[PDF] Top 20 STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT

... Supreme Court, “courts must … give effect to every word, phrase, and clause in a contract and avoid an interpretation that would render any part of the contract surplusage or ... See full document

... 655; 532 NW2d 842 (1995). Attorneys must only act as would an attorney of ordinary learning, judgment, or skill under the same or similar circumstances. Id at 650. “An attorney has the duty to fashion such a strategy so ... See full document

... To support the detennination of the Court that Plaintiff is liable for the MDCH's costs, expenses, and attorney fees in the amount of $3,500.00, the MDCH moves to supplement the record m[r] ... See full document

... 7 collapsed inwardly, that there was no label inside or 8 out; see trial transcript volume one, pages 13 to 16. 9 The district court found that nothing within 10 the regulations required a buckle on the helmet or ... See full document

... The totality of the circumstances complained of herein present clear evidence of a violation of the Open Meetings Act by the Ann Arbor City Council regarding medical marijuana policy se[r] ... See full document

... (c) Representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities that they do not have or that a person has sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or ... See full document

... a Michigan court may exercise limited personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the Court employs a two-step ...the Court ascertains whether jurisdiction is authorized under Michigan’s long-arm ... See full document

... We also find without merit defendant’s argument that the filing of the first lien prevented the refinancing of her home equity loan and put her in further financial difficulty. The record shows that, a few months after ... See full document

... Plaintiff Check li st alleges that Defendants Salisbury and Pirtle breached their employment agreements by operating a competing business, i.e., Defendant Krystal Klear, soliciting cus[r] ... See full document

... trial court stated, Taylor took on the detriment of the liabilities of the lease when it was transferred to her (such as allowing an easement and access across to communication facilities and indemnifying New ... See full document

... trial court erred in entering a judgment based on innocent misrepresentation when it expressly concluded that there was no contract between plaintiff and ...this Court is left with a firm conviction that ... See full document

... this Court to examine plaintiff 's acceptance of the valuation by the ...trial court ordered the plaintiff to enter into the settlement agreement upon receiving testimony from defendant that he did not ... See full document

... We are not persuaded by Schudy’s argument on appeal that “physical evidence,” i.e. documentation, was required to support the oral testimony. Such documents might have been helpful, but as Peyton and Braciszewski ... See full document

... In determining whether the arbitration proceeding applies to bar plaintiff’s present action under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel, two principal questions must be addressed. The first is whether ... See full document

... side business offering and performing similar work, but operating alone in that capacity, not as an employer of ...side business in the same line of work did the Legislature avoid the “dubious” result ... See full document

... Plaintiffs argue that defendants breached paragraphs 10 and 23 of the purchase agreement. They contend that because an “as is” clause does not insulate a seller from liability where the seller makes fraudulent ... See full document

... trial court correctly found a mutual ...Supreme Court noted that “[l]egal or equitable remedial measures are not mandated in every case in which a mutual mistake has been ... See full document

... probate court conducted a lengthy hearing on appellant’s objections to the second account and the motion to dismiss the ...probate court ruled from the bench, and after an objection was subsequently made to ... See full document

... Plaintiff next claims that she showed an irregularity sufficient to challenge the foreclosure. Plaintiff’s primary argument on appeal is that defendant’s interest in the home is invalid by virtue of the fact that ... See full document

... this state that all the provisions of the no-fault act be respected, and Kurylowicz’s efforts to elevate some of its provisions and some of its goals above other provisions and other goals was simply a means of ... See full document