[PDF] Top 20 Case 2:13-cv JAR Document 168 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

... this case occurred on October 29, 2012, at a railroad grade crossing in Brown County, near Hiawatha, ...the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint ... See full document

... 38. Qualification of the 2009 Trusts and the 2012 Trusts for the preceding beneficial tax treatment is dependent upon their classification under federal tax law as grantor trusts. In turn, their qualification for grantor ... See full document

... (affirming district court’s dismissal of complaint because “[i]t is implausible that a reasonable consumer would interpret ‘Original Sundae Cone,’ ‘Original Vanilla,’ and ‘Classic,’ to imply that [the defendant’s ... See full document

... The proposed methods of service, particularly service through email and social networking websites, are not only permissible, but also are the most likely to provide the Defendants with notice of future filings and thus ... See full document

... “Defendants”). 1 On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs assert claims against Defendants for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 ... See full document

... liquidated and unliquidated Assets of the Receivership Defendants; (3) the sum of all liabilities of the Receivership Defendants; (4) the steps the Receiver intends to take in the future to: (a) prevent any diminution in ... See full document

... Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the ... See full document

... 49. By letter dated November 30, 2011, ICE acknowledged receipt of Plaintiffs’ Request and sought a 10-day extension of the 20-day deadline to respond. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(B). 50. By separate letter dated ... See full document

... Agreement states that the contract is “deemed to have been made in Kenosha, ...at 2-3. This provision appears on page two of the agreement, however, and its enforceability is therefore at ...and ... See full document

... Paragraphs 6(d), 12, 20, 23 and 24, (ii) each Party expressly reserves all defenses, arguments and motions as to all Claims that have been or might later be asserted in the Lawsuit, including, but not limited to, ... See full document

... the court grants defendants' motion to the extent that plaintiff seeks to recover from Ilawan under Title VII either individually or in his "official" ... See full document

... 7, 13; Dkt ...Bank. 1 For simplicity, the Court will uniformly refer to the various parties representing this interest across the life of this case as “the ... See full document

... 10. Although “[b]oth the Form U-4 and the Rule 12200 use the term ‘customer,’” neither “offers a thorough definition of the term.” 6 Dougherty, 118 F. Supp. 3d at 713. “Rule 12200 simply provides ‘that a customer ... See full document

... The record in this case shows that Ms. Naskidashvili came to the United States from Georgia on a six-month visa to visit her family. Naskidashvili Dep. at 10. Before this trip, she had visited once ... See full document

... 15. The Operating Agreement further provides that a member may be expelled and may forfeit all his/her shares if, among other things, the member has “two or more unexcused consecutive absences from mandatory ... See full document

... A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. The plausibility standard ... See full document

... this Court “have entered final injunctions using the new language the government ...at 2; see also Injunction and Judgment at 1-2, Barron ...No. 13-cv-1330(KBJ) ...this ... See full document

... specifically states that it “is not investigating individuals who simply support or have an interest in WikiLeaks,” and “does not ...Hardy 1 st ...the Court that its responsive documents do not ... See full document

... 8. Defendant The Dolben Company, Inc. (“Dolben”) is a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, with its principal place of business at 1 Beacon Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA ... See full document

... The purpose of this letter is to inform you of recent changes to my practice, including a new name and a new location for LasikPlus. I have changed the name of my practice from LasikPlus of Kansas, P.A. to ... See full document