• No results found

18 results with keyword: 'court appeals eighth district texas el paso texas'

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

As the San Antonio Court of Appeals noted in Perkins, although the district court’s review of the administrative decision is confined to a substantial evidence review, the court is

Protected

N/A

11
0
0
2022
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Fireman’s Fund also appeals the district court’s judgment that Weeks reached maximum medical improvement on April 17, 2002, which is the date reported by Dr. Fireman’s Fund argues

Protected

N/A

12
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

We reversed and remanded the case for new trial after holding that Appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorneys failed to preserve the trial court’s error

Protected

N/A

6
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

In an action against a professional employee of a school district involving an act that is incidental to or within the scope of duties of the employee’s position of employment

Protected

N/A

7
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

On March 26, 2005, a tractor-trailer driven by Maddox collided with a vehicle and careened into a building in which Jason Ferguson was standing, causing it to collapse around him.

Protected

N/A

13
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

On February 26, 2002, Appellants were involved in a traffic accident at the intersection of Las Casitas and Marvin in El Paso County, Texas. The accident was investigated by Deputy

Protected

N/A

11
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Appellants raise four issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in granting Plaintiff Clayton’s motion for partial summary judgment and denying Defendants’ motion and in

Protected

N/A

9
0
0
2022
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Kanlic failed to correctly diagnose and treat malpositioning of the hip, looseness in the acetabular component, and infection in Meyer’s hip, which caused her to suffer

Protected

N/A

9
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

3 The OAG also challenges the adequacy of Rodriguez’s reports to her immediate supervisors and the Ombudsman. However, Rodriguez did not identify these individuals in her

Protected

N/A

8
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

After amending the discovery control plan by an agreed order, Sibley, P.C. filed an amended original answer on August 4, 2009. In the amendment, Sibley, P.C. asserted

Protected

N/A

8
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

To establish that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule, the relator must show that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2)

Protected

N/A

8
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS RACES THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY CONTESTS

Courts of admittance: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Texas Northern District Court, Texas Southern District/Bankruptcy Court, Texas Western District Court.. 13th COURT OF APPEALS

Protected

N/A

6
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

The parties have entered into a joint stipulation confirming that the only disputed issues between them are (1) whether a right of survivorship exists among the grantees; and

Protected

N/A

7
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

Terrazas was charged by information with the offense of driving while intoxicated, second offense (“DWI”). Terrazas filed a pretrial Motion to Suppress alleging, inter alia,

Protected

N/A

9
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

After the solar facility was constructed, the Lyles filed a lawsuit against Midway, Drgac, and the twenty individuals who signed the surface waivers alleging that: (1) they

Protected

N/A

34
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

State , 224 S.W.3d 783, 785 (Tex.App.--Eastland 2007, no pet.)(petitioner failed to prove that charge did not result in final conviction; although theft charge was

Protected

N/A

5
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

#1 trustee. On her application, Wayne stated that as of the date of her application, she had resided continuously in the State of Texas for thirty-eight years and eight months and

Protected

N/A

12
0
0
2021
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

Brown counters that Sassin’s testimony is necessary for two reasons. Neither reason is persuasive, however. First, Brown asserts Sassin’s testimony was required because the trial

Protected

N/A

10
0
0
2021

Upload more documents and download any material studies right away!