• No results found

Hilti Calculation Examples

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Hilti Calculation Examples"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

4

4

Examples

Examples

Example Example 1 1 314314 Example Example 2 2 318318

4

4

(2)

60°

c1 c2

F

N=9,0 kN

V=15,6 kN F=18,0 kN

Single-anchor fastening close to two edges of a column

Given: Hilti HVA adhesive anchor with HVU capsule and HAS-R M20 rod

grade of concrete: C20/25

inclined working load: F = 18.0 kN

thickness of concrete member: h = 300 mm

edge distance: c1 = 100 mm, c2= 150 mm

Calculation:

1.

Tension

Valid design tensile load:

Rd,c Rd,s

Rd min N ;N

N

1.1 Design tensile load to resist pull-out and concrete failure, NRd,c:

(3)

4

Initial value of design tensile load, N0Rd,c

kN 62,9 NRd,0 c

Influence of concrete strength

0 , 1 100 25 f  1 f B ck,cube



 

 



 

 

; for f ck,cube

25N/mm2

Influence of anchorage depth

; 0 , 1 h h f  nom act

T

for hact

hnom;

hnom

hact

2,0

hnom

Influence of anchor spacing

; 0 , 1 h 4 s 5 , 0 f  nom N ,

 A

because of single-anchor fastening

Influence of edge distance

70 , 0 mm 170 mm 100 72 , 0 28 , 0 h c 72 , 0 28 , 0 f  nom 1 N , 1 R

92 , 0 mm 170 mm 150 72 , 0 28 , 0 h c 72 , 0 28 , 0 f  nom 2 N , 2 R

Design tensile load to resist pull-out of concrete cone kN 40,5 0,92 0,7 1,0 1,0 1,0 kN 62,9 c Rd, N

Design tensile load to resist steel failure, NRd,s

kN 3 , 84 NRd,s

Final design tensile resistance:

N ;N

40,5 kN min

(4)

2.

Shear 

Valid design shear load:

Rd,c Rd,s

Rd min V ;V

V

2.1 Design shear load to resist concrete edge failure, VRd,c:

Concrete design resistance, V Rd,c for a single anchor in a multiple-anchor fastening:

V ,  AR V , V , B 0 c , Rd c , Rd V f  f  f  V

Initial value of design shear load at a concrete edge with minimum edge distance kN

12,4 VRd,0 c

Influence of concrete strength

; 0 , 1 25 f 

B,V

ck,cube

for f ck,cube

25N/mm2

Influence of loading direction

o o V , o o V , o o V , 180 90 ; 0 , 2 f  90 55 ; sin 5 , 0 cos 1 f  55 0 ; 0 , 1 f 

   ; 0 , 2 f ,V

for 

90o

Influence of edge distance

28 , 1 mm 85 mm 100 mm 85 mm 100 c c c c f  min min V ,  AR

; kN 31,7 2,0 1,28 1,0 kN 12,4 VRd,c

2.2 Design shear load to resist steel failure, VRd,s:

V

(5)

4

3.

Combined Load:

The design resistance for a combined load is given by:

kN

30,7

31,7kN

sin60

kN

40,5

cos60

V

sin

N

cos

 

(

F

3 2 1,5 o 1,5 o 3 2 1,5 Rd 1,5 Rd Rd



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 

 

Design action load:

F Sd F

F

assuming a partial safety factor for the working load,

F, of 1.4

kN 2 , 25 4 , 1 kN 0 , 18 FSd

Proof:

 

 30,7 kN F kN 25,2 FSd

Rd

This application is safe if designed according to the Hilti FTM.

N

F ( )

V   Rd

(6)

  c

s

1          h

2  

2   V

1

2

3

4

5

6

 N F

Six-anchor fastening close to one edge

Given: Hilti HDA-T M16 design anchor 

anchoring in non-cracked concrete

grade of concrete: C30/37

inclined working load: F = 80,0 kN

angle of inclination:

= 20°

thickness of concrete member: h = 400 mm

edge distance: c = 160 mm,

spacing: s1 = 190 mm, s2= 300 mm

Calculation:

1.

Tension

Valid design tensile load:

Rd,c Rd,s

Rd min N ;N

N

1.1 Design tensile load to resist pull-out and concrete failure, NRd,c:

(7)

4

kN 63,0 0,76 0,67 1,22 kN 101,4 NRd,2,6c

kN 47,9 0,76 0,76 0,67 1,22 kN 101,4 NRd,4 c

kN 42,8 0,68 0,76 0,67 1,22 kN 101,4 N1,5Rd,c

kN 32,6 0,68 0,76 0,76 0,67 1,22 kN 101,4 N3Rd,c

Design tensile load to resist concrete cone pull-out for a multiple-anchor fastening kN 292,1 kN 32,6 kN 47,9 2 kN) 42,8 kN (63,0 NRd,groupc

1.2 Design tensile load to resist steel failure, NRd,s kN

0 , 84 NRd,s

Design tensile load to resist steel failure for a multiple-anchor fastening kN 0 , 504 6 kN 0 , 84 NgroupRd,s

1.3 Final design tensile resistance:

N ;N

292,1 kN min

NRdgroup

Rd,groupc Rd,groups

Initial value of design tensile load, N0Rd,c

kN 101,4 N0Rd,c

Influence of concrete strength

22 , 1 mm / N 25 mm / N 37 25 f  f  2 2 cube , ck B

Influence of anchor spacing

67 , 0 mm 190 6 mm 190 5 , 0 h 6 s 5 , 0 f  ef  1 1 N ,  A

76 , 0 mm 190 6 mm 300 5 , 0 h 6 s 5 , 0 f  ef  2 2 N ,  A

Influence of edge distance

68 , 0 mm 190 mm 160 49 , 0 27 , 0 h c 49 . 0 27 , 0 f  ef  N , R

(8)

2.

Shear 

Valid design shear load:

Rd,c Rd,s

Rd min V ;V

V

2.1 Design shear load to resist concrete edge failure, VRd,c:

Concrete design resistance, VRd,c for a single anchor in a multiple-anchor fastening:

V , V ,  AR B 0 c , Rd c , Rd V f  f  f  V

Initial value of design shear load at a concrete edge with minimum edge distance kN

26,1 VRd,0 c

Influence of concrete strength

22 , 1 mm / N 25 mm / N 37 25 f  f  2 2 cube , ck B

Influence of shear loading direction

o V

, 1; 0

Influence of anchor spacing and edge distance

83 , 0 mm 150 mm 160 mm 150 3 3 mm 300 2 mm 160 3 c c c n 3 s ... s s c 3 f  min min 1 n 2 1 V ,  AR

 kN 26,4 1,0 0,83 1,22 kN 26,1 VRd,c

Design shear load to resist concrete edge failure for a multiple-anchor fastening kN 79,2 3 kN 26,4 VRd,groupc

(9)

4

2.2 Design shear load to resist steel failure, VRd,s : kN

3 , 93 VRd,s

Design shear load to resist steel failure for a multiple-anchor fastening kN 0 , 560 6 kN 3 , 93 VRdgroup,s

2.3 Final design shear resistance:

V ;V

66,0kN min

VRdgroup

Rdgroup,c Rdgroup,s

3.

Combined Load:

The design resistance for a combined load is given by:

kN

166,3

kN

79,2

sin20

kN

292,1

cos20

V

sin

N

cos

 

(

F

3 2 1,5 o 1,5 o 3 2 1,5 Rd 1,5 Rd Rd



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 



 

 

  Design action: F Sd F F

assuming a partial safety factor for the working load,

F, of 1.4

kN 0 , 112 4 , 1 kN 0 , 80 FSd

Proof:

 

 166,3kN F kN 112,0 FSd

Rd

This application is safe if designed according to the Hilti FTM.

N

F ( )

V   Rd

(10)

References

Related documents

Arc-Flash Hazard Calculation Examples The following examples break down the calculations and compare the Hazard Risk Category (HRC), Incident Energy (cal/cm²), Flash

Our own University Professor, Tweed Roosevelt, will deliver an exclusive Hutton House Lecture series of three talks – one on each of the Roosevelts (Theodore, Eleanor and

The public sector shows a lower intensity of cloud adoption than the private sector, and this seems to be due to higher regulatory barriers, such as concerns about security and

Also conducting dynamic response analysis of the full-scale rockfall protection wall with the TLAS inputting time history of the transmitted impact force obtained from the test

And his sons answered and replied a second time, and said, " Speak, father, for we listen." 5, He said unto them, " I give you no command save in regard to the fear of the Lord

Fuzzy regression analysis using genetic algorithm allows to estimate and predict the level of power losses in electrical networks.. The minimum and maximum lines of the proposed

However, with a second set of simulations, we show that when the maximum number of factors allowed in the estimation becomes very - but still legitimately - large, also the original

Within these contexts of school practice, the concept of cultural diversity is also used by teachers to stress the influence of social and family context – often reduced to