• No results found

The Acharya-Pantev-Wijnholt system

We now analyze the supersymmetry condition for a configuration of n D6-branes wrapping Q. If we work with any Calabi-Yau, the moduli space of such configura- tions receive corrections from holomorphic disks bounded by the branes. However,

if we assume X is near the large volume limit, such corrections are small and we can replace X by the symplectic linearization T˚Q. We will argue then that the

brane configuration is described by a triplepE, Ac, hqconsisting of a rankncomplex vector bundle, a “stable” flat SLpn,Cq-connectionAconQ, and a harmonic metric h on E. The equation determining h is a moment map condition that selects a prefered gauge orbit of Ac under complexified gauge transformations. In the next section we will give an interpretation of this data by using Corlette’s theorem to introduce a moduli space of “flat Higgs bundles” on Q.

Remark 4.2.1. It is known [Wit96] that a configuration of n D6-branes on a fixed special Lagrangian Q is described by a SUpnq-connection on Q. In our setup, the

extra complexified directions parametrize K¨ahler deformations that keepQ special Lagrangian.

The unbroken supersymmetry (BPS) condition for IIA string theory on T˚Q

with n D6-branes is given by theHermitian-Yang-Mills equations:

$ ’ ’ & ’ ’ % F2,0 “0 ΛF “0 (4.2.1)

HereF is the curvature of aSUpnq-connectionAon a holomorphic vector bundle

E over T˚Q endowed with a hermitian metric, and Λ is the Lefschetz operator of

contraction by the K¨ahler form. Note that becauseAis hermitian, the first equation implies F0,2 F2,0 0.

given by a flat connection on a complex line bundle over Q. This is a dimensional reduction of a Up1q Hermitian-Yang-Mills connection on a line bundle over T˚Q.

Thus, to find the condition on Q, we need to compute the dimensional reduction of equations 4.2.1 down to Q.4

Since we are working on T˚Q, choose local coordinates x

j on Q and yj on the fiber,j “1,2,3. The complex structureJ adapted to the semi-flat metric is chosen such that zj “xj `iyj are holomorphic coordinates (i.e., Q is totally real). Now, the hermitian condition allows us to write A1,0 “A0,1, and it follows that:

A1j,0 “Aj `iAj`3

A0j,1 “Aj ´iAj`3 (4.2.2)

Let us write A1,0

“ ř3j1Ajdxj `iθjdyj. Assume that A and θ do not depend on the fiber directions yj. It is clear that:

A:“ 3 ÿ

j“1

Ajdxj (4.2.3)

becomes a well-definedsupnq-valued one-form onQ. Moreover, becauseQis special Lagrangian, NQ{T˚Q –T Qso the a priori vertical supnq-valued one-form

4Another way to see this is by noting that the HYM equation describes a “spacetime filling

brane” onT˚Q, and the wrapping condition is obtained by performing three T-dualities along the

3 ÿ

j“1

θjdyj (4.2.4)

can be be dualized (via the metric) to a supnq-valued one-form θ. In this semi-flat setup, the dualization map is the action of the complex structure Jkjpdyjq “ ´dxk.

Letd“ B ` B. By assumption, BA“ Bθ“0. We have:

F2,0

“ BA1,0`A1,0^A1,0

“ BpA`iθq ` pA`iθq ^ pA`iθq (4.2.5)

and

F1,1 “ BA0,1`A1,0^A0,1 (4.2.6)

The first equation becomes:

FA“θ^θ

DAθ “0 (4.2.7)

and the second equation is:

DA‹θ“0 (4.2.8)

where the “bundle Hodge star” on Ω1pAdpE|

Qqqis a combination of the Hodge star on the base Q and the Hodge star induced by the hermitian metric on E. One

can also define the “adjoint” of DA by D:A :“ ‹DA‹ and write equation 4.2.8 as D:Aθ “0.

We will refer to equations 4.2.7 and 4.2.8 as the Acharya-Pantev-Wijnholt sys- tem, or APW for short. The reason we choose this name is that, as far as the author is aware, the recognition that these equations describe the supersymmetric gauge theory associated to a system of D6-branes wrapping a three-cycle appears

first in work of Acharya [Ach98], and the Higgs bundle/spectral cover interpreta- tion, which we will discuss next, first appeared in the work of Pantev and Wijnholt [PW11]. Recently, the system has been studied more carefully in [BCHSN18] and [BCHLTZ18]. We note, however, that these equations have appeared long before (in a different context) in the Mathematics literature in the works of Donaldson [Don87] and Corlette [Cor88]. In fact, theorem 5.1.8 below establishes that solutions to these equations are essentially described by the well-known Donaldson-Corlette theorem 5.1.7.