This text is intended for a one or two-semester undergraduate course in **abstract** **algebra**. Traditionally, these courses have covered the theoretical aspects of groups, rings, and fields. However, with the development of computing in the last several decades, **applications** that involve **abstract** **algebra** and discrete mathematics have become increasingly important, and many science, engineering, and computer science students are now electing to minor in mathematics. Though **theory** still occupies a central role in the subject of **abstract** **algebra** and no student should go through such a course without a good notion of what a proof is, the importance of **applications** such as coding **theory** and cryptography has grown significantly. Until recently most **abstract** **algebra** texts included few if any **applications**. However, one of the major problems in teaching an **abstract** **algebra** course is that for many students it is their first encounter with an environment that requires them to do rigorous proofs. Such students often find it hard to see the use of learning to prove theorems and propositions; applied examples help the instructor provide motivation.

Show more
343 Read more

The linear transformation, F in this context is called the deformation gradient and it describes the local deformation of the material. Thus it is possible to consider this deformation in terms of two processes, one which distorts the material and the other which just rotates it. It is the matrix U which is responsible for stretching and compressing. This is why in continuum mechanics, the stress is often taken to depend on U which is known in this context as the right Cauchy Green strain tensor. This process of writing a matrix as a product of two such matrices, one of which preserves distance and the other which distorts is also important in **applications** to geometric measure **theory** an interesting ﬁeld of study in mathematics and to the study of quadratic forms which occur in many **applications** such as statistics. Here I am emphasizing the application to mechanics in which the eigenvectors of U determine the principle directions, those directions in which the material is stretched or compressed to the maximum extent.

Show more
503 Read more

Groups are vital for modern **algebra**; Its basic structure can be found in many mathematical phenomena. Groups can be found in geometry, which represent phenomena such as symmetry and some types of transformations. Group **theory** has **applications** in physics, chemistry and computer science, and even puzzles such as the Rubik's Cube can be represented using group **theory**. In this extended summary, we give the definition of a group and several theorems in group **theory**. We also have several important examples of groups, namely the permutation group and the symmetry group, together with their applications.Group **theory**, in modern **algebra**, the study of groups, which are systems that comprise of a set of components and a binary operation that can be connected to two components of the set, which together fulfill certain adages.

Show more
In this paper I present a **theory** of monetization that introduces the concept of the caveat mutator burden, the minimum amount of information an actor must obtain about a potential exchange partner before feeling confident enough to carry out a transaction. This burden is thought to vary with the actors involved, the context of the exchange, and the types of valued objects or services exchanged. Moreover, and central to the thesis presented here, the caveat mutator burden is radically altered in subtle but important ways by the introduction of monetary instruments into the context of exchange. In monetary exchange, a portion of the trust that is required for the actor to feel confident in carrying out the exchange is invested in a social institution that guarantees the value of the money received or given rather than the exchange partner, and thus, is more likely to encourage such transactions in many conditions. And yet, it is shown here that contrary to the informal statements and implicit models of monetization in the literature, monetization is not the juggernaut it is made out to be. Some households in Nang Rong pay their laborers, some do not. Presuming that few non-household members ever truly work for free, the conclusion is that some households continue to have valid reasons for

Show more
214 Read more

Chapter 5 is devoted to our second application of representation theory of locally compact groups, namely, a generalization of Mackey's Intertwining Number Theorem for one dimensional re[r]

108 Read more

If, from a group G, we select a subset H of elements which themselves form a group under the same composition law, H is said to be a sub- group of G. According to this definition, the unit element { e } forms a subgroup of G, and G is a subgroup of itself. These are termed improper subgroups. The determination of proper subgroups is one of the cen- tral concerns of group **theory**. In physical **applications**, subgroups arise in the description of symmetry-breaking, where a term is added to a Hamiltonian or a Lagrangian which lowers the symmetry to a subgroup of the original symmetry operations.

Show more
19 Read more

The events that give the greatest impetus to the development of this **algebra** should be rela- tivistic quantum mechanics established by Dirac, i.e., the present Dirac equation of spinor[5]. The coefficient matrix γ µ of this equation is a concrete Clifford **algebra**. Further development of the **theory** of Clifford algebras is associated with a number of famous mathematicians and physicists: R. Lipschitz, T. Vahlen, E. Cartan, E. Witt, C. Chevalley, M. Riesz and others [6–8]. The first per- son to realize that Clifford **algebra** is a unified language in geometry and physics should be David Hestenes. He published “space-time **algebra**” in 1966 and has been working on the promotion of Clifford **algebra** in teaching and research[9].

Show more
23 Read more

Various integral transforms are known to be extremely useful in analysis and **applications**. One example is the Fourier transform in analysis and applied problems; another example is the Segal-Bargmann transform [1] in quantum **theory**. An important common prop- erty of integral transforms is that they relate various spaces of functions and various oper- ators on these spaces and allow one to “transplant” a problem from one space to another. Because of that, the problem at hand may become easier to solve. A somewhat similar situation arises when working with tensor equations in the finite-dimensional setting. Namely, by an appropriate choice of coordinates one can significantly simplify a given tensor equation. Although the analogy is obvious, an infinite-dimensional setting o ﬀ ers a significantly larger variety of situations. In particular, by using the Segal-Bargmann transform, one can relate problems on spaces of ordinary or even generalized functions to problems on spaces of holomorphic functions.

Show more
35 Read more

4) To omit as many topics as possible. This is a foundational course, not a topics course. If a topic is not used later, it should not be included. There are three good reasons for this. First, linear **algebra** has top priority. It is better to go forward and do more linear **algebra** than to stop and do more group and ring **theory**. Second, it is more important that students learn to organize and write proofs themselves than to cover more subject matter. **Algebra** is a perfect place to get started because there are many “easy” theorems to prove. There are many routine theorems stated here without proofs, and they may be considered as exercises for the students. Third, the material should be so fundamental that it be appropriate for students in the physical sciences and in computer science. Zillions of students take calculus and cookbook linear **algebra**, but few take **abstract** **algebra** courses. Something is wrong here, and one thing wrong is that the courses try to do too much group and ring **theory** and not enough matrix **theory** and linear **algebra**.

Show more
146 Read more

in teaching **abstract** **algebra** course is that many students considering it as relatively new experience dealing with an environment that requires them to do rigorous proofing. Similarly, [11], [6] asserted that several abilities must be mastered by students to achieve the goal of **abstract** **algebra** learning, one of which is the ability of mathematical reasoning. The reasoning is the thinking process that connects facts or concepts to draw a conclusion [12], [13], [14]. In other words, reasoning can be interpreted as a thinking process to draw conclusions or make a correct statement that has been known to be true. Similarly, [15], [16], emphasize that mathematical reasoning is active thinking that has certain characteristics in finding the truth. People tend to think with various way, structures, or orders in the real world and symbolic situations of objects. Therefore, mathematical proofing is a formal way of expressing certain types of reasoning. Another definition proposed by [17] ,[18], [19] that reasoning is five interrelated processes in mathematical thinking activities that are categorized as sense-making, conjecturing, convincing, reflecting, and generalizing. Sense-making is closely related to the ability of problem schemes development and represent the knowledge they have. Conjecturing refers to the activity in drawing a conclusion and a **theory** based on incomplete facts or in other words it is a strategy of completion, argumentation, and communication. Convincing describes the implementation of completion strategy based on the two previous processes. Reflecting contains an activity of re-evaluating those three processes that have been carried out. Based on the above opinion, it can be concluded that reasoning is a thinking activity to perceive conclusions or make a new statement that is correct based on relevant theories. The study from [20] divide indicators of mathematical reasoning ability into four, namely 1) drawing logical conclusions; 2) conjecturing and proofing; 3) giving explanations to the model, making patterns and making connections between facts or concepts; and 4) using the patterns relationships to make analysis, analogy or general conclusions. According to [21], [22] reasoning indicators of mathematics consist of 1) make calculations based on applicable mathematical formulas or rules; 2) draw general conclusions based on visible mathematical processes/concepts; 3) make estimation; and 4) draw conclusions based on the similarity of visible processes/mathematical concepts. Based on the above research, the indicators of mathematical reasoning abilities in this study are presented in Table 1 below.

Show more
He discovered the remarkable fact that complex semi simple groups form group schemes over Z , so that one can tensor them with any ﬁeld to produce algebraic semi simple groups over that ﬁeld. If the ﬁeld is algebraically closed this procedure will yield essentially all semi simple algebraic groups. If the ﬁeld is ﬁnite one will get new ﬁnite simple groups beyond those ﬁrst studied by.Finally, the notion of a quantum group arose from the idea that quantum mechanics is a deformation of classical mechanics, namely, there is an essentially unique deformation of the Lie **algebra** of smooth functions on phase space with the Poisson Bracket. Given this point of view it is natural to ask whether the symmetry groups of classical geometry can also be deformed into interesting objects. In the 1980’s such a **theory** of deformations emerged, under the impulses of several groups of people. Since classical semi simple Lie algebras are classiﬁed by discrete data, they are rigid. So, in order to deform them one must enlarge the category, [14].

Show more
20 Read more

The **theory** of numbers is an area of mathematics which deals with the properties of whole and rational numbers. Analytic number **theory** is one of its branches, which involves study of arithmetical functions, their properties and the interrelationships that exist among these functions. In this paper I will introduce some of the three very important examples of arithmetical functions, as well as a concept of the possible operations we can use with them. There are four propositions which are mentioned in this paper and I have used the definitions of these arithmetical functions and some Lemmas which reflect their properties, in order to prove them.

Show more
[2]. Weber, K., & Larsen, S. (2008). Teaching and learning group **theory**. Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, (73), 139. [3]. Dubinsky, E. (Ed.) (1997). An investigation of students’ understanding of **abstract** **algebra** (binary operation, groups and subgropus) and The use of **abstract** structures to build other structures (through cosets, normality and quotient groups.) [Special Issue]. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(3).

Section 3 contains many important results and definitions which will be used frequently throughout our discussion of Gr¨ obner bases and Buchberger’s Algorithm in Section 5. Here we discuss Buchberger’s Algorithm and Buchberger’s Criterion and examine them in depth to verify their termination. We also consider the Hilbert Basis Theorem, and an equivalent theorem, the Ascending Chain Condition. Prior to this we discuss the division algorithm as it is extended to the polynomial ring k[x 1 , . . . , x n ] in section 4. We conclude by considering a few **applications** of Gr¨ obner

98 Read more

‘essential’ equations and mles are generated. The first of these questions can be addressed by looking at critical pair criteria. These criteria preclude the generation of certain crit ical pairs which are provably redundant. If these equations had been generated, then the potentially costly process of normalisation and deletion would have to occur. Of course a critical pair criterion could make a c-completion procedure more inefficient. The costliness of the normalisation and deletion process has to be measured against the costliness of ap plying the criterion. It can also be seen that, even though the equations which are precluded are redundant, they may be applied in an intermediate stage of deriving one of the useful equations or rewrite mles. This section will investigate how critical pair criteria fit into the **theory** of the inference system XC.

Show more
167 Read more

Chapter 2 is based on joint work with Schuster [225]. This chapter has experimental charac- ter: by analogy, we generalize a concept of extension narrower than simple containment from the **theory** of quasi-orders, where this is common and indeed inevitable, to an **abstract** ideal **theory** for single-conclusion entailment relations; the ideals are the subsets saturated with respect to the corresponding algebraic closure operators. A proof pattern called Zorn Scheme that over constructive set **theory** derives from Raoult’s principle of Open Induction (Section 2.2.2) then prompts variants of Lindenbaum’s Lemma in Section 2.3.2, and helps to describe the intersection of all complete ideals above a given ideal in a computationally meaningful way. To this end in Section 2.3.3 we carry over from commutative ring **theory** a point-free version of the Jacobson radical, which moreover prompts a syntactical counter- part of Lindenbaum’s Lemma. In Section 2.4, our results turn out to have **applications** in commutative **algebra**, lattice **theory**, formal logic and order **theory**; the running example is in fact the deducibility relative to intuitionistic and classical logic. In Section 2.5 we finally relate all this to multi-conclusion entailment relations, which thus leads over to the following chapter.

Show more
200 Read more

The latter feature is actually the foundation for engineering **applications** of the Boolean **algebra**. Boole also discussed probability **theory**, however, other logic parts are mainly the same. The underlying idea of his work was to reduce the logical thought to solving of equations. The algebraic operations have been defined to correspond to the basic activities while reasoning. In terms of these operations Boole formulated in an algebraic structure that shares essential properties of both set operations and logic operations. The work was done independently of other works by logicians and mathematicians at that time. For instance, the results by Augustus De Morgan were not used, since Boole did not consider conjunction and disjunction as a pair of dual operations.The approach followed by Boole and his point of view to the subject is possibly best described by himself.

Show more
Grayson, R. J. (1979). Heyting-valued models for intuitionistic set **theory**. In Fourman, M. P., Mulvey, C. J., & Scott, D. S., editors, **Applications** of sheaves, Proceedings of the Research Symposium on **Applications** of Sheaf **Theory** to Logic, **Algebra** and Analysis held at the University of Durham, Durham, July 9–21, 1977, Volume 753 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 402–414. Springer-Verlag. Libert, T. (2005). Models for paraconsistent set **theory**. Journal of Applied

16 Read more

28 Read more