Punching shear
55Centre line
Cover
Outer edge of effective cross section, circumference, u
tef zi
TEd
tef/2
Figure 9.1
Notations used in Section 9
6.3.1
6.3.2
Exp. (6.30)
Fig. 6.11
The torsional capacity of a solid rectangular section with shear reinforcement on the outer periphery TRd,maxmay be deduced from the general expression:
TRd,max= 2vfcdk2b3sin q cos q where
k2 = coefficient obtained from Table 9.1 b = breadth of the section (< h, depth of section)
Torsional resistance governed by the area of closed links is given by:
TRd = Asw/s) = TEd/(2Akcot q) fywd where
Asw = area of link reinforcement
fyw,d = design strength of the link reinforcement s = spacing of links
Additional longitudinal reinforcement distributed around the periphery of the section should be provided and the area of this reinforcement should be obtained from the following expression:
2Asl = TEdukcot q/(fyd2Ak) = (Asw/s) ukcot2q where
TEd = applied design torsion uk = perimeter of the area Ak Assuming fyd= fywd
9.3 Combined torsion and shear
In solid sections the following relationship should be satisfied:
(TEd/TRd,max) + (VEd/VRd, max) ≤ 1.0 where
TRd,max = 2mfcdAktef,isin q cos q as in Section 9.2.
VRd,max = vwzmfcd(cot q + cot a)/(1 + cot2q) as in Section 7.3.2.
Table 9.1 Values of k2
h/b 1
k2 0.141
2 0.367
3 0.624
4 0.864
Exp. (6.28) ENV 1992-1-1 Exp. (4.43)[21]
Exp. (6.29)
Serviceability
57
10 Serviceability
10.1 Introduction
The common serviceability limit states considered are:
■Stress limitation.
■Crack control.
■Deflection control.
For the UK, explicit checks on concrete stresses at serviceability are not normally required, unless lower values for partial factor gcthan those shown in Section 2, Table 2.3 are used.
Similarly, the steel stress need not be checked unless the values for gsare smaller than those indicated.
In compression members, the provision of links in accordance with detailing rules ensures that there is no significant longitudinal cracking.
Cracking and deflection may be verified by either following calculation procedures or by observing the rules for bar diameters and bar spacing and span-to-effective-depth ratios. This publication does not consider calculation methods.
10.2 Control of cracking
Cracks may be limited to acceptable widths by the following measures:
■Provide a minimum amount of reinforcement, so that the reinforcement does not yield immediately upon formation of the first crack (see Section 10.3).
■Where restraint is the main cause of cracking, limit the bar diameter to that shown in Table 10.1. In this case any level of steel stress may be chosen but the chosen value must then be used in the calculation of As,minand the size of the bar should be limited as shown.
■Where loading is the main cause of cracking, limit the bar diameter to that shown in Table 10.1 or limit the bar spacing to that shown in Table 10.2.
When using either table the steel stress should be calculated on the basis of a cracked section under the relevant combination of actions.
In the absence of specific requirements (e.g. water-tightness), the limiting calculated crack width wmaxmay be restricted to 0.3 mm in all exposure classes under quasi-permanent load combinations. In the absence of specific requirements for appearance, this limit may be relaxed to, say, 0.4 mm for exposure classes X0 and XC1.
In building structures subjected to bending without significant axial tension, specific measures to control cracking are not necessary where the overall depth of the member does not exceed 200 mm.
7.2, NA &
PD 6687[7]
7.3.3(2)
7.3.1(5)
& NA
10.3 Minimum reinforcement areas of main bars
If crack control is required, the minimum area of reinforcement in tensile zones should be calculated for each part (flanges, web, etc.) as follows:
As,min= kck fct,effAct/ss where
kc = a coefficient to allow for the nature of the stress distribution within the section immediately prior to cracking and for the change of the lever arm as a result of cracking
= 1.0 for pure tension and 0.4 for pure bending
k = a coefficient to allow for the effect of non-uniform self-equilibrating stresses, which lead to a reduction of restraint forces
= 1.0 for web heights or flange widths ≤ 300 mm and k = 0.65 when these dimensions exceed 800 mm. For intermediate conditions interpolation may be used
fct,eff = mean value of the tensile strength of concrete effective at the time cracks may be first expected to occur at the appropriate age. fct,eff= fct,m(see Table 3.1) Act = area of concrete in that part of the section which is calculated to be in the
tension zone i.e. in tension just before the formation of the first crack s = absolute value of the maximum stress permitted in the reinforcement Table 10.1
Maximum bar diameters for crack control Steel stress (MPa)
0.4 mm 0.3 mm 0.2 mm
Maximum bar size (mm) for crack widths of
160
Maximum bar spacing for crack control Steel stress (MPa)
0.4 mm 0.3 mm 0.2 mm
Maximum bar spacing (mm) for maximum crack widths of
160
Serviceability
59
10.4 Minimum area of shear reinforcement
10.4.1 Beams
The minimum area of shear reinforcement in beams Asw,minshould be calculated from the following expression:
Asw,min/(sbw sin a) ≥ 0.08 fck0.5/fyk where
s = longitudinal spacing of the shear reinforcement bw = breadth of the web member
a = angle of the shear reinforcement to the longitudinal axis of the member.
For vertical links sin a = 1.0.
10.4.2 Flat slabs
In slabs where punching shear reinforcement is required, the minimum area of a link leg, Asw,min should be calculated from the following expression:
Asw,min(1.5 sin a + cos a)/(srst) ≥ 0.08 fck0.5/fyk where
srand st= spacing of shear reinforcement in radial and tangential directions respectively (see Figure 12.5)
10.5 Control of deflection
10.5.1 General
The deflection of reinforced concrete building structures will normally be satisfactory if the beams and slabs are sized using the span-to-effective-depth ratios. More sophisticated methods (as discussed in TR58[23]) are perfectly acceptable but are beyond the scope of this publication.
10.5.2 Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios
Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios are given in Table 10.3.
This table has been drawn up on the assumption that the structure will be subject to its design loads only when the concrete has attained the strength assumed in design, fck. If the structure is to be loaded before the concrete attains fck, then a more detailed appraisal should be undertaken to take into account the loading and the strength of the concrete at the time of loading.
Table 10.3 is subject to the following conditions of use:
■Values for span-to-effective-depth ratios have been calculated using the criterion that the deflection after construction is span/500 for quasi-permanent loads.
■Table values apply to reinforcement with fyk= 500 MPa, ss= 310 MPa, and concrete class C30/37 (fck= 30).
■Values of basic span-to-effective-depth ratios may be calculated from the formulae:
l/d = K[11 + 1.5fck0.5p0/p + 3.2 fck0.5(p0/p – 1)1.5] if p0≤ p or
l/d = K[11 + 1.5 fck0.5p0/(p – p') + fck0.5(p'/p0)0.5/12] if p0> p
9.2.2(5)
& NA
9.4.3(2)
7.4.1, 7.4.2
& NA
7.4.3
PD 6687[7]
7.4.2(2)
Exp. (7.16a)
Exp. (7.16b)
where
l/d = limit span-to-effective-depth
K = factor to take into account different structural systems p0 = reference reinforcement ratio = fck0.5/1000
p = required tension reinforcement ratio = As,req/bd
For flanged sections, p should be based on an area of concrete above centroid of tension steel
p’ = required compression reinforcement ratio = As2/bd
■When the area of steel provided As, provis in excess of the area required by calculation As,req, the table values should be multiplied by 310/ss= (500/fyk) (As,prov/As,req) ≤ 1.5 where ss= tensile stress in reinforcement in midspan (or at support of cantilever) under SLS design loads in MPa.
■In flanged beams where beff/bwis greater than 3, the table values should be multiplied by 0.80. For values of beff/bwbetween 1.0 and 3.0 linear interpolation should be used.
■The span-to-effective depth ratio should be based on the shorter span in two-way spanning slabs and the longer span in flat slabs.
■When brittle partitions liable to be damaged by excessive deflections are supported on a slab, the table values should be modified as follows:
a) in flat slabs in which the longer span is greater than 8.5 m, the table values should be multiplied by 8.5/leff; and
b) in beams and other slabs with spans in excess of 7 m, the table values should be multiplied by 7/leff.
Table 10.3
Basic ratios of span-to-effective-depth, l/d, for members without axial compression
Beams
Structural system
Slabs
Simply supported
End span of continuous beams
Interior spans of continuous beams N/A
Cantilever
One- or two-way spanning slabs simply supported End span of one-way spanning continuous slabs
or
two-way spanning slabs continuous over one long edge Interior spans of continuous slabs
Flat slab (based on longer span) Cantilever
K
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.2 0.4
Highly stressed concrete ρ ρ = 1.5%
14
18
20
17 6
Lightly stressed concrete ρ ρ = 0.5%
20
26
30
24 8 Table 7.4N
& NA