6. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
6.2. Cloud computing now and in the future
Among the interviewees cloud computing was seen as a market with high growth potential, thus being in line with the forecasts previously described in the paper. However, as it still is a relatively new business concept, it requires companies to observe the market continuously, as changes happen rapidly and new players arise. As naturally for new companies that were interviewed that have built their business model upon cloud computing, they described its role as a “strategic cornerstone” and a precondition for the company’s existence. For companies with longer history in the ICT-business in general
cloud computing was seen more like a complementary business and an instrument, which enables companies to reach the economies of scale by minimizing the costs per unit. What has also been identified in the market place during the recent years is customers’ increased knowledge and awareness of the cloud, and the customers are more or less presuming that cloud based solutions are involved:
“…nowadays… we no longer even discuss (with the customer) whether the service operates in the cloud or not” (company B).
The classification between IaaS, PaaS and SaaS was seen among the majority of the interviewees as old-fashioned and irrelevant. As some features inside these service models overlap, in many cases it might even be impossible to draw the line where service model is being discussed. Thus, it can be presumed that better describing terms are likely to be created in recent years as both the business and the solutions start to mature.
“The trend of today that the customers are talking about, is a user-oriented cloud service, meaning how our customers are in the center and the customer has a certain need and how (different cloud services) can be combined to it in a suitable proportion” (company F).
When asked whether the largest global players such as Amazon, Microsoft and Google should be seen as rather competitors or co-operation partners, only one interviewee saw them strictly as competitors, while others saw their role more or less as a partner. This one IaaS provider described their strategy to target the segments that these giant players do not see worthwhile. Also, he mentioned that they can differentiate themselves with more customer focused service, as these giants offer highly standardized and generic service.
What was mentioned among all the interviewed companies was the essential need for them to create added value on top of for example Amazon’s services, whether this being a unique service model, local knowledge or innovation. As the interviewee from the company G summarized:
“… we need to also act like our service innovates more or less the concept significantly, and at that point I always talk about three different issues: either it has (innovation) in the user experience, in the core technology or then in the
business model how it is penetrated to the market, with what terms and through who, or then in their combination usually needs to be something completely unique and new.” (company G)
The other two IaaS providers (company F and J) saw that by combining their and for example Amazon’s offering, they can build hybrid cloud solutions, which may offer the most suitable end result for the end customer. Company F’s CTO mentioned that they do not need to be worried of these giants and their public cloud offerings at least in the near future, as local providers can still offer more competitive solutions through their private cloud solutions when prices are compared. However, by creating hybrid clouds, Finnish providers can utilize global players’ services, combine them with their own offering plus gain profit when configuring these applications. One factor highlighted also among the IaaS providers was the need for them to be able to create supplementary service, as the level of profitability in the pure capacity selling business is poor and shortsighted. To be able to succeed in the business in a longer run the strategic focus needs to be in the services adding value, as competing against the largest global players in a pure volume business is not seen as sensible.
For SaaS providers the co-operation approach is natural, as their services are often built on the giants’ IaaS and PaaS models. By utilizing the global players’ market reach, they can quickly enter new markets cost-efficiently. This factor was highlighted by company H’s interviewee when asked why they chose Amazon instead of a Finnish IaaS partner:
“… we have done some research and yes, Amazon is more expensive, but the fact that we can open (a business) within one hour in Sidney or Hong Kong is a big thing for us”. (company H)
However, one factor that was mentioned by company B was that the change in the customer field’s mindset has also enabled smaller players to compete against the giants. As in the past the end customers wanted to get one large system that could do a little bit of everything, nowadays the trend has been to put together a system which consist of several companies’ products and services. This enables smaller players to create for example a cutting-edge application, serving the customer better than for example Google’s equivalent application. Also, companies can develop interfaces that help different systems to
communicate with each other and build their business around that. Many interviewees were actually surprised how poor cloud based tools for example Google is offering at the moment when considering the size of their service development department, but naturally this has also given a great possibility for smaller players to enter the market.
For the cloud brokers also the co-operation with the market leaders is essential for their business. As cloud brokers’ business model is built on adding value to the IaaS and PaaS providers’ offerings, their aim can be assumed to co-operate with as many global players as possible, so that their range of services of which the customer can choose from is broad.