APPENDIX: NORMAL CURVE EQUIVALENTS

References

Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Gifted students' perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping.

Gifted Child Quarterly,48(1), 7.

Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological methodology, 93-114.

Amrein-Beardsley, A., Berliner, D. C., & Rideau, S. (2010). Cheating in the first, second, and third degree: Educators’ responses to high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(14), 1-33.

Ansalone, G. (2001). Schooling, tracking, and inequality. Journal of Children and Poverty, 7(1), 33-47.

Ansalone, G. (2003). Poverty, tracking, and the social construction of failure: International perspectives on tracking. Journal of Children & Poverty, 9(1), 3-20.

Ansalone, G. (2006). Tracking: A return to Jim Crow. Race, Gender & Class, 144-153. Ansalone, G. (2009). Tracking, schooling and the equality of educational opportunity. Race,

Gender & Class, 174-184.

Ansalone, G. (2010). Tracking: Educational differentiation or defective strategy. Educational Research Quarterly, 34(2), 3-17.

Ansalone, G., & Biafora, F. A. (2010). Tracking in the Schools: Perceptions and Attitudes of Parents. Race, Gender & Class, 226-240.

Ansalone, G., & Ming, C. (2006). Programming students for academic success: The PLS--an alternative to traditional tracking. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(3), 3-10. Archbald, D., Glutting, J., & Qian, X. (2009). Getting into honors or not: An analysis of the

relative influence of grades, test scores, and race on track placement in a comprehensive high school. American Secondary Education, 37(2), 65-81.

Archbald, D., & Keleher, J. (2008). Measuring conditions and consequences of tracking in the high school curriculum. American Secondary Education, 36(2), 26-42.

Argys, L. M., Rees, D. I., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Detracking America's schools: Equity at zero cost? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(4), 623-645.

Ballou, D., Sanders, W., & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 37-65.

Ballou, D., Goldring, E., & Liu, K. (2006). Magnet schools and student achievement. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Ballou, D., & Liu, K. (2007). Magnet schools and peers: Effects on student achievement.

Unpublished paper, Vanderbilt University.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barbour, J. D. (2011). The SAGE handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (F. W. English, Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Ben-Ari, R., & Kedem-Friedrich, P. (2000). Restructuring heterogeneous classes for cognitive

development: Social interactive perspective. Instructional Science, 28(2), 153-167. Berkelman v. San Francisco Unified School District, 501 F.2d 1264 (9th Cir. 1974). Berliner, D. C. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational research. Teachers College

Record, 108(6), 949 – 995.

Berry, K. J., Johnston, J. E., & Mielke, Jr., P. W. (2014). A chronicle of permutation statistical methods: 1920-2000, and beyond. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Betts, J. R., & Shkolnik, J. L. (2000). The effects of ability grouping on student achievement and resource allocation in secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 19, 1-15. Biafora, F., & Ansalone, G. (2008). Perceptions and attitudes of school principals towards school

tracking: Structural considerations of personal beliefs. Education, 128(4), 588-602. Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research: It’s Just Regression! New York:

The Guilford Press.

Bidwell, C.E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 2010, 100-114.

Boaler, J., William, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping— disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 5(2000), 631-648.

Boucher, V., Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2010). Do peers affect student

achievement? Evidence from Canada using group size variation, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 4723, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/36330

Braun, H. I. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models. Educational Testing Service: Policy Information Center.

Brown v. Board of Education, 98 L. Ed. 873 (1954).

Burns, R. B., & Mason, D. A. (2002). Class composition and student achievement in elementary schools. American Education Research Journal, 39(1), 207-233.

Burris, C., Wiley, E., Welner, K., & Murphy, J. (2008). Accountability, rigor, and detracking: Achievement effects of embracing a challenging curriculum as a universal good for all students. Teachers College Record, 110 (3), 571-607.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). In N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

Capper, C. A. (1993). Educational Administration in a Pluralistic Society: A multiparadigm approach. In Capper, C. A. (Ed.) Educational Administration in a Pluralistic Society (pp. 7-35). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Carbonaro, W. (2005). Tracking, students' effort, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 78(1), 27-49.

Chayt, M. (2010). Thirty-five years after Berkelman: Seeking a new debate about ability grouping. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 37(3), 617-639.

Cissell, G. (2010). Kentucky and education reform: The issue of pay-for-performance.

Jefferson Law Book Company, 39(119), 119-127.

Cohen, L., Manion, L, & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

Cohen-Vogel, L., & Rutledge, S. (2009). The pushes and pulls of new localism: School-level instructional arrangements, instructional resources, and family-community partnerships.

The new localism in American education: The yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108, 70-103.

Coleman, J. S. (1967). Equality of educational opportunity, reconsidered. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D. & York, R. (1966). Equality ofeducational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

Conger, D. (2005). Within-school segregation in an urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(3), 225-244.

Consiglio, A. (2009). Nervous laughter and the high cost of equality: Renewing “No Child Left Behind” will safeguard a vibrant federalism and a path toward educational excellence.

Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., Lindsay, J., & Greathouse, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 227-268.

Corcoran, S. P. (2010). Can teachers be evaluated by their students’ test scores? Should they be? The use of value-added measures of teacher effectiveness in policy and practice. Brown University: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.

Crenshaw, K. (Ed.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement.

The New Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Publishing.

Cuban, L. (2004). Looking through the rearview mirror at school accountability. Holding accountability accountable, 18-34.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). New standards and old inequalities: School reform and the education of African American students. Journal of Negro Education, 263-287. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to

equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Day, J. C., & Newburger, E. C. (2002). The big payoff: Educational attainment and synthetic estimates of work-life earnings (pp. 23-210). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.

Dillard, C. B. (1995). Leading with her life: An African American feminist (re) interpretation of leadership for an urban high school principal. Educational Administration Quarterly,

31(4), 539-563.

Dixson, A. D. & Rousseau, C. K. (2005). And we still are not saved: Critical race theory in education ten years later. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 7-27.

Donaldson, M. L. (2009). So long, Lake Wobegon? Using teacher evaluation to raise teacher quality. Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress.

Doran, H., & Fleischman, S. (2005). Challenges of value-added assessment. Educational Leadership 63(3), 85-87.

Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2009). Can tracking improve learning?. Education Next,

9(3), 64-70.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) of 1975, Pub. L. 94-142, § 1400, Stat. 773 (1976).

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-10 (1965).

English, F. W. & Steffy, B. E. (2011). Curriculum leadership: The administrative survival skill in a test-driven culture and a competitive educational marketplace. In F. English (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership (pp.3-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g (1974).

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Gamoran, A. (1992). Synthesis of research: Is ability grouping equitable? Educational Leadership, 50(2), 11-17.

Gamoran, A. (2009). Tracking and Inequality: New Directions for Research and Practice. WCER Working Paper No. 2009-6. Wisconsin Center for Education Research (NJ1).

Gamoran, A. & Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Reinforcement, compensation, or neutrality? American Journal of Sociaology, 94, 1146- 1183.

Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & LePore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 687-715. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis

and applications (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill.

Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gillborn, D. (2008). Racism and education: Coincidence or conspiracy? NewYork, NY: Routledge.

Goe, L., Bell, C, & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality: Washington, D.C.

Goldring, E. B. (2009). Perspectives on magnet schools. Handbook of Research on School Choice, Routledge.

Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Goodreau, S. M. (2014). Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: A primer for social network analysis in education research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 167-178.

Hallinan, M. T. (1994). School differences in tracking effects on achievement. Social Forces,

Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 527-544.

Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking k-16, 3(2), n2.

Hobson v. Hansen, 320 F. Supp. 720 (U.S.D.C, DC 1970).

Hochschild, J. (1997). Is school desegregation still a viable policy option?. PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(3), 458-66.

Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal Analysis: Modeling Within-person Fluctuation and Change. London: Routledge.

Horoi, I., & Ost, B., (2014). Disruptive Peers and the Estimation of Teacher Value-Added. From aefp.org:http://www.aefpweb.org/sites/default/files/webform/39th/Disruptive%20Peers% 20and%20the%20Estimation%20of%20Teacher%20VA-aefpdraft.pdf

Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NC: Routledge. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with

achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 201-213. Jackson, C. K. (2009). Ability-grouping and academic inequality: Evidence from rule-based

student assignments. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA.

Jenks, C. L. (1998). Evaluating educational system designs. Systems research and behavioral science, 15(3), 209-215.

Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.

Administrative science quarterly, 602-611.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Kalogrides, D., Loeb, S., & Béteille, T. (2013). Systematic sorting: Teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 103-123.

Koedel, C. & Betts, J. (2011). Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique. Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 18-42.

Kozol, J. (2006). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.