Question 1 AP PSYCHOLOGY 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES
Full text
Related documents
Point 2 was earned because the essay provides a method to correct the ethical flaw, namely that the researchers should “not [provide] a list of names and test scores.” Point 3
The essay earned point 6 because the student correctly explains the nature of crystallized intelligence as “one’s knowledge acquired throughout one’s lifetime” and provides
Specifically, students were required to demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between the following: (1) the rods in the eye and peripheral vision, (2) a
The essay earned point 1 when the student correctly identifies the independent variable as “whether or not the participants receive feedback.” Point 2 was awarded when the
Point 4 was earned when the student explains chunking as “cluster[ing] objects (or in Savannah’s case, words) into meaninful [sic] units.” Point 5 was granted when the student
The essay was not awarded point 3 because the student does not provide a specific example of an operational definition in a study. To earn point 4 a specific study had to
The student references general memory for location but does not make reference to a specific task, so the essay did not receive credit for point 6. The essay was awarded point 5
To score this point, students must present the hypothesis—an expectation about the relationship between variables—in either general terms (“People have a tendency to conform