[PDF] Top 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

... This Notice advises you of a proposed class action settlement. The settlement resolves a lawsuit over whether, after May 7, 2008, Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd. (“Blue Buffalo”) breached its True Blue Promise, which ... See full document

... Policy provisions that seek to limit stacking of uninsured motorist policies will not be enforced if they violate the public policy expressed in the financial responsibility law. Cameron Mutual Ins. Co. v. Madden, 533 ... See full document

... The Court concludes that based on the above facts, the requested hourly rates in this case are unreasonably high under prevailing community ...The Court does not question the ethics or abilities of Class ... See full document

... the district court a proposed settlement, the district court may enter a stipulated judgment after scrutinizing the settlement for ...the Court is satisfied that a settlement reached in ... See full document

... The terms “injury” and “personal injury,” as used in this act, shall be construed to mean an injury to an employe[sic] . . . arising in the course of his employment and related thereto . . .. The term “injury arising in ... See full document

... At oral argument, the Court asked the parties why Ms. Finio, who is not a party to the insurance contract in question and from whom no relief is sought in this case, was joined as a defendant in this action. None ... See full document

... a Missouri corporation with its principal place of business in Springfield, Missouri; the Stuttes are residents of Knoxville, Tennessee; and the amount in controversy exceeds ... See full document

... the Court approval of the Settlement or that may arise in the future, that Lead Plaintiff or any Settlement Class Member asserted in the Amended Consolidated Complaint (or any of the original complaints, including ... See full document

... the court considers matters outside the pleadings and the non-moving parties are not entitled to the safeguards of 12(b)(6) in that no presumption of truthfulness attaches to the ...this Court treats ... See full document

... federal district court decision, physicians and medical staff have more reason to think twice about price and other arrangements adopted by the practice associations and clinics to which they ...the ... See full document

... Maldonado’s claim that counsel failed to investigate and contest his role in the offense is, likewise, factually unsupported. Maldonado received a four-level leadership role enhancement. Maldonado was involved in a drug ... See full document

... Springfield, Missouri, VAUGHN testified before the Federal grand jury, and falsely stated he had personally met with IRS Revenue Officer Walt Staton, and an IRS-CI Special Agent Kyle Brice at the Springfield, ... See full document

... In the instant case, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. While the State has waived its immunity to be sued for breach of contract claims, it has only done so to the extent that the claim ... See full document

... the United States takes no position on the proper interpretation of Kentucky law, several observations regarding the Board’s arguments on this point are in ... See full document

... The Court may issue a temporary restraining order, sometimes without advance notice to a defendant, to preserve the status quo until it has had an opportunity to determine whether a preliminary injunction should ... See full document

... (“CHI”), based on his belief that Nazareth Hospital had been dissolved as a corporate entity when it was purchased by CHI. See id. at *1. The plaintiff sought to add Nazareth Hospital when he learned through discovery ... See full document

... the United States and the State of Illinois, and their agencies, officers, agents, employees, and servants, and the State’s political subdivisions from any claims (including attorneys’ fees, costs, and ... See full document

... This action is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution to challenge changes made to Wisconsin Statutes § 111.70, et seq., pursuant to a ... See full document

... Supreme Court of Virginia failed, Beck pe *'oned for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Beck's habeas petitio[r] ... See full document

... Based on the foregoing, we find that Appellants presented substantial evidence supporting a finding that they had an insurable interest in the RV, thus making a submissible case on their counterclaim. The trial ... See full document