CRITERIA: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=96%; NON-RSBI which =89%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI
(n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Very good overall performance in meeting this requirement. RSBI performance is better than the accreditation rate of non-RSBI school (89%). This indicates that selection of schools for the
RSBI is good based on this measure
Chart 3 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - Overall Accreditation by School Level
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
REQUIREMENTS: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: SD=88%; SMP=100%; SMA=100%; SMK=94%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18) ANALYSIS: SD and SMK are slightly behind SMP and SMA in meeting this requirement.
Chart 4 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - By School Type
Final Evaluation Report Page 34
5.3.1. Accreditation
Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Overall Performance
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN)
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI)
Level of Compliance: RSBI=96%; NON-RSBI which =89%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI (n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Very good overall performance in meeting this requirement. RBSI performance is better
than the accreditation rate of non-RSBI school (89%). This indicates that selection of schools for the
RSBI is good based on this measure
Chart 3 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - Overall
Accreditation by School Level
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
REQUIREMENTS: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN)
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI)
Level of Compliance: SD=88%; SMP=100%; SMA=100%; SMK=94%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18)
ANALYSIS: SD and SMK are slightly behind SMP and SMA in meeting this requirement.
Chart 4 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - By School Type
4.3.1. Accreditation
Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN)Overall Performance
Accreditation by School Level
SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18)
34 Final Evaluation Report
Chart 3 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - Overall
Chart 4 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - By School Type
Final Evaluation Report Page 34
5.3.1. Accreditation
Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Overall Performance INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=96%; NON-RSBI which =89%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI
(n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Very good overall performance in meeting this requirement. RSBI performance is better than the accreditation rate of non-RSBI school (89%). This indicates that selection of schools for the
RSBI is good based on this measure
Chart 3 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - Overall Accreditation by School Level
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
REQUIREMENTS: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: SD=88%; SMP=100%; SMA=100%; SMK=94%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18) ANALYSIS: SD and SMK are slightly behind SMP and SMA in meeting this requirement.
Chart 4 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - By School Type
Final Evaluation Report Page 34
5.3.1. Accreditation
Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Overall Performance INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=96%; NON-RSBI which =89%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI (n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Very good overall performance in meeting this requirement. RBSI performance is better than the accreditation rate of non-RSBI school (89%). This indicates that selection of schools for the RSBI is good based on this measure
Chart 3 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - Overall Accreditation by School Level
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
REQUIREMENTS: Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: SD=88%; SMP=100%; SMA=100%; SMK=94%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18) ANALYSIS: SD and SMK are slightly behind SMP and SMA in meeting this requirement.
Chart 4 - Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN) - By School Type
4.3.1. Accreditation
Accreditation “A” by National Standards Board (BAN)Overall Performance
Accreditation by School Level
SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18)
Chapter 4Results & Analysis
Chart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country
4.3.2. Curriculum & Graduates’ Competence
Overall PerformanceChart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI)
Level of Compliance: RSBI=6%, NON-RSBI=0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI
(n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall poor performance in meeting this requirement. Only SMA and SMK reported having obtained accreditation from other countries.
Chart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation 5.3.2. Curriculum & Graduates’ Competence
Overall Performance
INDICATOR: CURRICULUM AND GRADUATES’ COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS: Adoption of Curricula from Other Countries
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=37%; NON-RSBI=11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI (n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall less than satisfactory performance in meeting this requirement. However, some non-RSBI have also begun to adopt international curricula which may be an indication of positive influence of RSBI on other schools.
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI)
Level of Compliance: RSBI=6%, NON-RSBI=0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI (n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall poor performance in meeting this requirement. Only SMA and SMK reported having obtained accreditation from other countries.
Chart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation 5.3.2. Curriculum & Graduates’ Competence
Overall Performance
INDICATOR: CURRICULUM AND GRADUATES’ COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS: Adoption of Curricula from Other Countries
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=37%; NON-RSBI=11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI
(n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall less than satisfactory performance in meeting this requirement. However, some non-RSBI have also begun to adopt international curricula which may be an indication of positive influence of RSBI on other schools.
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country
Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country
Overall Performance
Chart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI)
Level of Compliance: RSBI=6%, NON-RSBI=0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI
(n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall poor performance in meeting this requirement. Only SMA and SMK reported having obtained accreditation from other countries.
Chart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation 5.3.2. Curriculum & Graduates’ Competence
Overall Performance
INDICATOR: CURRICULUM AND GRADUATES’ COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS: Adoption of Curricula from Other Countries
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=37%; NON-RSBI=11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI (n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall less than satisfactory performance in meeting this requirement. However, some non-RSBI have also begun to adopt international curricula which may be an indication of positive influence of RSBI on other schools.
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country
INDICATOR: ACCREDITATION
CRITERIA: Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI)
Level of Compliance: RSBI=6%, NON-RSBI=0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI (n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall poor performance in meeting this requirement. Only SMA and SMK reported having obtained accreditation from other countries.
Chart 5 - OECD or other Developed Country Accreditation 5.3.2. Curriculum & Graduates’ Competence
Overall Performance
INDICATOR: CURRICULUM AND GRADUATES’ COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS: Adoption of Curricula from Other Countries
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: RSBI=37%; NON-RSBI=11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
RSBI
(n=70) NON-RSBI
(n=9)
ANALYSIS: Overall less than satisfactory performance in meeting this requirement. However, some non-RSBI have also begun to adopt international curricula which may be an indication of positive influence of RSBI on other schools.
Chart 6 - Adoption of Curricula from OECD or other Developed Country
Obtaining Accreditation from Institution of OECD or other Developed Country
36 Education Sector Analytical and Capacity Development Partnership
Chart 7 - Adoption of Curricula from other Country by School Type Adoption of Curricula from Other Countries by School Level
INDICATOR: CURRICULUM AND GRADUATES’ COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS: Adoption of Curricula from Other Countries
Source of Data: Field Study School Survey (n=70 RSBI; n=9 non-RSBI) Level of Compliance: SD=24%; SMP=33%; SMA=45%; SMK=80%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% SD (n=17) SMP (n=15) SMA (n=20) SMK (n=18) ANALYSIS: SMK have made satisfactory progress in meeting this requirement, whereas other types of schools are well behind.
Chart 7 - Adoption of Curricula from other Country by School Type