• No results found

18 results with keyword: 'jus post bellum and the nature of peace'

Jus Post Bellum and the nature of peace

The following section presents a preliminary framework outlining the general nature of peace, distinguishing different facets: the spatial element, including the

Protected

N/A

286
0
0
2021
Cyber-warfare: jus post bellum

cyber-warfare, cyberattack, jus post bellum, international humanitarian law, international treaties, damage assessment, international cyber organizations, attribution, North

Protected

N/A

134
0
0
2021
The Westphalian Peace Tradition in International Law: From Jus ad Bellum to Jus contra Bellum

The Westphalian tradition would include concepts like peaceful coexis~ tence, equality of sovereign States, peaceful settlement of disputes, non~use of force, balance

Protected

N/A

24
0
0
2020
Displacement as Significant Collateral Harm in War

bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. 42 One of the consequence of my view is to acknowledge that providing for refugees and internally displaced is not simply a matter

Protected

N/A

21
0
0
2020
Rettferdig Krig og Internasjonal Humanitær Lov

Rettferdig krig tradisjonen beskriver gjennom sine tre deler, jus ad bellum, jus in bello og jus post bellum, en rekke prinsipper som må oppfylles dersom en krig skal kunne

Protected

N/A

75
0
0
2021
A Jus Post Bellum Analysis of Lethal Autonomous Weapons: Assessing the Importance of Human Interaction and Moral Repair to Peace

Reconciliation is an important concept when looking at moral repair and its necessary components. As shown within the previous discussion on forgiveness, there are demands

Protected

N/A

121
0
0
2021
Lecture 14.pdf

Learn policy, rewards, transition, and maximize utility

Protected

N/A

43
0
0
2020
Jus Ante Bellum

Lesson learned, what remains to talk about are: (1) armed humanitarian interventions, responses to terrorism, and other forms of “irregular” (“unconventional”) warfare; and

Protected

N/A

27
0
0
2021
BOOK ANNOTATIONS

After laying out the concept of jus post bellum, Patterson contrasts his framework with other approaches to post-conflict stabilization, including transitional justice,

Protected

N/A

47
0
0
2022
Commissions of Inquiry and the Jus ad Bellum

It is debatable what practical or normative force the fi ndings of these commissions should have, and in particular whether fi ndings and recommendations of commissions established by

Protected

N/A

24
0
0
2020
Absorptive capacity and market orientation in public service provision

The objective of this study was to examine the market orientation–performance relationship by focusing attention on the role of absorptive capacity and management context of

Protected

N/A

38
0
0
2021
Internal Jus ad Bellum

shows that self-determination, sovereignty, territorial integrity, or democratic legitimacy are in themselves insufficient as proper justifications for killing—unless we adopt

Protected

N/A

63
0
0
2021
The Morality of World War One

government been involved, Austria-Hungary violated the  jus ad bellum  jus ad bellum criteria of right intention: a criteria of right intention: a state must fight a war only for a

Protected

N/A

8
0
0
2021
Jus Ad Bellum and International Terrorism

If a state is impotent to prevent the presence of terrorist groups in its territory and their attacks against third states it must not prevent a victim state or its allies

Protected

N/A

53
0
0
2020
Just Cause and the Continuous Application of Jus ad Bellum

In other words, while one can indeed give some examples, in the end one has to say (or imply) things like: ‘Just causes are those aims the pursuit of which by means of war can

Protected

N/A

16
0
0
2021
Panel I Commentary - Jus ad Bellum

Clearly, the United States does not want to be in a position where international law permits Saddam Hussein to claim a right of self-defense against the United States sim- ply

Protected

N/A

9
0
0
2020
Panel I Commentary - Jus ad Bellum

So, to state that after entry into effect of the UN Charter, self-defense is only permissible in response to an armed attack, misses the point that lethal force continues to

Protected

N/A

7
0
0
2020
Applying Jus Ad Bellum in Cyberspace

USA , the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) distinguished armed attacks from armed force by holding that the former must achieve a minimum level of severity to constitute a

Protected

N/A

9
0
0
2021

Upload more documents and download any material studies right away!