[PDF] Top 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff

... JAMES W. ALMAND, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund; DOUGLAS M. BREGMAN, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund; BARBARA ANN SPICER, in her official capacity as ... See full document

... You are receiving this Notice as part of the Amara v. CIGNA class action litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. This litigation sought to remedy ... See full document

... decision, Plaintiff filed its original complaint against the University in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ...(“D.C. district court”) ... See full document

... U.S. 128 (1978). The evidence suggests otherwise. Authorities were aware that Esparza was the primary driver of a Cadillac, although he was not the owner. Moreover, the Government used Esparza’s recorded telephone calls ... See full document

... indicated a possible sexual relationship between Oliver and plaintiff, Inmate Jack Harris. At the time, Defendant Doug Diltz was the Investigative Captain in charge of the Intelligence (“Intel”) Unit at NSP. As ... See full document

... The factual and procedural history behind this litigation has been set forth in considerable detail in this Magistrate Judge's Ruling on Discovery Issue, filed May 29, 2013 (Dkt. #61)["May 2013 Ruling"], ... See full document

... K. “RSI,” “You,” and “Plaintiff” mean the Plaintiff corporation Radio Shed, Inc. (RSI) bringing this civil action and any and all of its agents, representatives, employees, servants, consultants, ... See full document

... or Court order (including any Protective ...or Court order (including any Protective Order), a designation may be “burned” onto the document’s image at a location that does not obliterate or obscure any ... See full document

... I hereby certify that on April 17th, 2008, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Consent Motion to Clarify the Scope of the November 12, 2007 Order and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof was ... See full document

... and inferences must be construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Porter, 419 F.3d at 891. The court does not make credibility determinations or weigh conflicting evidence at the summary ... See full document

... LCvR 7(m) provides that “[b]efore filing any nondispositive motion in a civil action, counsel shall discuss the anticipated motion with opposing counsel in a good-faith effort to determine whether there is any opposition ... See full document

... business. Based on these alleged misrepresentations, Ogletree asserts claims for fraud, misrepresentation, and violations of the Minnesota and Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Acts (MDTPA and TDTPA, respectively). Findlaw ... See full document

... Trial Court Public Access website, I have identified at least four civil litigation matters filed in 2009 in which attorney Michael Streater at the Briggs and Morgan law firm represents David Kloeber in a matter ... See full document

... 27. The total amount of out—of—pocket expenses incurred by Michael Simes, LLC, in providing professional services to Solinvest Group, Ltd., in connection with matters related to the United States Bankruptcy ... See full document

... the Court to understand why this case has not been ...The Court is aware that Randolph Rimstad testified that McDonnell negotiated an agreement with the Rimstads under which McDonnell would receive a 20% ... See full document

... Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Accretive Health, Inc. (“Accretive Health”) hereby moves to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by State of Minnesota Attorney General ... See full document

... The court agrees with Martinez and ...the court is aware of no maritime policy consideration that would suggest recognizing the sophisticated user defense for a negligence duty to warn claim and not a ... See full document

... The Court has reviewed the Fifth and Final Application for Interim Allowance of Compensation and for Payment of Expenses to Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP , Counsel for the March Debtors ("Fee Application") ... See full document

... Thus, any reasonable lawyer faced with a motion for summary judgment could simply have read Maryland Rule 2-501 and known that an unexecuted affidavit does not satisfy the Maryland standard for ... See full document

... particular, plaintiff seeks to strike the following portions of the transcript: page 9, line 14 to page 25, line 23; and page 32, line 22 to page 33, line ...to plaintiff, the subject testimony is ... See full document