AXA IM - Cartographies des risques
financiers, de non-conformité et opérationnels
Philippe d’Orgeval
Global Head of Risk Management
Plan
Univers des risques
Cartographie des risques au niveau de l’entreprise
De la cartographie des risques à la quantification des risques
Exemple de cartographie des risques opérationnels au niveau du fonds
Exemple de cartographie des risques d’investissement au niveau du fonds
Gouvernance
Market Appreciation Risk
Demand Risk
New Business Risk
Pension Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Own Investment Risk
Regulatory Risk
Legal Risk
Process/Execution Risk
System Risk
External Event Risk
Human Resources Risk
Modelling Risk
Investment Guidelines
Risk
Valuation Risk
Performance Risk
Market Risk
Credit Risk
Market Liquidity Risk
Business Risks
Operational Risks
Investment Risks
4 4
Consolidated
Heat Map
Definition of
AXA IM’s
annual
control plan
Validation of
Implementation
and monitoring of
the control plan
AXA IM’s annual
control plans
Production of entity
Level Risk Heat Map
Comprehensive assessment by local entity of
their risks level and criticality based on:
leveraging past year heat map and
quantification
the number of incidents and their financial
impact when relevant
forecasted impact of anticipated
regulatory changes
the outcome of the reviews performed
key points highlighted at the LCCs
Input from the business
Production of entity level Risk Heat Map and
proposal for reviews
Consolidation of the local heat maps to
produce an AXA IM Group Heat Map
Based on the produced Risk Heat Map:
definition of AXA IM’s control plan
with a focus on the most critical risks
allocation of the topics among the
different teams based on resources
skills/availability and set objectives
The Internal Audit team will take part in this
process but will have first selection of topics
so as to preserve their independence.
Discussion and validation of the plan by:
Business Heads
Global Risk management board
Internal Audit Committee
3
2
Implementation of the validated actions
Regular
review of the control plan’s
progress and results by Global Risk
management board and Audit Committee
4
Li
k
e
li
ho
od
Impact
1
E n tit y L e v e l C o n s o lid a te d Gr o u p L e v e l NotSignificant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius
Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH
O
Entity Level Risk Heat Maps
UK Internal Capital
Adequacy Assessment
Process (ICAAP)
Control Plans
Local Regulatory Capital
O
Consolidated Group Level
Risk Heat Map
Risk quantification process (Solvency II)
£
€
Capital Charge
Internal Audit
Control Plan
Operational Risk
Reviews
Local Compliance
Control Plans
Supplements the
existing top down
assessment carried our
through extensive
interviews across the
business
Input to the annual control planning
process (discretionary reviews).
Bases of local capital assessment
process
Not
Significant Minor Seroius
Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH Not
Significant Minor Seroius Very Serious Extremely Serious Frequent M H VH B B Likely M H VH VH B Unlikely M M H VH VH Remote L M M H VH 5
Cartographie des risques opérationnels au niveau d’un fonds
6
Equity Fixed
Income OPC Derivatives
4.1.1
09. investment guidelines risk
Breach of client guidelines Yes Yes Yes Yes Standard pre trade and post trade process via the
tool SENTINEL Possible 1 Low
4.3.2
09. investment guidelines risk
Breach of regulatory guidelines Yes Yes Yes Yes Standard pre trade and post trade process via the
tool SENTINEL Possible 1 Low
4.4.1 04. process
execution risk Trading with unauthorised broker / counterparty Yes Yes Yes Yes Standard process Unlikely 1 Low
4.4.4 04. process
execution risk Non respect of best execution process Yes Yes Yes Yes
Standard process. Monitoring done by Compliance
No incident reported in 2014 Unlikely 1 Low
… … … …
4.5.3 04. process execution risk
Tariff error, inadequate commissions or fees (incl.
Performance & management fees) N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Standard fee process performed by SGSS, and
controlled by AXA IM Finance. Unlikely 2 Low
6.1.1 05. system risk
IT system outage, disruptions, failure and downtime (including system capacity shortfall) due to aging IT infrastructure
N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
ISSUE production incidents in 2014 : Balanced & Index funds monitoring in Balanced Tool No risk: issue on limited time and risk indicators monitored by Fund Manager on 1st level
Probable 1 Medium Likelihood Impact level Rating 2014 Instruments L3 AXA Ref. Risk Universe
sub category Risk Description / assessment of the situation
Cartographie des risques d’investissement au niveau d’un fonds
7
Matrices illustratives de risques d’investissement pouvant affecter un fonds
Risk type
Illustrative Risk measures
Delta / Mdur
Single name
Sector
Country
Credit Quality
Exposure with addon
Eligibility
Collateral (ISDA/CSA)
Exposure
Actif / Passif
Stress test
Credit
Liquidity
Ctpty Risk
Risk type
Illustrative Risk measures
Delta / Mdur
Inflation
Delta
single name
Sector
Country
Market risk - FX
Delta
Market risk - Implied Vol
Vega
Ex-ante volatility/VaR
Stress test
Market risk - Rate
Market risk - Equity
Market risk - Portfolio
Level
Gouvernance et suivi du respect de la politique de gestion des risques
par les instances dirigeantes
8
Exemple de reportings revus en comité Risque
– Reporting des fonctions de contrôles: Risque et conformité, – Reporting de la sécurité informatique
– Reportingdes dépassements des limites d’investissements (règlementaire, client, interne)
– Reportingdes incidents (impact, plan d’action de réduction du risque de récurrence, profil de risque vs cartographie) – Reporting des « plaintes » clients