Under the settlement agreement, Merlyn agreed to transfer a substantial amount of her Imprimis stock to Kammer and to limit the sales of her remaining Imprimis stock, in

comments from the historic site board (which suggested delaying demolition of the Star Building until completion of phase 1 of the Project) and from SOHO (which suggested

protected species. She concluded that “[t]he work performed on the property has resulted in impacts to sensitive biological resources that are considered to be

argued defendant was attempting to benefit the Hoover Street Crips, not the Hoover Criminals. However, although the Hoover Street Crips had changed their name to the Hoover

The remaining issues are (1) whether the trial court erred by entering a judgment that failed to award Allen attorney fees as the prevailing party on a contract, (2) whether the

As part of the settlement, Fernando stipulated that the prenuptial agreement was “void and unenforceable.” Fernando lacks standing to appeal from a stipulated judgment, and he

In November 2012, Michael filed a motion to vacate the judgment for lack of jurisdiction, based on the case purportedly being removed to federal court and.. subsequently remanded

language in the Trust concerning distribution of the deceased spouse’s share was internally contradictory, and contrary to the intent of the Twetens. In order to resolve this

6 In pertinent part, section 23152, subdivision (b), states as follows: “In any prosecution under this subdivision, it is a rebuttable presumption that the person had 0.08

ABUSING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND MENTAL HEALTH In Mother’s appellant’s opening brief, under a separate heading, Mother contends substantial evidence does not support the

Because “the Act requires an inmate’s eligibility for resentencing to be evaluated on a count-by-count basis” (Johnson, supra, 61 Cal.4th at p. 688), defendant is entitled to a

The trial court ruled that the causes of action of fraud, intentional tort, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence all did not state facts

(2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 754, 770.) The court also made appropriate findings respecting father (that he was provided reasonable services, and that he failed to regularly participate

More pertinent to our pleading is that real party in interest has generally alleged a high volume of traffic, traveling at high rates of speed. Occurring at the intersection are a

Nowhere in the documents Castleview submitted in opposition to the motion is there any evidence of some action taken by Home Loan Center to induce LendingTree to do anything

The undisputed evidence can be summarized as follows: plaintiffs took out a mortgage loan; plaintiffs stopped making payments on their loan; plaintiffs requested modifications

offense that is now a misdemeanor under Proposition 47 “may file an application before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case to have the felony

Department of Transportation (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1074 [“It is appellant’s ‘burden on appeal to affirmatively challenge the trial court’s evidentiary ruling, and