CHANGES IN THE LOCAL INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM (LISM)

A variety of Russian scientists have concluded that we are moving into a higher area of aetheric density in the LISM, which is the single most important factor that is responsible for the observed Solar System changes in this

model. As seen from the Earth, our Heliosphere is traveling in the direction of the Solar Apex in the constellation Hercules. According to Dmitriev in 1997, Dmitriev & Mahatmas in 1995 and Kruzhevskii, Petrov & Shestopalov in 1993, since the 1960’s the Heliosphere has drifted into an area of the LISM that contains:

…[new] non-homogeneities [i.e. higher concentrations] of matter and energy containing ions [charged particles] of Hydrogen, Helium and Hydroxyl in addition to other elements and combinations. This kind of interstellar space dispersed plasma is presented by magnetized strip structures and striations. [emphasis added]

Western scientists may innately distrust the idea that there could be “magnetized strip structures and striations” in the LISM that would contain such charged particles. However, in this aetheric model we expect to see the same structures appearing on all levels of size. Figure 7.1 showed the Parker Spiral formation as it appears in our Solar System, and by the fractal principle there must be a similar formation in the galaxy. Figure 8.1 shows an overhead view of the Parker Spiral in the Solar System, with concentric circles indicating

the positions of the planetary orbits:

Figure 8.2 – Overhead view of Parker Spiral energetic structure in Solar System. (Courtesy NASA)

Each curving arm of the Parker Spiral that we see in Figure 8.2 does indeed represent a “magnetized strip” or “striation”, where there is a detectable increase in magnetic energy and charged plasma as our planet moves

through it. Dmitriev’s evidence, as well as our own, clearly indicates that this structure must also exist at the galactic level, by virtue of the fractal,

harmonic interconnectedness of the Cosmos. From here, Dmitriev’s quote continues:

The Heliosphere [solar system] transition through this structure has led to an increase of the shock wave in front of the Solar System from 3 to 4 AU, to 40 AU or more [1000% increase.]

The “shock wave” that Dmitriev is referring to here is what is known as the “termination shock,” and we can see it illustrated in Figure 8.3:

Figure 8.3 – Energetic activity of the Heliosphere, showing 70-100 AU termination shock.

One can assume from Dmitriev’s wording that this termination shock of luminous plasma was measured at 4AU [i.e. four times the distance from the Sun to the Earth] by Russian astrophysicists in the early 1960s, and once the hydrogen, helium, hydroxyl and other charged particle combinations became more prevalent later in the 1960s, the size and brightness of the termination shock also increased, now by a factor of over 1000 percent. Similar research did not begin in the United States until 1978, according to Prof. D.E.

Shemansky, [35] so Russian scientists had this information well in advance of NASA. Obviously, this extra brightness at the leading edge of the heliosphere is created much in the same way that the bottom of the Space Shuttle or a meteorite will become red-hot as it drifts from the low-density vacuum of space into the higher-density atmosphere of the Earth.

In more technical terms, Dmitriev goes on to explain what this 1000-percent or higher increase in the excitation of this magnetic boundary really means: This shock wave thickening has caused the formation of a collusive plasma in a parietal layer, which has led to a plasma overdraft around the Solar

breakthrough constitutes a kind of matter and energy donation made by interplanetary space to our Solar System.

What this passage is essentially telling us is that a new layer of luminous plasma has been formed that surrounds the Solar System and is now flowing into the Sun, planets and interplanetary space, raising the overall levels of energetic activity that we have observed. Subsequent sections of this chapter will detail the specifics of this energetic change. However, before we begin surveying the surrounding evidence, it is interesting to research the big question on many Western readers’ minds:

“If this is really happening, then why hasn’t NASA ever talked about it?” As we shall see, according to one distinguished Ph.D., [35] NASA seems to have a “persistent, pernicious bias” against any discussion of this heliospheric change, and will automatically assume, without question, that the LISM must maintain a “uniform density.” Other, more esoteric-sounding explanations are proposed for the observed luminosity and energetic increases, such as “re- accelerated solar wind,” that do not have the simplicity and elegance of Dmitriev et al’s model.

One rare exception to the rule of “unchanging LISM density” that we found was in a 1999 interview with Gary P. Zank at the University of Delaware. [42] In this interview, Dr. Zank proposes that if the LISM density were to change, then catastrophe might result, and we “may not know when it was coming:” “We’re surrounded by hot gas,” he said. “As our sun moves through

extremely ‘empty’ or low-density interstellar space, the solar wind produces a protective bubble – the heliosphere around our solar system, which allows life to flourish on Earth. Unfortunately, we could bump into a small cloud at any time, and we probably won’t see it coming. Without the heliosphere, neutral hydrogen would interact with our atmosphere, possibly producing catastrophic climate changes, while our exposure to deadly cosmic radiation in the form of very high-energy cosmic rays would increase.”

Zank used the SDSC CRAY T90 in a study of the heliosphere, the envelope of solar wind that surrounds the solar system. Two effects included in the

simulation ensure that the interaction of the solar wind with the local interstellar medium (LISM) is not stationary. The solar wind ram pressure varies on an 11-year time scale, and strong shocks are present during all phases of the solar cycle (although their frequency can vary)… Zank’s

calculations suggest that existing instruments might not detect an increase in the LISM sufficient to compress or collapse the heliosphere before the actual interaction had begun. [emphasis added]

Dr. Zank believes that we may encounter a random cloud of higher energy density in the LISM, whereas the galactic Parker Spiral model seems more plausible, since the same energetic structure has already been proven to exist in the Solar System. One key confession that we can glean from Dr. Zank’s advanced research is that our existing instruments are not sensitive enough to detect a significant increase in the LISM density before we actually enter it. Therefore, it seems rather foolish for most Western heliophysicists to assume that the LISM must maintain a uniform density, if our instruments are not sophisticated enough to prove it. More evidence to support this point comes

forth from the European Southern Observatory (ESO):

…unfortunately there are no direct ways to measure the local interstellar electron (or proton) density, nor the local interstellar magnetic field, while these two parameters govern the structure and size of our heliosphere. Therefore, there is a need for indirect observationswhich can bring stringent constraints on the plasma density and the shape and size of the interface to allow for the choice of an adequate theoretical model. [emphasis added] [16] Despite the ESO’s stated need for “indirect observations” of the density of the LISM, such as those reported by Dmitriev, it is almost always assumed that the LISM must have an unchanging density for any “adequate theoretical model.” [16]

Another example of “LISM density increase denial” would be in a paper by R.A Mewaldt from Caltech. [23] In the following quote, it is clearly acknowledged that Voyager 1 and 2 have detected anomalous “enhancements in the low- energy spectra” of the heliosphere. However, an increase in the density of the LISM is never mentioned as even a possible “seed population” for these

energetic enhancements:

Suggested seed populations include solar energetic particles (RSEPs), re- accelerated solar wind (RSW), and ions energized by co-rotating interaction regions. These re-accelerated components provide a possible explanation for enhancements in the low-energy spectra of Mg, Si, S and other elements observed by Voyager 1 & 2 beyond 60 AU (Stone and Cummings 1997; Cummings and Stone 1999). There are also unexpected and unexplained increases in the low-energy spectra of several elements reported at 1 AU (e.g., Takashima et al. 1997; Klecker et al. 1998; Reames 1999). [emphasis added]

So, from this study it is very clear to see that Western heliophysicists have indeed discovered “anomalous, unexpected and unexplained increases” in the energetic activity at the termination shock of the heliosphere, as we have expected from Dmitriev’s model. Yet, instead of admitting that the LISM density might have changed, they simply “consider new estimates of the neutral populations of elements in the ISM”, among other complex and problematic explanations that are only possible, not proven. No matter what models for “re-accelerating” solar energy are proposed, the fact is that energy must be conserved. The simplest explanation for the increase in the heliosphere’s energetic charge is that it is being added by an outside source. One professor, Dr. D.E. Shemansky of the University of Southern California, has dared to make a particularly bold statement about this problem,

suggesting that there is a deliberate effort in place by NASA to avoid any discussion of his “first evidence” for a “large increase” in the energetic density of the LISM [35]:

Research on the properties of the Local Interstellar medium have been carried out in scattered periods beginning in 1978. The NASA Space Physics Division has shown a persistent pernicious bias against work on the effects of the neutral gas in the LISM in the United States, from the time of the formation of the Division… The most important contributions to research in this program are papers (48), which presents a calibration independent method of

determining absolute LISM density, and (89), which presents the first evidence for a large increase in the LISM neutral atomic hydrogen density from

Voyager measurements of the 50 AU region… [emphasis added]

It is certainly interesting that Dr. Shemansky would say that NASA has

displayed a “persistent, pernicious bias” against this work. The Microsoft Word 2000 thesaurus indicates that the word “pernicious” is synonymous with

“destructive, harmful, deadly, evil” and “insidious.” So, the question must be asked: Why would there be a “deadly” and “insidious” interest on the part of NASA in not asking these crucial questions about an LISM density increase? The answer might well be found in the studies from Russia such as those of Dr. Dmitriev, where it is well-established that this LISM density increase is underway, and that it is causing massive energetic changes throughout our entire heliosphere. These changes fit perfectly with worldwide ancient

prophecies, including those of the Judeo-Christian Bible, describing events that would transpire in “end times,” or what other cultures referred to as “the dawning of the Golden Age.” It is undeniable that the media ridicules and ignores the UFO question, evidence of sunken ancient cities, Martian monuments and the like. [39] The door has now opened a crack with the admission of “Global Warming,” but the massive changes in the Sun and planets are discarded footnotes. Another clear area of suppression is in the real meaning of “redshift,” which holds the key to giving us a complete model to prove that changes in LISM density can and must exist:

Figure 8.4 – Dr. William Tifft’s “quantized” changes in “redshift” microwave data.

Indeed, a complete mathematical model already exists that can be combined with direct observational evidence to prove that galaxies must have regular, organized changes in their LISM density levels. In the book Seeing Red, the respected and controversial astrophysicist Dr. Halton Arp has shown rigorous, voluminous evidence to prove that “redshift” has nothing to do with the

distance of a celestial object, as is currently believed. [30, 31, 37, 38] Simply put, redshift is a measurement of how much of the microwave spectrum of reflected starlight shines near the ‘red’ end of the ‘rainbow.’ Sir Edwin Hubble proposed a theory that seemed plausible at the time, since it appeared that the farther an object was from the Earth, the higher its redshift.

Arousing similar controversy, Dr. William Tifft has proven that redshift is “quantized,” meaning that it only occurs in certain regular harmonic intervals, as seen in Figure 8.4. [1] Another proof for Tifft’s discovery can be seen in the graph of quasar data in Figure 8.5 [38]:

Figure 8.5 – Quantized values for ‘redshift’ in nearby quasars.

Clearly, if the wavelengths in Figure 8.5 were an indication of distance, and all redshift values only fall into certain exact intervals with nothing whatsoever in between, then it would imply that the Earth was the center of the Universe. All quasars in the Universe would naturally have to fall into discrete “shells” of distance away from the Earth, as seen in Figure 8.6. [38] This places us right back into the medieval “geocentric” models of the Universe!

Figure 8.6 – The Earth- centered Universe as seen from the mainstream redshift theory.

Simple common-sense knowledge of our position in the Galaxy would tell us that the Earth is not the center of the Universe; the major problem that we then face is that redshift is the primary method that astrophysicists use to calculate the distances of celestial objects. What we are faced with, instead, is a very strange anomaly that screams of “harmonics”, the basic vibratory patterns of sound in any given medium, which we would expect to see in aetheric models of the Cosmos. [39]

For our next key point, let us not forget that the luminous plasma formations observed by Dr. Erling Strand in Norway, (discussed in Chapter Five,) would spontaneously appear and disappear from view, with a temperature as hot as the Sun one second and no measurable temperature the next. Yet, throughout this entire time, the plasma formations could still be tracked on radar and / or in the infrared spectrum. We have concluded that these plasma formations are oscillating between two major levels of aetheric density, namely our own level and the level directly above our own. (Most thinkers would erroneously call these density levels “dimensions.”) [39]

When the plasma moves (displaces) into the higher density, its visibility and immense heat disappears, but it still emits higher-spectrum wavelengths such as infrared and very probably microwave as well. Therefore, when we see even, quantized harmonic values for all the microwave radiation that we observe from distant celestial objects, it is certainly plausible that this could be a sign of changing levels of aetheric energy density.

The final proof comes from Dr. Harold Aspden of Cambridge University, who has indeed mathematically proven that the aether has varying levels of density, creating what he calls “space domains.” [1] He describes each different level of interstellar medium (ISM) density as follows, and we have paraphrased in brackets to ease comprehension:

One can say that… each [aetheric density level] corresponds to the number of electrons and positrons that can be created as a group [after] an aether

particle [is annihilated] and the aether space thereby vacated [is then filled up by the electrons and positrons]… there are many such different domain

regions in the whole expanse of the universe.[emphasis added]

So, an “aether particle” is the same as what Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg has called a “field bubble” in Chapter Two. According to Aspden’s theory, the denser the LISM will be, the smaller the “aether particles” will be in that area, since they are under greater pressure. If an “aether particle” is then annihilated, a sudden empty space is formed, and electrons (photons) and positrons will rush into the empty space. The electrons (photons) and positrons do not change in size, so less of them would fit into a smaller space than would fit into a larger space.

Dr. Aspden’s data shows that only a certain exact number of positrons and electrons can fit in such an empty space, once it has been created. For each density, the number of particles that will fit in the empty “field bubble” of space is known as “N,” and it has a maximum value of 1843, which is the number for our own density. The density above our own has an N of 1842, the next has an N of 1841, and so on, since the field bubbles in each new density are smaller than the previous density. As can be studied in more detail on Aspden’s site, the mathematics behind this statement are quite involved, but

his data provides a perfect means to calculate formerly unsolved mystery numbers in the quantum realm, such as the fine-structure constant, (see Ch. 2-3 of this book,) at the “part-per-million level of precision.” Furthermore, this work was deemed worthy of being published in the prestigious Physics Letters A in 1972. [2]

Here’s the simplified punch line: when Dr. Aspden first saw Tifft’s quantized redshift values, he realized that they were identical ( ! ) to the values that corresponded to aetheric density levels in his model. [1] Yet, when Aspden tried to publish a follow-up to his original 1972 paper in Physics Letters A, complete with the direct observational evidence from Dr. Tifft to prove that these areas of higher density exist now in the Universe,the paper was

anonymously rejected as “numerological” and all further appeals failed – even though his new paper only added direct, visible evidence to what had already been accepted and published in the same journal in 1972. The falsely rejected paper can still be read on Aspden’s website in Tutorial 10, complete with his rebuttals to their criticism. In conclusion, Aspden makes the following

interesting speculations:

As can be verified, the 72.5 km/s steps reported from astronomical

observation are in precise accordance with the theory under discussion… Such domains [of aetheric energy density] have bearing on geological events such as geomagnetic field reversals, [which occur] as the solar system transits through boundaries separating adjacent space domains. [emphasis added] Naturally, this connection between aetheric density and geological events is exactly the same as the conclusions being made by Dmitriev et al, with Aspden providing a solid, mathematical model that dramatically strengthens the case.

Even more significantly, on page 764 of The Vital Vastness – Volume Two by Richard Pasichnyk, we read the following:

High redshift is usually connected with features pointing to the youth of a galaxy. Redshift is also a function of the positions in the systems, which

indicates strong intergalactic fields that influence redshifts. Likewise, individual galaxies display redshift gradients from their inner to far limits. [emphasis added] [31]

Since we were obviously quite interested in this data point, Pasichnyk communicated to us that this “galactic redshift gradient” discovery was actually published by astrophysics graduate students, since the mainstream would never allow such work to get through. Nonetheless, further

observational research will undoubtedly only serve to confirm this data ever more concretely than before. This effectively proves the existence of a Parker Spiral-type formation of changing aetheric energy levels in the Galaxy, as can