[PDF] Top 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

... under California state ...under California trademark laws. The Court concludes that Plaintiff’s allegations of extortion sufficiently allege commercial use for the purposes of state trademark law, ... See full document

... Cruzeta alleges that his “inclusion as a qualified participant within Sony’s Standard Retirement Plan” (“SRP”) was motivated by his continued employment at Sony. (SAC ¶ 13.) Further, Plaintiff alleges the SRP contains a ... See full document

... Section 9 of the FAA mandates that “the court must grant such an order unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 10 and 11.” 9 U.S.C. §9 (emphasis added). The grounds for not ... See full document

... 50. During 2000 and 2001, the profitability of Enron’s energy trading business, primarily based in Wholesale, dramatically increased for various reasons, including rapidly rising energy prices in the western ... See full document

... See also Dixie Electric Co-op. v. Citizens of the State of Alabama, 789 F.2d 852, 857-58 (11th Cir. 1986) (federal court may not adjudicate potential issues that may arise). In summary, the dispute must call ... See full document

... 45 C.F.R. § 160.103. A trial or deposition subpoena is appropriately treated differently from an order of the Court. When medical information is to be released in response to a subpoena or discovery request, the ... See full document

... Laborers District Counsel of Chicago and Vicinity (“Additional Plaintiffs” and, with Lead Plaintiffs, the “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class (as defined in ¶ 1 below), have reached a ... See full document

... the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with respect to my (our) claim as a member of the Settlement Class and for purposes of enforcing the ... See full document

... The Court did not decide in favor of the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settling Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a Settlement. This permits the parties to avoid the cost, delay, and uncertainty of a trial, and ... See full document

... five states, Alabama, Alaska, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Vermont, have issued cease-and-desist orders against MBC and its principals for securities fraud and registration ... See full document

... 3. Estimate of Average Amount of Recovery Per Share: Lead Plaintiffs’ damages expert estimates that approximately 2.076 billion shares of BoA common stock were purchased during the Class Period and held through a ... See full document

... the Court and serving on the United States and the State, in accordance with Section XVI of this Consent Decree (Notices), a motion requesting judicial resolution of the ...the United ... See full document

... This settlement addresses two consumer class action lawsuits currently consolidated and pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: (1) ... See full document

... the United States, including but not limited to the NYSE or another domestic exchange, during the Settlement Class Period, or (ii) the purchase or acquisition of Penn West call options, or sale or writing ... See full document

... -3-.. Few would disagree that, in complex matters, you get what you pay for. A receivership with available funds should be no different. As noted, in addition to the funds in the Mutual[r] ... See full document

... the United States Supreme Court held that judicial enforcement of racial covenants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the ... See full document

... G. On or about October 26, 2007, in order to impede and delay an IRS examination of his tax liability, DELPORT submitted to the IRS a document entitled “COUNTERCLAIM: Cross Action,” in which he made a “Declaration of ... See full document

... Plaintiff’s argument that the assignment of the mortgage created a “second fictional note” is groundless. Plaintiff asserts that the assignment gave HSBC a claim against the property, even though it could not properly ... See full document

... In the meantime, the Court finds that the tenets of equity favor extension of the redemption period. Dispossession is not appropriate during the period of redemption. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Sutton, ... See full document

... Between January 9 and March 15,2004, at the same time the market was primed by the false and misleading press releases, the Parris brothers, using the alias "John Alexander," [r] ... See full document