Improving pharmaceutical supply
chain performance: Pilot programme
National Seminar - 6 December 2005
Frank Hill, Head of Supply Chain Services
Contents
• Background
• Objectives and methodology
• Key milestones and outputs
• Impacts/benefits - stakeholders
• Performance management
• Sharing good practice
• Communications roll-out
Background
– why a major project
• Pharmaceutical supply chain last independently reviewed on national basis in 1986
• Supply chain generally given lower priority against other developments in hospital pharmacy
• Anecdotal evidence of poor/variable supply chain performance • Increasing concern from pharmacists about service levels
• No consistent measures in place against which to test this out And yet:
• Supply chain integrated with medicines management and clinical processes
• Needs to be fit for purpose to ensure patients get the right medicines at the right time
Objectives
• To achieve and sustain improved performance in the
pharmaceutical supply chain
- systems and processes - policy and practice
- relationships
Potential benefits
• Improved patient care
• Reduced supply chain activity and costs • Reduced errors and problem resolution
• Increased transactional efficiency and accuracy • Improved supply chain visibility
• Reduced inventory investment
• Improved supply chain partnerships
Pharmacy Supply Chain Best Practice
Implementation Pilot Project Organisation
Heartlands Pharmacy Project Team Performance Measurement & Supplier Relations Procurement to Pay Inventory Management & Logistics Process Automation Heart of England Pilot Project Board Regional Procurement Specialists Pharmacy System Expert Users Wholesaler Lead Contacts Programme Board Bournemouth Pharmacy Project Team Performance Measurement & Supplier Relations Procurement to Pay Inventory Management & Logistics Process Automation Bournemouth Pilot Project Board South Tyneside Pharmacy Project Team Performance Measurement & Supplier Relations Procurement to Pay Inventory Management & Logistics Process Automation South Tyneside Pilot Project Board
Phase 1 programme activity
Planning
Analysis
Best practice testing
Implementation Plan Gather data Analyse Performance Management Map P2P Processes Analyse inventory management Identify automated processes Identify best practice
opportunities Performance Management Inventory management P2P Processes Automated processes Report findings Produce implementation plan
8
Phase 2 programme activity
Planning
Implementation
Benefits tracking
Case study Handover
Start Gateway 4 Gateway 5 Gateway 6 Sign off
Performance management P2P processes Inventory management Automated
processes Final report
/case study Transition to
Pharmacy project team
Analysis of findings
Procurement to Pay processes
• Lack of clearly identified and documented supply chain processes
• Order process/transmissions not always standardised • Poor understanding of supply chain process costs/drivers • Need for improved waste/returns monitoring
• Current wholesaler service offering could lead to inefficient internal replenishment practices
• Invoice management process sometimes inefficient with invoice queries being passed and invoice reconciliation a manual process.
Analysis of findings
Inventory management and logistics
• Opportunities identified to improve logistics flows and storage layout in Pharmacy store/dispensary.
• No formal stock classification and inventory policy for the majority of products which made inventory management a challenging task.
• Varying levels of stock across departments and product categories were often difficult to understand.
• Significant variations in inventory level across the pharmacy supply chain
Analysis of findings
Performance management and supplier relationships
• Relationships with main wholesalers varied across the pilots • No systematic performance management process in place • Performance management managed by exception
• Main performance data provided by wholesalers in differing formats
Analysis of findings
Process automation
• Varying levels of process automation existed across the pilot sites
• The use of e-commerce within the replenishment process could be extended
• In a number of cases process improvement was constrained by lack of systems functionality
• Process activities related to robotics were centred on the dispensing elements with in-bound replenishment being a secondary consideration.
Recommendations
• The development of core procurement to pay processes and identification of costs and cost drivers
• Optimise use of e-commerce within the overall procurement to pay process
• Development of an inventory classification/stocking policy to manage inventory and replenishment frequency
• Review of existing inventory stocking points and
effectiveness of current materials management processes • Review of existing logistics flows and storage layouts to
Recommendations
• Establish waste and pharmacy returns monitoring process to understand drivers and reduce activity
• Using the KPI outputs from previous studies partner with wholesalers to develop a set of standardised performance metrics and performance review process
• Identify requirements for core pharmacy systems
functionality enhancements and escalate these where necessary through the national programme board
• Develop an Output Based Specification (OBS) for a new pharmacy system (South Tyneside).
Implementation
Each pilot established an implementation plan based around a number of the recommendations dependant on local
requirements
In certain cases a pilot would lead on a particular topic for example:
• Bournemouth: inventory classification and policy • Heart of England: performance management
What has been have achieved?
• Short-term benefits for pilot trusts
• Prospect of longer-term benefits as action plans are progressively implemented
• Closer working relationship between trusts and main wholesalers and better mutual understanding of each others’ business processes
• A raised profile for the pharmaceutical supply chain amongst a wide range of stakeholders
Supply Chain best practice outputs
• Process improvement end to end supply chain • Process automation/standardisation
• Stock classification/inventory management • Catalogue management
• Systems specification/ functionality • Required systems enhancements
• Waste management returns monitoring
• Performance management KPI’s/SLA’s in conjunction with Wholesalers
Benefits
• Improved patient care by having the right product in the
right quality at the right time -
average order
completion time reduced from 19 days to 5 days at
Heart of England
• Measure and manage performance within the supply
chain through improved performance
management/partnerships -
KPIs and Service
principles developed at Heart of England in
partnership with AAH and Unichem
• Efficient management of the invoice process between
pharmacy and finance teams
- invoice process clarified
with opportunity for prompt payment discounts at
Benefits
• Improved order/invoice accuracy through increased use of e-commerce - increase in e-commerce trading partners at South Tyneside from 5 to 39 representing 90 % of suppliers capable of trading electronically
• Potential procurement saving through improved decision making and inventory reductions – pharmacy supply chain-sustainable inventory reduction of £351K at Heart of
England
• Implementation of more efficient delivery arrangements -pharmacy store inventory reduction of 6% at Bournemouth
Benefits
• Reduced waste and returns through the pharmacy supply chain - savings potential of £48K together with a 5%
reduction in rework at Heart of England
• Identification of essential system functionality change – key requirements identified at Bournemouth being addressed nationally with systems suppliers
• Template for new pharmacy systems OBS developed at South Tyneside
Systems functionality
• Work has focused on the two leading suppliers: JAC
and Ascribe
• Barriers to implementation of best practice and KPI’s
identified by the pilot programme (JAC)
• Meetings planned with JAC and Ascribe to discuss
• Understanding of existing systems functionality can
also be poor within pharmacy
• South Tyneside has developed an output based
specification for a new pharmacy system
Systems functionality enhancements
JAC examples:
• Auto upload of prices
• Forward cover by product • Invoice matching
• Average time to fulfil order • Outer requirement flag
Impacts and benefits - stakeholders
• Materials management review at
ward level
• Shift non pharmacy products out
of pharmacy
• Improved management of invoice
process
• Improved business processes
• Reduction in manual orders
processing, increased use of e-commerce
• Development of agreed set of
KPIs and SLA’s framework
• Inventory reduction, smoother
demand and less emergencies
• Focus on core products and
supplier relationships
• Invoice efficiency-less invoice
queries
• More efficient/intelligent supply
chain trust partnerships
• Improved order efficiency-lower
delivery discrepancy rates
• Supply Chain partnership with
Impacts and benefits - stakeholders
• Inventory management classification/policy
• Direct deliveries • Bulk deliveries
• Reduction on order frequency and emergency orders
(more lines per order)
• Cost and inventory reductions • Potential impacts on delivery
routes-increased efficiency/accuracy
• Changes to delivery profile (fewer deliveries)
Accuracy through Ecommerce
Level of Ecommerce Ordering vs Order Errors
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% p r-0 4 M a y J u n J u l A u g S e p O c t N o v D e c a n -0 5 Fe b M a r A p r M a y J u n J u l A u g S e p % of E c om m e rc e O rde r E nt ry 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 N o of O rde r E rr ors
Performance management
Our KPI journey
Proposed best practice KPI’s Diagnostic measures proposed KPI agreement Purpose of the measures Pharmacy Dept performance drivers Meaningful display of KPI’s Unichem. measurement Data set Heartlands Pharmacy measurement Data set Pilot review Taking action 3 month pilot
Performance management
• KPI’s
– Line Fulfilment
• The order line delivered in full on the next day delivery inside the hour allocated window to the correct location
– Order Fulfilment
• The order completely fulfilled on the next delivery inside the 1 hour allocated window to the correct location
Performance
management-a pmanagement-artnership
OTIF Accurate/timely order information Order Generation routine Order Type 1, Bulk - low value/ High Volume 2, Routine Stock replen 3, Urgent E-commerce Accurate and Upto Date Product Description/ Codification Timely Catalogue/ Contracts UpdatesLow Cost Order processing
method
Order Aggregation
OTIF (On Time In Full) - Inputs & Impacts
Improved order aggregation through centralised purchases Opportunity for eInvoicing Supplier/Trust Strategic Partnership Transparency
of Demand Stock Availability
Long Term demand planning Work routines planned to accommate timely orders
Performance
management-a pmanagement-artnership
OTIF Increased Service Level at lower cost -Supplier/ Pharmacy Decrease in fragmented delivery Fewer Receipts Fewer invoices Reduced lines received incorrectly Reduced Rework (i.e. Invoice Queries) Reduced qty's received incorrectly Increased availability of Rx prescriptions within time req'dReduced patients waiting/calling back (to follows) Reduced number
of deliveries to wrong site
Reduced number of Ktrans
OTIF (On Time In Full) -Outputs & Benefits
Fewer Totes Release of bed Improved patient experience Avoids redispensing/non collections Prompt invoice payment Fewer line returns Fewer w/saler pick errors Increased Service at lower Cost - Pharmacy/ End User Supplier/Trust Strategic Partnership
Performance
management-a pmanagement-artnership
% of lines fulfilled in 1st delivery vs % of e-commerce orders
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Jan Feb Lines Fulfilled in 1st DeliveryMar April May June July Manufacturer FailingsAug Sep Oct Nov Dec Orders placed using Ecommerce route Orders fulfilled in first delivery
31
Line fulfilment – monthly
% of Lines Fulfilled in 1st Delivery vs % of e-commerce orders
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Base Line Service Level - Total Failings %
Total Failings % exc of Manufacturers Failings
Manufacturers Failings
Orders placed using Ecommerce route
Performance level – traditionally reported by wholesaler
Manufacturer cannot
supply (% failing) Performance level leaving RDC
True performance level.
Performance
management-a pmanagement-artnership
Average Time to complete invoice vs Average Time to Fulfill Order 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average time to match invoice Average time to pay invoice Average time to deliver complete order
Pharmacy supply chain tool kit
• Best practice pilots-final reports • Best practice case studies
• Critical success factors • Tools and templates • Exemplar site access •
Pharmacy supply chain tool kit
• Performance management - KPIs
- Template SLA
- Standard reason codes - Performance driver maps
• Implementation
- Implementation matrix
• Systems functionality
Pharmacy supply chain tool kit
• Process analysis and diagnostics
-
Supply Chain Assessment tool
- Audit tool (supply chain section)
- Process maps from each pilot
- Prioritisation matrices
• Inventory management
- Inventory categorisation
- Inventory policy
Communications and stakeholder
engagement
Stakeholders include:
• NHS pharmacy community (and NPSG)
• NHS supply and finance communities
• All wholesalers serving hospital market
• Manufacturers
• Trade associations
• Systems suppliers
Communications and stakeholder
engagement
Wide range of mechanisms being used:
• Targeted letters and emails and PASA’ s Procurement
Bulletin
• PS magazine and NHS Supply Chain Forum News
• PASA and NHS Logistics websites
• Professional journals eg Hospital Pharmacist
• Face-to-face meetings
• High profile seminars/events
• Pharmacy tool kit CD
Communications and stakeholder
engagement
Events:
• Presentation to NPSG - 14 September
• Final pilot briefing - 27 September
• Engagement of wider wholesaler community BAPW
-12 October
• Presentation at PDIG - 3 November
• National NHS Seminar - 6 December
Pharmaceutical supply chain pilot