A consistent challenge throughout our project was ensuring we would have enough data points to ensure adequate power for our statistical analysis. Our limited sample size opens the door for future researchers to collect more data, in the same manner as our study, to re-run the model. Specifically, we recommend that further research of this nature be conducted at other operational bases within the Air Force. From there, the research should expand to major weapon system acquisition bases. After that research has been conducted, the other military branches should duplicate these research efforts, both at the operational- and systems-levels. As stated previously, our hope is that this research serves as a starting point for a larger effort that eventually encompasses the entire defense acquisition field. With such a large data sample, the model will obtain adequate statistical power. Such a development would allow future researchers to draw more accurate and definitive conclusions as to the relationship between source selection method and contract outcomes. At that point, the findings may point to areas where the source selection process can be improved and cost or process savings realized across the Department of Defense.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
LIST OF REFERENCES
Albano, J. D. (2013). The contract management body of knowledge: A comparison of contracting competencies (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
The Analytical Services Corporation (TASC). (2012). The challenge of applying the LPTA process to the procurement of complex services. Retrieved from:
http://www.tasc.com/Media-Center-Site/Pages/The-Challenge-of-Applying-the-LPTA-Process-to-the-Procurement-of-Complex-Services.aspx
Assad, S. D. (2011). Department of Defense source selection procedures [Memorandum, Defense Procurement Acquisition Policy Director]. Retrieved from
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA007183-10-DPAP.pdf Bail Jr., P. G. (2010). The demise of the federal government small business program.
Defense Acquisition University. Retrieved from: http://www.dau.mil/pubscats/
PubsCats/AR%20Journal/arj53/Bail53.pdf
Barry, C. B. (1995). The federal acquisition reform act of 1994. Defense Institute of Security Assistance Management, 17(3), Spring 1995. Retrieved from:
http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA496621
Berteau, D. J., Hofbauer, J., & Sanok, S. (2010). Implementation of the weapon systems acquisition reform act of 2009. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Retrieved from: http://www.acq.osd.mil/damir/2009%20Conference/Future
%20of%20DoD%20Acquisition%20Plenary/WSARA%20Implementation%20 Lush.pdf
Calhoon, B. & Sybert J. (2012). Truth in negotiations act (TINA) essentials. [PowerPoint Slides]. Retrieved from: http://resources.ncmahq.org/chapters/leatherstocking /Shared%20Documents/TINA%20NCMA%20Webinar,%204-30-2013.pdf Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan (CWC). (2009).
Lowest-priced security not good enough for war-zone embassies. (CWC Special Report 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Corin, A. (2013). DOD officials outline next step in acquisition reform. Federal
Computer Week. Retrieved from: https://fcw.com/articles/2013/05/24/dod-better-buying-power.aspx
Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, 70, 927–939.
Federal Acquisition Regulation, 48 C.F.R.§3.502-1 (2014).
Garrett, G. A. (2007). World class contracting (4th ed.). Riverwoods, IL: Wolters Kluwer.
Gates, S. M., Keating, E. G., Jewell A. D., Daugherty, L., Tysinger, B., Rabbert, A. A., &
Masi, R. (2008). The defense acquisition workforce: An analysis of personnel trends relevant to policy, 1993–2006. National Defense Research Institute.
Government Accountability Office (2010). Defense contracting: Enhanced training could strengthen DOD’s best value tradeoff decisions (GAO-11-8). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Government Accountability Office (2014). Factors DOD considers when choosing best value processes are consistent with guidance for selected acquisitions (GAO-14-584). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hagen, C. (2014, November). “Better Buying Power” can reduce costs without slashing industry profits. National Defense Industrial Association Business and
Intelligence, November 2014.
Kendall, F. (2010). Implementation directive for Better Buying Power—Restoring affordability and productivity in defense spending. Retrieved from:
bbp.dau.mil/references.html
Kendall, F. (2012). Better Buying Power 2.0: Continuing the pursuit for greater efficiency and productivity in defense spending. Retrieved from: bbp.dau.mil /references.html
Kendall, F. (2014a). Better Buying Power 4 years on: Is it making a difference? Defense One. Retrieved from:http://cdn.defenseone.com/defenseone/interstitial.html?
v=2.1.1&rf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenseone.com%2Fideas%2F2014%2F04%
2Fbetter-buying-power-4-years-it-making-difference%2F83392%2F Kendall, F. (2014b). Better Buying Power 3.0: White paper. Retrieved from:
bbp.dau.mil/references.html
Levin, C., & McCain, J. (2014). Defense acquisition reform: Where do we go from here?
A compendium of views by leading experts. Retrieved from:
http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/report_-defense-acquisition-reform- where-do-we-go-from-here--a-compendium-of-views-by-leading-experts-october-2-2014
Lohfeld, B. (2014). Is price reasonableness really reasonable? Washington Technology.
Retrieved from: https://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2014/12/15/insights-lofeld-pricing.aspx
Lohfeld, B. (2015). Is DOD moving away from LPTA? Washington Technology.
Retrieved from: https://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2015/04/07/insights-lohfeld-end-of-lpta.aspx
Manuel, K.M. (2011). Competition in Federal contracting: An overview of the legal requirements (CRS Report No. R40516). Retrieved from Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40516.pdf
Maser, S. M., & Thompson, F. (2013). Dispelling fear and loathing in government acquisition: A proposal for cultivational governance in DOD source selections.
Journal of Public Procurement, 13(3), 289–314.
Nichols, R. & Totman, J. C. (2013). Myth-busting the LPTA conundrum. The Government Contractor, 55(46), 1–4.
Rosa da Silva, W. (2013). The use of sealed bidding and competitive negotiation in Brazil and worldwide. The Institute of Brazilian Business & Public Management Issues, 1–46. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Rumbaugh, M. (2015). Why does source selection take so long? Ashburn, VA: National Contract Management Association.
Rumbaugh, M. G. (2010). Understanding government contract source selection.
Management Concepts. Retrieved from: http://www.managementconcepts.com /Management-Concepts-Press/Book-Supplements/Understanding-Government-Contract-Source-Selection
Schultz, B., & Dotson, D. (2015). Getting the best value in a source selection? Defense AT&L, 6, 21–24.
Sherman, S. N. (1997). Proceedings from 82nd Annual International Conference. Public purchasing reform: Have FASA, FARA and ITMRA made the system better?
Institute for Supply Management.
Slate, A. R. (2004). Best value source selection: The Air Force approach part II. Defense AT&L, 6, 38–40.
Williams, W. T. (1970). The Truth in Negotiations Act: The need for both truth and fairness. Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository, 15(1), 108–131.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
1. Defense Technical Information Center Ft. Belvoir, Virginia
2. Dudley Knox Library Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California