- 68 -
- -
- - -- - -
--
-- - - -- -
--
4. 2
'.rhe Intake Of Beef ( Continued )D . H.
available/ha. ,
ex:r- ·�·ri:nents designed to providedatl:.1.
fo r es timatinethis filllct:i.on. should include a co rrespond.:i.n::; range in pas ture D . H . levels as well as different levels of ava.i.lable pasture D . M . p e r head,
4.
2. 1
Facto rs
Affecting The ?o tentia.l DaiJ.,y IntAke Of Grazing Ani . .!lRlsA
revi ew o fli terature indicates
t.hat the po te.::!.ti al C.aily inta.keo f gr:-tzine beef ani7nal.s is
a
ra.th.r-�r complex and poorly 1.mO.erstood facet of b eef produc tion.Bines (
19'70 )
conc luded th at where roughages are fed, intake isconstrained by the speed wi t.h which food pcw.ses through
the
rumen. Henc e size o f the rwaen, \vhich is related toani:!lal
livm.J eight(B:i.nes
1 9'70 )
Houl
d limi t dai ly intake , Bines alsoc
on.:>idered that t.IJ.e f8.ste r passage of a concentr01te die t throt.tgh the ruuen me<mt that rumen sJ.o;:;e v:ould have little li:ni ting effect
on po tential inta.lce of con.cent.r<i tes . In tllis c.1.s e the amow1t o f food E:aten per urri t tiras \.;o uld be rela.ted to theanimal' s
physiological s tate and gene tic make-up .Rayu10nd
( 1969 )
sugges tedthat
feed quali ty and in particular,digestibili ty, was a
major
ciete nninant of the vo luntary intake of grazineanimals.
Hov1ever, Hutt.on( 1963 )
\vo rkinewith
dry dairy cattle , andUJyatt (
19'70)
wo rkine with sheep , found no cle11r relationship between the digestibility of feed and animal in take \vhe re digestibili ty was above?O�;,L
Crompton.
( 1 962 )
suggested that themaximum daily
intake of feedD.M.
fo r bo th dai ry and beef cattle would be equivalentto
about3%
of animal livm1eight. Hutt.on( 1963 )
sho\.red that this" 3�
s tandard" could considerably w10.eres timate the intake of lac tating dair.yc
ows, and over es timate thei
ntake o f dry dai ry cows . In Hut ton ' s work the degreeof fatness the dry s t� ck had attained appeared to affect the level of
voluntary intake .
The
3%
of bodyweight standard, howeve r, s eemsto
��ve been generally accepted by research wo rke rs (1 )
as a guide to the po tential intake o f- 70 ...
young grmo�
i
ng beef animals on pa s ture .In
the absenceof
quantitative data from New Z(-!.'llano beef' grazing trials relating po ten-tial in-take topas-ture
andanimA.l
paraJUeters , a simplified indirec tappro ach .b,as been
used to define the po tential intal-::e of tJ1e er razing a•lit!!als in thiss tud,'!.
The daily
livewei.t;ht eain.sallowabl A wi thin tJ1e model are limited to the highes t gains thz.
t a re
consitd;en
tly
achieved on couunercial farms. If th
e relatj.o nsb.ips within the model betHeen dai ly intake and dailyl iveweit;ht
gain a re corr·ec t , then the po tential levels o fint-A.ke
implicit i n the model 1.rill only be ashigh as
tho.se levelsof intake
ac 11i evedon
commercial
farms .The po ter1tial
daily livewoight
gains(intakes)
used ar8 pres entedir:o.
Table4. 5
andt..lle
implications o f t.rris res tri c tion are discussed mo refuJ ly
in Sec tion4. 5. 1 . 5 .
4 . 2 . 2
F'ac to rs 'l'tili t Affec t ·rne Shape O f The Func tiOL1 H e laling
Several
overseas rese:!.rch wo r�wrA b �v8 shown t.h.;:lt. t..l-Ie relationshipbeti-Teen pas ture
intake/head/day
and feedavailable/head/dD.y is
curvil:i.near.Hull et al
( 196 1 )
gra z ed beef
animals at 5 s-tocking rates ,.,i thpas ttue beir1g spelled fo r 35 days between graz ings
.
Over
the
12o days o f theexperiment (Hhich
Has repeated over3 years)
the
animals ineach
s
tocki
r1g rate
trea"tlnen twere expos ed
toa
wide ra:1geo
f pas tur�;: av::l i UJ.bi l- i tie s . Hull�
al found a high c o rrelation be
tHeenthe
pas tureavaildble/
head before grazinG and the
intake/head
meas ured as diees
tible energy i n- take. This relationship was des c ribed by the func tion :y :: o .
16
-0 . 2�
X