• No results found

a) Introduction

Representative samples from each of the major inliers in

the vicinity of Moffat have been grouped together to form the

45 -

study, where more than one sample has been analysed at a given

locality, the results have been combined and a mean value for each

element computed for that locality. The discussion of the areal

variation for most of the elements is based on the results at 32

regional points but that for the trace elements Rb, Sr, Y and Zr,

and also C is based on only 30 and 27 points respectively. A summary

of the univariate statistics for the elemental composition of the

grid samples is given in Table 3-4.

b) Application of trend surface analysis

Many authors have pointed to the dangers of plotting

areally distributed data using contours determined by human

judgement, e.g. Whitten (1963). In this study an objective

contouring method is used, which is a modification of the genex*al

trend surface analytical technique. This involves the iterative

modification of a polynomial surface and is known as iterative

trend surface analysis (Cole 1969). The merits of this technique

will be discussed in more detail in Appendix C»

Linear, quadratic and cubic surfaces have been calculated

for each element. In every case it was found that the cubic surface

explained more ’sums of squares’. This was taken to indicate that

the cubic surfaces approximated the data distribution most closely.

Iterative surfaces have also been computed. These are a result of

10 iterations over the chosen cubic surface.

c) The cubic surfaces

elements are given in Table 3-5, The surface computed for Cu

accounts for 78 per cent of the variance whereas those quoted for

Si, Fe and Y account for more than 40 per cent and those computed

for Mn, Na, Zn, Sr and Zr account for more than 30 per cent. The

cubic surfaces which have been computed for the remaining elements

only account for less than 30 per cent of the variance and are

therefore not considered to be significant.

The boundary between significance and non-significance has

been arbitrarily fixed at the 30 per cent degree-of-fit level. This

was necessary because the measure of reliability of the fitted

surface is based on a sums of squares test. This test does not

define confidence limits. It has been demonstrated that if for a

100 points, a sums of squares test produces values that fall below

6.0, 12.0 and 16.2 per cent for the linear, quadratic and cubic

surfaces respectively, the distribution of data points is not

significantly different from random at the 0.05 level (Howarth 1967),

Critical sums of squares values have not as yet been proposed for

surfaces defined on less than 100 points but intuition suggests

that they must be higher than those quoted for 100 points.

The cubic surfaces for each of the elements are illustrated

in Figs 30-47. It is interesting that all eight significant

surfaces are centred around the Hartfell and Carrifran Burn exposures.

All surfaces, except for those for Si and Na which take the form of

elongate domes, conform to a general pattern of elongate basins. The

basins computed for Cu and Mn are aligned in a north-west to south­

east direction and as such they are orientated across the regional

47 -

Y are orientated parallel to the Caledonian strike. The structural

dome for Si follows the same NW-SE trend as displayed by both Cu

and Mn, The Na surface is unique in that it is orientated east to

west.

d) The iterative surfaces

The cubic surfaces are highly smoothed expressions of the

main geographic trend in the data. The iterative surface for an

element begins with the chosen cubic surface and progressively

modifies it until after a specified number of iterations, ten in

this work, it has improved the fit of the data but has lost much

of the original form (Table 3-5). It is therefore not possible to

generalise as much for the iterative map patterns as it was for the

cubic surfaces.

It was noted above that the peak of the dome or the lowest

part of the basin was located in the same general area over most of

the cubic surfaces. This is to some extent still true for the

iterative surfaces, Figs. 30 to 47, but the accurate position of the

’lows’ and ’highs’ is more difficult to define because of small-

scale fluctuations in the computed trends.

e) Conclusion

The irregular nature of the geographic orientations of the

trend surfaces is taken to imply that the distribution of the

elements is not governed by areal processes. In this study no

attempt has been made, nor would it have been possible, to sample a

vertical thickness of sediments between samples is less than 100 m

there is a large time difference. This is attributable to an

exceptionally slow overall rate of deposition. The points of

inflection in the surfaces coincide with those localities which are

predominantly composed of Ordovician sediments. Perhaps therefore,

the trend-surface maps are depicting stratigraphic time variations

in the chemical abundances.