• No results found

Life Insurance Valuation Interest Rate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Life Insurance Valuation Interest Rate"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Life Insurance Valuation

Interest Rate

Scott Gibson, FSA, MAAA

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Actuaries and Consultants

(972) 850-0850

(2)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Important Facts About the

Standard Valuation and

Standard Nonforfeiture Laws

¾ Prescribe formulas for setting reserves and cash values

¾ Formulas include maximum interest rates indexed to Moody’s Corporate Bond Yield

(3)

Valuation Interest Rates

¾ Current valuation rate for long life contracts is 4.50%

¾ Last changed in 1995

¾ Formula for valuation interest rate uses the lesser of 36-month or 12-month average ending June 30 prior to the year of policy issue

(4)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Moody’s Corporate Bond Yields

Month Year Yield Month Year Yield Month Year Yield

7 2002 7.27% 7 2003 6.25% 7 2004 6.24% 8 2002 7.06% 8 2003 6.58% 8 2004 6.08% 9 2002 6.87% 9 2003 6.37% 9 2004 5.91% 10 2002 7.08% 10 2003 6.32% 10 2004 5.87% 11 2002 7.01% 11 2003 6.27% 11 2004 5.89% 12 2002 6.90% 12 2003 6.20% 12 2004 5.84% 1 2003 6.84% 1 2004 6.08% 1 2005 5.72% 2 2003 6.62% 2 2004 6.00% 2 2005 5.55% 3 2003 6.53% 3 2004 5.84% 3 2005 5.77% 4 2003 6.44% 4 2004 6.22% 4 2005 5.65% 5 2003 6.02% 5 2004 6.51% 5 2005 8.02%* 6 2003 5.85% 6 2004 6.42% 6 2005 8.02%*

Projected 36-Month A verage = 6.39% Projected 12-Month A verage = 6.21% Projected 2006 Long Life Valuation Interes t Rate = 4.00%

* M aximum A verage M oody's Corporate Bond Yield that would res ult in a reduction in the long life valuation interes t rate

(5)

Valuation Interest Rate Change

¾ A change will occur if the 12-month average Moody’s Corporate Bond Yield is less than 6.21%

¾ To avoid a change, Moody’s Corporate Bond Yield would need to average at least 8.02% for May and June, 2005

¾ Moody’s Corporate Bond Yields have not been this high since June 2000

¾ Therefore, we expect the long life valuation interest rate to drop to 4.00% for 2006!

(6)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Example Impact of Valuation Interest Rate

Change

Traditional Whole Life – Age 45 – Male Nonsmoker

4.50% Reserve & 5.75% CV 4.00% Reserve & 5.00% CV

ROE % Prem Breakeven ROE % Prem Breakeven

15.20% 6.05% 7.52 Yrs 11.34% 3.93% 12.07 Yrs

A 4.00% increase in the premiums are needed to reestablish profit margins

(7)

Deficiency Reserves

¾ Could occur on any plan where guaranteed gross premiums are set equal to the valuation net premiums using the 4.50% rate

¾ This results in deficiency reserves which can be sizeable

¾ Most likely to affect term plans, term riders and traditional life plans

¾ Deficiency reserves deplete up surplus and decrease profitability

¾ Universal life contracts with 4.50% guarantees could result in additional reserves

(8)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Nonforfeiture Values

¾ One year deferral on the maximum nonforfeiture interest rate changes

¾ Maximum 5.00% rate would not be required until 2007

¾ Nonforteiture values may now be required for previously exempt term products

(9)

Disability Income and Long-Term Care

¾ Changes in the long life valuation interest rate also affect disability income and long-term care reserves

¾ As under life contracts, the lower interest rate will increase reserves for these contracts, deferring the recognition of profits

¾ New reserve factors will be needed for business issued in 2006 and later

(10)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

2001 CSO Mortality Table

¾ If products are repriced and refiled for a valuation rate change, should the new 2001 CSO Mortality Table be considered?

¾ Consider incorporating the 2001 CSO Mortality Table when repricing and refiling products

¾ Most states have now adopted the 2001 CSO Mortality Table. Remaining states should be onboard soon.

(11)

2001 CSO Mortality Table

States Adopted (WY Permitted) States Considering Adoption

(12)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Company Options

¾ Recompute reserve factors based on the new valuation rate. Do not adjust gross premiums or nonforfeiture values. Do not

incorporate 2001 CSO.

¾ Recompute reserve factors and gross premiums based on the new valuation rate. Do not adjust nonforfeiture values. Do not incorporate 2001 CSO.

¾ Recompute reserve factors, gross premiums and nonforfeiture values based on the new valuation rate. Do not incorporate 2001 CSO.

¾ Recompute reserve factors, gross premiums and nonforfeiture values based on the new valuation rate. Incorporate 2001 CSO.

(13)

Issues To Consider

¾ Product Margins and Competitiveness

¾ Surplus Strain and Statutory Earnings

¾ Administrative Systems

¾ Filing and Compliance Requirements

(14)

Lewis & Ellis Inc.

Questions?

Call L&E at:

Dallas Office: 972.850.0850

Kansas City Office: 913.491.3388

References

Related documents

ROCAUC obtained using IntelliGO to classify GIDs into 5 classes (Reg- ulation, Regulation of Genetic Expression, Metabolic, Synaptic, Neurogenesis) with different combinations

specifically, compared to the healthy group, individuals with BPD had higher values on the temperament dimen- sion of harm avoidance (but not novelty seeking) as well as on

The nurse measured the vital signs of the child (who was five years old), which included pain assessment (Face Pain Scale) and recorded the information in the child’s

We present and evaluate our semantic profiling architecture in four ways: (1) the perfor- mance of the Tag Filtering and mapping to Wikipedia entries, (2) the difference between

8      

When combining an infection with RRPs with a transfection of the plasmid encoding the structural glycoproteins, any mammalian or insect cell can po- tentially be used for the

TEKNILLINEN KORKEAKOULU HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY TEKNILLINEN KORKEAKOULU HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Contents Background Conclusion Purpose of thesis Future work

The product team in Swisscom recognised early on that one of the most important components to making the Mobile ID service a success – particularly in the early stages of deployment