• No results found

WORK SESSION ITEM City Council

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "WORK SESSION ITEM City Council"

Copied!
30
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

DATE: STAFF:

July 28, 2020

Ryan Mounce, City Planner

WORK SESSION ITEM

City Council

SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION

Manufactured Housing Rezoning Update.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of this item is to review and discuss issues relating to the potential rezoning of properties to the forthcoming Manufactured Housing (M-H) zone district, including the influence of existing land use policy and a possible extension of the manufactured housing redevelopment moratorium.

GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED

1. Should properties designated as commercial in City Plan or neighborhood plans be considered for rezoning to the new manufactured housing district?

2. What are Councilmember’s views on extending the manufactured housing redevelopment moratorium? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION

Both City Plan and the Strategic Plan identify policies and objectives to preserve manufactured housing and enhance the equitable treatment of manufactured housing residents. Council has also identified manufactured housing preservation and residents’ rights as a priority, and in August 2019, a 12-month moratorium was adopted limiting the City’s acceptance of any development application which would result in the loss of units within mobile home parks while additional preservation tools and residents’ rights strategies are explored.

Since the adoption of the moratorium, staff has been finalizing new preservation tools and resident rights protections. These efforts include Land Use Code updates to create a new Manufactured Housing (M-H) zone district and changes to the Municipal Code to clarify and enhance residents’ rights related to retaliation protections, tree maintenance, utility billing practices, and more. If the forthcoming Land Use Code changes are adopted, existing manufactured housing communities will be eligible to be considered for rezoning to the new zone district. Staff is seeking additional direction relating to which manufactured housing communities should be considered for rezoning based on guidance provided by the City’s comprehensive plan and relevant subarea plans.

Manufactured Housing Zone District - Rezoning Criteria

Staff previously discussed the design of the new manufactured housing zone district with Council at a work session on April 28, 2020. (Attachment 1) Staff shared that the new zone district would create a new preservation tool for manufactured housing communities and reduce the likelihood of park closure due to redevelopment. This is achieved primarily by limiting the types and intensity of certain land uses available to properties within the zone district. While the new M-H zone district creates a new preservation tool, the preservation goals of the district would only come into effect once properties are rezoned.

If the forthcoming M-H zone district is adopted by Council, the City may initiate and consider rezoning properties containing manufactured housing communities to the new district. At the April 28, 2020 work session, staff described several evaluation criteria used in the 2013 Affordable Housing Redevelopment Displacement Strategy report on potential manufactured housing communities to include in a new manufactured housing zone district. The report included criteria such as the size of a community, the percentage of owner-occupied units and whether

(2)

July 28, 2020

Page 2

a property was previously included in the City’s former mobile home park zone districts. Some criteria may be less relevant when compared to the overarching goals for manufactured housing preservation and most properties containing manufactured housing communities should be considered for rezoning.

An additional set of evaluation criteria staff wishes to highlight is the land use direction and guidance provided by the City’s land use policy documents, including City Plan and relevant neighborhood and subarea plans. The City’s Land Use Code requires quasi-judicial rezonings to be consistent with the comprehensive plan and/or warranted by changed conditions within the neighborhood surrounding the subject property.

Existing Land Use Guidance for Manufactured Housing Communities

City Plan provides land use guidance through a combination of policies related to the community’s growth framework and broad illustrations of development patterns for different types and intensities of land uses on the Structure Plan map. In addition, the City has adopted several neighborhood and subarea plans as elements of City Plan, which provide more specific land use guidance for neighborhoods and corridors within the community.

Most manufactured housing communities in the City are zoned residentially and designated on the Structure Plan or within relevant subarea plans for low and medium intensity residential development. A potential rezoning to the new M-H district for these properties aligns with their existing land use and intensity designations and would also promote the comprehensive plan’s growth framework and housing policies for the general location of residential development and to preserve a type of housing underrepresented in the community’s overall housing stock. Several manufactured housing communities are instead designated for commercial/mixed-use development on the Structure Plan map and in relevant subarea plans. In general, these designations provide long-term guidance for development patterns of greater intensity and variety than what is proposed as part of the M-H zone district. The preservation goals of the M-H district may also conflict with some of the policies and goals found in these plans which identify commercial areas for infill and intensification opportunities, promote land consolidation and redevelopment along certain corridors to support infrastructure and transportation improvements, or to support a broader mix of land uses and services.

Rezoning Options

Based on current land use guidance in City Plan and relevant subarea plans, rezoning of properties containing manufactured housing communities with residential designations could be considered. These properties represent approximately 88% of all manufactured housing units in the community and their designations in the comprehensive plan and subarea plans are consistent with the design and intent of the new M-H district. For commercially designated properties, a rezoning to the M-H district is not consistent with the current guidance provided by City Plan or neighborhood plans and there existing zoning would likely remain in place.

If Council desires to consider rezoning the commercially designated properties to the M-H district, staff could initiate a process to review and amend the comprehensive plan and relevant subarea plans. Such a review would investigate the possibility of changing land use designations and/or neighborhood-specific policy goals based on additional stakeholder input and updated neighborhood conditions since the original adoption of these plans.

Updates to City Plan or a neighborhood plan require a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board and Council adoption of an ordinance. The timeline to conduct additional stakeholder engagement and evaluate what may be competing policy priorities is likely to take a minimum of several months and could significantly lengthen the overall process to rezone properties to the new M-H district. This timeline would further push the rezoning process beyond the expiration of the manufactured housing redevelopment moratorium, currently scheduled to end on August 30, 2020.

(3)

July 28, 2020

Page 3

strategies. Following the implementation of the moratorium, staff began researching options and best practices and presented initial findings to Council at a work session in December 2019.

Council provided guidance for staff to pursue a new manufactured housing zone district and staff originally targeted implementation of the district and consideration of property rezonings in late spring 2020. Development of the new zone district standards and initial outreach activities took place in January and February, however, beginning in March, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted opportunities to meet with stakeholders, including input from boards and commissions, which had begun to cancel their monthly meetings. At a work session update on April 28, 2020 staff shared the timeline for the new zone district and rezoning process had become highly uncertain due to disruptions caused by the pandemic.

With the resumption of board and commission meetings in early summer and new procedures in place for virtual engagement activities, staff recommenced outreach efforts and is initiating the Land Use Code adoption process to create the new M-H district. Upon adoption of the Land Use Code changes, staff is also prepared to begin a City-initiated process to consider applying the new M-H district to properties through rezoning. The following meetings/hearings are required to implement the new zone district and complete the rezoning process:

Adopt Land Use Code Changes creating the M-H zone district • Planning and Zoning Board: recommendation to Council • Council First Reading

• Council Second Reading

(Potential) Update City Plan and Subarea Plans and review alignment for commercial property rezonings • Planning and Zoning Board recommendation

• Council First Reading • Council Second Reading

Rezoning of properties to M-H zone district

• Approval of Council exemption request to allow for quasi-judicial rezoning proceedings to occur using remote hearings

• 14-day written notice to property owners prior to P&Z meeting • Planning and Zoning Board recommendation

• 15-day newspaper notice prior to Council • Council First Reading

• Council Second Reading

These events must occur largely in a linear fashion. Each step should be completed before the next can begin. Staff anticipates the minimum time to fully complete the process to create the new M-H district and consider property rezonings is approximately two and a half months. This timeline would be extended further if City Plan and subarea plans need to be amended to consider rezoning commercial properties. Based on this schedule, the final portions of the rezoning process will occur after the manufactured housing redevelopment moratorium expires on August 30, 2020.

While staff is not aware of any imminent plans by property owners for redevelopment of a manufactured housing community, the expiration of the moratorium before the rezoning process is completed creates a risk that a property owner could submit a redevelopment proposal under current zoning and absent the preservation goals of the new M-H district.

Council could consider an extension to the moratorium to allow the overall rezoning process to complete fully within the redevelopment protections afforded by the moratorium. An Ordinance extending the moratorium would require two readings before Council and staff would bring its consideration forward in August prior to the current expiration on August 30. If Council wishes to consider an extension, staff recommends it be of limited duration, sufficient only to enable the timely completion of the rezoning process.

(4)

July 28, 2020

Page 4

Council may also consider allowing the moratorium to expire as currently planned on August 30, 2020. The risk of a redevelopment application being submitted in the first several weeks after moratorium expiration is partially mitigated by required development review process procedures. Before a formal submittal is made and accepted by the City, a property owner must first complete a conceptual review meeting, likely followed by a neighborhood meeting. Neighborhood meetings require a 14-day notification period and are followed by a 10-day waiting period before a development application may be submitted. These pre-application steps are likely to result in a minimum of one-month advance notice before a formal application is submitted.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Work Session Summary (PDF) 2. Powerpoint Presentation (PDF)

(5)

281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580

Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.221.6376

970.224.6134 - fax

Planning, Development & Transportation

MEMORANDUM

DATE:

May 1, 2020

TO:

Mayor Troxell and City Councilmembers

THRU:

Darin Atteberry, City Manager

Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager

Caryn Champine, Director of Planning, Development & Transportation

Tom Leeson, Community Development & Neighborhood Services Director

FROM:

JC Ward, Senior City Planner

Ryan Mounce, City Planner

RE:

April 28, 2020 Work Session Summary – Manufactured Housing Zoning &

Residents’ Rights Update

At the April 28

th

City Council Virtual Work Session, Ryan Mounce and JC Ward provided an

update on work underway to develop a new manufactured housing zone district and information

about recently completed and forthcoming residents’ rights and livability strategies, including the

potential for a manufactured housing licensing system. All councilmembers were present for the

discussion via video conferencing.

The new manufactured housing zone district and additional resident rights and livability strategies

are intended to advance Council priorities to preserve manufactured housing, prevent resident

displacement, and improve livability and protections available to residents in manufactured

housing communities.

General discussion and direction from the work session included:

Manufactured Housing Zone District & Rezoning Criteria

 Continuing to develop and bring forward Land Use Code changes to implement a new

manufactured housing zone district as a preservation strategy.

General support for ‘Option A’ for the types of permitted uses that should be included in

the new zone district. Discussion reaffirmed the focus of the zone district to specifically

preserve manufactured housing and minimize resident displacement, which could remain

a partial outcome under ‘Option B.’

 Some types of permitted land uses, such as extra occupancy rental houses and primary

short term rentals, may not be appropriate in the zone district or create new business

models that result in resident displacement.

 Review and refine the types of criteria staff may use to recommend sites for inclusion in

the new zone district. Criteria such as infrastructure condition could be punishing to

residents in certain communities who would otherwise not benefit from the goals of the

new zone district.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6C830CF7-EE75-4AA1-9E24-A3E61C7607E5

(6)

 Several questions or requests for additional information were raised on how the zone

district could impact the potential for resident owned communities, as well as how new

technologies (3D printing or new modular home systems) could supplement the zone

district to improve energy efficiency, building conditions, and levels of overall affordability.

Residents’ Rights Strategies & Licensing

 General support for research into mobile home community licensing system with additional

information and detailed options for Council’s consideration to define the specific livability

issues to address, responsible parties, and penalties.

 Exploration of mobile home community licensing programs will include analysis of

analogous programs in Colorado communities as well as successful regional models.

Initial research into mobile home community licensing in Colorado indicated programs akin

to business licensing with minimum enforcement authorization rather than a

livability/habitability focus supported by compliance staff.

 Licensing and other strategies should seek to minimize the pass-thru of costs and fees to

residents. Licensing and inspection fee rates should be informed by current costs to

residents or park management for addressing livability issues.

 The forthcoming mobile home community licensing Council Memo will describe the

process Staff will propose to vet licensing program options that will include input from

external stakeholders, mobile home community residents, and community partners.

 Mobile home neighborhood liaisons and community partners are establishing

communication and engagement networks to support discussions of resident owned

community models.

 Mobile Home Livability and Community-Building Mini-Grant round two funding is currently

on hold at the recommendation of PDT Finance as the City assesses 2020 budget and

anticipated shortfalls.

Next Steps & Follow-up

 Staff will resume and continue stakeholder outreach on both the manufactured housing

zone district and livability strategies following a pause due to the initial response to

COVID-19.

 The new zone district will continue to move towards implementation. Staff anticipates

presenting Land Use Code changes for Council’s consideration in early summer following

the resumption of Board and Commission meetings and remote quasi-judicial hearings.

Additional residents’ rights and livability strategies and municipal code changes are

scheduled for Council consideration in Q3 2020. Draft proposed language was included

in Council’s work session documents.

 Staff will prepare a memo for Council regarding options and research for a licensing

program and additional resident owned community strategies.

(7)

July 28, 2020

Manufactured Housing

(8)

Work Session Summary

Manufactured Housing Zone District

Criteria for rezoning; existing land use

guidance

Moratorium

Revised rezoning process & timeline

Implications for moratorium expiration

(9)

3

Direction Sought

1) Should properties designated as commercial in City Plan or neighborhood

plans be considered for rezoning to the new manufactured housing district?

2) What are Councilmember’s views on extending the manufactured housing

redevelopment moratorium?

(10)

Manufactured Housing Zone District

Manufactured Housing Zone District

Creates new tool to help preserve manufactured

housing communities

Maintain neighborhoods; reduce likelihood of

displacement

Implemented through Land Use Code updates

Upon adoption, properties could be considered for

(11)

5

Manufactured Housing Zone District

Rezoning Evaluation

New district intended for existing

manufactured housing communities

~ 1,400 units City limits

~ 2,100 units in GMA

Zoning considered at time of

annexation

(12)

Manufactured Housing Zone District

Rezoning Evaluation

Staff previously shared potential rezoning criteria from prior studies on a

manufactured housing zone district:

Discussion included that some criteria were less relevant; most properties

should be considered to achieve preservation goals

Size

Presence of Natural Hazards

% Owner Occupied Units

Prior Zoning History / Land

Use Guidance

(13)

7

Rezoning Criteria

Rezoning Evaluation – Land Use Code criteria

Quasi-judicial rezonings must:

Align with the comprehensive plan and/or

Warranted by changed conditions in surrounding neighborhood

Additional criteria which may be considered:

Rezoning compatible with existing/proposed uses surrounding property

Adverse impacts on the natural environment

(14)

Land Use Guidance

Rezoning Evaluation

Land use and zoning guidance is provided by:

City Plan Structure Plan map (broad)

Subarea plans (neighborhood-specific)

Land use and zoning guidance indicates:

General land-use categories & intensities

Residential, commercial, high density, etc.

Specific zoning categories

Policy goals & objectives

(15)

9

Land Use Guidance

Existing guidance:

Most properties containing a manufactured housing community are

consistent with City Plan / Subarea Plans

Designated for residential development

Identified for low/medium intensity

Surrounded by other residential uses and complementary activities

Promote growth framework and housing policies

(16)

Land Use Guidance

Existing guidance:

Several properties containing a manufactured housing community are not

consistent with City Plan / Subarea Plans

Designated for commercial or mixed-use

Identified for higher intensity development

Surrounded by other commercial uses and activities

Other policies seek to promote

Infill / intensification along major corridors

Infrastructure and transportation enhancements

Land consolidation and greater mix of uses

(17)

11

Options

1) Consider rezoning residential properties in alignment with City Plan /

Subarea Plans

Represents ~88% of City’s manufactured housing units

2) Consider rezoning both residential and commercial properties

Rezoning commercial properties not aligned with City Plan / Subarea

Plans

Requires additional process to amend policy documents

Understand policy implications of change in designation

Additional outreach with stakeholders

(18)

Moratorium Overview

Moratorium Established

Limit the City’s acceptance of development applications

Allow time to research and adopt preservation & residents’ rights tools

One-year; expires August 30, 2020

Work Underway

Resident’s rights – August Municipal Code changes

New M-H zone district – August Land Use Code changes

Rezoning process – August/September

(19)

13

Preservation Timeline

Original Timeline

Develop standards

Outreach / feedback

Adoption

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sep

Oct

Moratorium

Expires

(20)

Preservation Timeline

Revised Timeline

Develop standards

Outreach

Adoption

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sep

Oct / Q4

Outreach

COVID Delays

Moratorium Expires

Engagement Impacts

Reduced stakeholder input opportunities 2-3 months

Cancelation of Board & Commission meetings

Additional rezoning engagement planned: ongoing owner/manager

Commercial

Rezonings

Commercial

Rezonings

(21)

15

Moratorium Impacts

Moratorium Expiration: Impacts & Risks

After moratorium expires:

Property owners could submit redevelopment application under

current zoning

Mitigation

Requires 30+ days of pre-submittal work before submission of

application

(22)

Moratorium Options

1) Allow moratorium to expire; complete rezoning process as soon as possible

2) Consider extension of moratorium to allow rezoning process to complete

within moratorium protections

Requires two readings before Council

Recommended extension: 2 – 4 months

(23)

17

Direction Sought

1) Should properties designated as commercial on the Structure Plan map be

considered for rezoning to the new manufactured housing district?

2) What are Councilmember’s views on extending the manufactured housing

redevelopment moratorium?

(24)
(25)

Zone Development Timeline

19

City Limits

Manufactured Home Community

GMA Boundary

City

GMA

Total

Communities

10

14

24

Home Sites

1,400

2,137

3,537

Manufactured Housing Community (MHC)

Locations in the Fort Collins GMA

(26)

Zone Development Timeline

City Limits

Existing Zoning (city limits)

Residential Zoning

6 located in Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood

(LMN) District

1 located in Neighborhood Conservation Buffer

(NCB) District

Commercial Zoning

2 located in Service Commercial (CS) District

Mixed Zoning

(27)

21

Existing Standards

Existing CS & LMN Zoning:

No manufactured housing specific standards

Rely on ‘General Development Standards’ in Land Use Code

Wide variety of permitted uses and intensities

CS

LMN

95 permitted uses; mostly

commercial

No density maximum

3-story height limit

43 permitted uses; mostly

residential

Maximum density of 9 dwelling

units/acre (12 if affordable)

(28)

Existing Conditions - Density

Community 

 

 

 

 

Zoning   

 

Size (ac.) 

 

Units   

 

DU/Acre 

Skyline   

 

 

 

 

LMN 

 

 

25.68   

 

172 

 

 

6.69 

Hickory Village   

 

 

 

LMN 

 

 

30.31   

 

204 

 

 

6.73 

North College (College Frontage) 

 

CS 

 

 

12.84   

 

150 

 

 

11.68 

North College (Rear Half) 

 

 

LMN 

 

 

22.38   

 

172 

 

 

7.68 

 

North College (Overall)   

 

 

CS/LMN 

 

35.22   

 

322 

 

 

9.14 

Stonecrest 

 

 

 

 

CS 

 

 

2.26 

 

 

24 

 

 

10.61 

North Star 

 

 

 

 

LMN 

 

 

4.26 

 

 

54 

 

 

12.67   

Harmony Village 

 

 

 

LMN 

 

 

71.46   

 

486 

 

 

6.8 

Pleasant Grove   

 

 

 

LMN 

 

 

12.53   

 

114 

 

 

9.09 

 

(29)

23

Existing Conditions – Perimeter Setbacks

Community 

 

 

 

 

Perimeter Setbacks 

Skyline   

 

 

 

 

20’  

Hickory Village   

 

 

 

0‐5’ (buildings off‐parcel: Soft Gold Park)

North College   

 

 

 

0‐5’  

 

 

 

Stonecrest 

 

 

 

 

0‐5’ 

 

North Star 

 

 

 

 

10‐15’ 

Harmony Village 

 

 

 

15‐20’ (side); 5‐10’ (rear) 

Pleasant Grove   

 

 

 

0‐5’ 

 

(30)

Existing Conditions – Unit Separations

Community 

 

 

 

 

Min. Unit Separations 

Skyline   

 

 

 

 

10‐15’ (side to side); 15‐20’ (end to end) 

Hickory Village   

 

 

 

20‐25’ (side to side);  

North College (Overall)   

 

 

10‐20’ (side to side); 5‐15’ (end to end) 

Stonecrest  

 

 

 

 

5‐10’ (side to side); 

North Star 

 

 

 

 

10‐15’ (side to side); 0‐5’ (end to end)  

Harmony Village  

 

 

 

15‐20’ (side to side); 10‐15’ (end to end)  

Pleasant Grove   

 

 

 

15‐20’ some as low as 5’ from accessory buildings to unit (side to side) 

References

Related documents

Re: November 8, 2021 City Council meeting, agenda item 9A, “Mayor Candell California State Constitutional Amendment to Restore Local Land Use Control”.. To: City Council of

General Obligation Abatement Bonds (M.S. 469.1813) – The City can issue general obligation bonds without a referendum to finance various economic development purposes, including

In order to ensure compatibility with residential areas, the City shall require commercial uses in residential future land use categories that allow such uses to obtain a

SUBJECT: Request of Venable LLP for a City Council work session to discuss the application for a Special Use Permit pursuant to City Code Section 110-3.5.5.C to allow

AS PART OF THE APPLICATION, PUD-R (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL) IS BEING REQUESTED. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS A 7-LOT, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.

WHEREAS, this plan was presented to the City Council of the City of Elizabeth City during its regular work session meeting held on February 27, 2006.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT

Through public engagement work with MHP residents, property managers, MHP owners, industry associations, internal stakeholders, and staff from other Colorado cities

Smith asked that City Council considers holding a work session to discuss making changes to the Draft- Final 2021 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation along Duke Street