Figure 11: Symphalangus syndactylus principal component graph.
Principal component 1 accounts for 24% and principal component two 22%
of the variation of the sample
Figure 12: Homo sapiens and great ape principal component graph.
Principal component 1 accounts for 69% and principal component two 14%
of the variation of the sample
REFERENCES
1) Arsuaga and Carretero. 1994. Multivariate Analysis of the Sexual
Dimorphism of the Hip Bone in a Modern Human Population and in Early Hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 93, pp. 241–257).
2) Auerbach and Ruff. 2004. Human Body Mass Estimation: A Comparison of
“Morphometric” and “Mechanical” Methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 125, pp. 331–342).
3) Badyaev. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution (v. 17, pp. 369–
378).
4) Barbera, Imani, Becker, Lezotte, and Hobbins. 2009. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (v. 33, pp. 320–325).
5) Barelli, Heistermann, Boesch, Reichard. 2004. Sexual swellings in wild white-handed gibbon females (Hylobates lar) indicate the probability of ovulation. Hormones and Behavior (v. 68, pp. 25–31).
6) Barrett, Noordegraaf, and Morrison. 2008. Gender Differences in the Variability of Lower Extremity Kinematics During Treadmill Locomotion.
Journal of Motor Behavior (v. 40, pp. 62–70).
7) Betti. 2014. Sexual Dimorphism in the Size and Shape of the Os Coxae and the Effects of Microevolutionary Processes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 153, pp. 167–177).
8) Bytheway and Ross. 2010. A Geometric Morphometric Approach to Sex Determination of the Human Adult Os Coxa. Journal of Forensic Sciences (v.
55, pp. 859–863).
9) Chumanov, Wall-Scheffler, Heiderscheit. 2008. Gender Differences in
walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clinical Biomechanics (v.
23, pp. 1260–1268).
10) Coleman. 1969. Sex Differences in the Growth of the Human Bony Pelvis.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 31, pp. 125–152).
11) Correia, Balseiro, Areia. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in the human pelvis:
12) Cutting, Proffitt, Kozlowski. 1978. A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance (v. 4, pp. 357–372).
13) Decker. 2011. Virtual Determination of Sex: Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Adult Pelvis from 3D Computed Tomography Models. Journal of Forensic Sciences (v. 56, pp. 1107–1113).
14) DeSilva. 2010. A shift toward birthing relatively large infants early in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (v. 108, pp. 1022–1027).
15) Guégan, Teriokhin, Thomas. 2000. Human fertility variation, size-related obstetrical performance and the evolution of sexual stature dimorphism.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society (v. 267, pp. 2529–
2535).
16) Gingerich. 1972. The Development of the Sexual Dimorphism in the Bony Pelvis of the Squirrel Monkey. Anatomical Record (v. 172, pp. 589–595).
17) Gonzalez, Bernal, Perez. 2009. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis. Forensic Science International (v. 189, pp. 68–
74).
18) Gonzalez. Relating pelvic shape to hip abductor to sex estimation and locomotor cost. Forensic Science International
19) Gordon. 2004. Evolution of Body Size and Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Order Primates: Rensch’s Rule, Quantitative Genetics, and Phylogenetic Effects. Doctoral Dissertation – The University of Texas at Austin (pp. 195–
212).
20) Gordon. 2013. Sexual Size Dimorphism in Australopithecus: Current
Understanding and New Directions. In Reed, Fleagle, and Leakey (Eds.) The Paleobiology of Australopithecus (pp. 195–212). Springer.
21) Greulich and Thoms. 1944. The Growth and Development of the Pelvis of Individual Girls Before, During, and After Puberty. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine (v. 17, pp. 91–98).
22) Hager. 1996. Sex Differences in the Sciatic Notch of Great Apes and Modern Humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 99, pp. 287–300).
23) Jeong et al. Understanding Principal Component Analysis Using a Visual Analytics Tool. Charlotte Visualization Center, UNC Charlotte (pp. 1–10).
24) Kalberer, Sierra, Madan, Ganz, and Leunig 2008. Ischial Spine Projection into the Pelvis. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research (v. 466, pp. 677–
683).
25) Kerrigan, Todd, and Della Croce. 1998. Gender Differences in Joint
Biomechanics During Walking: Normative Study in Young Adults. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (v. 77, pp. 2–7)
26) Kimmerle, Ross, Slice. 2008. Sexual Dimorphism in America: Geometric Morphometric Analysis of the Craniofacial Region. Journal of Forensic Sciences (v. 53, pp. 54–57).
27) Kurki. 2011. Pelvic dimorphism in relation to body size and body size dimorphism in humans. Journal of Human Evolution (v. 61, pp. 631–643).
28) Kurki. 2007. Protection of Obstetric Dimensions in a Small-bodied Human Sample. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 133, pp. 1152–
1165).
29) Kurki. 2013. Bony Pelvic Canal Size and Shape in Relation to Body Proportionality in Humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v.
151, pp. 88–101).
30) Leigh and Shea. 1995. Ontogeny and the Evolution of Adult Body Size Dimorphism in Apes. American Journal of Primatology (v. 36, pp. 37–60).
31) Leutenegger and Kelly, 1977. Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in
anthropoid primates. Primates (v. 77, pp. 21–31).
32) Lewton. 2010. Locomotor Function and the Evolution of the Primate Pelvis.
Doctoral Dissertation – Arizona State University (pp. 21–32).
33) Lewton. 2012. Evolvability of the primate pelvic girdle. Evolutionary Biology (v. 39, pp. 126–139).
34) Lovejoy. 1988. Evolution of Human Walking. Scientific American. (v. 259, no.
5, pp 118–125).
35) Lovejoy. 2009. The Pelvis and Femur of Ardipithecus ramidus: The
36) Lowdermilk. 2010. “Labor and Birth Processes.” In Perry, Hockenberry, Lowdermilk, Wilson (eds.) Maternal Child Nursing Care. (4th ed.) Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
37) Lycett and Cramon-Taubadel. 2013. Understanding the comparative catarrhine context of human pelvic form: A 3D geometric morphometric analysis. Journal of Human Evolution (v. 64, pp. 300–310).
38) Meldrum and Hilton (eds.). 2004. From Biped to Strider: The Emergence of Modern Human Walking Running and Resource Transport. New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum (pp. 23–29).
39) Nicholson. 1945. The two main diameters at the brim of the female pelvis.
Journal of Anatomy (v. 79, pp. 131–135). Slice. 2007. Geometric Morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology (v. 36, pp. 261–281).
40) Nigg, Federolf, Landry. 2010. Gender differences in lower extremity gait biomechanics during walking using an unstable shoe. Clinical Biomechanics (v. 25, pp. 1047–1052).
41) Plavcan. 2012. Body Size, Size variation, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Early Homo. Current Anthropology (v. 53, pp. S409–S423).
42) Rak and Arensburg. 1987. Kebara 2 Neanderthal Pelvis: First Look at a Complete Inlet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 73, pp. 227–
231).
43) Ranta, Laurila, Elmberg. 1994. Reinventing the wheel: analysis of sexual dimorphism in body size. Oikos (v. 70, pp. 313–321).
44) Reno, Meindl, McCollum, Lovejoy. 2003. Sexual Dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (v. 100, pp. 9404–9409).
45) Review. 2002. Birth, obstetrics, and human evolution. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (v. 109, pp. 1199–1206).
46) Rodman, Peter S., and John C. Mitani. 1987. “Orangutans: Sexual
dimorphism in a solitary species.” In Smuts, Cheney, Seyfarth, Wrangham, and Struhsaker (eds.) Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press (pp.
12–20).
47) Rohlf and Bookstein. 1988. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan.
48) Rose. 1974. Ischial tuberosities and ischial callosities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 40, pp. 375–384).
49) Ruff. 1995. Biomechanics of the Hip and Birth in Early Homo. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 98, pp. 527–574).
50) Ruff. 2010. Body size and body shape in early hominins-implications of the Gona Pelvis. Journal of Human Evolution (v. 58, pp. 166–178).
51) Russell, Palmieri, Zinder, and Ingersoll. 2006. Sex Differences in Valgus Knee Angle During Single-Leg Drop Jump. Journal of Athletic Training (v. 41, 166–171).
52) Schultz. 1949. Sex Differences in the Pelves of Primates. Dept. of Anatomy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (pp. 401–424).
53) Smith and Leigh. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in primate neonatal body mass.
Journal of Human Evolution (v. 34, pp. 173–201).
54) Tague. 1989. Variation in Pelvic Size Between Males and Females.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 80, pp. 59–71).
55) Tague. 1992. Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Bony Pelvis, With a
Consideration of the Neandertal Pelvis From Kebara Cave, Israel. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 88, pp. 1–21).
56) Tague. 2000. Do Big Females have Big Pelves? American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 112, pp. 377–398).
57) Trevathan W. 2015. Primate pelvic anatomy and implications for birth.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences (v. 370, 20140065).
58) Walker. 2005. Greater Sciatic Notch Morphology: Sex, Age, and Population Differences. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 127, pp. 385–
391).
59) Walrath. 2003. Rethinking pelvic typologies and the human birth mechanism.
Current Anthropology (v. 44, pp. 5–31).
60) Washburn. 1948. Sex Differences in the Pubic Bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (v. 6, pp. 199–207).
61) Warrener, Lewton, Pontzer, and Lieberman. 2015. A Wider Pelvis Does Not Increase Locomotor Cost in Humans, with Implications for the Evolution of Childbirth. PLoS One (v. 10, pp. e0118903).
62) Weaver and Hublin. 2009. Neandertal birth canal shape and the evolution of human childbirth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (v. 106, pp. 8151–8156).
CURRICULUM VITAE