• No results found

Growing Better Melons

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Growing Better Melons"

Copied!
94
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Growing Better Melons

George Clough

Oregon State University

Hermiston Agricultural Research &

Extension Cente

r

(2)

Growing Better Melons

w/polyethylene mulch, drip irrigation

!"#$%&'

(

! ! !"#$%&'($%)&!

! ! !*$#+,-,&!

! ! !./+(!01,%21,%)&!

! ! !341+5$-/%!

! ! !6/((+%$-/%!

(3)

Growing Better Melons:

(4)

)*+,-.,/0&'(

(

(

1,23$-0&&(

( ( (

7!8!9,,:&!

(4.,-*((1&.,53$&670-.(

( ( (

7!4%+;/#1!

! ! !7!%/!)<+%%+%5!/#!#,'($%-%5!

! ! ! !7!,&'=!9>&,,2(,&&!1,(/%&!

((

(5)

8$&,*+,-.,/0&'(

(

(9"&.&(

( (

7!6($%)&!

! !7!.',?+$(+@,2!AB4+'1,%)!

! ! ! !C"#$%&'($%),#D!

! !7!E%?#,$&,2!!F$G/#!!

! !7!H%?,#)$+%)I!

! ! ! !2,(+J,#I!

! ! ! !B4$(+)I!

(6)

9"-&$*02,:"-&'(

(

(

4$;0(

( ( (

F$#5,#!K!L!M/&)!

(

)/0(

( ( (

N(2,#!!K!!L!!M/&)!

(7)

Watermelon Transplant Size:

Cell Size Leaf Area Weight

51 (1f”) 7.97 0.66

73 (1

!

”) 6.36 0.45

96 (1d”) 4.56 0.31

135 (1c”) 3.12 0.20

(8)

Watermelon Transplant Size:

Watermelon Transplant Size:

Yield (t/acre)

Cell Size Early Total

51

18.5

42.3

73 18.9 39.8

96 21.9 40.1

(9)

Watermelon Transplant Depth:

-

"soil line“ vs cotyledon

- 3 years

deep-setting tended to increase early yield

deep-set plants appeared more vigorous

depth did not influence total yield

(10)

Watermelon Transplant Age:

Watermelon Transplant Age:

- 2 locations

age of transplant did not affect early or

total yield or fruit size

(11)

Vavrina

, et al., U of Fla.

- 3 cell sizes (50, 73, 135 cell)

- 3 years

neither age of transplant nor cell-size

affected early or total yield or fruit size

(12)

Growing Better Melons:

(13)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Y ield tons/a

!""#$%&'()*(+,-$./(+0$

Clough, OSU

(14)

1998 Seedless Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs) Carousel 37.4 10.4 15.0 Crimson Jewel 32.4 11.2 14.1 Honey Heart 28.7 10.5 12.8 King of Hearts 27.4 11.1 13.2 Nova 35.0 10.3 12.4 Palomar 29.0 10.5 13.0 Summer Sweet 2532 41.5 10.0 15.3 Summer Sweet 3521Y 30.0 10.6 10.6

(15)

1998 Seedless Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs) Summer Sweet 5032 26.9 10.4 15.4 Summer Sweet 5544 29.7 11.2 14.6 SWX0037 37.2 10.7 18.4 SWX3022 25.8 11.3 16.6 SWX3053 28.3 10.7 13.1 SWX4016 38.6 10.5 17.6 Tri-X 626 33.7 10.8 13.5 Clough, OSU

(16)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Y ield tons/a

2008 Watermelon Yield

7/23/2008 *Primed

(17)

2008 Seedless Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs) 7167 8.6 8.5 12.6 7187 8.7 8.4 12.7 9601 HQ 9.7 9.3 12.2 9651 HQ 5.8 8.8 11.5 Crunchy Red F1 9.8 8.2 13.2 Melody 6.1 8.6 11.4 Super Crisp 32 7.9 8.7 13.2 Sweet Delight 6.0 8.8 12.8 Tri-X 212 10.4 8.5 13.7 Tri-X 313 8.8 8.3 13.7

(18)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Y ield tons/a

2009 Watermelon Yield

<=>?=>@@A( <=BC=>@@A( D=CB=>@@A(

*Primed

(19)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Y ield tons/a

2009 Total Yield

(20)

2009 Seedless Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs) 7167 32.2 9.9 15.8 7187 22.7 10.2 14.3 9601 HQ 33.1 10.2 14.1 9651 HQ 25.6 10.1 13.5 Crunchy Red F1 27.0 9.4 14.2 Melody 25.8 9.8 13.6 Super Crisp 32 25.1 10.4 14.2 Sweet Delight 26.0 10.5 15.3 Tri-X 212 23.1 9.7 13.4 Tri-X 313 25.8 9.8 14.3

(21)

Growing Better Melons:

(22)
(23)
(24)

Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs)

Fruit/

Acre

5104 43.7 11.3 10.4 4180 5109 30.3 10.8 7.6 3930 5116 35.6 11.3 8.3 4260 Extazy 33.4 10.9 8.5 3960 Liliput 37.6 11.3 10.3 3640 MiniTriploid 2132 40.1 10.9 11.5 3490 MiniTriploid 2308 30.4 11.0 10.4 2930 MiniTriploid 2168 34.8 11.8 12.8 2690 Petit Perfection* 30.0 11.9 6.3 4710 RWT 8149 32.0 11.5 6.9 4620

(25)
(26)

Organic Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs)

Fruit/

Acre

Bibo 14.6 11.9 3.0 9750 Little Deuce Coupe 20.5 11.7 4.1 9960 Mini Yellow 25.3 10.5 6.2 8330 Petit Perfection 24.0 10.9 4.2 11220 Poquito 31.8 10.1 7.2 8710 Precious Petit 20.1 10.9 3.3 11980 RWT 8189 16.1 12.0 3.4 9365 Valdoria 24.7 9.9 5.1 9860 Vanessa 24.2 9.9 5.3 9040

Drip irrigation, black polyethylene mulch, California

(27)

Seedless Personal Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit Wt

(lbs)

Fruit/

Acre

Bibo 38.5 14.0 6.6 11700 Petit Perfection 43.4 13.0 8.0 10890 Precious Petit 40.9 10.0 7.4 11980 RWT 8149 49.3 14.0 7.3 13470

Drip irrigation, black polyethylene mulch, conventional, Indiana

(28)
(29)

Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Fruit

Shape

Xite 33.4 11.6 1.13 Mohican 26.3 11.6 1.10 Petite Perfection 30.3 12.0 1.05

Average 4 locations, 5 in-row spacings

(30)

Seedless Mini-Watermelon

Production

In-row

Spacing

Plants

1000/acre

Fruit Yield

Ton/acre 1000/acre 9 6.5 31.6 11.0 12 4.8 32.8 11.0 15 3.9 29.7 10.3 18 3.2 28.6 9.7 21 2.8 27.4 9.0

Average of 4 locations, 3 cultivars

(31)

Seedless Mini-Watermelon Production

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Soluble

Solids

(%)

Hollow

Heart

Colored

Seed

Betsy 28.9 11.8 0.2 1.4 Petit Treat 24.6 12.6 4.1 0.7 Valdoria 30.0 11.8 0.3 2.4 Vanessa 32.0 11.6 0.7 0.6

Average 6 in-row spacings

(32)

Seedless Mini-Watermelon

Production

In-row

Spacing

Plants

1000/acre

Fruit Yield

Ton/acre 1000/acre 6 12.4 36.8 14.0 9 8.3 30.0 11.0 12 6.2 29.0 10.1 18 4.1 29.2 9.0 24 3.1 28.7 8.7 30 2.5 26.0 7.2 Average of 4 cultivars Walters, 2009

(33)

Seedless Mini-Watermelon

Production

In-row

Spacing

Costs

($/acre)

Net Revenue

Local Wholesale 6 10,892 $28,310 $4,790 9 9,008 $20,260 $2,700 12 8,240 $18,490 $2,450 18 7,568 $15,060 $1,480 24 7,182 $14,490 $1,480 30 6,778 $ 7,121 -$1,219 Average of 4 cultivars Walters, 2009

(34)
(35)
(36)

Growing Better Melons:

(37)

Nutrient Availability & Effectiveness:

Fixation - phosphorus

Leaching - NO

3

-N, K, B

Volatilization - urea"NH

3

#

Competition - soluble salts

pH - optimum 6 - 6.5:

Ca, P, Mg deficient < 6

Fe, P deficient > 7

(38)

Requirements:

Preplant soil test

-

quick, inexpensive

- very general, field variability

- "calibrated" to soil type

(39)

Application Rate:

Readily available

- production guides

- usually for maximum yields

- adjust for expected yield

(40)

Fruit removal:

w / 40 ton / acre yield

(80000 lb) (7.5% DM) (3% N) = 180

lb N

/ acre

(80000 lb) (7.5% DM) (0.5% P) = 30

lb P

/ acre

=

68

lb P

2

O

5

/ acre

(80000 lb) (7.5% DM) (2.5% K) =

150 lb K

/ acre

(41)

Requirements:

Tissue analysis

- more expensive

- slow turn-around time

- indicates plant nutrient status

- sampling more difficult

Plant sap quick-tests

- very quick

- accurate

(42)

Plant tissue analysis at early bloom stage for

watermelon.

(

4.,.E&( F( G( H( 9,( I/( 4( Fe Mn Zn B Cu Mo G02(%0-.(JKL( G,2.&(#02(7$33$"-(J##7L( Deficient <2.5 0.25 2.7 1.0 0.25 0.2 30 20 20 20 5 0.3 Adequate 2.5-3.5 0.25-0.50 2.7-3.5 1.0-2.0 0.25-0.50 0.2-0.4 30-100 20-100 20-40 20-40 5-10 0.3-0.5 High >3.5 0.5 3.5 2.0 0.5 0.4 100 100 40 40 10 0.5 Maynard, U Fla

(43)
(44)

Sufficiency ranges for petiole sap testing

for watermelon.

Crop development

stage

Fresh petiole sap

concentration (ppm)

NO3-N K Vines 6” long 1200-1500 4000-500 0 Fruits 2” long 1000-1200 4000-500 0 Fruits one-half mature 800-1000 3500-400

0 At first harvest 600-800 3000-350

0

(45)

Nutrition X Irrigation

Movement, redistribution and

accumulation of soluble nutrients are

influenced by irrigation application.

Nutrients move w/ wetting front as

water moves through soil.

(46)

Application w/Drip:

Broadcast (in bed) and Incorporate:

- 25-40% of N & K and 100% of P

and micronutrients.

Fertigate:

(47)

Application w/Drip:

Fertigation:

- apply nutrients in 1

st

part of irrigation

cycle

- chemigate near end of cycle to prevent

algae growth, precipitation etc.

(48)

Application w/Drip:

Foliar

- application of nutrients directly to the

leaves.

- large amounts of nutrients cannot be

applied w/o injury to plant.

- may be very effective with micronutrients,

especially if soil pH is alkaline.

(49)

Nutrient Sources:

Nitrogen

- at least 50% as N0

3

-N in cool or

fumigated soils.

NH

4

N0

3

Ca(NO

3

)

2

KNO

3

(50)

Nutrient Sources:

Phosphorus

- ordinary super phosphate (OSP) and

triple super phosphate (TSP) are

good P sources (more S and Ca w/

OSP).

- diammonium phosphate (DAP) may

precipitate micronutrients.

(51)

Nutrient Sources:

Potassium

-

KNO

3

- K

2

SO

4

- KCl (high salt index)

- K

2

SO

4

!

2MgSO

4

(52)

Growing Better Melons:

Soil Amendments:

Compost

(53)

Advantages:

Increase OM, WHC, CEC

Provide nutrients

Disadvantages:

Specialized equipment

Cost

Salts

(54)
(55)
(56)

2002 Columbia Basin trials

End-of-season Soil

Compost OM (%) K(ppm)

0 t/a 1.0 c 165 b

5 t/a 1.3 b 187a

10 t/a 1.4a 191a

(57)
(58)
(59)

2002 Columbia Basin trials

Wireworm “control”

Compost Plant Loss (%)

0 t/a 14.6a

5 t/a 16.3a

10 t/a 2.4 b

(60)

Growing Better Melons:

(61)

Advantages:

Eliminate or reduce soil pests

(

disease, insects, weeds

)

Disadvantages:

Specialized equipment

Cost

Safety

Timeliness

(62)

Fumigants:

Metam sodium

Vapam, Sectagon, Soil Prep

Telone

Telone II, Telone EC

Chloropicrin

Chlor-o-pic, Larvacide

Combinations

Telone C17, Telone C35, Inline

Dimethyl disulfide (DDS)

Paladin, Paladin EC

(63)

2002 Columbia Basin Fumigation trials

Verticillium wilt

(Verticillium dahliae)

Fumigant Plant Loss (%)

Telone C35 1.0 b

Inline 0.7 b

None 3.2a

(64)

2002 Columbia Basin Fumigation trials

Wireworm

(Limonius canus, L. californicus)

Fumigant Plant Loss (%)

Telone C35 0.3 b

Inline 4.8 b

None 26.6a

(65)

Implementation of Risk Mitigation

Measures for Soil Fumigant Pesticides

Buffer zones (2011):

-

application rate

- field size

- application equipment and methods

- emission-control measures (tarps)

Telone

: no buffer required

others: minimum 30’

(66)

Miscellaneous

Windbreaks

Wheat, rye

Pollination

1 hive / acre

50-60,000 bees / hive

500-750’ between hives

Seedless

1:3 or 1:4 diploid:triploid

(67)

Rogers SP-4 Super Pollenizer

Other cultivars available:

Companion Seminis Jenny Nunhems Minipool Hazera

Pinnacle Southwestern SP-1, 2, 4 Syngenta

(68)

Seedless Watermelon Pollenizers

Cultivar

Yield

(ton/acre)

Hollow

Heart

Companion 22.3c 9.0 Jenny 27.6ab 10.8 Mickylee 26.6abc 8.4 Patron 28.4ab 11.6 Pinnacle 23.8bc 5.8 Sidekick 29.1a 10.5 SP-1 27.6ab 8.3 Average of 4 locations Freeman et al., 2007

(69)
(70)

M

M(

(71)
(72)
(73)

Row Covers:

- increase soil and air temperatures

- frost protection

- insect exclusion

- wind protection

(74)

Results:

- increased earliness

- higher early yield

- higher total yield

- improved quality

(75)

Row Cover Materials:

- extruded polypropylene

(Agronet)

- spunbonded polypropylene

(Agryl, Gromax, Kimberly Farms, Lutrasil)

- spunbonded polyester

(Reemay)

- perforated polyethylene

(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)

Costs:

6' W Floating

$815/acre

35' W Floating

$1475/acre

6' W Perforated Clear

$240/acre

(89)

Labor:

construction - 12 hrs

venting - 30 hrs

removal - 27 hrs

based on single-sheet, continuous tunnels

6' bed centers, Fresno, Cal.

(90)

Management:

- pest control

weeds

insects

- venting

>85° F!flower drop

- wind

edges anchored

(91)
(92)
(93)
(94)

References

Related documents

Australopithecus and Paranthropus are characterized by a small cranial capacity, a relatively large projecting facial skeleton, large premolars, molars with thick enamel, and

Unfinished downloads and your express free atms not to make smarter security benefits to your lyft direct debit or your itin.. Appears on atm fees for more about how to verify your

The purpose of this study is to determine if adults seeking care in Grady Memorial Hospital’s emergency department for dental reasons are different than those seeking care for

Finally, we found that implicit feminine gender cues (i.e., butterflies, circles and the color pink) enhance perceived brand warmth and purchase intention in the presence of

The proposed study uses fuzzy numbers to handle uncertainty and using five criteria of profitability, life cycle, quality, social issues and production capacity,

Like Edgar, Fortuna used a sales comparison approach, however, Fortuna’s appraisal differed in that Fortuna sought to determine market value in a non-distressed sale scenario..

* From Cebu – 2 hours by fast craft to Ormoc City, then 40-45 minutes overland; or 45 minutes by plane to Tacloban then 1 hour overland.. * From Davao – By plane via Cebu City, then

intervention to help meet the needs of their chosen community. The course sought to empower adult refugees by 1) increasing their knowledge and skill level of the CNA process,