least 50% as N0
3-N in cool or
fumigated soils.
NH
4N0
3Ca(NO
3)
2KNO
3Nutrient Sources:
Phosphorus
- ordinary super phosphate (OSP) and
triple super phosphate (TSP) are
good P sources (more S and Ca w/
OSP).
- diammonium phosphate (DAP) may
precipitate micronutrients.
Nutrient Sources:
Potassium
-
KNO
3- K
2SO
4- KCl (high salt index)
- K
2SO
4!
2MgSO
4Growing Better Melons:
Soil Amendments:
Compost
Advantages:
Increase OM, WHC, CEC
Provide nutrients
Disadvantages:
Specialized equipment
Cost
Salts
2002 Columbia Basin trials
End-of-season Soil
Compost OM (%) K(ppm)
0 t/a 1.0 c 165 b
5 t/a 1.3 b 187a
10 t/a 1.4a 191a
2002 Columbia Basin trials
Wireworm “control”
Compost Plant Loss (%)
0 t/a 14.6a
5 t/a 16.3a
10 t/a 2.4 b
Growing Better Melons:
Advantages:
Eliminate or reduce soil pests
(
disease, insects, weeds
)
Disadvantages:
Specialized equipment
Cost
Safety
Timeliness
Fumigants:
Metam sodium
Vapam, Sectagon, Soil Prep
Telone
Telone II, Telone EC
Chloropicrin
Chlor-o-pic, Larvacide
Combinations
Telone C17, Telone C35, Inline
Dimethyl disulfide (DDS)
Paladin, Paladin EC
2002 Columbia Basin Fumigation trials
Verticillium wilt
(Verticillium dahliae)
Fumigant Plant Loss (%)
Telone C35 1.0 b
Inline 0.7 b
None 3.2a
2002 Columbia Basin Fumigation trials
Wireworm
(Limonius canus, L. californicus)
Fumigant Plant Loss (%)
Telone C35 0.3 b
Inline 4.8 b
None 26.6a
Implementation of Risk Mitigation
Measures for Soil Fumigant Pesticides
Buffer zones (2011):
-
application rate
- field size
- application equipment and methods
- emission-control measures (tarps)
Telone
: no buffer required
others: minimum 30’
Miscellaneous
Windbreaks
Wheat, rye
Pollination
1 hive / acre
50-60,000 bees / hive
500-750’ between hives
Seedless
1:3 or 1:4 diploid:triploid
Rogers SP-4 Super Pollenizer
Other cultivars available:
Companion Seminis Jenny Nunhems Minipool Hazera
Pinnacle Southwestern SP-1, 2, 4 Syngenta