The research “Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Blended Learning Scenarios in a Teacher Training Context accommodating their Individual Psychological Characteristics (BleSTePsy)” is implemented through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” and is co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund) and Greek national funds.
References
Abbit, J., & Ophus, J. (2008) “What we know about the Impacts of Web-Quests: A review of research”. AACE Journal, Vol. 16, No 4, pp 441-456.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001) “Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference context” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol 5, available at:
http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/pdf/ v5n2_anderson.pdf, last access: 13/5/2013 Barnett, M. (2002) “Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional
development: A critical review of the literature”, paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Bates, A. (1986) “Computer-assisted learning or communications: which way for information technology in distance education?”, Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 1, No. 1
ates, A., (2005) Technology, ELearning and Distance Education, London, Routledge.
Beetham, H. (2008), Review: Design for Learning programme phase 2, unpublished report, Bristol: JISC.
Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) “Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning” Educational Psychologist, Vol 26 No 3&4, pp 369-398.
Bower, M., Hedberg, J., & Kuswara, A. (2009) “Conceptualising Web 2.0 enabled learning designs”, in Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Aukland, (pp. 1153-1162).
Brown, M. (2009) “The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials, in J. T. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction, pp. 17- 36, New York: Routledge.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J. diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. (2003). “Design Experiments in Educational Research”. Educational Researcher, Vol 32, No1, pp 9-13.
Darling-Hammond, L., and D.L. Ball. (1997) Doing What Matters Most: Investing in Quality Teaching. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
Diaz, S. R., Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010) “Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis and the validity of the Community of Inquiry survey”, Internet and Higher Education, No 13, Vol 1-2, pp 22-30.
Dodge, B. (1995) Some thoughts about WebQuests, available at: http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html, last access May 12th, 2013
Edelson, D.C. (1998), “Matching the Design of Activities to the Affordances of Software to Support Inquiry-Based Learning”, in A.S. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J.L. Kolodner, & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of ICLS 98: International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Atlanta, GA, December 16-19, 1998, (pp.77-83). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
Fusco, J., Haavind, S., Remold, J., & Schank, P. (2011) Exploring differences in online professional development seminars with the community of inquiry framework, Educational Media International.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000) “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education”, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 2, No 2-3, pp 87-105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2001) “Critical thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education”, American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 15, No1
Garrison, D. R. (2007). “Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol 11, No1, pp 61-72
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland Innes, M. & Fung, T. S. (2010) “Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework”, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 13, pp 31-36
Garisson, D.R., (2011) A Response to David Annand - Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2011, available at
http://communitiesofinquiry.com/node/20, last accessed: May 29th 2012
Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L. and Turoff, M. (1995), Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching & Learning Online, Cambridge, MIT Press
Jimoyannis, A. (2010) “Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development”, Computers and Education, Vol 55, pp 1259-1269
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012) New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education, Cambridge University Press, second edition, 2012.
March, T. (2007) “Revisiting WebQuests in a Web 2 World. How developments in technology and pedagogy combine to scaffold personal learning” Interactive Educational Multimedia, Number 15 (October, 2007), pp. 1-17.
Mishra, P., Zhao, Y., & Tan, H. S. (1999) “From concept to software: Unpacking the black box of design”, Journal of Research on Computing in Education Vol 32, No 2, pp 220-238
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2003) “Not “what” but “how”: Becoming design-wise about educational technology”, in Y. Zhao. (Ed.). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices (pp. 99-122), Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Mishra P. & Koehler M. J. (2006) “Technological pedagogical content knowledge, A New Framework for Teacher Knowledge”, Teachers College Record Vol. 108, No 6, June 2006, pp. 1017–1054 Columbia University Prensky, M. (2001) “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants” On the Horizon, MCB University Press, Vol 9, No 5.
Redecker (2009) Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe, JRC publications
Schon, D. (1987) “Educating the reflective practicioner”, presentation at the 1987 meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, EUA.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009) “Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education”, Computers & Education, Vol 52, No 3, pp 543–553.
Steel, C. & Levy, M. (2009) “Creativity and constraint: Understanding teacher beliefs and the use of LMS technologies, refereed proceedings of the ASCILITE Conference, 6-9 December, 2009, Auckland, New Zealand.
Swan, K., Garrison, D. R. & Richardson, J. C. (2009) A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework, in Payne, C. R. (Ed.) Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp 43-57.
Swan, K. Matthews, D., Bogle, L. Boles, E. & Day, S. (2012) “Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol 15 (2012), pp 81–88.
Zhao, Y., & Rop, S. (2001) “A critical review of the literature on electronic networks as reflective discourse communities for inservice teachers”, Education and Information Technology, Vol 6, No 2, pp 81-94.