EB-2005-0201 IN THE MATTER OF

(“Hydro One”) - Ontario Power Generation Inc. The settlement proposal indicates that all parties reached agreement on Issues 1.0 to 7.0 and that all parties except OPG

is granted leave, pursuant to subsection 90 (1) of the Act, to construct approximately 6.5 kilometres of NPS 36 pipeline to parallel a portion of Enbridge’s existing NPS 30 XHP

Second, Hydro One is of the view that the Board need not issue conditions relating to Bruce B, because it is entirely appropriate for the Board to grant leave to construct based on

AND IN THE MATTER OF a combined proceeding initiated by the Ontario Energy Board pursuant to sections 19(4), 21(1), 21(5) and 78(3.03) of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998

For the reasons indicated, the Board finds the pipeline project proposed by Union in this proceeding is in the public interest and grants an Order for Leave to Construct subject

The arguments made by the parties can be classified along the following lines: (i) arguments relating to the adequacy of the notice given in the Combined Proceeding in relation

Toronto Hydro notes that it requires a Board decision no later than June 23, 2000 to implement the new rate structure and rates by July 1, 2000.. The tests for permitting interim

“Do the licence amendment provisions of the Ontario Energy Board Act give the Ontario Energy Board jurisdiction to make an order which would have the effect of transferring