• No results found

ADDITIONAL RESTORATION AND IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES

These are restoration, habitat enhancement, and sale area improvement activities that may be implemented after commercial thinning activities in an area are complete, if sufficient revenue is generated by the timber sales to support them. This environmental assessment assumes that all the activities listed here would be implemented, and takes into account the environmental effects of implementing them. These treatments are presented here by resource area.

Vegetation

Non-commercial young stand thinning

Following the proposed commercial thinning, selective non-commercial thinning In adjacent stands that are younger or smaller in size would accelerate the development of desired tree and stand characteristics, and contribute to the future connectivity of late-successional habitat on the landscape. Of the stands less than 35 years of age within the planning area, there are currently 77 stands totaling 2,770 acres which may benefit from a non-commercial thinning treatment. Table 2.4 below displays the seven stands, totaling 249 acres, which would be the highest priority for treatment due to their proximity (within 0.25 miles) to stands proposed for a commercial thinning treatment in the Proposed Action.

Table 2.4. Priority Stands for non-commercial thinning treatment Compartment Cell Stand Age in 2011 Acres

4203 182 27 17

4204 179 24 43

4204 185 34 21

4302 28 33 38

4302 40 31 18

4302 109 25 62

4303 71 30 50

Invasive plant treatment

After project activities are complete, thinning units, temporary roads, landings, and system roads within 0.25 miles of thinning units would be surveyed for invasive plants, and any infestations located would be treated. It is estimated that there would be approximately 40 infested acres that would need treatment.

Wildlife

Wildlife habitat enhancement

Limited mortality, windthrow or breakage of leave trees is expected following the commercial thinning treatment. However, given the generally low levels of snags and coarse woody debris (CWD) within project stands, the active creation of snags and CWD would enhance the habitat values provided by the project stands. Snag creation would use a variety of methods (girdling, topping and fungal inoculation) that would delay mortality of some trees and produce snags in multiple decay classes. The placement of flying squirrel nest boxes would provide short term habitat improvement while natural cavities develop. Coarse wood structures would be in the form of log pyramids and slash piles. In addition, forage planting of native shrubs is

recommended for big game and other species. Table 2.5 describes these activities.

Table 2.5. Recommended wildlife habitat enhancement activities

Activity Location Description

Snag creation All commercial

thinning units Estimated total snag creation need is 200 trees.

Table 2.5. Recommended wildlife habitat enhancement activities

Activity Location Description

Coarse wood

creation All commercial

thinning units Approximately 100 log pyramids and 100 brush piles would be created. Any creation of brush piles would be coordinated with slash and fuels treatments.

Placement of flying squirrel boxes

All commercial

thinning units Estimated need for 200 nest boxes across all units.

Forage planting of

native shrubs Landings and temporary roads

Shrub species include elderberry, snowberry, red osier dogwood, and willow. Approximately 1000 plants total across all units.

Aquatic Habitat and Roads Road decommissioning

Table 2.6 contains recommendations for road decommissioning. These roads are high priority for decommissioning due to their potential to deliver sediment to aquatic habitat were a landslide or culvert failure were to occur.

Table 2.6. Road segments recommended for decommissioning

Road number and mileposts Miles Op. ML 2 Obj. ML 3 No. stream crossings Priority

2355400, MP 0.0 to 1.2 1 1.2 2 2 3 High

2355400, MP 1.2 to 3.9 1 2.7 2 2 8 High

2360000, MP 0.0 to 0.6 0.6 2 2 2 High

2360200, MP 0.0 to 2.0 1 2.0 1 D 11 High

2361300, MP 0.0 to 0.3 0.3 1 1 2 Moderate

1 The effects of decommissioning this road segment have already been analyzed in either the Skokomish Road and Trail Remediation Project EA and Decision Notice; or the Church, Brown and Steel Creeks Decommission and Closure Project EA and Decision Notice.

2 Op. ML means “operational maintenance level,” and is the level at which the road is currently maintained.

3 Obj. ML means “objective maintenance level” and is the maintenance level recommended for the road in the Forest’s current Access and Travel Management Plan (USDA Forest Service 2004c).

Road stabilization and upgrading

Table 2.7 contains recommendations for stabilization and/or drainage upgrading of several system roads associated with project units.

Table 2.7. Road segments recommended for stabilization and/or drainage upgrading Road number and mileposts Miles Op. ML Obj. ML No. stream

crossings Priority

2300, MP 9.2 to 16.7 7.5 4 4 (many) Moderate-High

2340-230, MP 0.0 to 2.1 2.1 2 2 6 Moderate

2340, MP 9.2 to 12.9 3.7 3 3 14 Moderate-High

2360, MP 0.0 to 4.4 4.4 2 2 10 High

Table 2.7. Road segments recommended for stabilization and/or drainage upgrading Road number and mileposts Miles Op. ML Obj. ML No. stream

crossings Priority

2356-400, MP 0.0 to 1.3 1.3 2 2 8 Moderate

Aquatic organism passage improvement

There are several culverts on existing system roads in the planning area that are barriers to passage for fish and other aquatic organisms. Replacing these culverts with structures designed to allow fish passage would improve habitat for these creatures. Table 2.8 lists these culverts, including the amount of upstream habitat they block and their priority for replacement.

Table 2.8. Recommendations for aquatic organism passage improvement

Road number Milepost Stream name Fish stock Miles blocked Priority

2340-100 0.2 Vincent Creek Resident 0.7 Moderate

2350 5.5 Cabin Creek Resident 0.7 Moderate

2300 3.8 Fir Creek Resident 0.5 Moderate

2351 11.9 Rock Creek Resident 0.5 Moderate

2350 1.9 Nickelson Creek Resident 0.4 Low

2351 11.1 Rock Creek Resident 0.4 Low

2361 0.8 Cedar Creek Resident 0.3 Low

2353-210 0.2 Lebar Creek Resident 0.3 Low

2350 7.7 Vance Creek Resident 0.2 Low

PROJECT DESIGN CRITERIA, MITIGATION MEASURES, AND BEST