• No results found

Rehabilitation Pilot Project

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Rehabilitation Pilot Project"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Rehabilitation Pilot Project

Chair: Joel Stein, MD, Columbia University Medical Center

Vice-Chair: Alyse Sicklick, MD, Gaylord Hospital

Additional Project Leads:

Janet Prvu Bettger, ScD, Duke University

Robin Hedeman, OTR, MHA, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation Zainab Magdon-Ismail, MPH, American Heart Association

(2)

2008 NECC Rehabilitation Working

Group: Identified Priorities

1. Develop a longitudinal measure of patient function following stroke

2. Ensure better communications between levels of care regarding the patients’ medical status,

education, and secondary prevention

3. Create a standardized assessment across the NECC region to determine the appropriate level of rehab services required

(3)

Rehabilitation Recommendations

1. All hospitalized stroke patients should be assessed for and referred to the appropriate level of

post-stroke care. Whether state-based, regional or

national, primary stroke centers should require the provision of basic rehabilitation assessment and services (e.g. physical, occupational, or speech

therapy) and comprehensive stroke centers should be required to provide these rehabilitation services on site, or as part of a formal stroke care network with pre-specified relationships.

(4)

Rehabilitation Recommendations

2. Every stroke patient's functional status

should be assessed during inpatient

hospitalization with a standardized screening and assessment tool. NECC states should

collectively select a single instrument to be used by all states.

(5)

Rehabilitation Recommendations

3. States within NECC should develop a uniform set of stroke rehabilitation quality measures to be piloted in all post-acute settings where rehabilitation settings, such as Skilled Nursing Facilities, Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals, and Long-Term Acute Care Facilities. These measurements should include

rates of adherence to key guideline-based interventions in the treatment of stroke patients, and appropriate targets for

adherence should be established at the institutional and

regional level. Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals should obtain certification in stroke rehabilitation by external credentialing agencies or seek equivalent designation. Similar criteria

should be developed for the other post acute settings to permit comparable certification.

(6)

Rehabilitation Recommendations

4. Advocacy organizations should focus on ensuring that adequate rehabilitation

resources exist within the NECC region, that adequate insurance benefits exist to fairly

compensate for the cost of this post-acute care, and that these benefits are readily accessible to those patients who require services.

(7)
(8)

Focus: Assess for Rehabilitation

• Multiple guidelines include “Assessment of

Rehabilitation Needs”, but don’t define it

• The vast majority of GWTG hospital report

compliance with this standard

• Anecdotally, there is considerable variation in

the selection of patients for different levels of rehabilitation care

• Can we improve care by standardizing this

(9)

NECC Rehab Project

• To conduct a pilot study on Rehab Assessment

in Acute Care

• Approximately 20 acute care hospitals

• Collect data on factors that influence patients’

(10)

Intervention

• “Piggy-back” on the existing Get With The

Guidelines-Stroke database to collect

recommended data elements in the pilot hospitals.

• Collect data from a representative sample of

(11)

Rehab Pilot Goals

• Determine overall feasibility of this type of

data collection in the acute hospital

• Establish which data items are practical to

collect, and which are not

• Explore mechanisms for collecting this data in

a variety of hospitals throughout the region

• Preliminary analysis of factors that influence

patients’ discharge destination from an acute care hospital, and variation in practice

(12)

Methodology for Measurement of

Outcomes

• The strength of the factors influencing patients’ discharge destination will be determined by analyzing patients’

discharge destination in relation to the patients’:

– age, race, gender

– prior living environment

– health insurance status

– preadmission and discharge ambulatory status

– initial NIH stroke score

– functional assessment

– socioeconomic status

(13)

Tools Used

• Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Database

• Additional Fields added specifically for the Pilot:

Pre-morbid (pre-stroke) Modified Rankin

Barthel Index

Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)

Caregiver Availability

Highest Level of Education

Sites committed to collect data for 3 months and share 3 months of baseline GWTG data prior to the project as well

(14)

Participating Sites

• 22 Sites Total

– Academic Medical Centers: 12

– Community Hospitals (teaching & non-teaching): 10

• CT-3

• MA-4

• NJ-4

• NY (Downstate): 9

(15)

Site Participation By Bed Size

1 6 3 4 4 3 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Nu mb e r of Ho sp it as

(16)

General Observations

•Recruitment to a voluntary pilot project is challenging but possible!

•Needed leadership buy-in at various levels (e.g. VP for Quality)

•Resources at various institutions vary – the pilot is extra work for one or more staff members at each site

•Several sites needed IRB review

•Coding Instructions and Data Collection Elements need to be clearly defined

•We refined some of our data collection points based on site feedback

•We refined our coding instructions several times

•Valuable aspect of pilot project

•Who performs the data collection at each site?

•PT/OT/Speech

•Stroke Nurse Coordinators •Residents

(17)

Preliminary Analysis of 469 Patients

with Barthel Index recorded

Female Male

(18)

Race & Ethnicity

White Black/African American Other or UTD 41 428 Hispanic Ethnicity* Other

(19)

Discharge Location

Home

Inpatient Rehab (IRF)

(20)

Discharge disposition by age

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% <45 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ Hospice/Expired Subacute/Nursing Home IRF Home Age (years)

(21)

Discharge location by NIHSS

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0-4 5-9 10-14 15+ Hospice/Expired Subacute/SNF IRF Home NIHSS

(22)

Discharge Destination by Barthel Index

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 80-100 60-75 40-55 20-35 0-15 Hospice/Expired SNF IRF Home Barthel Index

(23)

Thank you to our Participating Sites!

The Allen Pavilion-NYP, NY Bassett Hospital, NY

Berkshire Medical Center, MA Boston Medical Center, MA Capital Health, NJ

Columbia University Medical Center-NYP, NY

Hackensack University Medical Center, NJ Hartford Hospital, CT

Jersey Shore University Medical Ctr, NJ Lutheran Medical Center, NY

Massachusetts General Hospital, MA Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, NY

The Mt. Sinai Medical Center, NY Newton-Wellesley Hospital, NY Sharon Hospital, CT

St. Charles Hospital, NY

St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, NJ St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, NY

Stony Brook University Medical Ctr, NY University Hospital of Brooklyn at Long Island College Hospital, NY

Weill Cornell Medical Center-NYP, NY Yale New Haven Hospital, CT

(24)

Next Steps

1. Complete Data Collection (12/31/2011) & Analysis

2. Publish Results

3. Determine follow-up study. Options include:

a. Expansion of pilot to more hospitals in the region and longer duration

b. Inclusion of outcome data at 30 or 90 days

(Modified Rankin, Barthel?, Re-hospitalization,

Mortality, Recurrent Stroke, Living situation (home vs. institution)

References

Related documents

Real Estate Exit Magnolia Point Realty 3616 Magnolia Point Blvd. Green Cove

Hii, Department, of Immunopathology, The Women's and Children's Hospital and the University of Adelaide, 72, King William Road, North Adelaide, S A 5006,

The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of home-based rehabilitation on functional performance (activities of daily living ADL) and gait speed for individuals

I had initially believed that anyone with student loans could potentially benefit from this program, which led me to use the decade average student loan burden (~$21,760)..

The 2016 Code requires every aspect of the Table 1 (checklist) must be answered by the Competent Person so as to adequately address all key elements of the reporting of

In Krakow, the aver- age waiting period for post-stroke rehabilitation on an inpatient basis is 24 days; the average waiting pe- riod for post-stroke rehabilitation on an

Produce textos escritos y/o situaciones orales simples para Produce textos escritos y/o situaciones orales simples para consultar sobre los alimentos que tiene y que

See Paulsen, supra note 25, at 2734 (positing that the words “supreme” and “inferior” in Article III do not necessarily imply anything more than a hierarchy by which a higher