[PDF] Top 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT SUMMARY

... In its October 31, 2003 restatement, McAfee acknowledged that its “accounting for sales to distribution partners in 1998, 1999 and 2000” violated GAAP due to various “concessions, incl[r] ... See full document

... Zagel, United States District Judge, at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Everett McKinley Dirksen United ... See full document

... the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Courthouse located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San ... See full document

... the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois captioned United States of America, et ...The complaint alleged that defendants ... See full document

... Federal district courts are required to act as gatekeepers to ensure that any and all expert testimony is both relevant and ...the Court is “charged with screening out experts whose methods are ... See full document

... The purpose of Local Rule 56.1 statements is to identify the relevant admissible evidence supporting the material facts, not to make factual or legal arguments. See Cady v. Sheahan, 467 F.3d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir. 2006) ... See full document

... Management District in each of these relevant ...the Court holds that this factor, how Georgia law defines SRTA, suggests that it is an arm of the ... See full document

... the court to determine damages “commensurately with the injury and the loss of gain sustained by the victim provided that the same was a natural result of the unlawful ... See full document

... As a direct and proximate result of Plaintiff’s use of Yaz as manufactured, designed, sold, supplied and introduced into the stream of commerce by Defendants, Plaintiff Lauren Murphy s[r] ... See full document

... incorporated multiple corporate entities four to five years ago and had a proprietary process for building up the credit scores of those corporate entities. Molz claimed that the 3rd S[r] ... See full document

... The Court rejected Defendants’ argument and found that “waiting lists for enrollment on the DD Waivers where [the community plaintiffs] languish for years without services” are the ... See full document

... (300) California Settlement Class Members opt out, Target shall have the right to terminate this ...the Court does not enter a Dismissal in the form of Exhibit B, or if the Court’s Dismissal does not become ... See full document

... the Court to individuals who may be members of a class of current and future adult immigration detainees who have or will have proceedings in immigration court in San Francisco during the ... See full document

... Purchaser Plaintiffs, Samsung shall pay attorneys' fees for private counsel for the Indirect 26. Purchaser Plaintiffs in the amount determined as provided in paragraph 27 of this Agreem[r] ... See full document

... If you are an eligible Settlement Class Member and wish to receive this benefit, you must timely submit a completed Claim Form to the Class Action Settlement Administrator as described below. In addition, Settlement ... See full document

... Namely, the Defendants' employees attempted to benefit their HSC financial basis swap positions tied to the December Inside FERC monthly price index at HSC by: (i) intentionally buyin[r] ... See full document

... The United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia agrees not to bring further criminal charges against the Defendant related to the charges to which he is pleading guilty[r] ... See full document

... As a publicly traded company, Critical Path adopted an insider-trading policy that prohibited trading in company securities by corporate insiders while in possession of material nonpu[r] ... See full document

... The DOJ and United States District Court for the Northern District of California, were incorrect in issuing the decision against ValueAct; the District Court should[r] ... See full document

... the Northern District of West Virginia granted Equitrans’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the counterclaims of vexatious litigation and trespass by landowners and denied the landowners’12(b)(6) motion to ...The ... See full document