• No results found

10 th December :00-16:30

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "10 th December :00-16:30"

Copied!
95
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Natural Capital Incentives and

Support Mechanisms for Business

& the Financial Sector Workshop

Defra, TEEB for Business Coalition & Natural

Capital Declaration

(2)

Workshop Agenda

Timings Speaker Description

10:00 - 10:10 Oliver Greenfield, Convenor, Green Economy Coalition Introduction to the day: Natural Capital incentives and support mechanisms for business

10:10 - 10:30 Keynote: Ian Cheshire, CEO, Kingfisher Group Natural Capital: the perspective from the Ecosystem Markets Task Force

10:30 - 10:40 Lord De Mauley, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for natural environment and science, Defra

Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services: The Government perspective

10:40 - 11:15 Dr. Dorothy Maxwell, Director TEEB for Business Coalition Business and Natural Capital - Developing the Natural Capital Protocol

11:15 - 11:35 Tea & Coffee Networking

11:35 - 12:00 Andrew Mitchell and Liesel van Ast, Natural Capital Declaration

The Financial Sector and Natural Capital - The Natural Capital Declaration

12:00 - 12:10 Christian del Valle, Managing Partner, Althelia Investing in Natural Capital – an international perspective

12:10 - 12:30 Zoe Knight, Director Climate Change Strategy, HSBC Bank Natural Capital – implications for economies and investors

12:30 - 12:40 Nick Barter, Head of the Natural Capital Committee Secretariat, Defra

Introduction to the Natural Capital Committees work to integrate natural capital into decision making

12:40 - 12:55 Helen Dunn, Senior Economic Advisor, Defra / secondee to TEEB for Business Coalition

Developing the UK roadmap for business accounting for nature – linking Natural Capital Protocol, NCD and Defra activities

13:00 - 13:45 Lunch (buffet lunch provided), tea and coffee Networking

13:45 - 13:55 Oliver Greenfield Introduction to 2nd half of the day.

13:55 - 14:25 Roundtable 1: Establishing the end point. Develop a vision for the end point of the roadmap.

14:25 - 14:40 Feedback from Roundtable 1

14:40 - 15:05 Roundtable 2: Where are we now & what actions are needed to support business integration of natural capital?

15:05 - 15:20 Feedback from Roundtable 2

15:20 – 15:30 Break Networking

15:30 - 16:05 Roundtable 3: Developing and delivering the roadmap

16:05 - 16:20 Feedback from Roundtable 3

16:20 - 16:30 Conclusions and wrap up The next steps and closing remarks from the hosts.

(3)

Ian Cheshire

(4)

Why business needs to change

(5)
(6)

6

Net Positive

(7)

7

Changes and developments witnessed

Puma’s Triple bottom line

Closing the loop Nike’s re-used trainer M&S coat Neonicotinoids Businesses adopting precautionary principle Government’s Green Paper on Biodiversity offsetting BIS CR consultation Net Positive movement

(8)
(9)
(10)

Lord de Mauley

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for natural

environment and science

(11)

NATURAL CAPITAL IN BUSINESS

Natural Capital Incentives and Supports, 10 Dec 2013, London

Dr. Dorothy Maxwell Executive Director

TEEB for Business Coalition

dorothy.maxwell@teebforbusiness.org www.teebforbusiness.org

(12)

BUSINESS POLICY & INTERNATIONAL

(13)

SCOPE: NATURAL CAPITAL

Source: Natural Capital at Risk – Top 100 Externalities of Business , Trucost for TEEB for Business Coalition, 15 April 2013, www.teebforbusiness.org Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services

Environmental Impacts VALUE

• Financial

• Non Financial

Externalities

• Positive & Negative

(14)
(15)

MAINSTREAMING

(16)

NATURAL CAPITAL PROTOCOL

AIMS & DELIVERABLES

• Valuing & Accounting for Natural Capital

– Why & How

– Business applications

• Two sector guides

• Road test

(17)

PROJECT TASKS

Consultation workshops & webinars (throughout process) Publish framework, sector guides with case examples

Revise & peer review Road test Case examples Peer Review & update

Independent Peer Review panel

Draft framework & 2 sector guides

Independent Technical Author Stakeholder Consultation

Mapping the Existing Natural Capital Initiatives

(18)

GOVERNANCE & CONSULTATION

INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN KIND

VISIBLE PROMOTION OF PARTICIPATION – website & publications ROAD TESTING

(19)

MAPPING EXISTING NATURAL CAPITAL

INITIATIVES IN BUSINESS

(20)

AIM

Mapping the initiatives

Valuation – methodologies, tools etc.. Applications in business and investors Links with policy initiatives

Inform Draft Straw man

Value add, fill gaps Users

Feedback Today

Mapping NC Initiatives in Business

(21)

Policy Business Engagement Business Applications Data NC Impacts & Dependencies Valuation

Mapping - Existing Status

Finance

(22)

VALUATION

(23)
(24)

Methodologies, guides & tools

for business

(25)

Developing methodologies,

guides, tools

(26)

Policy initiatives

(27)

Data/Databases

Existing e.g.

• Ecosystem Service Valuation Database (TEEB)

• Environmental Valuation Reference Inventory

Business Applications

• Filling data gaps, access & quality norms

• Technology Innovations

(28)

BUSINESS APPLICATIONS FOR

NATURAL CAPITAL

(29)

Strategy

• Value Creation, Net Positive • Integrated Thinking/Reporting

• 6 types of Capital – how natural integrates • Business Models

(30)

Sustainability Management

• Organisation

• Product / Supply Chain

Toolkit – well established, standards & tools

 Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services are gap Standards /Guides: Measuring and Managing Environmental Impacts in Business

ISO 14040/44 Life cycle Assessment (all environmental impacts) ISO 14067 Carbon footprint (GHG emissions only)

ISO14064 Water Footprint (draft) (water)

EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide (all environmental impacts )

EU Organisational Environmental Footprint (OEF) Guide (all environmental impacts of an organization) WRI/ WBCSD GHG product supply chain standard (GHG emissions)

(31)

Product/Supply Chain

• Bridge gaps

– Indicators

– Classification

Environmental Impact Categories (LCA)

Global Warming Potential (GWP) (IPCC 2007) Water eutrophication (ReCIPe 2008/CML 2002) Marine eutrophication (ReCIPe 2008)

Acidification (ReCIPe 2008)

Operational and embodied water use (water footprint) Waste

Non renewable resources depletion (EDIP 97(2004) Aquatic toxicity (Usetox)

(32)

Example - LCA impact indicators for

Ecosystem Services ?

(33)

Corporate Reporting & Disclosure

Natural Capital in

reporting

(34)

Financial

Accounts/Reporting/Disclosure

• GAAP & IFRS

• Full Cost Accounting & Life Cycle Costing

• Materiality

(35)
(36)

STRAWMAN

(37)

Feedback : Natural Capital Protocol

Aim: Why, What & How

Business language & consistency

Applications Focus

Scope : Natural, Social & Human Capital links

Format: More than one deliverable

• C-Level Guide – Why and How (high level)

• Protocol for practitioners – business, policy, consulting,

research

(38)

C-level guide – Straw man (business)

Business Case

• Why & what is the business value add • Risks & Opportunities

• Users –CFO, CEO, Sustainability, Operations, Procurement, etc...

Big Picture

• Business Models – Natural Capital links with 5 other types of Capital

Applying Valuing Nat Capital in Business

• Route map

• Using key questions/uses business are likely to have in practice • Examples to illustrate applications

(39)

Protocol – Straw man

Definitions & Scope

Measuring Natural Capital Impacts & Dependencies

• Classifications (e.g. FEGCS, Industry and trade consistency)

• Links to national environmental accounting metrics (UNSEEA) as suitable • Natural Capital Impacts and Dependencies- Indicators

• Bridging Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services indicator gaps in Life Cycle Assessment • Determining materiality per sector (sector guide)

Valuing Natural Capital - Business Applications How To

• Which technique & tool(s) for which application & how – fitness for purpose • Clarity on inputs required and outputs expected

• Clarity on benefits, limitations , trade offs

• Clarity on uncertainty of valuations – relative vs. absolute • Illustrate with examples (anonymized or real)

Valuing Natural Capital - Financial Institution Applications How To (linking with NCD project) Incentives required

• e.g. Payments for Ecosystem Services, Water Funds

Tools and Databases

• Filling gaps and access

• Criteria and quality norms required for consistency • Standalone/ adding to LCA databases and tools e • Using technology innovations in monitoring

(40)

NEXT STEPS

Feedback today

“Mapping” & “Straw man” Consultation draft –

early 2014

Participate in Natural Capital Protocol

http://www.teebforbusiness.org/how/natural-capital-protocol.html

(41)
(42)
(43)

Tea & Coffee Break 11:15- 11:35

(44)

The Natural

Capital

Declaration

and Roadmap

Andrew Mitchell, Founder & Executive

Director, Global Canopy Programme

Liesel van Ast, Programme Manager,

Natural Capital Declaration

(45)

– About the NCD and Roadmap

– Why is natural capital relevant?

– Work plans for Working Groups

– Proposed pilot projects

– Signatories and supporters

(46)
(47)
(48)

Links between natural capital and finance

Financial capital

Insurance Investment Banking

S ou rc e: P RI/UNE P F I, Uni v ers al O w ne rs hi p

(49)

The business case for financial

institutions to consider natural capital

• Over-exploitation of natural capital will cause price

volatility and business constraints across the economy. • Growing need to address exposure to indirect risks from

natural resource constraints and pollution issues embedded in loans, investments and insurance.

• Position portfolios for adjustments in price signals that aim to address depletion linked to market failure.

(50)

Engaging financial institutions 2010-2013

(51)

• Finance-led, CEO-endorsed initiative to mainstream natural capital in loans, bonds, equities and insurance, as well as accounting & reporting.

• Focus on the global financial sector: banks,

institutional investors, fund managers, insurance firms. • The NCD is building capacity for financial institutions to

develop structured approaches to address challenges. • Signatory financial institutions working with supporter

organisations to strengthen management of risks and opportunities to increase resilience and protect returns. • Project jointly managed by UNEP FI and Global

Canopy Programme.

(52)

• FMO (Dutch development bank) • First Green Bank (U.S.)

• Yes Bank (India) • Abrapp

• TEEB for Business Coalition

• Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

• Association for Sustainable & Responsible Investment in Asia (ASrIA)

• World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)

• Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB)

(53)
(54)
(55)

Secretariat UNEF FI, GCP NCD Steering Committee IFC Chair in 2013/14 WG Chairs, Supporters NCD Advisory Network

Academics and industry experts in natural resources, finance, accounting, science WG 1: Understanding Impacts/Dependencies Chair: Rabobank Project Manager KPMG Australia Project Manager CDP WG 2: Embedding NC in financial products Chair: Banorte WG 4: Natural capital disclosure/reporting Chair: Nedbank WG 3: NC accounting

Chair: National Australia

Bank Project Manager NVI/FFI Project Manager GCP

Governance NCD

Multidisciplinary

knowledge and expertise across signatories,

supporters and advisory network.

(56)

Objectives for implementation 2014-2016

• Build capabilities for signatory financial institutions to implement NCD commitments to understand, embed, account for and report on natural capital factors.

• Develop practical tools, guidance, methodologies, frameworks and indicators for financial institutions.

• Increase signatories in key areas (e.g. asset owners, fund managers, insurers, development/ banks, innovative and leading FIs) to address NC challenges across asset

classes and financial products.

(57)

Working groups for 4 commitments by 2020

Working Group NCD commitment

1. Understand Build understanding of risks and opportunities linked to impacts and dependencies on natural capital through operations, supply chains and portfolios.

2. Embed Support the development of methodologies to

integrate natural capital considerations into financial products and services

3. Account Work towards integration of natural capital into private sector accounting

4. Report Develop guidance for natural capital disclosure

(58)

Working Group 1

Chair: Lara Yacob, Rabobank (Netherlands); Project Manager: Global Canopy Programme

1. Map direct and indirect impacts and dependencies through loans and investments

2. Develop capabilities to evaluate natural capital risk. 3. Pilot project(s) to create and test methodology to

understand exposure to financial risk linked to natural capital.

Output: Methodology and guidance

(59)

Working Group 2

Chair: Marcos Mancini, Banorte (Mexico); Project Manager, Natural Value Initiative

1. Focus on corporate banking (lending, project

finance) and investment (public and private equities, fixed income).

2. Food & agriculture, energy and electric utilities; forest/timber and mining.

3. 2 work streams: (1) Risk management in existing products and (2) New opportunities, such as impact and thematic investment products.

(60)

Working Group 3

Chair: Rosemary Bissett, National Australia Bank Project Manager: KPMG Australia

1. Scoping to identify opportunities and barriers to quantify and account for NC in finance.

2. Work towards developing methodologies to quantify and evaluate materiality of NC across portfolios.

3. Develop and test methods for financial institutions to account for natural capital in financial reports.

Aligned with TEEB4B Protocol for companies.

Draft work plan for 2014-2016

(61)

Working Group 4

Chair: Vicky Beukes, Nedbank (South Africa) Project Manager: CDP

• Work stream 1: Disclosure

• R&D to enable disclosure by financial institutions on exposure to NC through financial activities/portfolios. • Develop disclosure programme with questionnaire and

guidance on natural capital reporting.

• Work stream 2: NC in Integrated Reporting by FIs • CDSB to help develop guidance for financial

institutions to include material natural capital

information in primary reports in an integrated way.

(62)

To develop and test methodologies under WGs.

NCD Pilot Project 1

• Develop evidence of natural capital as a material risk for financial institutions through portfolios.

• Develop practical ways to integrate material factors for natural capital-adjusted credit risk assessments.

Pipeline of NCD Pilot Projects

Understanding natural capital risks for financial institutions and embedding them in credit risk assessment

Phase 1 (under Working Group 1)

Developing and testing a methodology for mapping of impacts and dependencies across FIs’ portfolios

Phase 2 (under Working Group 2)

Develop methodology/ guidance to embed natural capital considerations into credit risk assessment

Work stream 1: Commercial banks and development finance institutions Work stream 2: Institutional Investors

(63)

.

Pipeline of NCD Pilot Projects

Guidance to address deforestation risk in soft commodities policies

Develop guidance to address deforestation and forest

degradation caused by agricultural production (i.e. oil palm, soy, beef) through lending, advisory and investment risk policies.

Partners

UN-REDD Programme UNEP

Figure 2. NCD Work package/Pilot Project 2

NCD Pilot Project 1

• Evaluate lending, advisory and investment risk policies in relation to sustainable production and consumption of soft agricultural forest-risk commodities.

• Identify good practice and opportunities to strengthen policies.

(64)

Thank you.

(65)

Christian De Valle,

Managing Partner

Althelia Ecosphere

(66)

Zoe Knight

Director, Climate Change Strategy

HSBC PLC

(67)
(68)

Natural Capital Committee

“A new independent Natural Capital Committee, to put the value of England’s natural capital at the heart of our economic thinking” reporting to

the Economics Affairs Committee chaired by the Chancellor.

The chairman of the NCC, Dieter Helm, was appointed in early 2012 with seven members added through 2012.

(69)

Natural Capital Committee

(70)

Natural Capital Committee

Defra Secretary of State: “What is clear is that we need to avoid growth that erodes our natural capital, and therefore our ability to grow in the future, but encourage growth which conserves or

enhances our natural capital”.

70

“I do not, however, just want to

maintain our natural assets; I want to improve them. I want us to derive the greatest possible benefit from them, while ensuring that they are available for generations to come. This is what the NCC’s innovative work is geared towards”.

(71)

Natural Capital Committee

1. provide advice on when, where and how natural assets are being used

unsustainably. For example, in a way that takes us beyond some

acceptability limits or non linearity thresholds, or in a way that diminishes some measure of comprehensive wealth;

2. advise the Government on how it should prioritise action to protect and

improve natural capital, so that public and private activity is focused where it will have greatest impact on improving wellbeing in our society.

This will include advising the Government on tools and methodologies to ensure that the value of natural capital is fully taken into account in policy decisions and in economic planning;

3. advise the Government on research priorities to improve future advice

and decisions on protecting and enhancing natural capital. The

Committee’s advice in this area will reflect consultations with the Research Councils and the academic community.

(72)

Natural Capital Committee

 Focus 1: Producing annual State of Natural Capital reports (first was April 2013). Providing information for Gov’t on whether our natural capital is being used sustainably.

 Working with Defra and the Office for National Statistics to ensure the timely development of experimental natural capital national accounts.

 Focus 2: Working with a few businesses (including major land owners and managers) to pilot the development of corporate natural capital

accounting.

 Working with academics and the Research Councils to identify research priorities that will improve future advice on managing our natural assets.  Providing ad-hoc advice to ministers – CAP reform, forestry, offsetting etc.

(73)

Natural Capital Committee

SoNC 1: the 2013 report set out a framework for what the NCC

thought was needed. Basically this was: to measure and value our natural capital in order to better manage it.

SoNC 2: the 2014 report will build on this and start to answer the

first of the NCC’s terms of reference – outlining the assets which are at risk – and suggest a generational framework for improving nature in a step towards its second ToR.

SoNC 3: the 2015 report will bring it all together (including its

corporate accounting work) and provide more concrete advice on its second terms of reference – how to prioritise public and private activity to protect and improve natural capital.

(74)

Natural Capital Committee

A single overarching 25 year framework (starting in 2015)

that:

• identifies where natural assets are not being used sustainably and/or are at risk;

74

• brings together existing policies and strategies for protecting and improving NC and identifies gaps in order to maximise impact and effectiveness;

• ensures existing and future public and private activity is focussed where it will have greatest impact on improving wellbeing in our society.

(75)

Natural Capital Committee

The NCC is tasked with providing advice to the

Government that is relevant to public and private activity

(as part of its second ToR).

75

This, combined with the fact that businesses own and

impact on much of our natural capital, is why the NCC

also has a corporate focus.

(76)

Natural Capital Committee

The NCC is working with its major landowners’ group to pilot experimental natural capital accounts.

The NCC, working with its consultants (eftec, RSPB and PWC), will:

◦ produce a methodology by late January;

◦ work with a small group of land-owning organisations to pilot accounts by summer 2014;

◦ use the lessons learned from the pilots to produce a generic accounting framework with accompanying guidance for other interested businesses to use by late 2014.

It will then report on this work in its third State of Natural Capital report (early 2015) and will consider whether it has a role in a 25 YP.

(77)

Natural Capital Committee

It is about working with them to develop and encourage the take up of NC accounts. We hope that it will be in their

interest to account for the natural capital they own. For example:

 To obtain a picture of what is happening to their assets over time, documenting changes on which more informed

management decisions can be made;

 To help make the case for securing wider revenue streams, from having a better understanding of the non-commercial value of their assets (benefits they provide to society); and

 To demonstrate value added to society – CSR type reasons.

(78)

Joint Workshop hosted by TEEB for Business

Coalition, Natural Capital Declaration and

Defra

Developing the UK roadmap for business

accounting for nature

Helen Dunn, Senior Economic Adviser, Defra

(79)

Introduction

• Background to roadmap initiative - EMTF on business accounting for

nature (recommendation 21)

• Why a roadmap? What could be the potential benefits? • Links to policy initiatives for accounting for natural capital • Scope and timetable for Roadmap

(80)

Background to roadmap initiative:

Ecosystem Markets Taskforce Report

• Ecosystem Markets Task Force Report (March 2013) set out

a high level narrative of the importance for business to

• integrate the real value of nature into its thinking. Benefits for

companies include greater resilience and managing risk more effectively.

• EMTF identified need for support including new measures

and standards to support awareness of how businesses

depends and impacts directly or indirectly on natural

ecosystems.

• EMTF also recommended that Government review incentive

structures surrounding standards and metrics to see if these create specific barriers to take up

“We need better tools and metrics to

understand the role nature plays in our businesses: tools and metrics that will

integrate financial, environmental, social and governance information in a concise, consistent and comparable format”

(81)

Background to roadmap commitment:

EMTF recommendation 21

The commitment to develop a roadmap was set out in the Government’s response to the EMTF

recommendation 21 on business accounting for nature at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/ecosystem-markets/.

In particular:

1. reviewing incentive structures to ensure they

support the uptake of ecosystem standards and metrics by business. As part of this work Defra

will support the TEEB for Business Coalition to lead a workshop focussed on the topic;

2. working with business to produce and publish

a roadmap in Spring 2014 that builds on the

(82)

Why a roadmap? What are benefits?

Key part of roadmap work to review incentives and barriers to business uptake of ecosystem standards and metrics – seen as a gap

Opportunity to engage with initiatives encouraging business and finance sector accounting for natural capital including TEEB for Business Coalition and NCD (+ many others)

Roadmap could help to support this agenda towards consistent effort to embed natural capital in business

decision making and develop a longer

term strategy to incentivise uptake.

(83)

Policy initiatives - accounting for natural

capital

Tracking natural capital at national level: ONS/Defra ecosystem

accounting roadmap to 2020: to make more visible on the nation’s balance sheet

Policy appraisal ‘micro’ level: High level guidance

on identifying and valuing impacts in policy appraisal

(84)

Developing metrics for environmental reporting

and business investment in natural capital

(85)

What is in scope for roadmap?

Reviewing the incentives and barriers for uptake

Focus at a national (UK) level, but be developed with strong understanding of the international context and at what level actions need to be driven

Highlighting opportunities for progress over the short, medium and longer term including mapping key ‘points of opportunity’ over time – whether UK based or internationally - to further increase uptake

To be drawn up with key partners TEEB4BC and NCD via consultation with businesses, advisory committees such as the Natural Capital Committee, NGOs and Government.

(86)

What business, finance and policy drivers might

accelerate the demand for uptake of standards and

metrics?

Harmonising metrics and tools, filling gaps

Build on existing roadmaps – e.g. NCD roadmap

Developing the business case & case studies Reviewing current barriers to uptake?

- Organisation level (relevance,

measurement, priority, integration)

- Macro (lack of various pressures

including from government, customers and investors)

(87)

Indicative timetable and milestones for

roadmap

Summary paper on outputs of Joint TEEB4BC/NCD/Defra Workshop – Jan 2014

Follow on discussions/ working groups held to build on workshop outputs – early 2014

Drafting with key partners TEEB4BC, NCD and stakeholders of

roadmap including incentives review and timeline for action developed – for comment, March 2014

Final version of Roadmap agreed and published – Spring 2014

(88)

Thank you

Background to business accounting for nature

roadmap – see Ecosystem markets taskforce

report and government response at:

http://www.defra.gov.uk/ecosystem-markets/

For further information on Roadmap and

interest in becoming involved please contact

Geoff Richards (policy lead) or myself at:

(89)

Lunch Break 13:00- 13:45

(90)

Part 2: Workshop Sessions

Roundtable 1

– Establishing the end point. Developing a vision for the end point of the road map. What will integration of

natural capital look like in an ideal world?

30 mins. discussion

Table facilitators will feed back to the group your top three priorities.

(91)

Part 2: Workshop Sessions

Roundtable 2

– Where are we now & what actions are needed to support business integration of natural capital?

Based on the straw man presented by TEEB on harmonised Natural Capital Protocol.

30 mins. discussion

Table facilitators will feed back to the group your top three priorities.

(92)

Feedback : Natural Capital Protocol

Aim: Why, What & How

Business language & consistency

Applications Focus

Scope : Natural, Social & Human Capital links

Format: More than one deliverable

C-Level Guide – Why and How (high level)

Protocol for practitioners – business, policy,

consulting, research

(93)

C-level guide – Straw man (business)

Business Case

• Why & what is the business value add • Risks & Opportunities

• Users –CFO, CEO, Sustainability, Operations, Procurement, etc...

Big Picture

• Business Models – Natural Capital links with 5 other types of Capital

Applying Valuing Nat Capital in Business

• Route map

• Using key questions/uses business are likely to have in practice • Examples to illustrate applications

(94)

Protocol – Straw man

Definitions & Scope

Measuring Natural Capital Impacts & Dependencies

• Classifications (e.g. FEGCS, Industry and trade consistency)

• Links to national environmental accounting metrics (UNSEEA) as suitable • Natural Capital Impacts and Dependencies- Indicators

• Bridging Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services indicator gaps in Life Cycle Assessment • Determining materiality per sector (sector guide)

Valuing Natural Capital - Business Applications How To

• Which technique & tool(s) for which application & how – fitness for purpose • Clarity on inputs required and outputs expected

• Clarity on benefits, limitations , trade offs

• Clarity on uncertainty of valuations – relative vs. absolute • Illustrate with examples (anonymized or real)

Valuing Natural Capital - Financial Institution Applications How To (linking with NCD project) Incentives required

• e.g. Payments for Ecosystem Services, Water Funds

Tools and Databases

• Filling gaps and access

• Criteria and quality norms required for consistency • Standalone/ adding to LCA databases and tools e • Using technology innovations in monitoring

(95)

Part 2: Workshop Sessions

Roundtable 3

– Developing and delivering the roadmap

Session aims to gain consensus on where the roadmap can add the most value to organisations, how they can contribute to its development, and mapping its key componements. 30 mins. discussion

Table facilitators will feed back to the group your top three priorities.

www.teebforbusiness.org EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide EU Organisational Environmental Footprint (OEF) Guide Carbon Disclosure Project http://www.teebforbusiness.org/how/natural-capital-protocol.html http://www.naturalcapitaldeclaration.org/multimedia/ http://www.defra.gov.uk/ecosystem-markets/

References

Related documents

● SIB (scale, index, base) byte ── when the addressing-mode specifier indicates that an index register will be used to compute the address of an operand, an SIB byte

Document Title : Helpdesk Incident and Request Management Procedure. Document Location :

Based on the most recent literature on SCD incidence, cause of SCD and economic aspects, the moment has arrived to implement more advanced cardiac screen- ing, with

Approach scores should increase because visual images of chocolate are typically intended to promote approach motives ( Fletcher et al., 2007 ), and because the thin body ideal

To replace the original hypothesis, it is proposed that the final common mode of action of epi- nephrine and phosphodiesterase inhibitors involves intracellular cyclic

Utami and Nahartyo (2012) found that type-A personality intensifies the positive associations among role conflict and role overload with burnout among auditors meanwhile

Clause 35(3) requires the person who wants to continue to use traditional knowledge or an expression of culture in a non-customary way to apply to the Cultural Authority within

Under the House and Senate HELP bills, large employers would be required to either offer health insurance coverage that meets standards or contribute a specified share of the cost