4.5 Case Studies
4.5.4 Case Study No 4 Raising standards of the most able through Latin
This study applied the granger causality analysis to ascertain the effect of banking sector reforms variables on banking industry performance indices:
return on assets, return on equity, profit before tax, yield on earning assets and
84 net interest income. The choice of the granger causality test is on the notion that two variables may relate with each other without one causing changes in the other, hence the weakness of the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) in estimating the effect of one variable on another. The granger causality result in Table 29 reveals that there is unidirectional relationship between bank capitalization and return on assets as causality flows from bank capitalization to return on assets at 5% level of significance. This implies that it bank capitalization has significant effect on return on assets of the Nigerian banking industry, whereas other banking sector reform variables via liquidity ratio, spread of interest rate and exchange rate has no significant effect on banking industry return on assets in Nigeria.
Table 29: Granger Causality Result for ROA and Banking Sector Reforms
Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob. Remarks
BCP does not Granger Cause ROA ROA does not Granger Cause BCP
26 7.64114 0.36646
0.0083 0.7013
Causality No Causality LQR does not Granger Cause ROA
ROA does not Granger Cause LQR
26 1.94394 0.41774
0.1893 0.6688
No Causality No Causality SPINT does not Granger Cause ROA
ROA does not Granger Cause SPINT
26 0.38197 0.29325
0.6912 0.7515
No Causality No Causality EXR does not Granger Cause ROA
ROA does not Granger Cause EXR
26 0.44471 2.84697
0.6520 0.1008
No Causality No Causality Source: Data output via E-views 9.0
On the return on equity and banking sector reforms analysis, Table 30 depicts that just an in return on assets, it is only bank capitalization that has significant effect on return on equity of the banking industry as causality runs from bank capitalization to return on equity at 5% level of significance. Other indices of banking sector reforms: liquidity ratio, spread of interest rate and exchange rate were found to have no significant effect on return on equity.
85
Table 30: Granger Causality Result for ROE and Banking Sector Reforms
Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob. Remarks
BCP does not Granger Cause ROE ROE does not Granger Cause BCP
17 8.04980 0.00649
0.0132 0.9369
Causality No Causality LQR does not Granger Cause ROE
ROE does not Granger Cause LQR
17 2.06093 1.02437
0.1731 0.3287
No Causality No Causality SPINT does not Granger Cause ROE
ROE does not Granger Cause SPINT
17 0.92431 0.52814
0.3527 0.4794
No Causality No Causality EXR does not Granger Cause ROE
ROE does not Granger Cause EXR
17 0.74424 0.75460
0.4028 0.3997
No Causality No Causality Source: Data output via E-views 9.0
From the regression output in Table 31, there is a one way causal relationship between bank capitalization and profit before tax of the banking industry owing to the evidence of causality from bank capitalization to profit before tax at 5% significance level. Similarly, a unidirectional exits between exchange rate and profit before tax. This implies that it is the profit of the banking industry that exert influence on exchange determination. Liquidity ratio and spread of interest rate have no significant influence of profit before tax of the Nigerian banking industry.
Table 31: Granger Causality Result for PBT and Banking Sector Reforms
Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob. Remarks
BCP does not Granger Cause PBT PBT does not Granger Cause BCP
16 4.57551 1.13570
0.0358 0.3561
Causality No Causality LQR does not Granger Cause PBT
PBT does not Granger Cause LQR
16 0.03710 0.77847
0.9637 0.4828
No Causality No Causality SPINT does not Granger Cause PBT
PBT does not Granger Cause SPINT
16 0.10056 0.41458
0.9051 0.6705
No Causality No Causality EXR does not Granger Cause PBT
PBT does not Granger Cause EXR
16 2.32872 10.4509
0.1434 0.0029
No Causality Causality Source: Data output via E-views 9.0
With the result in Table 32, banking sector reforms measurements have no significant effect on yield on earning assets of the banking industry as there no revelation of either unidirectional or bidirectional relationship between yield on earning assets and banking sector reforms variables. Nevertheless, it is surprising to observe that it is yield on earning assets that has significant effect on liquidity ratio of the banking industry.
86
Table 32: Granger Causality Result for YEA and Banking Sector Reforms
Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob. Remarks
BCP does not Granger Cause YEA YEA does not Granger Cause BCP
26 0.71397 0.25754
0.4123 0.6197
No Causality No Causality LQR does not Granger Cause YEA
YEA does not Granger Cause LQR
26 0.00127 8.65857
0.9721 0.0107
No Causality Causality SPINT does not Granger Cause YEA
YEA does not Granger Cause SPINT
26 1.01179 0.04141
0.3315 0.8417
No Causality No Causality EXR does not Granger Cause YEA
YEA does not Granger Cause EXR
26 0.17100 0.09839
0.6855 0.7584
No Causality No Causality Source: Data output via E-views 9.0