• No results found

Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Tools RFP # 2013DWBI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Tools RFP # 2013DWBI"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

     

Data  Warehouse  and  Business  Intelligence  Tools                   RFP  #  2013DWBI              

Request  for  Proposals  Issued:  November  12,  2013    

Deadline  for  Submittal  of  Proposals:  December  3,  2013  5:00pm                    

(2)

REQUIREMENTS:      

1. Complete  application  for  RFP  2013DWBI  as  described  in  this  document  

2. Bidders  may  attach  additional  pertinent  information  they  deem  important  to  the  selection,   implementation,  and  overall  success  of  the  project.    

3. Project  schedule  

4. Background  information  about  bidder  including:  

a. Length  of  time  business  has  provided  this  type  of  service   b. Three  references  using  your  service  3  years  or  more     c. Service  Level  Agreement  (SLA)  for  your  proposal   d. Description  of  past  projects  of  similar  scope  

5. Total  project  cost  including  indication  of  how  charges  will  be  incurred  as  services  are   implemented    

   

SPECIAL  CONDITIONS:      

1. Prices  to  remain  firm  through  approval,  execution,  and  duration  of  the  proposed  contract.   In  the  event  of  a  price  decrease  for  service  or  from  the  manufacturer,  said  decrease  shall   be  passed  on  to  the  Natomas  Unified  School  District  and  documented  with  new  price  sheet   sent  to  Natomas  Unified  School  District  Office.    

2. All  equipment/services  costs  must  be  new  and  included  and  identified  separately.     3. Any  prospective  bidder,  who  contacts  any  School  District  Board  Member  during  the  RFP  

process,  will  be  disqualified  from  consideration  for  the  RFP  award.    

4. The  Board  of  Trustees  reserves  the  right  to  reject  any  and  all  bids/proposals,  or  any  or  all   items  of  any  bid/proposal.    

5. This  RFP  will  be  posted  to  the  Natomas  Unified  website  (http://www.natomasunified.org).   Any  additions  or  corrections  will  be  addressed  in  the  form  of  addenda  posted  to  the  same   location  on  the  website.    

6. All  questions  regarding  this  RFP  should  be  directed  to  jrabin@natomas.k12.ca.us,  with  the   subject  of    “RFP  2013DWBI.”    

7. The  Deadline  for  questions  will  be  11/27/2013  at  5:00  pm  PST.    

8. Responses  to  all  questions  will  be  made  by  12/2/2013  at  5pm  and  will  be  posted  on  the   district  website.  

9. It  is  the  responsibility  of  the  prospective  bidder  to  check  the  website  for  updates  or   addenda.    

10. You  must  provide  one  original  and  two  copies  of  your  proposal  (3  total).     11. Manufacturer  must  warrant  all  parts  and  equipment.  

(3)

VENDOR  REQUIREMENTS    

   

The  vendor  must  meet  or  exceed  all  minimum  qualification  requirements.  All  submitted  quotes   must  provide  at  a  minimum,  all  requested  information  in  this  quote  document.  Any  portion  not   included  will  be  cause  for  elimination  from  the  quote  process.    

 

Each  response  will  be  reviewed  to  determine  if  it  is  complete  prior  to  actual  evaluation.  The   information  should  be  organized  as  indicated  in  the  quote  requirements.  Any  portions  of  the   submitted  quote,  which  are  to  be  treated  by  the  District  as  proprietary  and  confidential   information,  must  be  clearly  marked  as  such.    

 

The  District  reserves  the  right  to  eliminate  from  further  consideration  any  response,  which  is   deemed  to  be  substantially  or  materially  unresponsive  to  the  request  for  information,  contained  in   this  section.    

 

Vendors  must  include  a  reference  for  a  project  of  equal  size  and  scope  that  has  been  completed   within  the  past  three  (3)  years.  References  from  school  districts,  county  offices  of  education,  or   colleges  in  California  are  preferred.    Please  include  the  following  information  in  your  references:  

• Job  location    

• Contact  name  and  telephone  number     • Date  of  contract    

• Project  description     • Equipment/service  installed         QUOTE  EVALUATION      

Each  response  will  be  reviewed  prior  to  the  selection  process  for  completeness  and  adherence  to   format.  A  response  will  be  considered  complete  if  all  requested  sections  are  included  in  the  proper   order  and  properly  completed.  Vendors  may  also  provide  any  and  all  recommendations  for  

consideration  such  as  installation,  maintenance,  support  and  design  that  is  relevant  to  the  total   solution  of  the  District’s  technology  needs.    

Evaluation  Criteria    

• Experience  completing  similar  work    

• Costs,  including  unit  prices,  labor  rates,  travel/trip  charges,  etc.     • Client  references  and/or  citations  from  prior  installations  

• Quote  preparation,  thoroughness,  and  responsiveness  to  the  RFP  requirement    

(4)

RFP  SCHEDULE    

 

Milestone   Date  

RFP  Released   November  12,  2013  

Deadline  for  questions/inquiries   November  27,  2013  5:00  p.m.  

Response  to  questions/inquiries   December  2,  2013  5:00  p.m.  

Deadline  for  submission  of  sealed  proposals   December  3,  2013  5:00  p.m.  

Proposal  review   December  4,  2013  

Demonstrations,  interviews,  and  reference  checks   December  6,  2013  

   

SPECIFIC  INSTRUCTIONS  &  INFORMATION  TO  BIDDERS    

 

1. PROPOSALS:  Each  proposal  shall  conform  and  be  responsive  to  District  specifications.  Bidder   shall  furnish  complete  specifications  and  rates  for  all  services  requested.  Additional  pricing   schedules  detailing  items  listed  on  the  proposal  shall  be  attached  to  the  proposal.    

 

2. DEADLINE  FOR  RECEIPT  OF  PROPOSAL:  One  original  and  two  copies  (for  a  total  of  three)  must   be  submitted  in  sealed  envelopes  and  should  be  properly  identified  with  the  proposal  number   and  Proposal  Submittal  Deadline.  Proposals  must  arrive  in  the  DISTIRCT  OFFICE,  1901  Arena   Blvd.,  Sacramento,  CA  95834  before  5:00  p.m.,  December  3,  2013,  local  time.  Telephone,   telegraphic,  facsimile,  emailed,  and  late  proposals  will  not  be  accepted  or  considered.    

3. PROPOSAL  SUBMISSION  REQUIREMENT:  Proposals  shall  be  submitted  to  the  address  above   and  labeled  as  follows:    

 

Attention:  Joel  Rabin   Data  Warehouse  RFP  

(5)

OBJECTIVES  AND  SCOPE  OF  PROPOSAL  

 

The  primary  objective  of  this  project  is  the  construction  of  an  Operational  Data  Store  (“ODS”),  or   “Data  Warehouse.”    The  ODS  should  aggregate  “of  interest”  business  data  from  a  variety  of  line  of   business  (“LOB”)  applications  into  a  single  repository  for  consolidated  reporting/analysis.    The  ODS   should  align  with  the  new  California  State  Local  Control  Funding  Formula  (LCFF)  and  Local  Control   and  Accountability  Plan  (LCAP)  laws.  

 

NUSD  requests  proposals  for  an  ODS  that  includes  data  extraction,  data  cleansing,  data  storage,  

and  business  intelligence  tools.    The  District  desires  all  requirements  specified  to  be  provided  as  a  

single  solution  or  integrated  solution.  The  purpose  of  this  solution  is  to  provide  improved  access  to   information,  foster  more  informed  decision-­‐making,  and  support  the  District’s  Strategic  Plan.  This   tool  will  provide  the  infrastructure  that  allows  district  leaders  to  access,  query,  analyze,  and  use   data  to  inform  policies,  practice,  and  decision-­‐making  at  all  levels  of  the  organization.    

 

The  scope  of  this  project  includes  the  development  of  a  versatile,  dynamic,  rapidly  deployable   solution  for  data  warehousing,  analytics  and  reporting.  The  selected  solution  will  need  to  be  able   to  readily  connect  with  a  variety  of  commonly  used  system  database  formats,  and  will  need  to   have  flexible,  intuitive  solutions  for  common  reporting  needs.  The  successful  proposal  will  provide   functionality  “off  the  shelf.”  It  will  create  an  environment  that  does  not  require  a  great  deal  of   customization  “from  the  ground  up”  to  add  value  and  functionality  to  the  organization.  It  will   provide  a  very  intuitive,  useful  environment  to  the  end  users  for  finding  data  they  need,  analyzing   that  data,  and  easily  creating  useful  reports  from  it.  The  vendor  providing  the  solution  will  need  to   make  a  serious  commitment  to  ensuring  the  success  of  the  project,  and  should  have  experience   helping  other  K-­‐12  organizations  who  have  succeeded  with  similar  projects.    

 

NUSD  wants  to  transform  from  a  data  rich  district  to  one  that  is  both  data  and  information  rich.   Features  in  the  proposed  solution  should  include  but  not  be  limited  to  the  following:    

1. Data  Warehouse:  The  warehouse  should  include  a  centralized  database  to  collect  and   store  student  and  school  data  from  a  number  of  sources  and  from  multiple  years  as  well  as   NUSD  operational  data.    

2. Business  Intelligence  (BI)  tools:  The  solution  will  include  functionality  for  analysis,  

reporting,  and  dashboarding  within  a  centralized  portal.  Security  should  be  configurable  so   that  users  are  restricted  where  appropriate.    

3. Project  Management  Professional  Services:  There  should  be  a  clearly  laid-­‐out  plan  in  place   for  how  the  service  provider  will  provide  project  implementation,  deployment  support,   and  hand-­‐off  services  to  the  District.    

(6)

TECHNICAL  SPECIFICATIONS/REQUIREMENTS  

 

1. Data  Warehouse  

a. Data  warehousing  of  the  following  sources  of  data:  student  information,  student   achievement,  human  resources,  financial  data,  asset  tracking,  special  education,   food  services,  and  professional  development.  

b. Ability  to  integrate  other  data  sources  into  the  ODS  in  the  future  in  place  of  current   LOB  data  systems  or  in  addition  to  current  LOB  systems.  

c. Scheduled  tasks  (within  SQL,  or  within  Windows  OS,  as  appropriate)  to  accomplish   the  imports  on  the  desired  schedules.  

d. A  set  of  database  tables  and  a  methodology  for  logging  messages  or  error   conditions  during  imports.  

e. A  proposed  backup  methodology  to  protect  data  stored  in  the  ODS  against   accidental  loss;  a  method  for  doing  point-­‐in-­‐time  restores.  

f. Procedures  for  obtaining  student  data  and  for  safeguarding  that  data  during   movement  and  storage.    

g. A  set  of  scripts  or  methods  for  automating  Active  Directory  (AD)account  

provisioning  for  both  staff  and  students,  and  for  importing  AD  account  information   into  the  ODS.  

h. A  basic  Active  Directory  RBAC  (“role  based  access  control”)  i.e.,  a  groups-­‐based   methodology  for  securing  access  to  databases,  reports,  and  dashboards.  

i. A  set  of  sample  views,  stored  procedures,  and/or  table  valued  functions  that  can  be   used  to  ‘flatten’  or  ‘join’  databases  created  within  the  ODS  for  facilitating  

integrated  reporting  or  analysis  across  data  domains.      

j. A  set  of  sample  HTML5-­‐based  web  pages  to  facilitate  data  entry  and  editing  of   information  captured  in  the  ODS  (limited  in  sophistication  to  simple  ‘grid  editor’   kinds  of  User  Interfaces).  

 

2. Business  Intelligence  (BI)  Tools:      

a. A  set  of  sample  ODBC  connected  Excel  /  PowerPivot  spreadsheets  that  can  be  used   to  illustrate  Ad-­‐Hoc  analysis  techniques  using  the  ODS.  

b. A  set  of  sample  SSRS  (SQL  Reporting  Services)  reports  that  use  the  ODS  data  with   drill-­‐down  features  from  aggregated  district  reports  to  school  level  and  group   reports,  to  individual  student  reports  with  filter  options  and  student  selection   options.  

c. Reporting  options  should  be  available  on  both  personal  computers  and  mobile   devices,  independent  of  operating  systems  used.  

d. Following  are  critical  reports  of  necessary  development  as  part  of  this  project:   i. Individual  student  profile  

ii. Class,  teacher,  school,  program  and  district  summary  reports  with  built  in   historic  data  

(7)

iv. Tabular  and  graphic  displays  of  student  data  

v. Graduation  status  reports  for  individual  students,  groups  of  students,  and   schools  

vi. District  dashboard  reports  for  quick  views  of  student  data  

e. Ability  for  NUSD  staff  to  prepare  and  deploy  additional  reports  indefinitely  as   needed  to  meet  the  BI  needs  of  the  district.  

f. A  version  control  system  suitable  for  managing  changes  to  the  above.      

3. Project  Management  Professional  Services:  

a. The  project  plan  proposed  by  the  vendor,  including  the  proposed  solution,  

implementation  methodology  and  recommended  scope/statement  of  work  shall  be   reviewed  and  approved  by  NUSD.  Reviews  will  be  performed  at  pre-­‐defined  

checkpoints  during  the  course  of  the  project  to  monitor  progress.  Feedback  from   this  monitoring  system  shall  be  used  to  make  changes  in  the  implementation   strategy  by  the  vendor.    

a. Systems  Integration  advice  and  consulting  related  to  the  selection  and  building  of   physical  and  virtual  servers  necessary  for  the  construction  of  ODS  (i.e.  hardware   and  software  necessary  to  instantiate  a  sufficient  number  of  Microsoft  SQL  Server   instances  and  web  servers  for  production,  reporting,  and  test/QA  purposes.)   b. A  set  of  database  schemas  (databases/tables/columns)  suitable  for  housing  

imported  data  extracts  from  each  of  the  major  line  of  business  applications.   c. A  design  methodology  to  facilitate  future  integration  with  third  party  frameworks  

or  tools,  e.g.  EdFi  or  Clever.com  (specifying  how  such  integration  could  work  and   designing  compatible  schema  is  within  scope;  actually  building  frameworks  for  third   party  integration  is  not.)  

d. A  set  of  data  import/import  methods  and  scripts  (SQL  Server  SSIS  or  PowerShell  in   combination  with  secure  FTP  or  other  similar  secure  file  transfer  protocol)  suitable   for  securely  importing,  transforming,  and  “cleansing”  data  from  these  sources  on   an  appropriately  recurring  basis  

e. Suitable  documentation,  including  data  dictionaries  and  video  tutorials,  for  the   above  deliverables.  

f. Systems  and  procedures  to  backup  and  restore  data  to  include  retention  policy,   storage  environment  and  medium  used.    

g. Support  agreement  terms  and  conditions  (SLA)  and  associated  costs  (per  annum,   response  levels,  training  –  on  site  and/or  remote,  design  and  programming  rates  for   BSD  contracted  enhancements,  etc.).    

(8)

IMPLEMENTATION  PLAN  REQUIREMENTS:  

1. Schedule  for  work  

2. High  level  goals  of  project  

3. Roles  and  responsibilities  of  NUSD  technical  team  

4. Communication  protocols  between  vendor  and  NUSD  technical  team   5. Remote  desktop  framework  for  remote  access  (Microsoft  Server  2012)   6. SQL,  reporting,  and  web  server  architecture  

a. What  servers  and  storage  needs  will  be  required?   b. Which  servers  can  be  virtualized  and  which  cannot?   c. What  database  replications  will  be  needed  and  why?   d. What  backup  methodologies  will  be  used?  

7. Dedicated  virtual  machine  for  data  imports/exports  (SFTP)   8. Web-­‐based  collaborative  system  for  hosting  and  editing  reports   9. Role  based  access  control  methodology  

10. General  data  security  model,  make  selections  (row,  table,  database,  report,  application)   11. Auditing  tools  

12. Database  schemas  and  high-­‐level  data  “partitioning”   13. Data  dictionary  tools  

14. Data  sources  and  evaluate  synchronization  scheduling  needs   15. Reporting  and  Ad  Hoc  analytics  tools  that  will  be  used   16. Training  plan  for  Natomas  Data  and  Technology  team  

a. Change  process  management  rules  

b. Basic  version  control  system  implementation  and  training   c. Basic  database  structures  we  will  be  implementing  and  why   d. Primary  keys,  indexing,  referential  integrity  

e. Naming  conventions   f. Security  conventions   g. Report  creation   17. User  support  mechanisms   18. Export  options  (CSV,  XML,  other)   19. Potential  data  cleanliness  issues  

20. Data  transformation  methods  (SSIS,  Powershell,  other)   21. Data  warehouse  documentation  

 

 

NUSD  WILL  PROVIDE  

 

• Necessary  server  hardware  

• Necessary  software  licenses  for  ongoing  ODS  operation.  

• Necessary  logins  and  permissions  to  facilitate  ability  to  access  and  extract  the  intended  

data  from  the  specified  LOB  systems.  

References

Related documents

We developed a modular design project of an air stripping tower for ammonia removal as part of an environmental process dynamics class. We placed a large emphasis on

Eldridge Publishing, a leading drama play publisher since 1906, offers more than a thousand full-length plays, one-act plays, melodramas, holiday plays, religious plays,

Liu J., Gao Y., Cao D., Zhang L. and Guo Z. 2011 Nanoparticle dispersion and aggregation in 

In this paper, a new reliable analytical technique based on the Harmonic Balance Method (HBM) has been established to drive approximate periodic solutions of the strongly

Participants reporting recent illegal behavior (n ⫽ 63) endorsed more severe lifetime and recent (past-year) gambling disorder symptoms and higher gambling-related debt than

An additional framework with which this study engages is the impact that the internationalization of the conflict had upon the Yemen sense of national identity and

Present study addresses this issue by exploring the relationship of social capital and its dimensions, i.e., structural, cognitive, and relational capitals, with intellectual

To test the impact and effectiveness of plan Trustees, I use Board characteristics (i.e., Board composition, term and size) to explain plan excess returns (i.e., actual fund return