Integrating Quality Reporting into the
Electronic Medical Record
February 28, 2014
Karen Collum, MSN, RN, OCN
Clinical Program Nurse Leader – Transplant Service www. MSKCC.org
Objectives
Introduction
Electronic Documentation development to support
Quality Reporting
Electronic Medical Record features to support Quality
Reporting
Conclusion
OVERVIEW
OBJECTIVES
o
Identify steps within building electronic documentation
to support Quality Reporting
o
Identify areas within the Electronic Medical Record to
INTRODUCTION
o
Hospitals are implementing Electronic Medical Records
(EMR) at a growing rate.
o
EMRs, designed well, can help monitor, improve, and
INTRODUCTION
o
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
–
Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health (HITECH) Act
Incentive program for Medicaid and Medicare programs for demonstrating ‘meaningful use’
INTRODUCTION
Meaningful Use
o
Use of certified EMR technology to
– Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities
– Engage patients and families in their health care
– Improve care coordination
– Improve population and public health
INTRODUCTION
o
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements Overview
o
http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/
MU_Stage1_ReqOverview.pdf
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS
• Efficient communication
• Enhanced care coordination
• Positive financial return
• Standardization
BENEFITS
• Free text fields
• Scanned laboratory reports
• Inconsistent
Documentation
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS
o
Important to determine what information will
need to be retrieved from EMR, while
determining what information needs to be
captured/documented in EMR.
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
o
Development of Electronic Documentation
–
Identify significant data routinely captured/ extracted from
EMR related to Transplantation
Customization for individual department/services would need to be addressed
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
EXAMPLE: Inpatient Progress/Outpatient Follow Up
o
‘Significant Transplant Data’ (HSCT Summary)
– HSCT Date
– Number of days pre/post Transplant
– Diagnosis – Co-morbidities – Conditioning Regimen – Donor Type – Graft Source – Match – CMV/EBV/Toxo Status
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
Inpatient Progress /Outpatient Follow Up Note
o
Specific Fields
– Query-able
o
Standardization/Consistency
– Populated into each note
o
Logic/Calculation (Transplant Date)
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
EXAMPLE: Cell Infusion Document
o
Significant Data:
– Cell Infusion Type
– Cell Source – Method – Donor – Manipulation – Bag Number – Cell Doses
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
Cell Infusion Document
o
Required Fields
– Increase compliance
o
Data points specific to infusion type
– Manipulation Options different for each Infusion type
– CD 34+ and CD 3+ for Allogeneic Infusions
– CD34+ Only for Autologous
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
Cell Infusion Document
o
Electronic Documentation use to increase data capture
compliance
o
Reports used to confirm volumes/statistics and accuracy of data
captured in database.
– Report 1: Complete vs Incomplete Type of Transplant
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTATION
Cell Infusion Document
o
Ways to Use Document Reports
–
Compliance Audit
Are all notes completed/signed out
–
Statistic Report
How many Autologous vs Allogeneic
How many Related vs Unrelated
–
Quality Audit
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS
In addition to the Electronic Documentation, the
Electronic Medical Record can be used to
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD
o
Sources to Extract Data
–
Laboratory Orders
–
Laboratory Results
–
Medication Orders
–
Patient Care Orders
–
Flowsheets
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD
o
Information can be extracted based on the Order Name or
content of the order
–
Example: Allogeneic Collection/Processing Order
How many orders were placed?Were the orders placed 48 hours prior to Collection?
–
Example: Allogeneic Donor Eligibility Order
How many orders were placed?EXAMPLES
QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD
o
Audit Example
– Orders Received same day
or After product collected: 16% (15% in 3rd Quarter)
– Orders Received 24 hours
or more before product received: 85%
– Collection/Orders
cancelled: 16 orders (This also includes ‘duplicate’ orders)
TOTALS
Data Breakdown Number Percentage
Late
(after product collected)
1
1%
Day of Collection
18
15%
24 hours prior
17
14%
>24 hours prior
87
71%
Cancelled
16
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES
Reasons for Ineligible as documented on the order
CONCLUSION
o
Electronic documentation should not be reproductions of paper
forms.
o
Utilize features of electronic system to enhance documentation
and create smarter documents
– Dropdown/multi-select checkboxes create data that can be extracted
– Calculation logic for dates
CONCLUSION
o
Identifying areas in the EMR where data in
entered/captured will allow for development of reports
for quality review.
CONCLUSION
o
Report Types
–
Delivered – Excel/PDF
Time based (weekly, quarterly)
–
On Demand/Self generated
–
Parameter based
Content pre built
REFERENCES
o CMS.gov., (2013). EHR Incentive Programs: Meaningful Use. Retrieved from:
http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Meaningful_Use.html
o Price, M., Singer, A, & Kim, J. (2013). Adopting Electronic Medical Records: Are they just
electronic paper records? Cancer Family Physician, 59 e322-9
o Silow-Carroll, S., Edwards, J., & Rodin D. (2012). Using Electronic Health Records to
Improve Quality and Efficiency: The Experience of Leading Hospitals. The
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• ASBMT Administrative Directors SIG Quality Working Committee
– Kathie Viers, RN, MS CPHQ
– Leslie Parran, MS, RN, AOCN, NE-BC
• Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
– Transplant Service
– Information Systems Team