• No results found

Altering the model geometry from flat to cylindrical 117

4.   Ring modelling results and discussion 105

4.3.   Altering the model geometry from flat to cylindrical 117

on  the  inner  surface  of  a  cylinder,  with  a  radius  of  R  =  12/2π  μm,  which   represents   the   inner   surface   of   the  S.   pombe   plasma   membrane.   The   attachments   of   the   nodes   to   the   membrane   were   modelled   as   Hookean   springs,   so   that   if   the   nodes   are   pulled   away   from   the   membrane,   or   pushed  in  towards  it,  they  will  experience  a  restoring  force  proportional   to  the  distance  that  they  have  been  displaced.  This  connection  was  given   a   high   spring   constant   (i.e.   high   stiffness)   in   order   to   ensure   that   the   extension  or  compression  is  always  very  small.  

    As   before,   an   excluded   volume   interaction   was   included,   except   now  this  was  applied  to  any  beads  in  the  actin  filaments  that  moved  to  a   radius   greater   than   the   radius   of   the   cylinder   (i.e.   outside   of   the   cytoplasmic  volume).  For  these  beads,  a  constant  restoring  force  of  5  pN   was  applied  towards  the  cylinder’s  axis,  in  order  to  push  the  actin  beads   back  into  the  allowed  volume.  

  It   is   important   to   note   that,   whilst   the   model   now   uses   3D   cylindrical  ring  geometry,  the  simulated  ring  is  still  unable  to  contract,  as   the   cylinder   that   it   is   attached   to   has   a   fixed   radius.   We   have   already   discussed  how,  in  S.  pombe  cells,  the  process  of  ring  contraction  is  closely   coupled   to   the   process   of   septum   synthesis,   and   how   neither   is   able   to   occur   without   the   other   (section   1.11,   page   30)   [32,89].   Therefore,   performing  a  realistic  simulation  that  allows  the  ring  to  contract  would   also   require   modelling   the   process   of   septum   synthesis,   which   would   further  increase  the  complexity  of  the  model.  

  We   performed   simulations   with   this   cylindrical   model,   using   the   same   parameter   values   that   were   used   for   the   simulations   in   our   flat   model.  However,  in  our  initial  simulations  we  observed  that  many  actin   filaments  did  not  remain  against,  or  near,  the  membrane,  but  were  pulled   away   (Figure   4.2C).   Because   the   previous   simulations   used   a   flat   geometry,  this  behaviour  was  not  seen  before,  and  we  realised  this  was  

most   likely   happening   because   the   pulling   force   on   the   actin   filaments   was   overcoming   the   grabbing   forces   that   were   holding   them   near   the   membrane.   Comparison   of   our   3D   cylindrical   model   to   a   similar   3D   model  (aimed  at  describing  ring  formation  [164])  suggested  that  this  was   the  case,  as  for  their  simulations  a  maxInt  value  of  3  was  used  for  each   node,  with  slightly  less  than  half  the  number  of  nodes  that  we  used  in  our   simulations   (and   therefore   roughly   double   the   amount   of   Myo2   per   node)  [164].  

We   found   that   reducing   the   value   of   maxInt   down   to   1   was   necessary  in  order  to  keep  the  majority  of  the  filaments  contained  in  the   ring  (Figure  4.2D).  It  would  theoretically  have  been  possible  to  increase   the   strength   of   the   myosin   grabbing   forces,   which   keep   actin   filaments   near  the  membrane.  However,  the  way  that  myosin  grabbing  forces  are   implemented   in   this   model   arguably   leads   to   them   being   overpowered   already,   as   they   do   not   experience   the   same   decrease   in   force   when   interacting   with   multiple   filaments   that   is   applied   to   the   pulling   forces.   We  will  discuss  our  attempts  to  resolve  these  issues  in  the  next  section  of   this  chapter.  

Additionally,   from   a   basic   consideration   of   the   number   of   Myo2   molecules  in  each  node,  and  from  knowledge  of  the  processivity  of  type  II   myosins,  it  can  be  argued  that  the  myosin  pulling  forces  in  the  simulation   are   also   overpowered,   hence   we   chose   to   reduce   these   rather   than   increase   the   strength   of   the   grabbing   forces.   This   is   because,   using   the   measured  number  of  Myo2  molecules  in  the  S.  pombe  AMR,  and  assuming   there   are   75   Myo2   clusters   in   the   ring   (as   was   the   case   in   the   original   model),  it  can  be  calculated  that  there  would  be  an  average  of  around  40   Myo2  molecules  in  each  cluster  [64].  In  the  original  model,  these  clusters   could   interact   with   up   to   10   actin   filaments   at   maximum   force,   which   equates  to  4  Myo2  molecules  exerting  a  time-­‐averaged  force  of  4  pN  on   each   filament.   Considering   that   type   II   myosins   are   known   to   be   not   particularly   processive,   with   Myo2   previously   measured   to   have   a   duty   ratio  of  approximately  10%  [95],  then  for  4  Myo2  molecules  interacting   with  a  single  actin  filament,  a  time-­‐averaged  force  of  1.6  pN  would  be  a  

better   estimate1.   Therefore,   decreasing   the   value   of   maxInt   in   our   simulations   also   makes   sense   based   on   considerations   of   the   mechanochemical  properties  of  type  II  myosins.  

We  wondered  if  increasing  the  amount  of  crosslinking  in  the  ring   would   also   help   to   prevent   this   single-­‐filament   peeling   that   was   observed:   On   the   one   hand,   if   the   actin   filaments   were   more   tightly   crosslinked   to   each   other,   then   this   would   mean   that   the   pulling   forces   from   the   nodes   would   effectively   be   shared   across   multiple   filaments,   and   therefore   reduce   the   force   on   individual   filaments.   On   the   other   hand,  this  would  not  increase  the  number  of  connections  between  actin   filaments  and  the  membrane,  so  it  might  not  prevent  the  single-­‐filament   peeling  from  happening.  We  performed  some  simulations  where  we  used   a  maxInt  value  of  5,  and  increased  the  crosslinker  binding  rate,  however   we  found  that  this  did  not  appear  to  make  a  difference  to  the  amount  of   individual  filaments  peeling  off  of  the  ring.  We  shall  discuss  more  about   the  effect  that  crosslinkers  have  on  the  simulation  in  section  4.8.3.  

After   reducing   the   value   of   maxInt   in   our   simulations,   and   checking   that   this   produced   more   WT-­‐like   behaviour   (Figure   4.2D),   we   also   decided   to   implement   a   new   method   to   measure   the   ring   tension:   Previously,  the  ring  tension  was  measured  by  summing  all  the  tension  in   all  the  springs  in  the  simulation,  in  the  direction  parallel  to  the  ring  (i.e.   along  the  x-­‐axis).  As  the  direction  parallel  to  ring  was  no  longer  constant,   this   method   became   more   complicated   to   use   in   our   cylindrical   model.   Instead,  to  measure  the  total  contractile  force  the  ring  exerts  on  the  inner   surface   of   the   cylinder,   we   summed   the   tension   stored   in   the   springs   connecting   the   nodes   to   the   membrane.   It   can   be   shown   that   this   contractile   force,   Fc,   is   equal   to   2π   times   the   ring   tension,   T   (i.e.  Fc   =  

2πT)2.  Using  both  methods,  and  plotting  2πT  and  Fc  as  a  function  of  time   on   the   same   graph,   showed   that   both   results   are   largely   in   agreement                                                                                                                  

1  Assuming  that  the  4  Myo2  molecules  exert  4  pN  of  force  on  a  single  actin  filament  40%   (10%×4)  of  the  time,  this  leads  to  a  time  averaged  force  of  1.6  pN.  This  is  a  very  

simplistic  approximation,  which  does  not  take  account  of,  for  example,  multiple  myosin   heads  binding  at  the  same  time.  

(Figure   4.2E).   Using   our   3D   cylindrical   ring   model,   with   the   reduced   value  of  maxInt,  the  simulated  ring  produced  a  mean  2π×tension  of  243  ±   17  pN,  and  exerted  a  mean  contractile  force  on  the  membrane/cell  wall   of  235  ±  15  pN.  

Returning  to  our  flat  model,  and  again  using  the  reduced  value  of   maxInt  in  our  simulations,  we  measured  an  average  ring  tension  of  41.7  ±   3  pN  (Figure  4.2F),  which  is  more  than  a  5×  reduction  compared  to  the   case  with  a  maxInt  value  of  5  (Figure  4.2B).  While  this  decrease  in  ring   tension  would  be  expected  after  reducing  the  value  of  maxInt,  this  means   that   the   simulated   ring   tension   is   no   longer   in   agreement   with   the   experimentally  measured  value  of  390  pN  [35].  However,  the  reduction   in   the   value   of  maxInt   was   necessary   in   order   to   keep   actin   filaments   near   the   membrane   in   our   cylindrical   model,   an   issue   which   was   not   apparent   when   using   the   flat   geometry.   Therefore,   there   must   be   additional   mechanisms   which   help   to   make   the   process   of   tension   generation  more  efficient,  or  which  increase  the  number  of  connections   between  the  AMR  and  the  membrane,  and  we  will  discuss  some  of  these   in  section  4.8.2.  

 

4.4.  Making  the  myosin-­‐actin  interactions  more  realistic