Dedeoglu et al. proposed a software library approach [8] that eases common computational bottlenecks by optimizing over 60 low- and mid-level vision kernels. Optimized for TI’s C64x+ core, which has been deployed in many embedded vision systems, the library was designed for high-performance and low-power requirements. The algorithms are implemented in **integer** **arithmetic** and support block-wise partitioning of video frames so that a direct memory access engine can efficiently move data between on-chip and external memory. The authors highlight the benefits of this library for a baseline video security application, which segments moving foreground objects from a static background. Benchmarks show a ten-fold acceleration over a bit- exact unoptimized C implementation, creating more computational headroom to embed other vision algorithms.

Show more
18 Read more

[4] A. K. Verma, P. Brisk, and J. P. Ienne, “Challenges in Automatic Optimization of **Arithmetic** Circuits,” in 19th IEEE International Symposium on Computer **Arithmetic**, June 2009, pp. 213–218. [5] A. Ehliar, “Optimizing Xilinx designs through primitive instantiation,” in Proceedings of the 7th FPGAworld Conference, 2010, pp. 20–27. [6] A. Palchaudhuri and R. S. Chakraborty, High Performance **Integer** **Arithmetic** Circuit Design on FPGA: Architecture, Implementation and Design Automation. Springer India, 2015. [7] Xilinx Inc., “7 Series FPGAs Configurable Logic Block, UG474 (v1.5)”, Aug. 6 2013. [Online].

Show more
Numbers and hence, computation of these numbers is called Multiple-Length-**Arithmetic**. More specifically, application requires **integer** **arithmetic** operations for multiple-length numbers with size longer than 64 bits cannot be performed directly by conventional 64-bit CPUs, because their instruction sup-ports integers with fixed 64 bits. To execute such application, CPUs need to repeat **arithmetic** operations for those numbers with fixed 64 bits which increase the execution overhead. Alternatively, hardware algorithms for such applications can be implemented in FPGAs to speed up computations. However, the implementation of hardware algorithm is usually very complicated and debugging of hardware is too hard .

Show more
In Chapter 1 we set out three research topics for this thesis. The first one was “What floating-point and **integer** formats can most efficiently be combined?” After comparing several different floating-point and **integer** storage formats in Chapter 2, it should be clear by now that IEEE-defined floating-point formats are almost obligatory. Similarly, two’s complement notation is the standard for representing signed **integer** operands. For a low-cost floating-point and **integer** solution, IEEE-754 single precision and 32-bit two’s complement **integer** is a good combination (double precision would be too much of a bottleneck). However, because only 23 bits of the floating-point numbers are used for the significand, the **arithmetic** hardware for single precision floating-point is not sufficient for 32-bit **integer** operands. The floating-point format we propose instead, is an extended single precision based format. Eight additional bits in the significand are used (i.e., a sign-bit, an 8-bit exponent and a 32-bit significand) in order to make efficient use of the the hardware that is needed for 32-bit **integer** **arithmetic**. The result is a regular datapath (Chapter 4) that supports both common 32-bit **integer** input (two’s complement) and a floating-point format that strongly resembles single precision format, but uses eight more fractional bits. A major drawback is that the floating-point format is no longer entirely IEEE-754 compatible (Chapter 4). In addition, storage will be either very inefficient (exponent and sign-bit have to be store separately from the significand if standard 32-bit registers are used) or custom unconventional memories are needed. On the other hand, the eight additional bits offer more precision (Appendix A) that partially make up for the absence of double precision support.

Show more
168 Read more

Scalar functional units perform operations on operands obtained from S registers and usually deliver the results to an S register integer arithmetic is explained later in this section.. [r]

179 Read more

Classically, accuracy and computational efficiency are inversely related. However, parallelization may permit the computational efficiency to be improved without trading off accuracy. To achieve the desired speed improvements, this dictates either a large network of microprocessors or a custom-designed field programmable gate array (FPGA) or application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). These require more development effort than microprocessors, but can deliver the needed parallelization within either a single physical chip or a small set of chips. FGPAs combine tens to hundreds of thousands of look-up- tables, flip-flops, and switches that can be programmed by a user to achieve a custom design. This allows single **arithmetic** operations to be done in parallel, if desired, and then recombined. However, since device resources must be allocated to each operation, **integer** **arithmetic** is preferable, where possible, to floating point **arithmetic**; the use of **integer** **arithmetic** allows more operations to be computed in parallel since each operation requires fewer resources. ASICs typically can allocate the resources to allow for floating point operations and yet be more compact than FPGAs; however, the design is etched into silicon once and cannot be changed. They are thus less-flexible and have a much higher up-front development cost. As such, we focus on FPGA implementations at present.

Show more
Addition algorithm, floating point, 2-19--2-20 Address and multiply range errors, floating-point, 2-18 Address add functional unit CPU, 2-8 integer arithmetic, 2-63 Address base and limi[r]

138 Read more

Byte Array Comparisons Byte Load and Store Constant Loads Concurrency Support Indirect Load and Stores External Loads and Stores Global Loads and Stores Integer Arithmetic Intermediate L[r]

477 Read more

ว่าจะใช ้ในลักษณะการลบด ้วยวิธีการบวกด ้วย คอมพลีเมนต์. สรุป การลบด ้วยการบวกด ้วยคอมพลีเมนต์นั้นจะ[r]

24 Read more

To assert this, we give negate a type signature and attach type information to the implementation of the function: negate : Integer → Integer = λx : Integer.-x The type declaration says [r]

14 Read more

In 2007, the results of [13] played a central role in the surprising work of Ishai, Kushile- vitz, Ostrovsky and Sahai [33] on the “secure multi-party computation in the head” paradigm and its application to communication-efficient zero-knowledge for circuit satisfiability. This caused nothing less than a paradigm shift that perhaps appears even as counter-intuitive: secure multi-party computation (an in particular, asymptotically good **arithmetic** secret shar- ing) is a very powerful abstract primitive for communication-efficient two-party cryptography. Subsequent fundamental results that also rely on the asymptotics from [13] concern two-party secure computation [34, 21, 22], OT-combiners [29], correlation extractors [32], amortized zero knowledge [20] and OT from noisy channels [31]. For a full discussion and for some detailed examples of codices are used in applications, see [8].

Show more
14 Read more

ARITHMETIC UNITS Operation Time Since the primary function of an arithmetic unit in any computer is to perform repetitive arithmetic operations rapidly, the time required to execute an a[r]

100 Read more

However, it is not easy to determine the best bit- widths. The principal way is the range analysis. The tight range analysis is instrumental in exploring datapath and reducing the cost of **arithmetic** circuits. Allocating the output bit-width requires the calculation of the numerical value range in terms of the inputs. Previous explorations mostly relate to the finite bit-width causes. Dynamic analysis [1]-[4], as a simulation-based method, is used to explore numerical value and analyze range. Nayak et al [2] present a framework for generating an efficient hardware for signal processing applications described by Matlab. They rely on data range propagation, while precisions are analyzed and optimized by the DFG which is an acyclic graph representation of a circuit. A memory packing algorithm is proposed to generate faster hardware requiring less execution time. C. Shi et al. [3] set up a statistical model to estimate hardware resource in terms of perturbation theory. A tool that automates the floating-point to fixed-point conversion (FCC) process for digital signal system is

Show more
x(n + 1) = µx(n)(1 − x(n)) (1) It has been experimentally proved that the system behaves chaotically if the value of µ > 3.5699. This chaotic system is run to make a chaotic sequence x(i) for i varying from 0 to (M N/8) − 1. It is then grouped into 8 bits to form an **integer** so that a pseudo random array of M N/64 integers is formed. By avoiding the repeating elements, it is possible to form an array of length 256. This array can be taken as an index to shuffle the columns of input DCT matrix. This system is a well encrypted system providing good compression by suitably selecting the quantization matrix. The key (K s ) size is chosen as 16-bit.

Show more
In this paper, we investigate the infinitary analogues of such familiar number theoretic functions as the divisor sum function, Euler’s phi function and the Mbbius function... KEY WORDS [r]

11 Read more

ucts thereby improving the performance of **integer** multiplication. Fig. 2 shows a circuit for generating one partial product using the radix-4 Booth recoding. Firstly, the multiplicand A is expanded to { 2A, A, 0, A, 2A } . The expansion is eﬃciently implemented using shifts and NOT gates. Then, one out of the ﬁve candidates is selected at the 5:1 selector. The selector output is the partial product. The selector is controlled by a 3-bit chunk of the multiplier namely { x i+1 , x i , x i − 1 } .

15 Read more

45. AEROSPACE On the Moon, a falling object falls just 2.65 feet in the first second after being dropped. Each second it falls 5.3 feet farther than in the previous second. How far would an object fall in the first ten seconds after being dropped? CRITICAL THINKING State whether each statement is true or false. Explain. 46. Doubling each term in an **arithmetic** series will double the sum.

56 Read more

Using Software to Solve Harrison Integer Programming Problem. Excel solution to the Harrison Electric integer[r]

106 Read more

If multiplying by a positive means to add groups, what does it mean to multiply by a. negative[r]

54 Read more